
Pilots of doomed South Korean plane ‘switched off wrong engine' after flying into birds before crashing and killing 179
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE pilots of the doomed South Korean plane appeared to switch off the wrong engine after flying into birds before crashing.
The crash at Muan International Airport on December 29 killed 179 people after the plane did an emergency landing, hit a concrete slab at the end of the runway, and exploded into a fireball.
5
Black smoke and flames pouring from the wreckage after it smashed into a concrete slab at the end of the runway
5
The plane landed on its belly and careered off before being stopped dead in its tracks by concrete
Credit: UKNIP
5
The aircraft carrying 181 people crashed in December
Credit: Unpixs
Officials took back copies of the interim findings from reporters after grieving relatives of victims killed in the crash disrupted a news conference of Saturday.
They accused them of prematurely blaming the pilots for the devastating crash.
Prior to the media event, investigators told relatives and their representatives that they had concluded that there was no engine defect on the plane.
They added that various errors by the pilots had led them to land the aircraft too quickly, without the wheels being down.
Preliminary findings confirmed the conclusions that aviation experts had reached from the plane's final path, as well as horror video footage captured from the fatal crash.
In the final four minutes of the doomed flight, power to the aircraft's flight recorders was cut off - initially obstructing the investigation.
After going into the flock of birds, one of the engines failed - while the other continued to produce a bit of power.
Investigators revealed: "A pilot may have mistakenly turned off the engine.
While an official told South Korea's MBN TV news: "The pilot should have turned off the right engine, which was severely damaged by the bird strike, but he turned off the left engine, which was spinning, and the black box and power went out."
The pilots then ignored standard procedure for continuing of landing after a bird strike on approach.
Terrifying moment Boeing passenger plane catches FIRE after take off with flames erupting from the engine
They are said to have climbed back up before performing unorthodox manoeuvres and turning to make a rushed landing in the opposite direction - on the same runway.
As the heartbroken families of victims entered the media briefing, officials were quick to take copies of the report back from reporters, explaining how it hadn't been officially issued.
A man was heard shouting: "They've just blamed it all on the pilots."
Head of the relatives' group Kim Yu-jin slammed the report as being unsatisfactory.
She said: "When investigators take a position, it should be accompanied by documents that support their position and convince the bereaved family that their conclusions are inevitable.
"We were only given their conclusions.
"We have repeatedly asked them to be careful about these disclosures because the way that the results of the investigation are communicated can have an impact on the compensation that families receive."
The packed jet - Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - was carrying 181 people from Bangkok, Thailand.
Firefighters said two of the six crew members, one man and one woman, survived after being pulled from the tail of the plane.
The 33-year-old man suffered multiple fractures and is receiving special care following the disaster.
He reportedly told doctors that he had already been rescued when he woke up, Yonhap said.
Timeline of the Muan plane disaster
By James Halpin, foreign news reporter
SOUTH Korea has suffered its deadliest air disaster in two decades as a jet carrying 181 went down with only two survivors.
4.29am - Jeju Air flight 7C 2216 leaves Bangkok carrying tourists coming home from package holidays in Thailand.
8.57am - Pilot receives bird strike warning on approach to Muan International Airport.
8.58am - Pilot issues a mayday call - and witnesses report hearing an "explosion" overheard as video shows an apparent bird strike.
9.00am - Plane aborts first landing attempt on Runway 01.
9.03am - The jet then attempts a second landing on Runway 19 on its belly - and crashes in a fireball.
