Syngene International Q1 Results: Revenue grows 11% YoY to Rs 790 crore, Net profit jumps 59% YoY
For the quarter, the company's revenue from operations rose 11% year-on-year (YoY) to ₹875 crore, compared to ₹790 crore in Q1 FY25. Reported revenue, including other income, stood at ₹892 crore, up 10% YoY.
Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) came in at ₹224 crore, growing 19% from ₹188 crore last year. The EBITDA margin improved to 25% from 23% YoY, driven by revenue growth and cost optimization.
Net profit (PAT) surged 59% to ₹87 crore from ₹54 crore in the same quarter last year. The PAT margin expanded to 10% from 7% YoY. Key Financials: YoY comparison Metric Q1 FY25 Q1 FY26 YoY Change (%) Revenue from operations (₹ Cr) 790 875 ↑ 11% Reported revenue (₹ Cr) 808 892 ↑ 10% EBITDA (₹ Cr) 188 224 ↑ 19% EBITDA margin (%) 23 25 ↑ 200 bps Net profit (PAT) (₹ Cr) 54 87 ↑ 59% PAT margin (%) 7 10 ↑ 300 bps
Commenting on the results, Peter Bains, Managing Director and CEO, highlighted that the performance was in line with expectations, supported by continued conversion of pilot programs into longer-term contracts in the Research Services business and progress in the Biologics manufacturing division.
Deepak Jain, CFO, noted that the quarter's profitability also benefitted from a tax credit, and the company maintained a strong balance sheet to invest in capabilities and technology.
Other business highlights included the successful completion of USFDA inspections, inauguration of a state-of-the-art peptide laboratory, and recognition by TIME and Statista as one of the world's most sustainable companies.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
9 hours ago
- Business Upturn
IEX hits record electricity trade volume of 12,664 MU, up 25.5% YoY in July 2025
Indian Energy Exchange (IEX), the country's leading electricity trading platform, clocked its highest-ever monthly electricity trade volume in July 2025. The exchange reported a total traded volume of 12,664 million units (MU), including the Term-Ahead and Real-Time Ancillary Services (TRAS), marking a robust 25.5% year-on-year growth. This surge in volumes came even as India's power consumption touched 153.6 billion units (BUs) during the month, as per government data—up 2.6% YoY. Interestingly, despite the higher demand, market clearing prices fell sharply on the back of stronger supply-side liquidity. The Day-Ahead Market (DAM) settled at an average Rs 4.18 per unit, down 16% YoY, while Real-Time Market (RTM) prices dropped 23% YoY to Rs 3.83 per unit. These lower prices provided cost-effective opportunities for Discoms as well as commercial and industrial consumers to meet their power needs through exchange-based procurement. Day-Ahead, Term-Ahead & Real-Time Market Performance The DAM, including HPDAM, recorded 5,510 MU in July 2025, up 9% from July 2024. The RTM achieved its highest-ever monthly volume of 5,109 MU, a sharp 53% YoY rise. The Term-Ahead Market (TAM), including various short-term contracts, traded 917 MU, up 28% YoY. Green Market Trends: G-DAM & G-TAM The Green Market—comprising the Green Day-Ahead Market (G-DAM) and Green Term-Ahead Market (G-TAM)—continued its steady growth. In July 2025, the green segment recorded 1,025 MU, compared to 990 MU in July 2024, posting a 4% YoY increase. The weighted average price in G-DAM stood at Rs 3.91/unit. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Market Update In the two trading sessions held on July 9 and July 30, IEX facilitated trading of 16.26 lakh RECs at a clearing price of Rs 360 per REC. However, the REC trade volume declined by 48% YoY. The next REC trading sessions are scheduled for August 13 and August 27, 2025. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at
Time Magazine
21 hours ago
- Time Magazine
SAP CEO Christian Klein on Building Bridges in the Age of AI
SAP, the 53-year-old German tech giant, builds software for virtually every business function, from supply chain and resource management to finance, sales, and human resources. Its products are used by over 440,000 customers worldwide, including 98 of the world's 100 largest companies. Taken together, its client base generates over 80% of global commerce, according to the company. At the helm sits Christian Klein, 45, who has been at SAP since 1999. 'You can say it's a big minus or a big plus when you're spending your whole career in one company,' he says. 'I started here as a student. And I still know people from back then. We have four generations here working for SAP—it's a company of 110,000 people.' Under Klein's leadership, the company has accelerated its transformation into a cloud-first enterprise, with cloud revenue accounting for over half of its total revenue in the first quarter of 2025. Meanwhile, SAP is embedding AI into its core products with the goal of becoming the "#1 enterprise application and business AI company." SAP is one of the most valuable public companies in Europe and made headlines when it took the top spot in March. Klein spoke with TIME on June 4 about his success as a leader, how AI is changing enterprises, and the difference between power and influence. This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity. What have you changed your mind about since becoming sole CEO in 2020? Our software helps to build bridges and facilitate