How Macron triumphed over Starmer
France's president Emmanuel Macron had little incentive to agree anything but a symbolic 'returns' agreement with Sir Keir Starmer. Most of the French political class, public opinion and 'humanitarian' organisations do not support Britain returning migrants to France. Nor for that matter do other EU states. Why would they? What then was Macron seeking from the summit?
The French president is still smarting from Brexit
The French president is still smarting from Brexit, as he all but confessed first to Parliament then at the summit's press conference. The Aukus pact between Australia, the UK and US cutting the French out of Australian submarine construction, is another open wound. Macron wants his pound of flesh. He cut some from more arcane aspects of the Franco-British summit.
First, on aerospace Starmer agreed to inject 163 million euros (£140 million) into the French-led, Paris-based Eutelsat satellite business, hoping to challenge Elon Musk's Starlink. Eutelsat's 2022 take-over of Britain's low orbit internet satellite network One Web was disingenuously badged as a merger. The French state now has a majority stake and the inevitable is happening. Despite One Web being headquartered in the UK and Britain having a thriving satellite industry, the next generation of Eutelsat satellites will be built in France. Little surprise that Macron posted impishly on social media: 'Thanks to our British friends as they continue to follow us on the Eutelsat adventure!'.
'Follow' being the operative word, Sir Keir also obliged in the expansion of the present day 10,000 strong Franco-British Combined Joint Expeditionary force, created by the 2010 Lancaster House agreements and originally commanded from Northwood in the UK, being expanded to 50,000 and headquartered in Paris.
The supplicant Prime Minister conceded to Macron on nuclear issues. Much play has been made of Paris and London agreeing henceforth to coordinate their use of nuclear weapons, while retaining sovereign independence over their use. This is a personal win for Macron, whose neutered status in French domestic politics is combatted by his increased activism internationally. Macron will claim credit for securing the British nuclear deterrent as protection for the EU, thereby legitimising France as the rightful claimant to the role of Europe's defence supremo.
But at the more secretive nuclear level, one fears further Starmer concessions. A little mentioned dimension of Franco-British defence collaboration, signed with the 2010 Lancaster House agreements, is the 'Teutates Treaty'.
Here, the two states pledged collaboration on highly sophisticated nuclear weapons technology. Key to this is joint manufacture and operation of inordinately expensive computer equipment for military nuclear simulation and testing. This is vital to the upgrading of either state's nuclear warheads in compliance with the international Nuclear Test Ban treaty. The billions pledged in 2010 have been discreetly drawn from the nuclear heading of the two countries defence budgets.
France benefitted greatly from Teutates. Forced by international opinion to stop undersea nuclear testing in the South Pacific in 1996, France needed to catch up on computer-generated nuclear test simulation, which Britain, with the Americans, had used for years.
Unsurprisingly, the centre for this joint research was based in France, not Britain, at Valduc near Dijon. Joint French and UK teams carry out state-of-the-art nuclear weapons simulation on the MERLIN flash X-ray radiographic machine, built at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston and shipped to France. As France prides itself – with some licence – on its independently manufactured and controlled nuclear deterrent, much French literature on the EPURE facility omits close cooperation with Britain.
Starmer and Macron's closer nuclear collaboration will doubtless mean further expensive funding of the French EPURE facility, with Britain becoming ever more dependent on French goodwill for the upkeep of its nuclear deterrent. Will Macron have hinted to the gullible Starmer that in the Trumpian world France would be best sharing construction of Britain's home produced and designed nuclear warheads? One wonders further whether deal-maker Starmer countenances an eventual French replacement for the American Trident nuclear missile delivery system in Britain's nuclear deterrent? More British dependence on France for its ultimate protection inexorably leads to erosion of British sovereignty.
