logo
Florida's home insurance crisis hits hardest in some of the state's poorest counties

Florida's home insurance crisis hits hardest in some of the state's poorest counties

Miami Herald18-07-2025
Steve Cates was walking back to his house from his mailbox, flipping through a clutch of newly delivered letters, when one envelope stopped him in his driveway. It was from his insurance company.
His home felt sturdy, but he knew getting insurance in this bucolic community on the north side of Lake Okeechobee was a struggle. His fiancée and several friends had had their policies canceled. His was dropped, too, the year before, although a few weeks later the insurance company had renewed the policy at a rate of a few hundred dollars more. The annual rate had jumped by 180 percent in six years, to $4,742, but he sent a check right in anyway.
Now, standing in his driveway, staring at yet another non-renewal letter, his hand shook. He still owed $30,000 on his mortgage. Going without insurance, as some people he knew were doing, would be difficult, because his mortgage company required insurance. He feared the life he had built in this home over two decades was about to end.
Insurance experts have warned repeatedly that rising economic losses from extreme weather events driven by climate change threaten the industry with collapse—and with it, housing markets and families' finances. Together with Louisiana and wildfire-wracked California, Florida, threatened by tropical cyclones barreling into its coasts, is where the crisis is hitting hardest.
The risk is driving insurance companies to raise rates and withdraw from markets entirely, a situation that itself represents a crisis threatening to destabilize what for many Americans is their most important asset, their home.
Much attention has focused on the threats to pricey real estate and resulting high premiums along the coast of South Florida. But an Inside Climate News analysis of data on home insurance non-renewals shows that already disadvantaged inland rural communities around Lake Okeechobee are an overlooked epicenter of the state's insurance crisis.
That finding stems from data released in December by the U.S. Senate Committee on the Budget. The Senate committee asked large insurance companies to disclose the number of policies that were not renewed each year from 2018 to 2023. Committee staffers received data from 23 companies, collectively accounting for about two-thirds of the home insurance market across the nation. (The committee said it focused on non-renewals because industry experts say high non-renewal rates represent an early warning sign of market destabilization.)
The committee's report drew a direct connection to climate change, noting that spiking non-renewal rates in 2022 and 2023 were concentrated in the counties facing the highest risk of climate-related disasters. 'The stuff that scientists have predicted for decades about climate change is now starting to come true, and the leading indicator of that is the insurance industry,' Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), chairman of the committee at the time of the report's release, told Inside Climate News.
Insurance companies 'look at places like Florida—which is seeing a combination of sea level rise and worsened storm activity and warming oceans around the state on three sides of it and more moisture held in the warmer air above it so that rain bursts are more dangerous—and they are starting to realize, 'Wow. That's going to be more risk than we can bear, and it's also really hard to predict,'' he said.
'So that makes Florida—as they used to say in the movies—the preview of coming attractions.'
Poorer Inland Residents Are Most Vulnerable to Losing Coverage
Florida had the highest rates of home insurance non-renewal in the nation, rising to around 3 percent of policies statewide in each of 2022 and 2023. But within the state, Inside Climate News found a more complex picture that could not be explained simply by the risk of financial losses from hurricanes and other tropical storms: The highest non-renewal rates were not in coastal counties like Miami-Dade, Monroe, Lee and Broward that are in the direct firing line of landfalling storms. Instead, they were concentrated inland, in the four rural counties around Lake Okeechobee: Glades, Hendry, Highlands and Okeechobee.
To make sense of this finding, Inside Climate News turned to data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's National Risk Index, used to identify the U.S. communities most severely threatened by natural hazards. We found no relationship between county-level non-renewal rates and the Expected Annual Loss Rate for Buildings, a measure of the percentage losses in building values anticipated each year. Where the counties around Lake Okeechobee stood out was in a measure of risk that also accounted for social vulnerability and resilience in the face of natural disasters.