global trade. We have multinationals in the U.S. and China, in Asia—everywhere—doing global business. Five years ago, when I came into this job, in my perspective of the world everyone was a winner. I saw democratic values in most parts of the world, and said "ah, that will never change." Because I'm still reasonably young and have not lived in times like this, I never thought things could change so fast—at least when it came to global trade. But here we are. I have to deal much more with all of the geopolitics than I had to, say, five years back. That definitely has changed. Why do you think you're good at your job? When you're a CEO, over the years you learn that when you believe "I have the right strategy on a nice PowerPoint—I have written it all down—the rest is just about execution," you're completely wrong. Especially when you're a European company with many stakeholders, you need to think about strategy first from the customer-perspective. Everyone says that [laughs], but you really have to make sure that you're hitting that nail. Otherwise, you could steer the company in a completely wrong direction. You need to make sure everyone—your employees, shareholders, the workers council, and so on—is excited, committed, and passionate about strategy and where you're leading the company. You have to be a bridge builder: to make sure everyone is involved and understands the strategy, and everyone is moving in the same direction. Otherwise, things can fall apart very easily. In your May CEO address, you said we can think of AI agents as 'digital coworkers.' If AI agents can robustly function as digital coworkers in the near-future, why hire humans at all? Here's an example: we just had financial earnings at SAP. Now, AI gives me certain simulations and predictions on how the year could end, given all of the trade conflicts and the uncertainty out there in the market. Would I fully trust AI to say "this is how you should put out your financial guidance for the rest of the year?" No: I still feel we need a human being at the end of the chain who can make slight adjustments, incorporating their past experience. Or think about selling software. When you are traveling the world, the cultures are so different. When I walk into a customer meeting in Japan, it's different from walking into a customer meeting in Germany or the U.S. AI can give me a beautiful sales pitch or a great demo, but at the end it's human beings who need to understand how to position it, how to emotionally talk about it, particularly across different cultures. And I don't see an AI yet that is able to do that—at least not better than a human being. You point to emotional connection and cultural understanding. AI is already highly-persuasive and can understand emotional nuance. A key limit is that current AI systems lose coherence over long time periods. If that changes—and the same system can run for months or years at a time—do you still think AI won't be able to do these parts of the job? You're right, emotional intelligence will get better and better. No doubt about that. But at the end of the day, there needs to be someone in the company you can hold accountable. I don't want to see SAP in the headlines, with a customer saying "I relied only on SAP AI agents to close my books or to run my supply chain, and they completely screwed it up. Despite AI doing 99% good work, it didn't play out as expected.' Ultimately, I'm convinced there must be some human beings still in the mix. Do I expect to need the same amount of developers, salespeople, and consultants in the future? Definitely not with the job profiles that they have today. But do I still need other jobs that are coming up—more data scientists? More people thinking about the future of the industry? Yes, absolutely. It would be an illusion to believe AI will help and drive more productivity, but the workforce will still look the same. That will be absolutely not the case. But I also can't imagine a workforce only with digital workers. Can you imagine a scenario where in five years time, 90% of your workforce is gone, so you have closer to 10,000 employees than 100,000? Oh, that is tough. In certain job profiles, I can absolutely see they can be 60% to 70% digital. In others, for example, take audit: Of course, you have policies as a company, but with every policy—for example, the E.U. Data Act, which I don't like so much—there is always a gray zone. You ask five lawyers and five large language modules about interpretation—does this contract adhere to the E.U. Data Act?