The Trump administration dismisses most on a federal board overseeing Puerto Rico's finances
A White House official told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the board 'has been run inefficiently and ineffectively by its governing members for far too long and it's time to restore common sense leadership.'
Those fired are board chairman Arthur Gonzalez, along with Cameron McKenzie, Betty Rosa, Juan Sabater and Luis Ubiñas. The board's two remaining members — Andrew G. Biggs and John E. Nixon — are Republicans.
Sylvette Santiago, a spokesperson for the board, said none of those fired had received notifications ahead of their dismissal.
The board was created in 2016 under the Obama administration, a year after Puerto Rico's government declared it was unable to pay its more than $70 billion public debt load and later filed for the biggest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.
In remarks to the AP, the White House official claimed the board had operated ineffectively and in secret and said it 'shelled out huge sums to law, consulting and lobbying firms.' The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the subject, also accused the board's staff of receiving 'exorbitant salaries.'
The board spokesperson did not return a message seeking additional comment.
Puerto Rico is struggling to restructure more than $9 billion in debt held by the state's Electric Power Authority, with officials holding bitter mediations with creditors demanding full payment.
It's the only Puerto Rico government debt pending a restructuring, with the White House official accusing the board of preferring to 'extend the bankruptcy.'
In February, the board's executive director, Robert Mujica Jr., said it was 'impossible' for Puerto Rico to pay the $8.5 billion that bondholders are demanding. He instead unveiled a new fiscal plan that proposed a $2.6 billion payment for creditors. The plan does not call for any rate increases for an island that has one of the highest power bills in any U.S. jurisdiction as chronic power outages persist, given the grid's weak infrastructure.
Alvin Velázquez, a bankruptcy law professor at Indiana University, said he worries the dismissal of the board members could spark another crisis in Puerto Rico.
'This is really about getting a deal out of (the power company) that is not sustainable for the rate payers of Puerto Rico,' he said.
Velázquez, former chair for the unsecured creditors committee during the bankruptcy proceedings, also questioned if the dismissals are legal, since board members can only be removed for just cause.
'What's the cause?' he said. 'What you're going to see is another instance in which the Trump administration is taking on and testing the courts.'
The dismissals were first reported by the Breitbart News Network, a conservative news site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump's tariffs take effect, potentially upending global trade and prices
President Donald Trump's long-awaited tariffs took effect shortly after the stroke of midnight Thursday, imposing sweeping new taxes on imports that economists say will likely get passed on to U.S. consumers and businesses. Trump has announced frameworks of trade agreements with roughly a dozen of the United States' closest trading partners, including the United Kingdom, the European Union, Japan and South Korea. But goods from nations with which the U.S. does hundreds of billions of dollars of trade, such as India, Switzerland and South Africa, will see new taxes of up to 39 percent, with India's rate set to jump to 50 percent in three weeks. 'We've really just started,' Trump said Wednesday in the Oval Office. 'This is just in its infancy.' The White House has yet to reach full agreements with the U.S.'s three top trading partners. The Trump administration agreed to hold off charging higher rates on merchandise from China and Mexico while negotiations with both countries continue. Trump is charging some Canadian imports a 35 percent tax that took effect Aug. 1. Trump has long held that imposing taxes on trade will improve the nation's grim finances and rebalance relationships with foreign nations that he says are taking advantage of the U.S. He has also used tariffs in recent weeks to try to accomplish foreign policy objectives, dangling threats of new trade barriers to stop skirmishes between Thailand and Cambodia. But consumers often ultimately pay for tariffs through higher prices, even if some of the costs are spread throughout the supply chain. And there are many nations with which the U.S. must trade to secure goods that can't be made or grown at home. Some economists worry that Trump's new trade policy could cause the economy to shrink and rupture certain alliances that domestic producers have relied upon to manufacture cheap goods. A test case could be Apple's iPhones and other consumer electronics, which are assembled at factories predominantly in China and India. The company announced a $100 billion investment Wednesday to produce components, including glass and semiconductors, for those items in the U.S. — in part to avoid tariff rates. Trump said he planned to impose a 100 percent tariff on chips and semiconductors, but those wouldn't apply to firms that are standing up new domestic production facilities. 