Is education like bomb disposal or like cooking?
I've been working for more than 25 years in the education sector. I've seen the stress, the pain, the 'obsessions' and not least the pressures that parents place on students and students place on themselves.
I've had parents sit with their daughter in front of me during Parent-Teacher Day and basically court-marshal the poor girl for not doing better than a C in Geography.
I've heard stories from counsellors (and sometimes even HR) about the depression, the self-harm and the breakdowns.
Hence my original question (posed to parents mainly): How do you view education? Is it a life-or-death matter? Is it as critical as disarming a bomb placed in some mall and figuring out which wire to cut, the red or blue one, where one wrong move can lead to disaster?
What if we treated schooling the way an open-hearted chef viewed his kitchen i.e. as a place where experimentation reigns, where various recipes and concoctions may be tried and tested, where success need not be narrowly defined and can, in fact, be a matter of 'taste' and individual desire? — Picture from pexels.com
Do we view education as analogous to performing heart surgery where we need to monitor practically every little step our child takes, where we need to ensure that every subject he's taking produces a Distinction, lest the whole world collapses and our families are branded as societal failures?
Because if we do so — and I suspect many Asian families do — then it perfectly explains the amount of burdens, stresses and pressures we as parents and educators place on our children and young people.
Seeing formal education and examinations as Do-Or-Die or as some Mission Impossible quest through some booby-trapped maze would totally explain why we 'hover' over our children with their studies, why we place such heavy (even impossible) academic demands on them, why they would end up believing that anything less than all-pervasive excellence equates to failure.
And why many of them break.
Is there a better way?
What if our paradigm of education — instead of approximating something like missile-interception or a brain operation — took the form of, say, cooking?
What if we saw education as a rich practice where creativity can flourish and multiple outcomes may be accepted?
What if we treated schooling the way an open-hearted chef viewed his kitchen i.e. as a place where experimentation reigns, where various recipes and concoctions may be tried and tested, where success need not be narrowly defined and can, in fact, be a matter of 'taste' and individual desire?
What if we treated learning like travel? Where the journey is at least as important as the destination? Where difference and variety are concepts and practices to be celebrated and enjoyed, where 'competitiveness' is rejected as false and unhealthy?
If we can be courageous enough to try, then maybe fewer students will hate schooling. Maybe fewer will feel like they're being shoved into prison every day.
Maybe fewer will feel like losers because we'd all realise that not achieving a high score in Biology is about as normal as not being able to play top-class tennis (that is to say, not at all a matter of failure, disgrace or about being a social outcast).
And schooling and learning can finally be a matter of enjoyment and fun.
* This is the personal opinion of the columnist.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Planting the seeds of sustainability — Khalidah Adibah Sahar, Maisarah Hasbullah and Noor Munirah Isa
AUGUST 14 — If you want to see the future of Malaysia, don't look at the Parliament. Look inside a preschool classroom at 10 a.m., where tiny hands are building cities out of blocks, or pretending the water in the sandpit is an endless river. Here, in these small worlds, the habits that will one day shape the real one are already forming. A recent 2023 study by UPSI researchers involving 219 preschool teachers across Malaysia revealed something both hopeful and worrying: teachers actually know about sustainability. They believe in it. They want to model it for their students. Many can explain environmental care, social equity, and responsible resource use with ease. Their hearts are in the right place. But when the storybooks close and the day's lessons unfold, the ideals don't always make it into practice — especially in environmental and economic aspects. Recycling bins sit unused. Water keeps running while cups are washed. The concept of 'enough' is rarely discussed when resources are handed out. While social sustainability values like empathy, sharing, and cooperation are often encouraged, hands-on practices such as composting, energy saving, or storytelling around local environmental heroes are far less common. This isn't because our teachers don't care. It's because the system hasn't given them the tools, time, or training to weave sustainability seamlessly into daily learning. Early childhood teacher training programmes rarely