—and you get different answers. It's like when you have issues with your back and you ask five doctors, and they come with five different root causes. These things will still exist. So in these jobs, I don't believe that there will be only digital workers. In other jobs, I definitely see a much higher share. It really depends on the job profile. Do you think you'll live to see an AI system do every part of your job? Part of it. I need to make a lot of decisions every day. They are sometimes pretty logical decisions, where you just look at the facts. But sometimes there are tough decisions you have to make using your emotional intelligence. There are certain market trends which may not be captured by the facts, but you talk to people, to other stakeholders, and you make a different decision. So I don't believe that a CEO can be purely digital in the future. Sometimes you're still making decisions based on your gut feeling. What are the biggest bottlenecks to enterprise adoption of AI? In the enterprise world, where we are setting up our agents, you need 100% accuracy. So for example Joule, our digital assistant, cannot mess around with compliance checks on travel and on sourcing, or on directing the flow of materials. People are betting their jobs and their companies on our software and on AI. This needs 100% accuracy: if you as a tech company don't understand the business process—if you don't have the data or you can't access all of it—that is a big issue. This is a big obstacle for many companies: understanding how to apply the technology. The good position of SAP is: we are running these business processes, we know the rules and workflows, we have the data. Others who are more on the infrastructure and hardware layer… they don't have the business context. They're missing the data. Is accuracy the biggest challenge? Or are there others? The second piece is on data. Every company you walk into has their data siloes: there have been trends with collecting data and creating data lakes, but no one has solved the problem of making all the data match. And when it doesn't fit, AI can't do magic immediately to say, "I 100% understand how this data fits together and I can correlate it to produce good results for the company." The third piece involves regulation, which often kills innovation before it gets started. Certain parts of the world need to be careful to not only see risk, risk, risk with regard to AI, but also the upside for the economy. What do you think is the appropriate regulatory framework for AI? Here's my pragmatic view. In the European Union—it's good that we have a union, I'm all in for it—we have AI regulation in many member states, and then the E.U. puts another regulation on top. The result is confusion, different interpretations, and before companies or startups can use the technology to race against others in the world, it's already game over. That is the problem. I'd say: have one framework for all of Europe, and then give some freedom within this framework, especially when you are early in the development and testing cycle—you cannot do harm in this early phase. Of course, the moment when you bring it to market and to scale, there must be regulation. But don't regulate the technology! Regulate the outcome, so AI is unfolding in the right way in the chemical industry, the automotive industry, the defense industry. But don't regulate the technology, because then you regulate technological innovation, which is never good. You need to see you are not living on an island here in Europe. All of these tech players—we are the only large tech player in Europe, but there are many startups—there is competition everywhere, and we cannot give these companies and startups a disadvantage when it comes to speed of innovation just by over-regulating. If you were 22 today, fresh out of university, what would you do? At 22, I still wanted to become a professional skier. I would try it again. It's my passion. I love to be in the mountains, I love to ski, and I'd try to turn that passion into a profession. So you wouldn't set out to become a CEO? I wasn't planning to become the CEO when I was 22 years old. That goal developed over time. I don't like it when you're too early on, saying "I need to be the CEO." I'm more on the 'first deliver' side: prove yourself, prove that you can work in and deliver great results as a team, and the rest will follow. It was only when I became the chief operating officer of SAP, and I considered our transformation into a cloud company, that I developed the goal of becoming CEO. We had a strategy, and the software was instrumental for that. But I saw it was not only a piece of technology which would make transformation work. It's also an understanding of the culture, and the tone from the top. You need to understand: where do you want to go with your company? Do you want to be a cloud-pure SaaS company, or do you want to still be a legacy? What does it take? Then you can connect software and technology and AI to it. So it was only around 2017 that I thought, 'oh, I could be the CEO of SAP. I have a vision for this company on how to move it into the next century. It probably sounds a little bit odd, but it's not the power and the responsibility that drew me to the role. It was about: 'you can influence a lot of things to create a great future for SAP.' I saw how we worked and what was needed. What do you think distinguishes power and influence? Becoming a CEO and believing that now you're making a decision, and you have the power, so everyone will just follow, is probably the biggest mistake you can make. You can put a lot of policies in place, you can put more pressure, but people will not just automatically follow. You need to over-communicate in times of change to convince people. When we did this drastic change and our share price collapsed five years back, I couldn't just say, "Oh, now we did it. The strategy is clear. I have the power now to tell you exactly what to do." You need to influence people. You need to convince them. (To receive weekly emails of conversations with the world's top CEOs and decisionmakers, click here.)