Starmer's craving for a 'reset' with the EU made a Macron win at the summit effortless. But that will not suffice to heal Macron's Brexito-Aukus scars. Though they did not sign that treaty, Keir Starmer and British civil servants would do well to recall that the treaty's name 'Teutates' was also that of a Celtic god to whom the Gauls made human sacrifices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves making bigger mistakes than Truss, says Badenoch
Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are making 'even bigger mistakes' than Liz Truss and have not learnt the lessons of her mini-budget, Kemi Badenoch has warned. Writing in The Telegraph, the Tory leader accuses the Government of taking Britain's finances 'to the brink' over concerns that it is pushing the country into a 'debt spiral'. Comparing Labour to Ms Truss marks Mrs Badenoch 's first major public criticism of the former Conservative prime minister, whose tax-cutting 2022 mini-budget was followed by a market meltdown. Mrs Badenoch says: 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes. 'They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books.' Her comments are a bid to blunt Labour's continued efforts to pin Britain's current economic woes on the Tory legacy of Ms Truss's premiership. Almost three years on, Ms Reeves and Sir Keir still regularly resort to blaming the mini-budget for unpopular decisions on tax and spending. But the remarks also risk reopening old wounds within the Tories, with some allies of Ms Truss arguing that she had the right vision for a low-tax economy. A source close to Liz Truss told The Telegraph: 'Kemi has not learned the lessons of the Mini Budget, which is that when Conservative MPs fail to back tax cuts, fracking and welfare restraint, they get booted out of office. 'The Bank of England has since admitted that two thirds of the market movement in 2022 was down to their failure properly to regulate pensions. 'Kemi needs to do the work and actually look at what happened in 2022 and hold the Bank of England to account.' The former Tory prime minister has said it was failures by the Bank of England, rather than her tax cuts, which led to the subsequent financial turmoil. Her supporters have also pointed out that borrowing costs on Government bonds have risen to a higher level now than in the aftermath of the mini-budget. In her now infamous mini-budget in September 2022, Ms Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng, the chancellor at the time, announced a series of surprise tax cuts, including the abolition of the top 45p income tax rate. It was not accompanied by a forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility, nor did it contain any spending restraints to balance the books. The budget provoked a calamitous market reaction, with the pound hitting an all-time low against the US dollar, government borrowing costs surging and increased mortgage rates. Ms Truss was swiftly forced to abandon the 45p cut and sack Mr Kwarteng, replacing him with Jeremy Hunt, to try and calm the financial markets. She resigned two weeks later. Since coming to power last year, Labour has also been criticised for its financial decisions. Ms Reeves used June's spending review to set out a £300bn spree over the next five years, to be funded by higher taxes and more debt. She has handed a £190bn increase to public services, paid for by the tax raid on businesses which has been blamed for stalling economic growth. A further £113bn will be ploughed into infrastructure projects after the Chancellor tore up her fiscal rules to allow herself to borrow more for investment. Last month's borrowing figure came in at £20.7bn, the second-highest level on record behind June 2020, when the Treasury was funding furlough payments. As a result, Mrs Badenoch warns that Britain is entering a 'debt spiral'. She says the reversal on £5bn of cuts to sickness benefits has added 'more pressure to the public purse' and has fuelled fears of further growth killing tax rises. The UK now faces higher borrowing costs than once-bankrupt Greece and is spending more on debt interest repayments every year than the entire defence budget. Mrs Badenoch writes: 'Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have taken profligate spending to a different level. The UK economy is teetering on the brink. 'Bond markets are increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today with no balancing spending decreases. This is how countries enter a debt spiral. 'But it is not inevitable, it is a choice. A debt crisis would make everyone in the country a lot poorer and ruin people's lives. 'The Prime Minister must not let pride stop him doing what, I sincerely hope, he knows deep down is essential – cutting government spending.' Mrs Badenoch's comments also come against the backdrop of internal disagreement over whether the Tory party should continue to apologise for its time in office. She used her first speech as leader, delivered in December last year, to directly say sorry to voters for the Conservatives' failures on immigration. One of her closest allies, Baroness Maclean of Redditch, told a meeting in June that the party had 'done the apologies' and should now move on to setting out policies. But a few weeks later Alex Burghart, the shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, told activists that the Tories should keep acknowledging their mistakes. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, had led internal Tory criticism of the mini-budget, vowing last month that the party would 'never, ever' repeat it. Until now Mrs Badenoch had held her fire, though she did privately tell her shadow cabinet that it would be helpful if Ms Truss made fewer public interventions. Her warning comes after the International Monetary Fund and senior City figures sounded the alarm about Britain's spiralling debt. Ray Dalio, a billionaire US hedge fund investor, warned last week that the UK has entered a 'doom loop' of more borrowing, higher taxes and low growth. Ms Reeves has repeatedly refused to rule out returning with more tax rises in the autumn despite warnings that doing so would further damage the economy. The Chancellor is under growing pressure from Left-wing backbenchers to introduce a wealth tax, which would probably prompt a fresh exodus of entrepreneurs. Starmer and Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget By Kemi Badenoch Picture the scene: a new Prime Minister and Chancellor spending billions without also making the necessary savings to offset their splurge and balance the books. The markets react adversely, interest rates spike and the cost of living gets worse with prices soaring. For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes. They continue to borrow more and more, unable and unwilling to make the spending cuts needed to balance the books. They are egged on by a Left-wing Reform Party, chasing Labour votes with ever more outlandish promises of nationalisation and welfare giveaways. The Conservative Party is now under new leadership, and my abiding principle will be that the country must live within its means. Before you dismiss us as being part of the problem, (after all, the mini-budget happened on our watch), the difference is that in 2022 we recognised what had gone wrong and took action to fix it. Labour aren't doing this. In fact they're making a bad situation even worse. Since the pandemic, Britain has become more and more reliant on debt to pay for public services. We now spend almost twice as much on debt interest than we do on defence. And the deficit is over £70bn. Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have taken profligate spending to a different level. Labour politicians are used to entering office with a surplus built up by cost-cutting Conservatives. Their instincts are simply to spend more, and they were wholly unprepared for the post-Covid economic situation. We saw it when both Starmer and Farage refused to back my call to keep the two-child benefit cap, a policy that saves £3 billion a year. And we saw it again when the Prime Minister watered down his own Welfare Bill. Instead of making savings, it now actually increases welfare spending – adding more pressure to the public purse. Before that debate, I made a straightforward offer: Conservative MPs would give him the numbers in Parliament to get the Bill through, if the Prime Minister committed to cutting welfare costs, getting people into work, and ruling out further tax rises this autumn. He refused. So instead, we watched as the Government stripped its own legislation of any serious reform. The markets were also watching. The UK's borrowing costs are reaching levels not seen for 30 years – higher than even those in Greece. Incredibly, borrowing costs are higher now than after the mini-budget. That means prices rising and the long-running cost of living crisis continuing. The UK economy is teetering on the brink. There are now warnings, in the City and in Westminster, that a fiscal crisis may even be on the horizon. Ray Dalio, the billionaire founder of hedge fund Bridgewater Associates, said this week that Britain had entered a 'doom loop' of rising debts, higher taxes and slower growth. Dalio's warnings came days after the International Monetary Fund said the government must take radical action to avoid a debt spiral. As we all saw in 2022, the Chancellor and the Prime Minister are reliant on the bond markets. Yet those bond markets are increasingly jittery about the levels of borrowing today with no balancing spending decreases. Rachel Reeves's unfunded series of U-turns have only added to the pressure. She is boxed in by her party on one side, and her fiscal rules on the other. Everyone now assumes tax rises are coming in the November Budget and the Government isn't denying it. The OBR is warning that higher tax is not good for growth. They are right. The Institute of Directors say that taxes and dire economic outlook is leading to the worst business confidence since the pandemic. Labour's mismanagement of our economy is having real consequences, and it's working people, savers and business owners who will pay more for declining public services. At the same time, rising welfare and poor incentives are pushing more people out of the workforce, making our problems even harder to fix. This is how countries enter a debt spiral. But it is not inevitable, it is a choice. A debt crisis would make everyone in the country a lot poorer and ruin people's lives. The Prime Minister must not let pride stop him doing what, I sincerely hope, he knows deep down is essential: cutting government spending. He should do so, for all our sakes.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
My grandparents fled Hitler, today in London someone screamed 'filth' in my face
Barrister, author and London Islington resident David Renton, 52, attended the counter-demo outside London's Thistle City Barbican Hotel organised by Islington Community Independents, today. Yesterday, I was part of the 1500-strong crowd in Islington, which gathered to defend the refugees living in the Thistle City Barbican hotel in north London against protesters. I went because, although I'm white and British. I'm also the grandchild of refugees: people who had to hide their documents beneath the railway seats as they fled from Hitler. I talked to other people there. Paul Murphy brought his two choirs, The Mixed Up Chorus and Sing For Freedom. Both choirs have included singers that were refugees staying at this hotel. Paul says he came 'To defend refugees. To stop the far right.' It comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told MPs that asylum hotel use will end by the end of this Parliament. Cathy Bird, a minister for Union Chapel, said, 'Britain is a welcoming country. The people who come here are fleeing from wars. In their position, we'd do the same thing.' Another supporter who didn't want to give her name said, 'This has always been a union area, for people who worked in the print shops at Fleet Street. Generations of people have settled here, Italians in Clerkenwell, the Bangladeshis more recently. We won't let the racists divide us.' While on our peaceful march, one angry woman on the other side screamed in my face, 'You're Filth, You're Filth.' I wasn't shocked by her clear rage-filled hate, but I am at a loss understanding why you would shout at someone just because they disagree with you? I tried speaking to one Far Right protester. Michael, told me, 'the refugees aren't law abiding.' I said I thought his fears were exaggerated. We didn't agree. One concession Michael made was that he could understand that it must be awful for the men being made to stay in the hotels, often for years, while the home office decides how to process their refugee applications. Some media outlets have reported that people who are living in hotels waiting for their asylum claims to be processed, who are banned from working, have been working as delivery drivers. This rhetoric plays exactly into the hands of Far Right agitators. Migrants want to work but the government – both Tories and Labour – have insisted that asylum seekers can't. 'I don't mind if they do Uber Eats,' Michael told me. What he means is that, in any sensible system, we'd be welcoming refugees' desire to work, finding them jobs. He's right on that. But it goes further than he realises. Michael could accept refugees if they'd do hard, low-paid jobs. I respect anyone who does that work, but it shouldn't be the limit. Many of the refugees are skilled people. If we did let them work, soon we'd realise that many of them have spent years back home training as doctors, nurses, teachers. They aren't just grunt labour, they're desperate to show us their talents, if only we'd let them. The real danger isn't the people in this hotel; it's racist outsiders coming to my town to stir up hate. David is author of The New Authoritarians Convergence on the Right published by Pluto Press. Available at and
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Newshour Trump moves nuclear submarines after Russian ex-president's comments
Russian media have dismissed Donald Trump's announcement that he will deploy nuclear submarines closer to Russia. Mr Trump said his decision was prompted by 'provocative comments' on social media by the former Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev. Mr Medvedev said in a post on X on Monday that President Trump was playing "the ultimatum game" with Russia, and that such an approach could lead to a war involving the United States. Also in the programme: The world's first legislation to control artificial intelligence starts coming into force in the EU today; and from Gaza, the sixteen-year-old with a dream to become a great violinist. (Photo: Dmitry Medvedev was Russia's president in 2008-12. Credit: Reuters)
