Changes to UC & PIP payments in full as Labour reveals bruising welfare bill concessions in bid to quell rebellion
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
BRUISING concessions to the government's welfare plans are being laid out by Welfare Secretary Liz Kendall following a humiliating u-turn.
Changes to Personal Independence Payments and Universal Credit are being spelled out to MPs ahead of a crunch vote tomorrow.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Cabinet MInister Liz Kendall reveals changes to benefits system after u-turn
Credit: Alamy
Ms Kendall told MPs: "Protecting existing claimants, whilst beginning to focus people on those with higher needs for new claimants going forward, strikes the right and fair balance."
Outlining some of the costs, she said that the measures she outlined will cost £2.5 billion in 2029-30.
But Sir Keir Starmer is facing a fresh backlash as 150,000 people will still be pushed into poverty by the end of the decade despite his benefits u-turn.
Dozens of Labour rebels are yet to be convinced to back the Downing Street proposals despite the number being affected nearly reduced in half.
The staggering estimate is less than the original forecast of 250,000 extra people left in relative poverty once their housing costs have been stripped out.
But the current figures don't include any possible 'positive impact' from extra funds going in to support people with disabilities and long-term health issues.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome said: "Even with the concessions, the government's own analysis forecasts that 150,000 people could still be pushed into poverty by disability benefit cuts by the end of the decade.
'As Labour MPs, we didn't enter politics to make struggling constituents poorer. We must stop this Bill.'
The Prime Minister faced a major revolt with 126 of his Labour MPs threatening to wreck his flagship legislation and throw it out.
But he made a partial u-turn allowing personal independence payment changes to only apply to new claimants from November next year.
The same applied to Ministerial plans on the health-related element of Universal Credit.
But the changes mean Chancellor Rachel Reeves will have to find more cash to meet the savings, first thought to be £3 billion.
It comes after the u-turn on winter fuel payments which will leave a £1.5 billion hole in the public finances.
The Labour leadership are still engaged in talking to the rebels to vote for the bill even though big changes were made.
Backbench MP Clive Efford who has been a Labour MP since 1997 said he would still oppose welfare plans despite major concessions.
When asked if he had changed his mind to back the government, he said: 'No, I've not, I'm afraid.
'There are still £3.5bn worth of savings that are required in these measures and we don't yet know the poverty impact that they will have.'
A No 10 spokesman said: 'The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day.
"It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them.
'No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that. For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked.'
The terms of reference for a comprehensive review of the Pip payments led by Welfare Minister Sir Stephen Timms will also be set out. But it will not report for another year.
It will be co-produced with disabled people, the organisations that represent them, and MPs.
Sir Keir Starmer said last week that the changes now strike the 'right balance' despite the government earlier saying there will be no u-turns.
He said: 'The most important thing is that we can make the reform we need.
'We talked to colleagues, who've made powerful representations, as a result of which we've got a package which I think will work, we can get it right.
'For me, getting that package adjusted in that way is the right thing to do, it means it's the right balance, it's common sense that we can now get on with it.'
But despite the concessions Mikey Erhardt, from Disability Rights UK, last week accused the Government of 'playing politics with our lives', saying the vote next Tuesday must still be pulled.
He said the changes will mean 'a benefits system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today'.
He added that the original decision 'prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of disabled citizens'.
Mr Erhardt added: 'Despite seemingly rowing back on some of the worst aspects of its plans, the Government is still attempting to slash billions of pounds from a system that doesn't provide enough support as it stands.'
The MS Society said Ministers were simply 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'.
They urged MPs 'not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Did my MP vote against Starmer's plan to cut benefits?
Sir Keir Starmer 's welfare bill has managed to scrape past its second reading as he fended off what is believed to be the most significant rebellion since he became prime minister a year ago. The bill passed its second reading by 335 ayes to 260 noes, a majority of 75, with 49 Labour MPs voting against the welfare cuts which have caused controversy. Disability minister Sir Stephen Timms announced a last-ditch concession that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) – which had been the central pillar of the government's reforms – would not take place until after a review of the benefit had concluded. The government had initially planned to change the eligibility criteria for disability benefits for all new claimants from November 2026 but now the new system will not come into force until the review has concluded. It comes just days after the government watered down the legislation for the first time on Thursday, excluding all existing claimants from changes to PIP in a chaotic U-turn. Sir Keir's welfare bill has continuously caused controversy as a growing rebel camp, led at the time by Dame Meg Hillier, putting forward an initial amendment which forced the government to U-turn from its initial plans. While she voted to back the legislation, almost 50 Labour MPs expressed their discontent with the bill still. One key voice in the 'noes' was MP Ms Maria Tidball, born with a congenital disability affecting all four limbs, who broke down in tears as she delivered an impassioned speech criticising the welfare cuts. Another key rebel, Rachel Maskell, said disabled people will have been worried watching the debate. The MP for York Central said: 'I'm obviously really sad that the Bill went through but I think my greatest sadness is that disabled people will have been looking on and seeing Parliament debating their futures, and I think they'll be incredibly distressed when they see the way that Parliament was today. 'That's the thing that tugs at me, because I think ultimately we've got huge responsibility to disabled people and they weren't served well by the department today.' Sir Stephen Timms later said, in response to concerns over a two tier system, that it was 'completely normal in social security.' 'PIP replaced DLA (disability living allowance) in 2013 but half a million adults are still on DLA today. That doesn't cause problems. Parallel running is normal, and actually it's often the fairest way to make a major change.' Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said welfare reform was particularly 'difficult' for Labour because the party cared 'passionately' about the subject. Asked what the main lessons were from the backbench rebellion over proposed cuts, she told broadcasters: 'Welfare reform is always really difficult, perhaps especially for Labour governments. 'It's something we care passionately about.'