In other words, non-renewals were highest in the Florida counties where climate-related hazards are compounded by poverty and other factors that make it harder to withstand and recover from extreme weather events. Glades County, with a median household income of less than $39,000 a year compared to the statewide figure of around $72,000, had the highest non-renewal rates and is the state's poorest county.
The counties south of Lake Okeechobee constitute a region known as the Everglades Agricultural Area, which was set aside as the Everglades were drained for farming. The region is among the nation's most bountiful, raising rice, sod, vegetables such as lettuce and sugarcane, making Florida the country's top producer of the crop. Vast ranchlands stretch north of the lake, where Okeechobee County is situated.
That county had the second-highest non-renewal rate in the state in 2022 and there too, insurance is a common worry. 'It's kind of like always in the back of your mind, that you're just waiting for that shoe to drop,' said Okeechobee Mayor Dowling Watford, whose own policy has doubled in cost in recent years to some $6,000 annually. 'We didn't even think about not paying it or trying to find another insurance company. When you have insurance, you don't want to do anything to jeopardize that.'
Even though they're farther from the coast, Okeechobee and its neighboring counties have by no means avoided the consequences of severe storms. In the 1920s an unnamed hurricane caused Lake Okeechobee to overflow, killing thousands. The catastrophe prompted a massive federal effort to drain and contain the Everglades, including the construction of the earthen 143-mile Herbert Hoover Dike around the entire lake. In 2004 the region was battered again by Frances and Jeanne, two of four hurricanes that menaced the state that year within the span of six weeks. Last year Hurricane Milton spawned at least 45 tornadoes across central and south Florida.
'What we're seeing here is a recognition of the risk of these storms causing damage anywhere in the state. I don't think there is any part of Florida that is safe from storms,' said Chuck Nyce, a professor of risk management and insurance at Florida State University. 'I think you're seeing that companies really made a conscious effort to reduce their risk from central Florida, south.'
Meanwhile, a growing scarcity of insurance is but one aspect of the crisis facing Florida, especially the underserved counties of the state's heartland. Policies also are increasingly unaffordable. The situation means that the homeowners who are most at risk of losing insurance are those with the least resources for dealing with disasters, and with no insurance they are even more exposed.
Paying Premiums or Dropping Coverage
Inside Climate News also looked at changes in home insurance premiums, using data provided by Philip Mulder of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Benjamin Keys of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. The pair have shown that, across the nation, premiums are rising fastest in communities facing the greatest threats from natural disasters.
While premiums have risen in the counties around Lake Okeechobee, they remain lower and have risen somewhat less steeply than in wealthier coastal counties like Monroe, which includes the Florida Keys. There, the median annual premium exceeded $7,600 in 2023, compared to around $2,800 in Glades County.
This makes sense, according to Ishita Sen, an assistant professor of business administration at Harvard Business School who has studied the Florida insurance market. While the counties around Lake Okeechobee face lower risks of losses than wealthier coastal counties, their poorer residents are likely to respond to proposed premium hikes by switching from the large companies surveyed by the Senate Budget Committee to smaller local carriers. If they can't find an insurance company willing to provide coverage, they will end up insured by Citizens Property Insurance Corp., the state-backed insurer of last resort—and if they have already paid off their mortgage and are no longer required to have insurance, may forgo coverage altogether.
'Poorer communities have lower coverage to begin with, and they tend to drop coverage in response to premium increases,' Sen said.
The Senate Budget Committee aimed to gather data on non-renewals driven by insurers' decisions to stop providing coverage. But the survey may also include non-renewals caused by homeowners deciding they can't afford to pay increasing premiums.
Doc Thrift, 69, initially put his Okeechobee house up for sale after receiving a renewal notice for $14,500. Thrift, who is experienced in construction, has lived for the last 20 years in a 2,000-square-foot stucco home his late wife designed and he built almost entirely himself. His wife suffered from a neuromuscular disease and died five years ago. He now lives here alone with his dog, Jake.
He eventually decided he could not part with the home and took out a personal loan to pay off the mortgage so that he can go without insurance, as many people he knows are doing.
