
China shows signs of tackling the price wars that are taking a toll on its EV industry
China's industrial policy has engineered a remarkable transformation to electric vehicles in what is the world's largest auto market. In so doing, it has spawned far more makers than can possibly survive. Now, long-simmering concerns about oversupply and debilitating price wars are coming to the fore, even as the headline sales numbers soar to new heights.
Market-leader BYD announced this week that its sales grew 31% in the first six months of the year to 2.1 million cars. Nearly half of those were pure electric vehicles and the rest were plug-in hybrids, it said in a Hong Kong Stock Exchange filing. The company phased out internal combustion engine cars in 2022.
BYD came under thinly veiled criticism in late May when it launched a new round of price cuts, and several competitors followed suit. The chairman of Great Wall Motors warned the industry could come under threat if it continues on the same trajectory.
'When volumes get bigger, it's just much harder to manage and you become the bullseye,' said Lei Xing, an independent analyst who follows the industry.
The government is trying to rein in what is called 'involution' — a term initially applied to the rat race for young people in China and now to companies and industries engaged in meaningless competition that leads nowhere.
BYD has come under criticism for using its dominant position in ways that some consider unfair, sparking price wars that have caused losses across the industry, said Murthy Grandhi, an India-based financial risk analyst at GlobalData.
With the price war in its fourth year, Chinese automakers are looking abroad for profits. BYD's overseas sales more than doubled to 464,000 units in the first half of this year. Worried governments in the U.S. and EU have imposed tariffs on made-in-China electric vehicles, saying that subsidies have given them an unfair advantage.
The latest bout of handwringing started when BYD cut the price of more than 20 models on May 23.
The same day, the chairman of Great Wall Motors, Wei Jianjun, said he was pessimistic about what he called the 'healthy development' of the EV market. He drew a comparison to Evergrande, the Chinese real estate giant whose collapse sent the entire industry into a downturn from which it has yet to recover.
'The Evergrande in the automobile industry already exists, but it is just yet to explode,' he said in a video message posted on social media.
Two days later, a BYD executive rejected any comparison to Evergrande and posted data-filled charts to buttress his case.
'To be honest, I am confused and angry and it's ridiculous!' Li Yunfei, BYD's general manager of brand and public relations, wrote on social media. 'All these come from the shocking remarks made by Chairman Wei of Great Wall Motors.'
Next, the government and an industry association weighed in. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers called for fair competition and healthy development of the industry, noting that major price cuts by one automaker had triggered a new price war panic.
On the same day, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology vowed to tackle involution-style competition in the auto industry, saying that recent disorderly price wars posed a treat to the healthy and sustainable development of the sector.
'That price cut might have been the final straw that irked both competitors and regulators for the ruthlessness that BYD continues to show,' Lei said.
The following month, 17 automakers including BYD made a pledge: They would pay their suppliers within 60 days.
One way China's automakers have been surviving the bruising price wars is by delaying the payments for months. The agreement, if adhered to, would reduce financial pressure on suppliers and could rein in some of the fierce competition.
'The introduction of the 60-day payment pledge is the call of the government to oppose involution-style competition,' said Cui Dongshu, the secretary-general of the China Passenger Car Association.
It also reduces the risk of an Evergrande-like scenario.
Many automakers had stretched out payments by paying suppliers with short-term debt — promises to repay them in a certain period of time — instead of cash. Real estate developers used the same system. It worked until it didn't. When Evergrande defaulted on its debts, suppliers were left holding worthless promises to pay.
'This practice is seen as a potential cause of a larger crisis, similar to what happened with Evergrande,' Grandhi said.
The vows to speed up payments and the government calls to rein in the price wars, along with a rollback of some financing offers, point to an effort to reverse downward price expectations, said Jing Yang, a director at Fitch Ratings who focuses on the auto industry.