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Freeze-Drying Equipment Market to Worth Over US$ 5,087.49 Million By 2033
The market is defined by a dual engine: high-value biologics demanding precision and consumer food trends driving industrial scale. Both urgently seek technological innovation to slash long, energy-intensive cycles and boost process efficiency across all segments. Chicago, Aug. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The global freeze-drying equipment market was valued at US$ 3,031.67 million in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 5,087.49 million by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 5.71% during the forecast period 2025–2033. The global freeze-drying equipment market is currently in a state of hyper-expansion, fueled by a massive influx of capital. Hundreds of millions in investments, from $30 million dedicated plants to €250 million CDMO facilities, are being deployed to meet intense demand. This demand stems from both the high-value pharmaceutical sector and exploding consumer markets, particularly premium pet food and nutraceuticals. This has ignited a dynamic global landscape where the manufacturing scale of the Asia-Pacific region is strategically pitted against the high-value innovation and R&D hubs of North America and Europe. Download Sample Pages: Parallel to this physical growth, the current scenario is defined by a technological arms race. The competitive focus has shifted decisively to intelligent manufacturing, integrating AI, Process Analytical Technology (PAT), and continuous processing into next-generation equipment. The strategic goal is to slash cycle times, reduce significant energy consumption, and ensure flawless GMP compliance. This intense push for automated, data-driven lyophilization is fundamentally boosting profitability and rapidly redefining industry standards, separating market leaders from followers. Key Findings in Freeze-Drying Equipment Market Market Forecast (2033) US$ 5,087.49 million CAGR 5.71% Largest Region (2024) Asia Pacific (43.22%) By Equipment Type Tray-style freeze dryers (37.50%) By Operation Industrial freeze dryers (51.71%) By Capacity 10-150 Kg (30.10%) By Application Food Processing and Packaging (43.72%) Top Drivers Commercial necessity to stabilize high-value, large-molecule drugs and biologics. "Clean label" consumer movement demanding nutrition without any chemical preservatives. Pharma's asset-light strategy outsourcing capital-intensive lyophilization to specialized CDMOs Top Trends Advanced cycle modeling and PAT to slash energy-intensive run times. Engineering shift from traditional batch systems to continuous manufacturing lines. Expansion into preserving live microbial cultures for the probiotic industry. Top Challenges High failure risk when scaling complex cycles from lab to production. Ensuring sterility at the automated loading/unloading isolator interface. Intense energy consumption creating prohibitive long-term operational cost barriers. Strategic Capital Injections and Expansions Signal a Bullish Market Outlook The confidence of key players is a leading indicator of market health, and recent capital flows are overwhelmingly positive. Analysis of strategic initiatives shows a clear trend toward capacity expansion to meet forecasted demand. A prime example is IMA Life North America's US$ 30 million investment in a new Tonawanda, New York, manufacturing facility in May 2024, a move aimed squarely at bolstering its pharmaceutical freeze-drying equipment output. This investment momentum is also potent in the food sector, where Turkish producer Pol's has invested in a new 4,000-square-meter factory. Underscoring this North American and European trend, Parker Freeze Dry inaugurated a substantial 130,000-square-foot manufacturing plant in South Dakota in January 2024. The tangible impact of such expansions is evident in Pol's projected annual production increase from 200 tonnes to 300 tonnes. These corporate actions are a direct response to the lucrative freeze-drying equipment market, which was estimated to be worth US$ 1012 million in 2024. Technological Innovation and Automation Emerge as Key Competitive Differentiators In a rapidly evolving freeze-drying equipment market, technological superiority is a critical success factor. The competitive landscape is being reshaped by relentless innovation, with automation and efficiency at the forefront. A forward-looking collaboration between NJM and MAQUINARIA INDUSTRIAL DARA, SL, will see the launch of the new Dara coolvaccum line in July 2025. GEA's introduction of the RAY® Plus series in October 2024 offers unprecedented scalability, with cabinet sizes from 45 to 180 square meters and the capability to integrate up to six cabinets into a single system. This system's performance, achieving