'You can't build something—design something and build it—and then walk away and not have feelings about it. Because my wife's memory is here,' said Thrift. 'Your whole world has been snatched away, and you have to start all over again.'
Even Citizens can cancel or decline to renew insurance if homeowners don't meet the conditions of coverage. Monica Clark and her husband had the private insurance policy on their home canceled after the 2004 hurricane season and ended up insured by Citizens. The state-run insurer sent multiple cancellation letters through the years, each basing coverage on different contingencies Clark felt were unreasonable, such as undergoing another inspection or making additional upgrades to the property.
Monica Clark estimates she spends up to 20 percent of her time thinking about insurance. Credit: Amy Green/Inside Climate News
This spring they received yet another cancellation letter from Citizens, and the most affordable policy they could find was with a private company for $10,000 a year. Two of Clark's relatives who live nearby received renewal notices for roughly $16,000 in recent years—her nephew is opting to pay for the policy by working overtime, while her brother is going without.
Problems obtaining insurance from large, established providers will drive homeowners into the arms of companies vulnerable to insolvency. In her research into the Florida insurance market, Sen has tracked the withdrawal of major insurance providers from the state and their replacement by smaller firms that have proved vulnerable to insolvency.
'Insurers are leaving, and they are in no means wanting to come back,' Sen said. 'The ones that are replacing them are of low quality.'
Seven Florida insurers became insolvent in the 13 months between January 2022 and February 2023. The problems faced by smaller companies, together with rising premiums being charged by those that remain, likely explains why Inside Climate News found that data from Citizens showed a surge in new policies from the state-backed provider even before the spike in non-renewals with large traditional insurers documented by the Senate Budget Committee.
The industry blames the collapse of so many insurers on a tide of lawsuits filed against them by law firms that have marketed their services to policyholders in the wake of major storms.
Mark Friedlander, spokesman for the Insurance Information Institute, an industry group, criticized the Senate Budget Committee's report for its focus on the risks posed by climate change. 'It just touched the surface and certainly didn't explain why non-renewal rates were so high in Florida compared to other states,' said Friedlander, himself a Floridian. 'Blaming it all on climate change is really a shallow way to look at this problem.'
Florida's insurance consumer advocate, Tasha Carter, declined multiple requests for comment. Her staff referred inquiries to the state's Office of Insurance Regulation, which did not respond to requests for comment.
Citizens, meanwhile, has shifted policies back to private-sector insurers through what it calls 'depopulation,' offering financial incentives for companies to take over its policies. This leaves the state-backed provider holding the riskiest policies. 'If there is a big hurricane, Citizens is not going to be able to make those payments,' Sen said. 'It isn't looking good.'
After the January fires in Los Angeles County, Citizens' California counterpart, known as the FAIR Plan, faced a similar predicament and had to be given a $1 billion buyout. That money will come from private-sector insurers, who are expected to pass the cost onto their customers by hiking premiums.
Citizens wouldn't need to seek a specific buyout, however, because existing Florida law allows it to issue bonds to raise the necessary funds and then recoup the money over a number of years by imposing surcharges on the premiums paid by Florida homeowners—not just its own customers. It has already done so once before, after the severe hurricane seasons of 2004 and 2005, recovering the money it paid out over the following decade.
'Citizens can never go broke,' said its spokesman, Michael Peltier.
But the same can't be said of the customers who ultimately foot the bill. For his part, Steve Cates still is holding out hope his insurance company will renew his policy. If not, he is not sure whether he would pay off the mortgage and go without insurance or try to sell the house. Parting with the home would be difficult. Cates had thought about leaving the house to his son.
'What I really don't understand is how they can drop so many people around the lake and not down on the coasts,' he said. 'I'm just sitting here, and I don't know which way to go. It's unstable times for me right now.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia CEO says Trump gives America an advantage. Hear that, progressives?
Nvidia CEO says Trump gives America an advantage. Hear that, progressives?

