G.O.P. Toils to Find Votes for Policy Bill as Senate Prepares to Debate
The Senate on Sunday moved toward a debate on the embattled Republican tax cuts and domestic policy bill, as G.O.P. leaders toiled to build enough support in their own ranks to push it through before a Fourth of July deadline set by President Trump.
Democrats who are unified against the measure protested its consideration by forcing Senate clerks to read the 940-page bill aloud, a maneuver that delayed the debate and was likely push any major votes to Monday. But even as the endgame drew nearer for the legislation, which would extend tax cuts first enacted in 2017 and exact steep cuts in Medicaid and nutrition assistance programs to help pay for them, continued to change.
The Senate official who enforces the chamber's rules determined that two last-minute provisions — added on Saturday to benefit Alaska and Hawaii and help secure the vote of Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska — violate Senate rules and would likely need to be dropped from the bill, according to an aide.
Those provisions were crucial to winning the support of Ms. Murkowski on the initial procedural vote that narrowly passed late Saturday night on a 51-49 vote, with two Republicans and all Democrats opposed. It was uncertain whether she would still back the legislation if those sweeteners were dropped.
The ruling by the chamber official, the Senate parliamentarian, involved a special boost to the states' Medicaid payment rates and one to the prices Medicare pays hospitals in those states for some medical services.
Adding to the uncertainty around the measure were new estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which showed that it would pile at least $3.3 trillion to the already-bulging national debt over a decade, nearly $1 trillion more than the House-passed version. That could pose big problems for the measure in the House, which must give it final approval and where fiscal hawks have warned that the price tag of the measure must not rise.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Thom Tillis, key Republican holdout on Trump's tax bill, won't seek reelection
Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a key holdout on President Donald Trump's sweeping legislation on taxes, Medicaid, border resources and more, will not seek reelection. Tillis, first elected to the Senate in 2014, said it was "not a hard choice" and that leaders who want bipartisan solutions have become an "endangered species" in Washington. "As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven't exactly been excited about running for another term. That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home." "It's not a hard choice and I will not be seeking re-election," he said in the statement. Tillis hinted that he may break from Republicans and Trump again in the coming year and a half. "I look forward to having the pure freedom to call the balls and strikes as I see fit," he said in the statement. The Republican's seat in battleground North Carolina was already a top target for Senate Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. He faced a potentially brutal fight to keep the seat as the left pushed to reclaim control of the chamber. After Tillis voted against advancing the GOP's massive domestic policy bill June 28, Trump threatened to embrace potential primary challengers in a series of social media posts. 'Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!' Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social. Tillis said June 28 that he could not support the bill because of it's expected impacts on Medicaid and rural hospitals. 'I did my homework on behalf of North Carolinians, and I cannot support this bill in its current form. It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities,' Tillis' statement read. 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population,' he added The House approved significant changes to Medicaid that were expected to save at least $625 billion − potentially causing 7.6 million Americans over the next decade to lose health insurance. The Senate sought even deeper cuts, and lawmakers are expected to vote on the push early June 30.