a sublimation rate over 3 kilograms per square meter per hour, sets a new industry benchmark. For the R&D segment, VFL Science Private Limited launched the Penguin Classic laboratory freeze dryer in December 2024, featuring a modern 7-inch touchscreen. The push for smarter systems is evident in IMA Life's February 2024 introduction of a modular platform for continuous aseptic manufacturing and Telstar's January 2024 integration of advanced SCADA systems for enhanced real-time monitoring. Performance innovation is seen in products like the Buchi Lyovapor L-300, which can reach -105°C, while sustainability is addressed by GEA's LYOAIR® system using 100 percent natural refrigerants. GEA's prototype atmospheric spray-drying technology shows the potential to slash energy use by nearly 50%. Automation is delivering tangible ROI, with potential operational cost reductions of up to 20% and energy savings of 15–30%. The integration of digitalization and energy-efficient components is now a standard expectation in the market. Pharmaceutical and Biotech Demands Underpin Robust Valuations and Future Growth The biopharmaceutical sector remains the cornerstone of the freeze-drying equipment market, driven by the critical need to stabilize vaccines, biologics, and other high-value parenteral drugs. Market valuation data confirms this segment's impact; the global market was valued at US$ 2.08 billion in 2023 and is projected to climb to US$ 2.44 billion in 2024. Forecasts for 2025 vary, with one analysis pointing to US$ 2.29 billion and another, highly optimistic projection suggesting a value of US$ 55,630.4 million. The long-term growth trajectory is undeniably strong, with a 2032 forecast of US$ 8.4 billion. The broader lyophilization equipment market, which includes related services, was valued at US$ 7.94 billion in 2024. From a segment perspective, industrial-scale equipment is dominant, contributing more than 89% of the market share in 2024, with the tray-style freeze dryers segment projected for significant future growth. Merging Market Segments: Nutraceuticals, Pet Food, and R&D Applications Future growth for the freeze-drying equipment market is being strategically unlocked by diversifying into high-value emerging segments where consumer demand is exploding. The projected surge of the freeze-dried pet food market from US$18,250.07 million in 2024 to US$29,589.7 million by 2034 represents a systemic shift towards human-grade pet nutrition that necessitates major investment in new industrial-scale equipment. Similarly, the nutraceuticals sector, with a projected CAGR of 6.5% through 2025, creates a lucrative niche for specialized machinery capable of preserving the bioactivity of sensitive, high-value ingredients. For equipment manufacturers, these trends are a clear mandate to innovate and supply tailored solutions that capture the immense potential of these rapidly expanding, high-margin consumer markets. Simultaneously, the R&D sector functions as the critical incubator for this future commercial pipeline in the freeze-drying equipment market. The introduction of advanced lab-scale models like the Penguin Classic in December 2024 is a strategic move to embed a manufacturer's technology at the very inception of product development. A deeper analysis of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) in this segment reveals a dual dynamic. For research institutions, ongoing costs—from $25 to $40 for vacuum pump oil to $60 for a door seal or over $300 for a refrigeration system—make long-term reliability a key purchasing factor. For equipment suppliers, this creates a vital and predictable aftermarket revenue stream through service and consumables, ensuring customer value beyond the initial sale. Food and Beverage Sector Demand Creates Significant Market Penetration Opportunities The food and beverage industry represents a high-growth vector for the freeze-drying equipment market, as consumer demand for clean-label, long-shelf-life products intensifies. The market for the end products is projected to expand by an impressive US$ 43.87 billion between 2024 and 2028, with the fruit segment currently dominating. This directly translates to equipment demand across all scales. A home-use Stay Fresh unit has a capacity of 18 pounds of fresh food, while commercial models like the Parker 2 can process 500 pounds per batch. At the industrial level, the Parker 6 handles up to 1500 pounds of wet material. The efficiency of smaller units is also notable, with a medium home dryer capable of removing 0.5 liters of moisture per hour, showcasing the technology's scalability. Total Cost of Ownership Analysis: Unpacking Operational and Energy Metrics A comprehensive assessment of the freeze-drying equipment market must include an analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO), where