USA Today

time13 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Nvidia CEO says Trump gives America an advantage. Hear that, progressives?

The top executive of the world's most valuable company doesn't have to flatter anyone, even the president of the United States. I'm worried about artificial intelligence. It feels like it's invasive, increasingly ubiquitous and coming for my job. I'm not alone. More than 30% of Americans think AI will do more harm than good. But on July 24, the Trump administration unveiled a bold plan to ensure that the U.S. dominates the world when it comes to AI. It's eased my mind a bit. President Donald Trump's plan sounds smart and promising. Global tech leaders support it, too, including the chief executive of the world's most valuable company. "America's unique advantage that no country could possibly have is President Trump," Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said on the "All-In" podcast. Trump says US will win the AI race Trump, speaking at the Winning the AI Race summit for "All In," declared that the U.S. will outpace foreign competitors in developing artificial intelligence. That's important because tech leaders have noted that the country that achieves certain AI milestones may well develop an insurmountable lead in unleashing the most revolutionary technology of our lifetimes. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on conservative values, family and religion from columnist Nicole Russell. Get it delivered to your inbox. The Trump administration is taking a hands-off approach to regulating AI at this point. The president even signed executive orders to reduce regulations on constructing data centers and block states from regulating AI on their own. Opinion: Trump wins again. Columbia's $200 million fine will reshape higher education. Tech industry giants embrace Trump's AI plan The shift in the tech industry from critics to partners of Trump has been remarkable. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was one of those critics. Now he supports the president. Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg also has made an obvious shift toward Trump. And, of course, SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk famously supported Trump before their very public and nasty falling out this year. Opinion: We're creating AI that could surveil US citizens. And the government is in on it. The tech leaders admittedly have their own interests in mind in praising Trump these days. But those interests also include America's economic, technological and national defense priorities. Our nation's strength and the prosperity and well-being of Americans may well depend on whether we win the AI race in the years ahead. It's Huang's support that impresses me the most. The top executive of the world's most valuable company doesn't have to flatter anyone, even the president of the United States. Nvidia is leading the global race to the future, and this leader among leaders now says having Trump in the White House is an advantage for America. Perhaps even progressives should listen. Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

Map Shows Best and Worst States To Move to in 2025—Ranked
Map Shows Best and Worst States To Move to in 2025—Ranked

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows Best and Worst States To Move to in 2025—Ranked

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Thinking about moving to another state? Utah, New Hampshire and Idaho are among the best states to head to, while New Mexico, Louisiana and California are among the worst. That's according to a new study by ConsumerAffairs, which named the best—and worst—U.S. states to move to in 2025. Drawing on five key metrics—affordability, safety, economy, healthcare and education, and quality of life—the report ranks all 50 states based on their overall appeal for newcomers. For the second consecutive year, Utah, New Hampshire, and Idaho claimed the top three positions, the study noted. These states offer strong scores across multiple categories, especially in safety, economic stability, and overall quality of life. Harrison Stevens, VP of marketing at TurboTenant, cautioned that rankings may not apply equally to everyone. "Stats and lists like these can help, but also they're not the perfect indicator of what state is right for you," he told Newsweek. He pointed to New Hampshire—ranked second overall—but 33rd for affordability. "So, it's probably not the best state for someone looking for affordable housing." New Mexico ranked lowest overall due to weak performance in safety, healthcare, and education, despite strengths like affordable housing and sunshine. "If New Mexico's affordable housing and abundant sunshine are calling your name, you might think again —the state scored poorly in safety, health care and education, making it the worst state to move to this year," the report warned. What To Consider When Moving States in the U.S. Jeremy Savory, founder of global consulting firm Millionaire Migrant, said tax incentives often play a central role in domestic migration. "Any country—or in this case, any U.S. state—with a low or zero-tax jurisdiction has been doing well in the real estate market and will continue to do well," he told Newsweek. "People are moving within their own country—to Florida and Texas—because people move to where their money goes further." Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius, agreed that financial optimization drives migration. "Huge priorities for choosing where to live are making the most out of savings, investments, and entitlements during retirement while limiting the impact of taxes," he told Newsweek. Orestis noted that retirees are increasingly turning to inland, low-tax states away from climate-prone coastal areas. "As Americans consider where they may live in retirement, they must also prepare themselves for the negative impact that climate change-driven disasters will have on their finances, health, and lifestyle," Orestis said. Rising insurance costs and environmental risks are shifting retirement preferences away from traditional sunbelt states like Florida and Arizona. Max Dugan-Knight, a climate data scientist at Deep Sky, echoed those warnings. "Heat waves are becoming more common and more deadly in many places, hurricanes are causing worse flooding, and these trends impact all of the metrics in the study," he told Newsweek. He said affordability is now closely linked with climate resilience. "As risk in your area increases the cost of things like home insurance will skyrocket. You will end up paying for climate risk through the cost of insurance or the cost of damages if you choose to go without." Dugan-Knight advised avoiding areas already struggling with climate pressures. "Hot places are going to get hotter," he said. "Extreme heat in places like Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas is only getting worse. These areas also have risks when it comes to water security, which is going to become a critical issue in the next few years." As for coastal regions, the scientist issued a final note of caution: "Flooding tends to be the costliest kind of property and low-lying areas are most at risk, particularly on the Gulf and South Atlantic coasts." Top 10 Best States To Move To in 2025 Utah New Hampshire Idaho Virginia South Dakota Maine Nebraska Massachusetts Wisconsin Wyoming Top 10 Worst States To Move To in 2025 New Mexico Louisiana California Oregon Arkansas Nevada Oklahoma Alaska Arizona New York Source: Based on a study by ConsumerAffairs that looked at five key metrics—affordability, safety, economy, healthcare and education, and quality of life. See the full ranking of all 50 states at the ConsumerAffairs website. Do you have a travel-related video or story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.

