‘Good news': Australians tipped to be $125k better off in retirement
The average young Australian is tipped to be $125,000 better off in their retirement simply by staying in the workforce, a major superannuation fund reveals.
Australian Retirement Trust says the rise in the superannuation guarantee over the last five years is 'good news' for Australian workers who will have more in their retirement nest egg.
Under changes to the superannuation guarantee proposed by the Rudd government and enacted by the Morrison government, every working Aussies superannuation rate automatically went from 9.5 to 12.00 per cent.
The changes were brought in incrementally, up 0.5 per cent a year, with the final change starting from July 1 2025.
According to the Australian Retirement Trust this five year plan will now see a 30-year old earning $100,000 retire with an additional $125,000 when they finish up their careers.
Australian retirement trust executive general manager for advocacy and impact, Anne Fuchs, said the boost to the SG rate is good news for all working Australians.
'This half per cent step may seem small, but for working Australians, it's like reaching the summit of your own financial Everest,' Mrs Fuchs said.
'Since the Superannuation Guarantee was introduced in 1992, it has become the cornerstone of Australia's retirement system – evolving from a modest 3 per cent contribution to a robust framework that provides you with meaningful savings for your future.'
Separate research from the Association of Superannuation Funds said the increase from to 12 per cent will mean the median 30-year old worker making $75,000 a year will add about $20,000 to their superannuation balance by the time they retire.
This $20,000 increase will mean the median 30-year old will retire with $610,000 in superannuation, above the $53,383 a year or $595,000 they would need for a comfortable retirement.
Couples should fare even better.
ASFA says a couple requires $73,875 a year or $690,000 combined in total to live comfortably in retirement using their super plus age pension top-ups.
The major caveat to these figures for singles and couples is owning your own home by retirement.
Check your superannuation rate
While the rate of change might seem small, Australian Retirement Trust urges Aussies to check their superannuation rate.
According to survey data by the super fund four out of every five Australians don't know how much they've put away for retirement, while only one in five can correctly identify the current superannuation guarantee.
'Whether you're just starting your career or nearing retirement, understanding these changes can help you make smarter financial decisions,' Ms Fuchs said.
'As we look towards our own retirement savings, we should also look towards ensuring the Superannuation Guarantee is fit-for-purpose as our nation ages and grows.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
Retired publican lists $12m luxury apartment
A retired publican has listed his luxury $12m apartment in a luxury Elizabeth Bay block full of big hitters. Ken Thompson, who sold his Blues Point Hotel to former Qantas chief Geoff Dixon for $6m more than a decade ago, has owned the three-bedroom, three-bathroom apartment with double parking and harbour views in the exclusive 'One Onslow' building since paying $5.05m off-the-plan in 2007. He's now listed it with BresicWhitney's Romany Brooks, hot on the heels of her selling a luxury penthouse to fashion icon Collette Dinnigan for about $7.2m in the nearby Tradewinds block alongside principal Shannan Whitney. MORE: Security guard sells apartment he won in lottery MORE:Lowes heir soaks up $24m pay day Brooks says Thompson's apartment is well-priced, compared with other newer buildings nearby that have recently sold for as much as $60,000 per sq m. 'I feel that around $40,000 per sq m, this delivers the scale downsizers are seeking and delivers on value,' Brooks says. She has deliberately chosen to market the apartment for sale without styling it. 'It has 3m ceilings and is 302sqm, I want buyers to feel the scale,' she said. 'Buyers being able to experience it unfurnished highlights the opportunity for them to create something special and showcases the quality finishes.' MORE: 2025 house price record broken twice in a week Thompson moved out of the second-floor apartment, which sits directly above the one Aussie Home Loans founder John Symond bought for $4.1m in 2011, after the death of his beloved wife, Elizabeth, and it's recently been rented out to the Canadian embassy at $5000 per week Other famous owners in the nine-unit boutique block include Joanna McNiven, widow of businessman John McNiven, who bought in for $9.7m in 2011 and mining entrepreneur Nick Curtis and his wife, Angela. Symond initially owned three units in the block, but sold two of them in 2018, including the sub-penthouse to the Curtises for $7.25m. Rosanna Hindmarsh, the wife of Canberra's construction industry boss John Hindmarsh, sold the penthouse for $20m in 2021 to businessman and philanthropist Thomas Yim and his wife, Denise. It had been Hindmarsh's construction firm that built the block. MORE: Billionaire chicken heiress's record breaking sale
West Australian
39 minutes ago
- West Australian
WA Budget 2025: Opposition calls for rethink on payroll tax as companies feel the pressure
Shadow treasurer Sandra Brewer has called on the Cook Government to reform payroll tax after it was left untouched in this week's State budget. Ms Brewer said the Government should look at either increasing the threshold to have to pay the tax or to lower the rate of the tax itself. Despite the call, she did not have a suggestion on how much to change either number by. Ms Brewer said the pleas from businesses had been falling on deaf ears. 'Industry associations and employer groups have been asking for a higher threshold and a lower rate to be more competitive with other Australian states for years now, but the government doesn't listen,' she said. 'The opposition is open to listening to all views on payroll tax but we encourage the government to use their parliamentary power and their record receipts of royalties and taxes to look at reforming this tax.' Currently, business with wages of more than $1 million pay payroll tax, with the rate increasing progressively through to business with wages of more than $7.5 million where the full rate of 5.5 per cent is applied. According to the Budget, the payroll tax raised $5.88 billion in the 2024-25 financial year and is tipped to rise to $6.15 billion in 2025-26. By 2028-29, the revenue raised by the tax is expected to surpass $7 billion. Surveying business Vision Surveys Consulting owner Jay Sidhu said he was feeling the pinch from payroll tax. 'Payroll tax is just an unnecessary burden to businesses, especially businesses like us in an economy like this where we're trying to hire more staff,' he said. 'It's being that hindrance for us to even look at potentially hiring more people, it's something that we have to consider very strongly before we actually think of growing sustainably.' Ms Brewer also linked the tax to the current housing shortfall, saying the tax disincentivized construction businesses from growing, limiting its capacity. 'I'm constantly approached by businesses who are finding the rising costs of doing business extremely difficult, and payroll tax is just another cost,' she said. 'It has to be passed on to clients or consumers and that contributes to everything going up. 'We see it particularly in small businesses that are working in the housing sector they have enormous costs and payroll tax is another burden that needs to be passed on to, ultimately, the home buyer.' A State Government spokesperson said taxes were being constantly monitored. 'Our Government continually monitors its tax settings, including payroll tax, to ensure our tax system is fair and competitive with other jurisdictions,' they said. 'It's important to note more than 90 per cent of WA's 235,000 businesses don't pay payroll tax — only larger businesses, and in recent years we've seen incredibly strong growth in business investment. 'Our government has delivered a range of tax reforms to support businesses and reduce red tape, including the biggest increase in the payroll tax threshold in more than two decades in 2020 when we increased the payroll tax exemption by $150,000. 'This provided a payroll tax cut to about 70 per cent of payroll tax paying businesses, including around 1000 that were no longer required to pay payroll tax.'