'If you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge even though you're building, and you're not producing yet,' Trump said in the Oval Office Wednesday afternoon, flanked by Apple CEO Tim Cook. The policy is designed to give firms 'breathing room' to move manufacturing facilities and supply chains to the U.S., similar to the White House's treatment of tariffs on automakers, a Trump administration official said. Trump in April revised his original tax plans on auto imports to relieve manufacturers from the effects of 'stacked' tariffs, or levies that would apply to vehicles, component parts and source materials. 'We're fully cognizant of the fact that you can't set up a factory overnight on something as complicated as semiconductors,' said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. 'This is designed to reflect that and build in some flexibility.' The tariffs that took effect Thursday were delayed by months of back and forth between the Trump administration and dozens of countries as the White House seeks to overhaul the international trade order. On April 2, Trump unveiled sweeping new duties against merchandise from dozens of countries — from the U.S.'s closest allies to minuscule uninhabited Antarctic islands — in an event he dubbed 'Liberation Day.' The highest rates targeted countries where the United States runs a trade deficit, meaning those countries export more to U.S. businesses than they import. The announcement sent shock waves through global markets and threatened to teeter the U.S. economy. Trump swiftly pulled back, delaying the implementation date to Aug. 1, and ordering senior trade and diplomatic officials to swiftly cut agreements in what the White House came to brag would be '90 deals in 90 days.' Last week, hours before the tariffs were set to kick in, the administration said the deadline would be delayed another week to give U.S. Customs and Border Protection more time to prepare to charge the new levies. After 126 days, the administration came up far short of Trump's goal on deals, though the agreements it did achieve — and its additional extensions with Mexico and China — cover the vast majority of the U.S. international goods trade. Those frameworks are far from formal trade deals, which can take decades of negotiations and emerge in binders the size of phone books. Trump has heralded many of the new arrangements via sparse social media posts. 'For sure, this means higher prices,' said Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a left-leaning think tank. 'The question we're all asking is how it's going to be divided between the various middlemen, the direct importer, retailers and the consumers. The history has been most of it is paid by the consumers, and my guess is that will end up being the case this time, as well. But that is up for grabs. We just haven't seen tariffs like this.' Trump imposed most of the import taxes by using economic emergency powers that the White House has claimed without precedent. Those levies face legal challenges, and one trade court has already sided with a group of businesses, states and advocacy organizations that say Trump overstepped his authority to regulate the economy. The administration appealed the ruling, but if more judges agree with the original ruling, much of the administration's nascent trade and foreign policy agenda could be undone overnight. The question seems destined for the Supreme Court, analysts say. Administration officials insist that consumers will feel little impact from Trump's tariffs because foreign manufacturers will eat the cost increase to retain their hold on the U.S. market. But a growing number of companies in recent weeks, including Procter & Gamble, Nike and Hasbro, have said they plan to raise retail prices to compensate for their rising tariff bill. On Wednesday, Weyco Group, which sells shoes under the Florsheim and Nunn Bush brands, said it raised retail prices on July 1 to offset the cost of Trump's import taxes. Before trade tensions soared, Weyco made about three-quarters of its shoes in China. The company beefed up its U.S. inventory before the tariffs on Chinese goods spiked in April. It also squeezed cost reductions from its suppliers in China and shifted some production to Cambodia, Vietnam and India. The fast-changing nature of the president's trade offensive has made it hard to keep pace. As CEO Thomas Florsheim explained the strategy to investors on a quarterly earnings call, news arrived that the president had just raised tariffs on Indian products to 50 percent. 'We're going to have to wait and see what happens with India,' Florsheim said. 'If the Indian tariffs get unmanageable, we're going to have to shift more product back to China.'
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
‘Common Sense' is baffled by the narrative from the left…
'Common Sense' Department: We're baffled by the narrative on the Left that says the Trump administration is trying to silence Mahmoud Khalil…
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
US Offers to ‘Simplify' Harvard Case Over Foreign Student Ban
The Trump administration offered Wednesday to 'simplify' its lawsuit with Harvard University over a proposed ban on international student enrollment as both sides face off in a broader dispute involving billions in frozen federal funding. The shift is the latest twist in litigation over the government's attempt in May to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students, citing claims of campus antisemitism and alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party. A federal judge quickly blocked the move.
