Presenting the Twins' All-Quarter Century Team, the best in Minnesota since 2000
Editor's note: The Athletic is marking 2025 by naming an MLB All-Quarter Century Team, selected by Jayson Stark. Some of our beat writers are picking All-Quarter Century Teams for the teams they cover. Check this page to find all of our All-Quarter Century Team coverage.
Postseason success has been maddeningly elusive, but the Minnesota Twins have the 12th-best record in MLB since 2000, going 2,015-1,991 (.503) while finishing with a winning record in 15 of 25 completed seasons and reaching the playoffs in 10 of them.
Advertisement
That includes the final two years of Tom Kelly's managerial career, followed by 13 seasons of Ron Gardenhire (.507), four seasons of Paul Molitor (.471) and Rocco Baldelli (.526) for the past seven years. And, of course, there was a venue change in 2010, with the move from the Metrodome to Target Field.
Today we're selecting a Twins All-Quarter Century Team consisting of 10 hitters (nine lineup regulars and one utility player) and six pitchers (five starters and one closer) who were Minnesota's best players from 2000 to 2025. Longevity matters and pre-2000 performances aren't factored in.
Here are the highest WAR totals by a Twins catcher since 2000, according to FanGraphs:
8.3 — Joe Mauer, 2009
6.5 — Joe Mauer, 2008
5.8 — Joe Mauer, 2006
5.7 — Joe Mauer, 2010
5.0 — Joe Mauer, 2013
4.6 — Joe Mauer, 2012
No other Twins catcher reached 4.0 WAR in any season from 2000 to 2025.
Mauer was the Twins' starting catcher for 10 years, from 2004 to 2013, when a concussion ended a spectacular decade behind the plate in which the first-ballot Hall of Famer hit .323/.405/.468 for a 134 wRC+ and 46.3 WAR, with three batting titles, three Gold Glove Awards, five Silver Slugger Awards, six All-Star appearances and the 2009 American League MVP.
In the 11 seasons since Mauer ceased catching (2014 to 2025), all Twins catchers have combined to hit .236/.308/.389 for a 91 wRC+ and 18.1 WAR.
This was a pretty easy one. — Aaron Gleeman
The catcher who has always called Minnesota home gets the call of a lifetime.
Joe Mauer, you've made it to Cooperstown.
🎥 Emily Meisinger/@Twins pic.twitter.com/vUdsG046aa
— National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum ⚾ (@baseballhall) January 24, 2024
Another shoe-in.
Following the departure of Torii Hunter to the Los Angeles Angels in 2008, Mauer and Morneau made the Twins relevant again. They ushered in a new era at Target Field, one which held so much promise until both sustained career-altering concussions.
Morneau's run from 2006-10 included the AL MVP in 2006 and a runner-up AL MVP finish in 2008. And he potentially had an AL MVP award robbed in 2010 when he took a knee to the head while sliding into second base, thus ending the best season of his career with a .345/.437/.645 line in 81 games.
Advertisement
Even though injuries slowed the back half of his career and eventually led to a trade, Morneau produced 19.9 WAR for the Twins, more than doubling their next-best first baseman (Doug Mientkiewicz, 8.2). — Dan Hayes
Perhaps three-time batting champion Luis Arraez would have at least made an argument for this spot if he hadn't moved more to first base and been traded for Pablo López. But nobody comes close to Dozier's production, including the 167 homers he belted between 2012-18.
Dozier was one of the few bright spots during a 99-loss campaign in 2016, setting the AL record for round-trippers by a second baseman with 42. He was an All-Star in 2015, won a Gold Glove Award in 2017 and was a key leader in the clubhouse for a young wave of talent arriving in the latter part of his Twins tenure. — Hayes
Koskie improved from borderline unplayable at third base — to the point Kelly would use him in left field — to become one of the best defensive third baseman in baseball, while posting an OPS at least 10 percent better than the league average in all six of his full seasons with the Twins.