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Will the tech behind the teen social media ban work? These questions remain unanswered
Technologies to enforce the Australian government's social media ban for under 16s are "private, robust and effective". That's according to the preliminary findings of a federal government-commissioned trial that has nearly finished testing them. The findings, released on Friday, may give the government greater confidence to forge ahead with the ban, despite a suite of expert criticism. They might also alleviate some of the concerns of the Australian population about privacy and security implications of the ban, which is due to start in December. For example, a report based on a survey of nearly 4,000 people and released by the government earlier this week found nine out of 10 people support the idea of a ban. But it also found a large number of people were "very concerned" about how the ban would be implemented. Nearly 80 per cent of respondents had privacy and security concerns, while roughly half had concerns about age assurance accuracy and government oversight. The trial's preliminary findings paint a rosy picture of the potential for available technologies to check people's ages. However, they contain very little detail about specific technologies, and appear to be at odds with what we know about age-assurance technology from other sources. The social media ban for under-16s was legislated in December 2024. A last-minute amendment to the law requires technology companies to provide "alternative age assurance methods" for account holders to confirm their age, rather than relying only on government-issued ID. The Australian government commissioned an independent trial to evaluate the "effectiveness, maturity, and readiness for use" of these alternative methods. The trial is being led by the Age Check Certification Scheme — a company based in the United Kingdom that specialises in testing and certifying identity verification systems. It includes 53 vendors that offer a range of age assurance technologies to guess people's ages, using techniques such as facial recognition and hand-movement recognition. According to the preliminary findings of the trial, "age assurance can be done in Australia". The trial's project director, Tony Allen, said "there are no significant technological barriers" to assuring people's ages online. He added the solutions are "technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services and can support the safety and rights of children online". However, these claims are hard to square with other evidence. On Thursday, the ABC reported the trial found face-scanning technologies "repeatedly misidentified" children as young as 15 as being in their 20s and 30s. These tools could only guess children's ages "within an 18-month range in 85 per cent of cases". This means a 14-year-old child might gain access to a social media account, while a 17-year-old might be blocked. This is in line with results of global trials of face-scanning technologies conducted for more than a decade. An ongoing series of studies of age estimation technology by the United States' National Institute of Standards and Technology shows the algorithms "fail significantly when attempting to differentiate minors" of various ages. The tests also show that error rates are higher for young women compared to young men. Error rates are also higher for people with darker skin tones. These studies show that even the best age-estimation software currently available — Yoti — has an average error of 1.0 years. Other software options mistake someone's age by 3.1 years on average. This means, at best, a 16-year-old might be estimated to be 15 or 17 years old; at worst, they could be seen to be 13 or 19 years of age. These error rates mean a significant number of children under 16 could access social media accounts despite a ban being in place, while some over 16 could be blocked. Yoti also explains businesses needing to check exact ages (such as 18) can set higher age thresholds (such as 25), so fewer people under 18 get through the age check. This approach would be similar to that taken in Australia's retail liquor sector, where sales staff verify ID for anyone who appears to be under the age of 25. However, many young people lack the government-issued ID required for an additional age check. It's also worth remembering that in August 2023, the Australian government acknowledged that the age assurance technology market was "immature" and could not yet meet key requirements, such as working reliably without circumvention and balancing privacy and security. We don't yet know exactly what methods platforms will use to verify account holders' ages. While face-scanning technologies are often discussed, they could use other methods to confirm age. The government trial also tested voice and hand movements to guess young people's ages. But those methods also have accuracy issues. And it's not yet clear what recourse people will have if their age is misidentified. Will parents be able to complain if children under 16 gain access to accounts, despite restrictions? Will older Australians who are incorrectly blocked be able to appeal? And if so, to whom? There are other outstanding questions. What's stopping someone who's under 16 from getting someone who is over 16 to set up an account on their behalf? To mitigate this risk, the government might require all social media users to verify their age at regular intervals. It's also unclear what level of age estimation error the government may be willing to accept in implementing a social media ban. The legislation says technology companies must demonstrate they have taken "reasonable steps" to prevent under-16s from holding social media accounts. What is considered "reasonable" is yet to be clearly defined. Australians will have to wait until later this year for the full results of the government's trial to be released, and to know how technology companies will respond. With less than six months until the ban comes into effect, social media users still don't have all the answers they need. Lisa M. Given is a professor of information sciences and director of the Social Change Enabling Impact Platform at RMIT University.