'We may watch how effectively these measures are in reversing the price trend and how would that affect EV demand in the coming quarters,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dr. Phil's Merit Street Media files for bankruptcy, sues Trinity Broadcasting
Dr. Phil McGraw's Texas-based media company filed for bankruptcy on Wednesday and simultaneously filed a breach of contract lawsuit against business partner Trinity Broadcasting Group, which specializes in Christian programming. Merit Street Media, which was formed in 2023 and launched Merit TV in 2024, is a joint venture of McGraw's Peteski Productions and Trinity Broadcasting. McGraw agreed to provide Merit Street with new episodes of his 'Dr. Phil Show,' primetime specials and other content, while Trinity Broadcasting contributed distribution and production services, according to the lawsuit that essentially blames the Christian broadcaster for the bankruptcy. Merit Street accused Trinity Broadcasting of reneging on its obligations and abusing 'its position as the controlling shareholder of Merit Street to improperly and unilaterally burden Merit Street with unsustainable debt, doing so either without notice or in direct violation of promises not to do so.' 'This lawsuit arises out of a sad but oft told story: one side lived up to its commitments but the other, the Defendant [Trinity], did not. Moreover, these failures by [Trinity] were neither unintended nor inadvertent. They were a conscious, intentional pattern of choices made with full awareness that the consequence of which was to sabotage and seal the fate of a new but already nationally acclaimed network,' the complaint, filed in conjunction with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, stated. 4 Dr. Phil addresses his crowd during an season 7 episode of his show in 2008. Dr. Phil / YouTube 'This fresh voice on the national stage is inexorably going dark, going off the air because TBN has refused to honor its commitment to transfer its must carry rights and thereby provide national distribution for the network—Merit Street,' the complaint continued. 'And this conduct stretches beyond mere breach of contract and extends to breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing—the full extent to which may require a forensic accounting audit.' Trinity 'formed Merit Street as a joint venture and contractually committed to provide valuable services to the joint venture,' according to the complaint. 'But [Trinity] then reneged on its obligations and abused its position as the controlling shareholder of Merit Street to improperly and unilaterally burden Merit Street with unsustainable debt, doing so either without notice or in direct violation of promises not to do so,' the complaint stated, noting that it owes over $100 million to third parties and that Trinity, referred to as 'TBN' in court documents, should be responsible. 4 Merit Street accused Trinity Broadcasting of reneging on its obligations. 4 McGraw agreed to provide Merit Street with new episodes of his 'Dr. Phil Show,' primetime specials and other content. Dr. Phil/YouTube 'The most egregious impact is TBN's conscious and knowing choice to cause Merit Street to lose its national distribution by withholding distribution payments despite repeatedly acknowledging those distribution payments were 100% TBN's sole responsibility. Simply put, as a result of TBN's conduct, Merit Street has nowhere to send its broadcast signal and nowhere to air its programming no matter how great it may be,' the complaint stated. Merit Street bills itself as an organization that 'provides clarity and solutions on the issues and topics that matter most to Americans,' including 'traditional family content,' news, sports, music, true crime and more. 4 President Donald Trump shakes hands with Dr. Phil McGraw during an event in the White House Rose Garden on May 1, 2025. Getty Images The bankruptcy filing lists both estimated assets and liabilities in the $100-$500 million range. Merit Street is seeking damages, legal costs, and 'further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.' Trinity Broadcasting did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Fox News Digital.

Business Insider
12 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Johann Rupert continues to stand out among African billionaires with a recent $3 billion gain
The South African business magnate, Johann Rupert who heads luxury goods holding company Richemont, has emerged as Africa's most impressive billionaire in 2025, according to Bloomberg Billionaires Index data. Johann Rupert, a South African magnate, leads Africa's billionaires in 2025 with a net worth of $17 billion, according to Bloomberg. Rupert's wealth increased by $3.33 billion year-to-date, showcasing robust financial momentum despite market fluctuations. The billionaire's net worth experienced notable changes, reflecting an overall upward trend due to strategic investments. Rupert's net worth is currently $17 billion, up $3.33 billion year to date. His most recent daily change indicates a robust $123 million increase, highlighting the constant momentum his fortune has experienced despite market dips along the way. Johann Rupert's net worth surges thus far Rupert's net worth came in at $13.7 billion at the beginning of 2025, a sum he had maintained for most of the fourth quarter of 2024. However, by mid-February, the millionaire had surprised observers with a roughly $4 billion increase in fortune, bringing his net worth to $17 billion in just over six weeks. While his fortune fluctuated in the following months, it fell to $13.6 billion in March before rebounding to $15.3 billion in April, Rupert's trend has remained generally upward. Bloomberg reported a $1.64 billion year-to-date growth, buoyed by a $97.7 million single-day gain in April. These swings are not uncommon in the world of high finance, but Rupert's recovery and ability to consistently rebound with exponential gains are what make his 2025 story so interesting. Rupert's fortune is heavily influenced by his investment in Compagnie Financière Richemont, the Swiss-based luxury goods conglomerate that controls iconic brands like Cartier and Mont Blanc. The South African billionaire's interests have benefited as global demand for luxury products recovers and Richemont makes digital and strategic pivots. This year, his wealth trajectory has been more than simply raw statistics; it demonstrates strategic corporate endurance in a hard financial context. Johann Rupert has stood out as the anomaly on a continent where few billionaires have enjoyed weak, if not negative, development. With markets still evolving and Richemont expanding its footprint in Asia and the Middle East, the billionaire's net worth could reach new heights before the end of the year.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jane Street Curbed in India After $4.3 Billion Trading Gain