5
A firefighter works near a wrecked landing gear (R) at the scene where a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 series aircraft crashed
Credit: AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
02-08-2025
- Scottish Sun
Major update in Brazil plane crash as ‘pilot reported malfunction' the day before tragedy, ex-employee reveals a year on
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR update has been revealed in last year's Brazil plane crash, with the pilot said to have reported a malfunction a day before the tragedy. It comes almost a year of the aircraft spiralled down to the ground and exploded in a huge fireball - tragically killing all 62 people on board. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 The plane was seen in a 'death spiral' as it plummeted towards the ground - killing all 62 on board Credit: GLOBO NEWS/UNPIXS 8 Wreckage from a plane that crashed by a home in Vinhedo, Sao Paulo state, Brazil, last August Credit: AP A former employee said they witnessed the final maintenance of the ATR 72-500 before it took off for Cascavel on August 9, 2024. He told g1 the pilot who operated the plane the night prior to the crash reported to the maintenance team that he had experienced problems with the aircraft's de-icing system. The failure was allegedly omitted from the technical logbook and ignored by management - when it reportedly should have prevented the plane from taking off. The ex-employee said how staff were pressured by company management to avoid aircraft downtime for maintenance, adding that there was also little time to assess the condition of aircraft. He told g1: "The leader himself asked: 'Well, if he didn't report it in the log, there's no problem with the aircraft.' "That was the company's legacy: if the captain reports it, there's maintenance action; if he doesn't report it, they won't waste time with anything he says." The Aeronautical Accident Investigation and Prevention Center suggested in the preliminary report that the plane's blackbox captured a conversation between the pilots in which they mentioned a failure in the de-icing system. De-icing systems are crucial in aviation as ice can negatively affect aerodynamic performance - potentially increasing the aircraft's weight and impairing its speed and lift. The former employee believes that had this problem been reported to the logbook, the tragic crash would have been avoided. The Voepass Airlines plane was previously labelled an "old wreck" and was only in service for weeks before the deadly plunge. Horrified Brits watch as TUI plane tyre EXPLODES during take-off in Corfu Passengers and their families complained about the aircraft just 24 hours before it spiralled down to the ground and exploded in a huge fireball last week. The plane smashed into a residential area of the city of Vinhedo, with neighbours filming it dropping and crashing. The Voepass flight had left Cascavel, in the Parana state, and was bound for Guarulhos, in Sao Paulo. Valinhos City Hall later confirmed all on board were dead and that no residents on the ground were injured or killed. One grieving mother said that Friday's crash "wasn't a fatality, it was a crime" after the plane horrifically dropped out of the sky in a death spiral. Maria de Fátima Albuquerque lost her daughter Arianne Albuquerque Risso in the crash, who was a resident doctor in oncology at the Cascavel Cancer Hospital. An emotional Mrs Albuquerque told Globo G1 at the time: 'It wasn't a fatality, anyone who was on that plane would have died, because it was an old wreck. "It wasn't a fatality, it was a crime. Who can ease my pain? You'll see me fighting every day." 8 The debris at the site where an air plane crashed with 62 people on board Credit: AP 8 Authorities are now investigating the cause of the crash Credit: Claudia Vitorino 8 The aircraft was labelled 'an old wreck' by passengers and their families Credit: Reproduction/TV Globo A tragic passenger on the fatal flight had also sent messages to her family saying she was 'scared' of the 'old' plane. Rosana Santos Xavier, 23, had expressed her concern about the ATR 72-500 aircraft in the family chat group shortly after boarding. She wrote: 'I'm so scared of this flight, I swear, it's an old plane. 'There's a broken seat, it's chaos.' The 23-year-old's mum, Rosemeire dos Santos Xavier, told her to read a Psalm to calm her nerves. But she says deep down, she had a bad feeling. A short while later, Rosemeire saw on the news that a plane had crashed. Rosemeire told local media: 'I panicked. I started running around the house screaming.' Rosana was heading back to her home in Franco da Rocha near São Paulo, Brazil, after a work trip. All flights grounded at multiple major UK airports over 'radar failure' as holidaymakers are left 'stranded' The plane had also been undergoing a series of maintenance shutdowns, Brazilian news programme Fantastico has found. In March, the Voepass aircraft experienced a hydraulic problem and abnormal contact with the runway that caused "structural damage", leaving the aircraft out of operation for four months. And just a day before Friday's horror crash, passengers on board the same plane reported suffering from the sweltering heat due to faulty air conditioning. During the flight, passengers reported that they faced extreme heat due to the malfunctioning air conditioning, with one of them saying the temperature was "unbearable". People were trying to cool down as best they could, with one man even taking off his shirt because of the sweltering heat. Voepass said in a statement that the safety has always been the company's priority, adding it "has always acted in compliance with the strict requirements that guarantee the safety of its air operations". 8 Arianne Albuquerque Risso, who died after a plane crash in Vinhedo, Sao Paulo 8 Lawyer Laiana Vasatta, pictured with her husband Fábio Bigolin, was another victim of the horror crash Credit: Jam Press


Scottish Sun
21-07-2025
- Scottish Sun
How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow
FALL FROM THE SKY How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow PILOTS manually cutting the engines were to blame for the two most deadly air crashes of this decade, investigations suggest. With a total of 420 lives lost in the flick of three buttons, urgent questions are swirling about what can be done to reduce the risk of pilot error or sabotage. Advertisement 8 The wreckage of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 which crashed and burned at Muan International Airport in South Korea in December Credit: AFP 8 Some 179 people were killed in the disaster Credit: AFP 8 An Air India plane smashed down into a built-up are in June, and killed all but one of the 242 people on board Credit: Alamy 8 Former airline pilot Terry Tozer explained what could have contributed to the pilots' actions Credit: Channel 5 News The Jeju Air emergency-landing crash killed 179 people in December, and 241 people died when the Air India plane came down shortly after takeoff in June. Investigators have sensationally revealed there is "clear evidence" that the Jeju Air pilots mistakenly shut down the wrong engine after a bird strike. The plane was then forced to make an emergency landing at Muan International Airport on December 29, where it slammed into a concrete wall and burst into a fireball. Meanwhile, the leading theory in the Air India crash is that the pilot manually flipped both guarded fuel switches to the 'cut-off' position — a move aviation experts say could only have been deliberate. Advertisement read more on the air disasters CRASH DISASTER Pilots of doomed South Korean plane 'switched off wrong engine', killing 179 A report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India (AAIB) revealed a recording of the panicked co-pilot asking which the main pilot shut off the engines. Terry Tozer, former airline pilot and author of "Confessions of an Airline Pilot – Why Planes Crash", told The Sun that it would have been be possible for the Air India pilot to shut off the engines without the other noticing. In the cockpit were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder. Terry said: "The handling pilot, which we know was the First Officer, would have had his hands full. Advertisement "He would have had his hands on the controls, but the monitoring pilot [Sumeet] would have his hands free." What caused fireball South Korea plane crash as 179 confirmed dead in horror explosion "There is absolutely no procedure or logical reason why you would shut the engines off just after takeoff. That's so blindingly obvious that it doesn't need to be stated. "So either it happened by accident, which I think a lot of people find extremely hard to believe or it was done deliberately." Terry said that the switches are "latched", meaning you have to lift them up before you can move them. Advertisement Despite the safety mechanism, Terry said it would 'probably' have been possible for one pilot to shut down the engines without the monitoring pilot noticing, because the switches "would be kind of behind his natural line of sight". The experience pilot also called on investigators to release a key piece of evidence that could clear up what happened in India. 8 Captain Sumeet Sabharwal is thought to have switched both the engines off shortly after take off A cockpit view of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft shows the fuel switch; Advertisement 8 Brit Vishwas Ramesh was the only survivor of the Air India disaster Credit: Dan Charity He explained the area microphone on the cockpit voice recorder would have picked up the sound of the switches being flicked. Terry said: 'So it would have been helpful if the investigators had said whether or not they were able to tell whether a switch type sound was detectable around about the time that they think the switches might have been switched off.' Speaking about the Jeju crash, Terry said the pilots "obviously" shut down the wrong engine by "mistake" - but revealed they would have been contending with a chaos in the cockpit. Advertisement He said: 'They probably would have had all kinds of bells and whistles going off and lots of indications that both engines were in trouble.' The former pilot said "takes time to analyze whether or not you should shut down one or neither or both" - but this was time the Jeju pilots did not have. He also said the new revelations about those crucial moments had been revealed in a "very odd manner". Terry said: "I understand that it was released to the relatives of the victims and in private, prior to release to the general public. Advertisement "And then that causes riots and chaos." 8 A family member of a victim of the Jeju air crash mourns at the site Credit: EPA 8 An engine of the Jeju Air passenger plane wreckage is salvaged days after the crash Credit: EPA Advertisement However, Terry said that whatever happened in the two cockpits, there is one factor that determines passengers' fate above all else. He said the 'single most important thing' in passenger safety is the "airline culture". Terry explained: 'If it is a disciplined professional safety culture with a good training regime, then that makes a huge difference.' Terry recalled a similar occasion when the wrong engine was shut down - the Kegworth air disaster of 1989 - and said that was "definitely a cultural problem in the training department'. Advertisement 'That may have been a factor with Jeju Air,' he said. In the wake of the two tragedies, many aviation figures have called for he introduction of cockpit CCTV. That would clear up immediately how the two engines came to be shut off on the Air India flight - but Terry said pilots would push back. He said: 'I can see why the investigators might welcome cockpit CCTV. Advertisement "We should be doing everything we can to minimize crashes. 'And in any responsible environment, with a good airline and a regulatory environment that is already happening. "And obviously, if there was a video evidence of what went on on the cockpit. They would know the answers pretty clearly by now. "But it's something that I think pilots would resist, for the simple reason that they're already scrutinized, trained, checked, examined, monitored, regulated so much."