Social Security: Two Types of Benefits To Be Paid This Week
Social Security: Two Types of Benefits To Be Paid This Week

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Social Security: Two Types of Benefits To Be Paid This Week

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. This week, two payments will be made by the Social Security Administration (SSA). What To Know Millions of Americans receive Social Security benefits, whether it be retirement checks or disability payments, known as Supplemental Security Income (SSI). On Friday, August 1, checks will go out for SSI recipients, retirees who have been collecting checks since before May 1997, and retirees who also collect SSI benefits. Following on the from this, further payments will be made on Wednesday, August 13 : Retirement, spousal and survivor benefits for those born between the 1st and 10th of any calendar month : Retirement, spousal and survivor benefits for those born between the 1st and 10th of any calendar month Wednesday, August 20 : Benefits for those born between the 11th and 20th : Benefits for those born between the 11th and 20th Wednesday, August 27 : Benefits for those with birthdays between the 21st and 31st : Benefits for those with birthdays between the 21st and 31st Friday, August 29: SSI payments. This payment would usually come at the first of the month for September. However, due to September 1 falling on Labor Day, a national holiday, the payment will be made slightly earlier. Stock image/file photo: A Social Security card with U.S. Dollars. Stock image/file photo: A Social Security card with U.S. Dollars. GETTY How Much Can I Get? The average Social Security check was $2,002.39 as of May 2025, although numerous seniors have expressed dissatisfaction about the amount they get. "The average Social Security benefit amount changes monthly," an agency spokesperson told Newsweek. "As wages tend to rise over time, each new group of retirees raises the average benefit amount, since their benefit calculations typically reflect higher earnings." Social Security benefits vary by individual. Payments are calculated based on a person's 35 highest-earning years—adjusted for inflation—and the age at which they begin claiming benefits. In 2025, the maximum monthly benefit for someone retiring at the full retirement age of 67 is $4,018. Retiring early at 62 reduces the maximum to $2,831, while delaying retirement until 70 raises the potential benefit to as much as $5,108 per month. SSI recipients received an average of $718.30. How much beneficiaries get is based on how much money they earn and other resources available to them. Seniors on Social Security With more than 50 million Americans collecting retirement checks from the federal government every month, many seniors want to see major reform to the program, according to a new report by The Senior Citizen's League. The advocacy group found that only 10 percent of beneficiaries are satisfied with their monthly check, while 63 percent reported being dissatisfied. Beneficiaries have also taken issue with the annual cost of living adjustment, or COLA, with many saying it doesn't accurately reflect cost increases year-to-year for older Americans. In a recent poll, 34 percent of respondents identified updating the COLA formula as their top policy priority for enhancing Social Security benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store