(Bloomberg) -- India's regulator has temporarily barred Jane Street Group LLC from accessing the local securities market for index manipulation, dealing a severe hit to the US firm that allegedly made $4.3 billion in trading gains in the South Asian nation in less than two years. Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing The Securities and Exchange Board of India said it would seize 48.4 billion rupees ($570 million) from Jane Street, which it claimed is the total amount of 'unlawful gains' made by the firm, according to a 105-page interim order by Ananth Narayan, a board member at the regulator, on its website. Jane Street said it disputes the findings. Jane Street is one of the most active foreign players in India, the world's largest derivatives market by contracts traded, and one that has become a magnet for high-frequency trading firms amid a retail investing boom sparked by the pandemic. SEBI's order marks a rare instance of such an action against a foreign entity. The US-based market maker's operations in India came under a global spotlight last year after a court battle with Millennium Management revealed it earned $1 billion trading in Indian equity derivatives. Other details disclosed in the case helped trigger SEBI's investigation, which continued even as the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. earlier this year closed a separate probe into irregular trades by the firm. Jane Street made about 365 billion rupees ($4.3 billion) in overall gain from trading in Indian derivatives and cash market during the period between January 2023 and March 2025, according to the SEBI order. 'SEBI is sending a message to global HFT giants that you are welcome to trade here but if you undertake unfair practices then we also hold a stick,' said Tejas Shah, head of derivatives at Equirus Securities Pvt. 'I would expect some temporary impact on volumes as other HFTs sit back a little.' Shares of Nuvama Wealth Management Ltd., Jane Street's local trading partner, plunged 11% in Mumbai trading, the most in over three months. India's benchmark NSE Nifty 50 Index was down 0.2% while a broader gauge of Asian equities fell 0.3%. SEBI alleged that on weekly index options expiry days, Jane Street used a large amount of funds to influence price action in the futures as well as the cash market — where volumes are relatively low. That allowed it 'to put on significantly larger and profitable positions in the highly liquid index options market by misleading and enticing a large number of smaller individual traders.' The regulator had warned Jane Street to avoid such trading practices as early as January this year, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The investigation found that the trading strategy continued to be used in May, the person said. Curbs Imposed Pending detailed investigation, Jane Street Group entities are immediately 'restrained from accessing the securities market and are further prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities, directly or indirectly,' SEBI said. Banks have been directed to ensure no debits are made without SEBI's permission in respect of the accounts held individually or jointly by the entities, according to the interim order. SEBI also said the restrictions can be lifted if Jane Street deposits the said amount in an escrow account at a designated bank in India. Jane Street disputes the findings of the SEBI interim order and will further engage with the regulator, a representative for the US-based market maker said in a statement. SEBI said the firm can contest the regulator's 'prima facie observations' within 21 days of the receipt of the order. 'This may signal SEBI's growing vigilance and willingness to assert control over foreign institutional activity making hefty gains in its derivatives market —particularly where such strategies blur the line between smart trading and market distortion,' said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo Markets in Singapore. Derivatives Boom Global high-frequency trading and market-making firms from Ken Griffin's Citadel Securities LLC to Optiver have rushed to expand operations in India in recent years as the retail investor-led boom saw options premiums surge 11-fold in the five years to March 2025. Follow Bloomberg India on WhatsApp for exclusive content and analysis on what billionaires, businesses and markets are doing. Sign up here. The retail frenzy has helped foreign funds and local proprietary firms that use algorithms as they pocketed $7 billion in gross profits in the 12 months ended in March 2024, according to a SEBI study. Retail investors, meanwhile, lost an equivalent of $21 billion from trading futures and options in the three years to March 2024., according to the regulator. To protect them, SEBI has since November imposed several restrictions on trading options including higher minimum investment limits and an increase in lot sizes to protect retail traders. The measures have helped cool trading this year. The regulator's action 'will also create a level playing field for everyone especially the local players who were losing a lot of money,' said Shah of Equirus. SEBI also directed Jane Street entities to close out or square off any open positions they may have in exchange-traded derivative contracts within three months from the date of order or at the expiry of such contracts, whichever is earlier. Jane Street is 'committed to operating in compliance with all regulations' in the regions it operates in around the world, the firm said in its statement. 'This is a good move by SEBI, but we need more corrective measures to protect market integrity,' said Deven Choksey, managing director at DRChoksey FinServ Pvt. 'Mechanisms like Algos, HFTs are creating inequalities in the markets. Institutions have an edge.' --With assistance from Lianting Tu, Kurt Schussler, Alex Gabriel Simon, Ashutosh Joshi, Ruchi Bhatia and Russell Ward. (Updates prices in the seventh paragraph.) SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data