The Sun
21-07-2025
- The Sun
How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow
PILOTS manually cutting the engines were to blame for the two most deadly air crashes of this decade, investigations suggest. With a total of 420 lives lost in the flick of three buttons, urgent questions are swirling about what can be done to reduce the risk of pilot error or sabotage. 8 8 8 8 The Jeju Air emergency-landing crash killed 179 people in December, and 241 people died when the Air India plane came down shortly after takeoff in June. Investigators have sensationally revealed there is "clear evidence" that the Jeju Air pilots mistakenly shut down the wrong engine after a bird strike. The plane was then forced to make an emergency landing at Muan International Airport on December 29, where it slammed into a concrete wall and burst into a fireball. Meanwhile, the leading theory in the Air India crash is that the pilot manually flipped both guarded fuel switches to the 'cut-off' position — a move aviation experts say could only have been deliberate. A report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India (AAIB) revealed a recording of the panicked co-pilot asking which the main pilot shut off the engines. Terry Tozer, former airline pilot and author of "Confessions of an Airline Pilot – Why Planes Crash", told The Sun that it would have been be possible for the Air India pilot to shut off the engines without the other noticing. In the cockpit were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder. Terry said: "The handling pilot, which we know was the First Officer, would have had his hands full. "He would have had his hands on the controls, but the monitoring pilot [Sumeet] would have his hands free." "There is absolutely no procedure or logical reason why you would shut the engines off just after takeoff. That's so blindingly obvious that it doesn't need to be stated. "So either it happened by accident, which I think a lot of people find extremely hard to believe or it was done deliberately." Terry said that the switches are "latched", meaning you have to lift them up before you can move them. Despite the safety mechanism, Terry said it would 'probably' have been possible for one pilot to shut down the engines without the monitoring pilot noticing, because the switches "would be kind of behind his natural line of sight". The experience pilot also called on investigators to release a key piece of evidence that could clear up what happened in India. 8 8 He explained the area microphone on the cockpit voice recorder would have picked up the sound of the switches being flicked. Terry said: 'So it would have been helpful if the investigators had said whether or not they were able to tell whether a switch type sound was detectable around about the time that they think the switches might have been switched off.' Speaking about the Jeju crash, Terry said the pilots "obviously" shut down the wrong engine by "mistake" - but revealed they would have been contending with a chaos in the cockpit. He said: 'They probably would have had all kinds of bells and whistles going off and lots of indications that both engines were in trouble.' The former pilot said "takes time to analyze whether or not you should shut down one or neither or both" - but this was time the Jeju pilots did not have. He also said the new revelations about those crucial moments had been revealed in a "very odd manner". Terry said: "I understand that it was released to the relatives of the victims and in private, prior to release to the general public. "And then that causes riots and chaos." 8 8 However, Terry said that whatever happened in the two cockpits, there is one factor that determines passengers' fate above all else. He said the 'single most important thing' in passenger safety is the "airline culture". Terry explained: 'If it is a disciplined professional safety culture with a good training regime, then that makes a huge difference.' Terry recalled a similar occasion when the wrong engine was shut down - the Kegworth air disaster of 1989 - and said that was "definitely a cultural problem in the training department'. 'That may have been a factor with Jeju Air,' he said. In the wake of the two tragedies, many aviation figures have called for he introduction of cockpit CCTV. That would clear up immediately how the two engines came to be shut off on the Air India flight - but Terry said pilots would push back. He said: 'I can see why the investigators might welcome cockpit CCTV. "We should be doing everything we can to minimize crashes. 'And in any responsible environment, with a good airline and a regulatory environment that is already happening. "And obviously, if there was a video evidence of what went on on the cockpit. They would know the answers pretty clearly by now. "But it's something that I think pilots would resist, for the simple reason that they're already scrutinized, trained, checked, examined, monitored, regulated so much."