energy consumption and operational efficiency are paramount. At the consumer level, the average electricity cost for a single cycle is around $2.88. A medium home unit's freezing cycle operates between 350-400 watts for 4 to 12 hours, consuming 1 to 4 kWh. Pre-freezing food for just 1 hour can reduce this to 0.5 kWh. The main drying cycle, peaking at 1100-1300 watts, takes about 16 hours for an 8-pound batch and consumes 12 kWh. The 7-hour final drying cycle adds another 6 kWh. Overall, a home unit uses 5 to 10 kWh per cycle. In stark contrast, the industrial Parker 2 consumes 730 kWh per 16-hour cycle, and the Parker 6 uses 998 kWh in the global freeze-drying equipment market. Average power consumption ranges from 750-1000 watts for home units, 1500 watts for medium commercial dryers, and can exceed 2000 watts for industrial systems. With a complete cycle taking 20 to 40 hours, these metrics are critical for calculating long-term operational expenditure. Extended Shelf-Life Remains a Core Value Proposition Driving Market Adoption The fundamental benefit of lyophilization—preservation—remains a powerful and enduring market driver. The ability to extend the shelf life of food products to 25 to 30 years under proper storage conditions is a compelling value proposition for consumers focused on emergency preparedness and waste reduction. Furthermore, commercially produced freeze-dried meals are consistently rated to last for up to 25 years. This unique selling proposition ensures a stable and growing demand base, from individual households to large-scale food manufacturers, providing a solid foundation for the market. Explore the Report Before You Buy – Book a Walkthrough: A Regional Analysis of the Dynamic Global Freeze-Drying Equipment Market A geographical breakdown reveals distinct centers of gravity and growth within the global market. The Asia-Pacific region has solidified its position as the market leader, commanding a 35.4% share in 2024. This dominance is actively supported by government bodies across several Asian nations that are providing incentives and investing in the technology to spur industrial development. North America, however, remains a critical and mature market, holding a substantial share of over 42% in 2024. Within this region, the United States is the primary engine of growth, accounting for a remarkable 88.90% of the total North American market, a testament to its advanced pharmaceutical and food processing infrastructure. Global Freeze Drying Equipment Market Major Players: Azbil Corporation Buchi Corporation GEA Group Harvest Right Cuddon Freeze Dry Harvest Right Hitachi, Ltd. Labconco IMA SpA Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH Millrock Technology, Inc. Optima Packaging Group GmbH Shanghai Tofflon Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Scala Scientific SP Industries Syntegon Senovatec Freeze Drying Systems Pvt. Ltd. ULVAC Inc. ZIRBUS technology GmbH Key Market Segmentation: By Equipment Type Bench-top freeze-dryers Tray-style freeze dryers Manifold freeze dryers Rotary freeze dryers Mobile freeze dryers Parts & Accessories By Operation Industrial freeze dryers Commercial freeze dryers Laboratory freeze dryers Pilot scale freeze dryers By Capacity <10 Kg 10-150 Kg 151-500 kg 501-1000 kg >1000 Kg By Application Biotechnology Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Food Processing and Packaging Dairy Vegetable & Meat Nutraceuticals Other Farm & Agri products Healthcare/ Medical Others (Research, Preservation) By Region North America Europe Asia Pacific Middle East Africa South America Need a Customized Version? Request It Now: About Astute Analytica Astute Analytica is a global market research and advisory firm providing data-driven insights across industries such as technology, healthcare, chemicals, semiconductors, FMCG, and more. We publish multiple reports daily, equipping businesses with the intelligence they need to navigate market trends, emerging opportunities, competitive landscapes, and technological advancements. With a team of experienced business analysts, economists, and industry experts, we deliver accurate, in-depth, and actionable research tailored to meet the strategic needs of our clients. At Astute Analytica, our clients come first, and we are committed to delivering cost-effective, high-value research solutions that drive success in an evolving marketplace. Contact Us:Astute AnalyticaPhone: +1-888 429 6757 (US Toll Free); +91-0120- 4483891 (Rest of the World)For Sales Enquiries: sales@ Follow us on: LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube CONTACT: Contact Us: Astute Analytica Phone: +1-888 429 6757 (US Toll Free); +91-0120- 4483891 (Rest of the World) For Sales Enquiries: sales@ Website: in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