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
We Shouldn't Have Billionaires, Mamdani Says
Zohran Mamdani, who campaigned for mayor on the theme of making New York City more affordable, said in a major national television interview that during a time of rising inequality, 'I don't think we should have billionaires.' Mr. Mamdani, the likely winner of the Democratic primary for mayor of New York, said in an appearance on 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that more equality is needed across the city, state and country, and that he looked forward to working 'with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them.' At the same time, Mr. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, asserted that he is not a communist, a response to an attack from President Trump. 'I have already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am — ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for,' Mr. Mamdani said. But one question he continued to sidestep was whether he would denounce the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' after he declined to condemn it during a podcast interview before the primary. The slogan is a rallying cry for liberation among Palestinians and their supporters, but many Jews consider it a call to violence invoking resistance movements of the 1980s and 2000s. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
Colorado bar owner settles with former employees over sexual harassment allegations
The owner of a Greeley bar who allegedly spoke about female job applicants as unsuitable for hiring because they were "too ugly" or "not f***able" agreed to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit that was filed by six former employees. James Jennings will pay $100,000 to the group, according to terms of the agreement. The former employees accused Jennings of creating an overtly sexual and hostile workplace environment at Starlite Station, a Western-themed bar and dance hall which opened in November 2018. Their lawsuit, led by attorneys at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, claimed often touched female employees with their permission, pursued relationships with female employees, and pressured female employees to let him sleep at their home. "Unwelcome comments, unwelcome touching, the owner of the business touching women, making comments about female employees' breasts, buttocks, sex stereotypes," said Nathan Foster, a trial attorney with the EEOC, after the lawsuit's filing. "Our complaint alleges that that's a problem not only for the women who were talked about and who were discriminated against, but also for the male employees who didn't want to work an environment where that was the norm." CBS Jennings allegedly made inappropriate comments about some potential female employees being "too ugly" or "not f***able" to certain male employees. He also tried to engage the male employees in discussions about their sex lives. Those conversations included inquiries into whether the male employees were sleeping with any of the female employees. Foremost among the men who objected was Gary DeJohn, the manager hired by Jennings to get the business launched. "I stood up for women that needed to be stood up for," DeJohn said. "It was incredibly hard to deal with. There were times that I - the one with expertise - quit. I told him I wasn't going to put up with it. He actually fired himself when I quit." But Jennings went back on that promise and returned weeks later, DeJohn said. "It wasn't about money. It wasn't about being a business," DeJohn added. "I wasn't going to have my staff there drinking after hours and then sleeping there. That was a problem almost immediately." The EEOC complaint states Jennings had sex after hours at the bar with an intoxicated female employee who had no ability to consent. The Greeley Police Department investigated the 2019 incident and filed no charges against him. The EEOC, however, claims the encounter was captured on a security camera in Jennings's office. Further, a number of employees were told by Jennings in "counseling memos" they had violated company policy by opposing his conduct. The female employee was subsequently terminated when she refused to sign company documents related to the sexual encounter, per the EEOC complaint. The business temporarily lost its liquor license two months after the incident. Another of the former female employees in the EEOC complaint believed she was fired from her position for refusing to have a sexual relationship with Jennings, according to a court document. CBS Two Starlite employees who were not part of the lawsuit backed the sexual harassment allegations in it. Jennings's sexual overtones, they told CBS Colorado in 2022 after the EEOC complaint was filed, began during the interview process prior to the bar's opening. "I was like, 'Cool, I'll be here for an official interview tomorrow morning,'" said former employee Sophia McElroy. "He was like, 'Make sure you wear a low-cut shirt.'" Hailie Duncan was 18 when she applied. She and McElroy both confirmed Jennings did not take action against customers who sexually harassed them, and forced them to wear uniforms they were uncomfortable with. "He was like, 'You don't have to wear it, but you don't have to have a job here,'" said Duncan. In a press release announcing the settlement, the EEOC stated Jennings retaliated against employees in the lawsuit by filing his own defamation suit against them. That is what spurred the EEOC, with the former employees' complaint in hand, to file its lawsuit against Jennings. "This case demonstrates why owners should not think that they can escape liability simply by closing a business and filing retaliatory defamation lawsuits in an attempt to silence victims," stated Mary Jo O'Neill, regional attorney for the EEOC's Phoenix District Office (which includes Colorado), in the press release. The EEOC also accused Jennings and his mother of using corporate funds from their company, 'Murica LLC, to pay a mortgage on a home, a personal loan and personal credit cards. CBS Colorado reached out to Jennings for a response on the accusations and the settlement Sunday. No response has been received. The two parties signed the settlement agreement June 5. "For the five years that this has gone on," said a former female employee and plaintiff in the lawsuit who wished to remain anonymous, "and the damage that he has done, personally, mentally, and emotionally....$100,000 can't bring a life back." That woman and DeJohn both confirmed Michael Chacon, a seventh member of the group who filed the EEOC complaint, took his own life three years ago. The Starlite ordeal was partly to blame, both said. "He was one of the first to say, "I don't agree with what's going on here,'" DeJohn said, "and he tried to bring it up. We all have him to thank." Starlite Station closed in 2021. The strip mall in which it was housed was demolished and re-developed in 2022. DeJohn suggested anyone in the same position as he and the other Starlite staffers trust their instincts. "You know what's right," he said. "Just do what's right. Eventually, you'll be on the right side of it. "And don't be afraid."