show how to teach sustainability to a four-year-old in ways that are playful, tangible, and culturally relevant. Without that scaffolding, even the most committed educator can feel like they're improvising — and often under less-than-ideal conditions. In under-resourced schools or rural areas, these challenges become more pronounced. Limited access to outdoor spaces, a lack of clean infrastructure, or even shortages of basic materials can make 'green' teaching feel like a luxury. Yet interestingly, our study found that public and private preschool teachers demonstrated similar levels of sustainability awareness. The care is there. What's missing is the bridge between knowing and doing. The irony is sharp: we talk about building green cities and smart economies, yet the foundations — the mindsets of the next generation — are left to chance. The smallest classrooms are where the largest changes can begin, but they are also where the cracks in our commitment show most clearly. If Malaysia is serious about the Sustainable Development Goals — particularly Goal 4 (Quality Education), Goal 13 (Climate Action), and Goal 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) — we need to stop treating sustainability as a subject and start treating it as a culture. A culture that's baked into curriculum design, teacher training, and the everyday rhythm of school life. Preschoolers learn how to share, how to care, and how to notice the world around them. — Picture from Unsplash/Nurpalah Dee Imagine preschools where compost bins sit next to snack tables, where community gardens are as normal as playgrounds, and where stories of indigenous environmental wisdom are told alongside fairy tales. These changes don't require massive budgets or sweeping reforms — just intentionality, creativity, and support for the educators who are already willing. Because here's the truth: preschoolers don't just learn alphabets and numbers. They learn how to share, how to care, and how to notice the world around them. They copy what they see. If their classroom models wastefulness, they will assume that's the norm. If it models care and responsibility, they will carry those habits forward. For that to happen, awareness must lead to action — not tomorrow, not when budgets improve, but now. This means giving teachers access to practical sustainability resources, embedding environmental and economic awareness into lesson plans, and recognising these efforts as central, not supplementary, to education. Once a child learns that rivers don't run forever, that rubbish doesn't disappear, and that fairness is worth fighting for, they carry it into every decision for the rest of their lives. That's not just education. That's nation-building in its purest form. And so, the challenge is not whether we believe in sustainability, but whether we are prepared to practise it in the places where it matters most. Because in the quiet of those small classrooms, with their tiny chairs and bright crayons, the future is already being written — and we get to decide what kind of story it will tell. * Khalidah Adibah Sahar, Maisarah Hasbullah and Noor Munirah Isa are senior lecturers from the Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Not Westernised, just globalised: Speaking English as an ‘Anak Merdeka' — Shazlin Razak
AUGUST 13 — Every time I speak English in public, I feel eyes on me. Some admire. Some judge. Some smile. Others sneer. When I speak it fluently, confidently, without fumbling, the assumption often follows: 'She must think she's more Western than Malaysian.' As a language lecturer with over 15 years of experience and a TikTok content creator under the name Awin Rzk, I often teach my followers how to speak English with a British flair, for fun, for style, for confidence. But some netizens are quick to attack. 'Lupa daratan', they say. 'Tak hargai Bahasa Melayu'. What they fail to see is that I am not promoting arrogance, nor am I dismissing our national language. I am sharing knowledge. I am educating. I am empowering. My content, both online and in the classroom, is born from love. Love for my students, my country, and the belief that Malaysians deserve to be articulate in any room they walk into, whether at home or abroad. That assumption, though quietly harboured, is far too common in our society. And this Merdeka, I feel compelled to speak. Not just as a content creator. Not just as a lecturer. But as a proud 'anak Malaysia'. We are not Westernised for speaking English. We are globalised. And we are free. Independence was never just about driving out foreign powers. It was about reclaiming our right to choose. The right to chart our own path. The right to learn any language, access any knowledge, and express ourselves without fear or shame. So why, after all these years of nationhood, are we still policing how Malaysians speak? Why is fluency in English still met with suspicion, as if it is a sign of betrayal? I do not teach