Koskie is one of the most underrated position players in team history, ranking 12th in WAR among Twins hitters, ahead of many far bigger names. But he was very good every season, occasionally great, and his combination of left-handed power and plate discipline with above-average defense never goes out of style. — Gleeman
Jorge Polanco is the Twins' WAR leader at shortstop for the 2000s, but he holds only a slight lead over Correa in nearly double the number of games played. While Correa's tenure has been hampered by bouts of plantar fasciitis in each foot, he's simply been a great addition to the franchise.
No matter how he seems to be feeling physically, Correa's sure-handed, strong-armed defense is a sight to behold. His potent bat has carried the lineup in two of his first three seasons in town, the other being slowed by his first foot injury.
Advertisement
But Correa's biggest impact could be felt late in 2023 when he finally had a chance to rest his foot and balled out in the postseason, going 9-for-22 (.409), providing heady defense and helping the team end its two-decade postseason losing streak. — Hayes
The only negative about Hunter's Twins tenure was that it ended. Hunter's arrival in 1999 with several other young core members marked the start of a turnaround after several years of struggle in the wake of Kirby Puckett's early retirement. The Twins flourished with Hunter, averaging 83 wins in his 10 full seasons, winning at least 90 games and the division four times.
Hunter's defense was excellent, as demonstrated by the seven Gold Glove Awards he won with the Twins, and he was a major presence in the lineup, averaging 25 homers and 90 RBIs from 1999-2007. Hunter also managed to be a big postseason performer, hitting .300/.337/.538 in 21 games. — Hayes
An epic moment in @AllStarGame history.
19 years ago, @toriihunter48 robbed @BarryBonds. 😱 pic.twitter.com/yq5YKvBSx0
— MLB Vault (@MLBVault) July 9, 2021
We avoided the difficult decision of leaving Hunter (23.0 WAR) or Buxton (24.2 WAR) off the 2000s team by going with three positionless outfielders rather than choosing one in left, center and right.
Copout? Maybe, but Hunter and Buxton are clearly both deserving of places on this team. Plus, who wouldn't want to watch them playing alongside each other and robbing hits in the same outfield? (Other than opposing batters, of course.) — Gleeman
Cuddyer gets the slight nod over Max Kepler for the third outfield spot. Kepler has a big edge defensively, although Cuddyer's great arm and ability to play caroms off the Metrodome baggy were plenty valuable as well.
And Cuddyer (110 wRC+) was simply a better hitter than Kepler (102 wRC+) while also playing longer for the Twins. In fact, only Mauer, Morneau and Hunter have more games in a Twins uniform in the 2000s. — Gleeman
Advertisement
The Twins hoped for but never could have imagined what they'd receive from Cruz when he agreed to a one-year deal with a second-year team option ahead of the 2019 season. Cruz was a monster at the plate, the captain of 2019 Bomba's Squad, but also a leader through and through.
Cruz immediately had everyone's respect when he entered the clubhouse, a standard bearer for how to work and act who provided Baldelli, a rookie manager, with a captain. He held that role for two-plus seasons in a Twins uniform.
Beyond his leadership, Cruz redefined the DH position for the franchise. He blasted 41 homers in his first season, was on 43-homer pace during the COVID-shortened 2020 campaign and continued with absurd production in his age-40 season in 2021.
As if all that weren't enough, Cruz's trade to Tampa Bay produced starting pitcher Joe Ryan. — Hayes
Polanco started by far the most games at shortstop for the Twins since 2000, but we went with Correa there and instead fit Polanco onto the team by taking advantage of his versatility in the utility role.
Polanco is the only Twins player with at least 275 career games at both shortstop and second base, and he also volunteered to play third base when it helped the team. His flexibility, switch-hitting ability and 111 wRC+ across 832 games with the Twins make him an ideal 10th man. — Gleeman
From the moment Santana returned to the majors with a new changeup in mid-2002 through the day the Twins traded him on Feb. 2, 2008, he was the best pitcher in the league. It just took the Twins a while to realize it, keeping him in the bullpen an infuriating long time.
Santana spent only four seasons as a full-time member of the Twins' rotation, but it was the most dominant four-year run by any pitcher in team history. He went 70-32 with a 2.89 ERA and 983 strikeouts in 912 innings, winning two Cy Young Awards and deserving a third.
