Trump paused student-loan forgiveness for nearly 2 million borrowers on income-based repayment plans
President Donald Trump's Department of Education quietly updated its guidance on student-loan forgiveness for borrowers on income-based repayment plans, which give enrolled borrowers monthly payments based on their income and family size with the promise of forgiveness after 20 or 25 years.
According to Federal Student Aid data, just under 2 million borrowers were enrolled in IBR as of the second quarter of 2025.
A notice posted on FSA's website said that ongoing litigation with former President Joe Biden's SAVE plan is preventing the administration from processing IBR forgiveness.
"Currently, IBR forgiveness is paused while our systems are updated to accurately count months not affected by the court's injunction. IBR forgiveness will resume once those updates are completed," the notice said.
The SAVE plan, which allowed for cheaper monthly payments and a shorter timeline to debt relief, has been blocked since July 2024. Forgiveness through other repayment plans, including income-contingent repayment, was also blocked due to the court order. However, the court order did not include IBR, which falls under a different congressional statute.
The department's deputy press secretary Ellen Keast told BI that the IBR relief pause is to "comply with ongoing court injunctions."
"Legal IBR discharges will resume as soon as the Department is able to establish the correct payment count," Keast said. "For any borrower that makes a payment after they became eligible for forgiveness, the Department will refund overpayments when the discharges resume."
Keast referred to a SAVE provision that allowed certain forbearance periods to count toward loan forgiveness. She said that while the court does not prevent relief through IBR, it impacts the types of forbearances that can be counted toward IBR relief, requiring the department to pause the discharges until it can adjust payment counts.
The department did not comment on when the pause will be lifted. It comes at a precarious time for millions of borrowers — the department is restarting interest on SAVE borrowers' accounts beginning August 1, meaning their balances will once again start growing after a year on pause.
To prevent balance growth, the department recommended that enrolled SAVE borrowers switch over to an IBR plan to begin making payments again.
Trump's spending bill, which he signed into law on July 4, eliminated existing income-driven repayment plans and replaced them with two options: a standard repayment plan and a new Repayment Assistance Plan that allows for forgiveness after 30 years. Those plans aren't set to go into effect until July 2026. Since the bill also eliminates the SAVE plan, the department said borrowers should enroll in IBR in the meantime.
Collections on defaulted student loans also restarted in May after a five-year pause, and the department said that wage garnishment will begin later this summer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Reddit Post Breaking Down A MAGA Dad's "Awakening" From Two-Time Trump Voter To Trump Critic Is Going Viral
A Reddit post by a user who claims their father voted for Donald Trump twice has recently gone viral for revealing what finally turned their MAGA dad into a Trump critic. At the start of the post, the redditor explained what initially attracted their father to Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign. "What got him into Trump was the first primary debate he participated in, in which he brutally attacked Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and the others..." Related: They went on to explain that their father, a business owner, personally benefited from Trump's tax cuts, which made his view of Trump's first presidency a "success," despite events like January 6. According to the redditor, things started to change for their father when Trump's tariff war threw his business into "disarray." Related: The negative financial impact of Trump's tariff war made their father seek out more "accurate reporting" of Trump, and the new information "awakened" him. Related: "He wishes Trump would stop being such an idiotic fuckup." And finally, the post ended with the redditor's realization about changing the minds of "casual Trump voters." "You can bring all that stuff up, and they'll just wave it off. But as soon as he does do something harmful that affects them, they can be turned." After reading the post, people in the comments shared their perspective on "uniformed voters" who supported Trump. "I just think so many people drank the 'John Wayne' kool aid in the Reaganite '80s, the idea that, like the lone gunslinger, Americans are singular, self sufficient individuals, not members of a society. So many in the U.S. bought that BS wholesale, like this guy's Dad," one user wrote. "He thinks he only need care about his business, his family and his bikes, but he forgets that for businesses to flourish he needs society at large to be healthy, he needs trade rules to be enforced, and he needs stability in trade hates paying taxes, but never thinks about why the roads are maintained, why water comes out of the tap or electricity out of the socket. He's been trained and rewarded to see himself as a lone entity, independent of all social bonds. Now he's been uncomfortably reminded he is part of an interdependent society, but I'm sure he'll forget the reminder soon enough. Individualism is too deeply ingrained in his psyche for him to abandon it now." Related: "Everyone keeps saying 'they voted for this.' But in reality, some didn't. There are lots of uninformed voters out there. I'm not excusing it, but it's true. My dad is the same way," another user admitted. "He liked the sound bites he saw about draining the swamp and liked the idea of a businessman instead of a career politician. My dad is woefully misinformed and wouldn't listen to me either. But he's not an evil monster. Just complacent and kinda ignorant. He's also 83, so there's that." "They're not going to figure out Trump sucks until they get burned by the hot stove," this user wrote. "I think there is a large portion of classic Republicans, not the MAGA people, who probably just didn't give a shit about most of Trump's agenda harming other people." And finally, "I feel like the real takeaway from this is that the dad is against something Trump did, but still doesn't regret his vote." "The popular Reddit sentiment is that conservatives are feeling regret now that his policies are hurting them, but the actual sad truth is that given the opportunity at a revote, they'd probably vote for Trump again because they're convinced Harris would've still been worse or as bad as Trump anyway," another user wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:
Buzz Feed
24 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
MAGA Dad's Viral Journey Away From Trump