English because I want Malaysians to abandon their roots. I teach it because I want them to rise. I want them to speak at international forums, to publish in global journals, to lead in multinational companies. I want them to sit at the world's table, not quietly in the corner, but with presence, poise, and power. Our students are brilliant. But I have seen too many of them shrink during job interviews or international conferences. Not because they lacked intelligence, but because they lacked confidence in their English. And sometimes, it is not even their fault. It is ours. We made them believe that being too fluent was showing off. That choosing English meant forgetting where they came from. We told them to be proud of being Malaysian, but only if they spoke a certain way. Let me be clear. Bahasa Melayu is our national language, and it is sacred. It holds our soul and our history. But loving one language does not mean we must reject another. Speaking English does not dilute your patriotism. It expands your ability to be heard. We are a nation born of many cultures. We speak Malay, Chinese dialects, Tamil, Iban, Kadazan, English, and more. That is not a weakness. In fact, it reflects the very essence of who we are. It shows how truly Malaysian we are diverse, adaptable, and united in our differences. This Merdeka, I raise the Jalur Gemilang as I do every year. I sing Negaraku with my hand on my heart. And I continue teaching English with purpose. Not to Westernise my students, but to equip them with the tools to thrive beyond borders while staying rooted in who they are. This Merdeka, I raise the Jalur Gemilang as I do every year. I sing Negaraku with my hand on my heart. — Bernama pic That is what it means to be truly Merdeka. To speak without shame. To learn without limits. To grow without fear of being misunderstood. So no, I am not Westernised. I am Malaysian. I am a language lecturer with years of experience and a digital educator who teaches out of love for this country. I believe our young Malaysians should never feel they have to choose between fluency and patriotism. Let them speak with confidence. Let them dream in many languages. Let them rise in every room they enter. Because the world is listening. And it is time Malaysia speaks clearly, proudly, and without shame.
Borneo Post
4 days ago
- Borneo Post
26,000 Year 6 pupils to sit for Sarawak's first UP-DLP test this October
Dr Annuar (centre) presents an MRP cheque to a recipient as others look on. SIBU (Aug 11): The inaugural Dual Language Programme Sarawak Assessment Test (UP-DLP) for Year 6 pupils, scheduled for Oct 15 and 16, will be carried out professionally to ensure integrity, transparency, and strengthen parents' confidence in the system, said Deputy Minister of Education, Innovation and Talent Development Datuk Dr Annuar Rapaee. According to him, about 26,000 pupils from 1,050 schools statewide, excluding Chinese primary schools (SJKC), will sit for the test, which covers three core subjects: Mathematics, Science, and English. Dr Annuar said the test papers are developed locally and vetted by Cambridge University Press and Assessment (CUPA) to ensure quality and credibility. 'We want to safeguard the integrity of the examination, and therefore the papers will be treated as highly confidential,' he said. Dr Annuar, also the Nangka assemblyman, told this to reporters after presenting the Minor Rural Project (MRP) grants to 12 schools under the constituency, in a ceremony held at SMK Agama Sibu yesterday. He further highlighted that the examination papers will be printed outside Sarawak – with three sets prepared – one kept as standby. 'Marking will be carried out by assessors from Swinburne University, University of Technology Sarawak, and Curtin University, covering the southern, central, and northern region respectively.' 'Markers will not be allowed to bring the examination papers out of the examination room. 'Papers will be tagged for each school, stored in a secure school safe, and delivered under police escort to prevent leaks,' he said. The grading system will not follow the Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE) model, he added. 'Pupils will not be graded by the number of A, B, or C results achieved. In other words, we only want to know the overall performance of pupils and schools,' he explained. 'We will not announce the top-performing schools, but we will inform schools of how many pupils scored excellent results and how many performed below average. This, he noted, is to allow the ministry to identify and assist schools that need support. Outstanding pupils may be offered places at the Yayasan Sarawak International Secondary School (YSISS) based on their UP-DLP performance. Dr Annuar acknowledged there may be challenges during the first implementation, especially in rural areas. 'Examinations start at 9am, so teachers in the interior may need to spend the night at schools to ensure they can start on time.'