Powys County Times
7 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
The welfare reform vote: All you need to know
MPs have backed a Government proposal to reform welfare payments for sick and disabled people, but only after significant concessions saw much of Sir Keir Starmer's plan abandoned. Below, the PA news agency looks at what happened, what it means for personal independence payment (Pip) and universal credit, and what might come next. – What have MPs agreed to? MPs voted on Tuesday to allow the Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to advance to the next stage in becoming law. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had previously threatened to vote against the legislation, enough to block its passage through the Commons, but in the end only 49 did so. But ministers were forced to offer a series of concessions to persuade the rebels to back the Government. – What concessions did the Government make? Last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced a partial U-turn aimed at heading off the rebellion that included three key points. Firstly, changes to Pip eligibility would only come into effect in November 2026, and anyone claiming the benefit before that date would not be subject to the new rules, instead of imposing the changes on everyone. Secondly, people claiming the health element of universal credit, and new claimants with the most severe conditions, would see their incomes protected in real terms. Thirdly, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would conduct a review of the Pip assessment, 'co-produced' with disabled people. But during Tuesday's debate, Sir Stephen offered a further concession, saying any changes to Pip eligibility would only be introduced after his review had concluded, further delaying them. – What do the concessions mean for the Government's proposals? The decision to push back Pip changes to an unspecified date, and leave uncertain the details of what those changes will be, removes a major part of the Government's reform plans. The proposed changes to universal credit remain, raising the standard allowance while halving the health element for most new claimants from April 2026. But the concessions will also pose a problem for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will need to find extra money now the expected savings from welfare reform are no longer expected to materialise. Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by 2029/30, a key year for Ms Reeves' fiscal targets. – What happens next? The Government has pledged to make the necessary amendments to remove the Pip changes from the Bill when it returns to the Commons next week. It is then likely to continue through Parliament, becoming law after it has been approved by both MPs and peers. But wider questions remain for the Government. Not only does Ms Reeves face a fiscal headache, but the Prime Minister could face a political one too as he seeks to repair fractured relations with his backbenchers. And uncertainty will continue to surround the Government's plans for welfare reform.
Powys County Times
7 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Starmer ditches Pip benefit reforms in face of Labour revolt
Sir Keir Starmer was forced to abandon a key plank of his welfare reform agenda to get the legislation through its first Commons test. In a late climbdown as MPs prepared to vote, the Government shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. The move will cause a headache for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has seen a forecast £4.8 billion saving from the welfare budget whittled away through a series of concessions, leaving her to seek extra money through spending cuts, tax hikes or borrowing to balance the books. The Resolution Foundation's chief executive Ruth Curtice said the concessions meant the reforms would now make no 'net savings' in 2029/30 – a key year for Ms Reeves's fiscal targets – even if they did reduce costs in the longer term. The decision to remove the Pip changes from the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was announced just 90 minutes before MPs voted on Tuesday night. The legislation cleared its first hurdle by 335 votes to 260, majority 75. Despite the late concession, there were 49 Labour rebels, the largest revolt so far of Sir Keir's premiership. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insisted the Labour Party was '100%' behind the Prime Minister, but acknowledged there were 'lessons to be learned' after the rebellion. She also appeared to express regret over the handling of the issue, saying: 'I wish we had got to this point in a different way.' But Ms Kendall also insisted it was 'really important we passed this Bill', saying: 'We need to make changes, because too many people have been written off, are left to a life on benefits, when being in good work is so important.' The decision to remove key parts of the Bill is remarkable for a Government with a working majority of 165 and after just under a year in office. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused ministers of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'. She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' Earlier, a Labour rebel attempt to halt the legislation was defeated by 179 votes. A total of 44 Labour MPs including two tellers backed the bid by rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell, who described the Bill as 'unravelling' and 'a complete farce'. A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was dropped after the first partial U-turn on the legislation last week, which restricted the Pip changes to new claimants from November 2026. That date has now been abandoned in the latest climbdown, with any changes now only coming after disability minister Sir Stephen Timms' review of the Pip assessment process. Sir Stephen announced the climbdown in the middle of the debate on the legislation. He acknowledged 'concerns that the changes to Pip are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading'. He said the Government would now 'only make changes to Pip eligibility activities and descriptors following that review', which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026. The concession came after frantic behind-the-scenes negotiations in Westminster involving the Prime Minister, his Cabinet and wavering Labour MPs. Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns and public affairs at the MS Society, said: 'We thought last week's so-called concessions were last minute. But these panicked 11th hour changes still don't fix a rushed, poorly thought-out Bill.' But Jon Sparkes, chief executive of learning disability charity Mencap, said: 'The last-minute change relating to the review Sir Stephen Timms is leading sounds positive and we are pleased that the Government has listened.' He added: 'Disabled people should not have to pay to fix black holes in the public finances.' The Government's concessions have gutted the reforms, leaving only parts of the current Bill still on the table. Proposals to cut the health element of universal credit by almost 50% for most new claimants from April 2026 remain in place, along with an above-inflation increase in the benefit's standard allowance. In an earlier climbdown, Work and Pensions Secretary Ms Kendall said existing recipients of the health element of universal credit, and new claimants with the most severe conditions, would have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'.