A Reddit post by a user who claims their father voted for Donald Trump twice has recently gone viral for revealing what finally turned their MAGA dad into a Trump critic. At the start of the post, the redditor explained what initially attracted their father to Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign. "What got him into Trump was the first primary debate he participated in, in which he brutally attacked Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and the others..." They went on to explain that their father, a business owner, personally benefited from Trump's tax cuts, which made his view of Trump's first presidency a "success," despite events like January 6. According to the redditor, things started to change for their father when Trump's tariff war threw his business into "disarray." The negative financial impact of Trump's tariff war made their father seek out more "accurate reporting" of Trump, and the new information "awakened" him. "He wishes Trump would stop being such an idiotic fuckup." And finally, the post ended with the redditor's realization about changing the minds of "casual Trump voters." "You can bring all that stuff up, and they'll just wave it off. But as soon as he does do something harmful that affects them, they can be turned." After reading the post, people in the comments shared their perspective on "uniformed voters" who supported Trump. "I just think so many people drank the 'John Wayne' kool aid in the Reaganite '80s, the idea that, like the lone gunslinger, Americans are singular, self sufficient individuals, not members of a society. So many in the U.S. bought that BS wholesale, like this guy's Dad," one user wrote. "He thinks he only need care about his business, his family and his bikes, but he forgets that for businesses to flourish he needs society at large to be healthy, he needs trade rules to be enforced, and he needs stability in trade hates paying taxes, but never thinks about why the roads are maintained, why water comes out of the tap or electricity out of the socket. He's been trained and rewarded to see himself as a lone entity, independent of all social bonds. Now he's been uncomfortably reminded he is part of an interdependent society, but I'm sure he'll forget the reminder soon enough. Individualism is too deeply ingrained in his psyche for him to abandon it now." "Everyone keeps saying 'they voted for this.' But in reality, some didn't. There are lots of uninformed voters out there. I'm not excusing it, but it's true. My dad is the same way," another user admitted. "He liked the sound bites he saw about draining the swamp and liked the idea of a businessman instead of a career politician. My dad is woefully misinformed and wouldn't listen to me either. But he's not an evil monster. Just complacent and kinda ignorant. He's also 83, so there's that." "They're not going to figure out Trump sucks until they get burned by the hot stove," this user wrote. And finally, "I feel like the real takeaway from this is that the dad is against something Trump did, but still doesn't regret his vote." "The popular Reddit sentiment is that conservatives are feeling regret now that his policies are hurting them, but the actual sad truth is that given the opportunity at a revote, they'd probably vote for Trump again because they're convinced Harris would've still been worse or as bad as Trump anyway," another user wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.
Business Insider
25 minutes ago
- Business Insider
U.S. to implement Trump's executive order restricting Birthright Citizenship
The United States Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced plans to enforce President Donald Trump's executive order (EO) restricting automatic birthright citizenship, as soon as it takes effect. The SSA intends to enforce an executive order signed by President Trump limiting automatic birthright citizenship. The order applies to children born after February 19, 2025, and restricts citizenship to children of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents. This policy shift could significantly affect immigrant populations, particularly their access to citizenship and social benefits. The executive order, titled ' Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,' was signed on January 20, 2025. It is expected to apply to children born after February 19, 2025, with enforcement scheduled to begin on July 27, 2025. This move will alter decades of established practice that grants citizenship to nearly all individuals born in the U.S. and will affect a wide range of foreign nationals, including African migrants, students, and professionals residing legally or temporarily in the United States. According to Reuters, the SSA's plans signal the administration's readiness to proceed with enforcement as soon as legal challenges are cleared. Under the current constitutional framework, children born in the U.S. are automatically granted citizenship regardless of their parents' immigration status. However, the new policy would limit that right to children born to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents. ' With respect to citizenship, an SSN applicant may currently demonstrate U.S. citizenship by providing a birth certificate showing a U.S. place of birth, ' the SSA stated. CNN reports that, 'Several rulings issued by federal courts this month have ensured that that policy will not take effect for now, and the guidance documents acknowledge that reality.' However, preparations for implementation are underway. 'The government is preparing to implement the EO in the event that it is permitted to go into effect,' a USCIS memo read. Key Changes to Citizenship Verification Previously, Social Security Numbers (SSNs) were issued to U.S.-born applicants based solely on a birth certificate indicating a place of birth within the country. Under the new order, that will no longer be sufficient. Applicants born after the EO's implementation date will be required to provide proof that at least one parent was a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident at the time of their birth. 'To comply with the EO, SSA will require evidence that such a person's mother and/or father is a U.S. citizen or in an eligible immigration status at the time of the person's birth, ' the SSA stated. The Social Security Administration will revise its internal manuals and application procedures to reflect these changes. Updated procedures will require applicants to submit one or more of the following: 1. Certificate of Naturalization 2. Certificate of Citizenship 3. U.S. Passport issued under the EO 4. U.S. Citizen Identification Card issued by the Department of Homeland Security 5. Consular Report of Birth Abroad 6. Other verification from the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, or federal/state court records 7. A U.S. birth certificate plus evidence of a parent's U.S. citizenship or eligible immigration status The Security administration added that children of green card holders may also qualify, but only with verified documentation such as a Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551), a Machine Readable Immigrant Visa (MRIV) with a Temporary I-551 stamp, or relevant DHS records. ' Once the EO takes effect, a birth certificate showing a U.S. place of birth will not be sufficient documentary evidence of U.S. citizenship for persons born after the EO takes effect, ' the SSA said. Implications for African Families The policy shift is expected to impact thousands of African nationals living in the U.S. on temporary work or student visas, including those under H-1B and F-1 classifications. It may also affect African families who travel to the U.S. for childbirth or educational purposes, expecting their children to gain automatic citizenship. For African countries with large diaspora populations in the U.S. including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa; the loss of automatic citizenship rights could have long-term impacts, including reduced access to public benefits, limited legal protections for children, and potential disruptions to remittance flows and transnational family stability. On the brighter side, CNN reports that immigration rights advocates have filed legal challenges against the policy and have emphasized that the newly released SSA and USCIS guidance is 'meaningless' so long as the courts continue to block enforcement.