Advertisement
Santana played six total seasons in Minnesota after returning from the minors, and the Twins won 69 percent of his starts, playing like a 112-win team with Johan on the mound. When anyone else started during that span, the Twins won 52 percent of the time, equivalent to an 84-win team.
Twins fans are all too aware of their 2-18 postseason record versus the New York Yankees. Both wins came in Santana starts. With any other pitcher on the mound versus New York in the playoffs, the Twins are 0-16.
There's a decent chance that my last words — hopefully many years from now — will be 'Johan should have three straight Cy Youngs.' — Gleeman
#OTD in 2007, @johansantana struck out 17 batters in a #TwinsWin over the Rangers! pic.twitter.com/K0J8aSX7w8
— Minnesota Twins (@Twins) August 19, 2021
Radke tends to be underrated in discussions about the best starters in Twins history because he pitched in such a hitter-friendly era. And this 2000s-only exercise also ignores several of his best seasons, including an All-Star nod in 1998.
But the strike-throwing machine's ERA was 12 percent better than league average from 2000 to 2006 while averaging 195 innings per season, including topping 200 innings in five of seven years.
Santana (29.0 WAR) and Radke (22.3) are the only Twins starters to produce more than 16 WAR in the 2000s, and Radke also stepped up with a 3.60 ERA in six playoff starts.
His first innings weren't always pretty, and he gave up some tape-measure homers, but Radke logged the most innings of any Twins pitcher in the 2000s and his 112 ERA+ is comparable to the current rotation trio of López (114), Bailey Ober (113) and Ryan (111). — Gleeman
Santana's inclusion on this list speaks volumes to how well the rest of his time in the Twin Cities went considering it all began with an 80-game suspension for performance-enhancing drug use in 2015, before he ever threw a pitch for the Twins. Signed to a four-year, $55 million deal in December 2014, Santana lived up to the hype once he got going.
Advertisement
Santana returned from the suspension and provided 6 1/3 innings per start in 2015 with a 4.00 ERA, demonstrating the type of workhorse he'd be. From 2016-17, he produced a 3.32 ERA in nearly 400 innings, leading an upstart 2017 group to the Wild Card Game. Though Santana suffered a finger injury late in 2017 that limited him to five starts in 2018, few Twins pitchers made the type of impact he had over the first 2 1/2 seasons. — Hayes
A consensus top-50 prospect who was supposed to be The One, Berríos' career got off to an inauspicious start with an 8.02 ERA in 58 1/3 innings as a 22-year-old in 2016. But for the next 4 1/2 seasons, Berríos was a very good pitcher, going 52-36 with a 3.76 ERA and 9.1 strikeouts per nine innings before the Twins traded him to the Toronto Blue Jays in 2021.
Berríos topped 200 strikeouts in 2018 and 200 innings in 2019. He was the team's most consistent starter after returning to the Twins in May 2017 after more seasoning in the minors, making 121 starts. And he pitched well in the postseason in '19 and '20, allowing a combined two earned runs (four overall) in nine innings in losses to the Yankees and Houston Astros. — Hayes
While flush with position players, the Twins have always struggled to land front-line starting pitchers. But the team's January 2023 trade to acquire López for fan-favorite Arraez has more than delivered. In two-plus seasons with the Twins, López has proven to be a strikeout machine and a pitcher capable of handling the big moments.
López tops all Twins starting pitchers this century with 10.1 strikeouts per nine innings, racking up 234 and 198 whiffs in his first two seasons. His strikeout-to-walk ratio is the team's third-best over the past 25 years, behind only Phil Hughes and Ryan.
What gives López the edge over Ryan or Ober for the final rotation spot is his outstanding performance during the 2023 postseason. Calling the pressure of ending the 18-game losing streak a privilege, López led the Twins to a 3-1 victory in the wild-card opener against Toronto and followed it with a dominant seven innings in Houston for a second-round win. — Hayes
Glen Perkins (three times), Eddie Guardado (twice), Taylor Rogers and Brandon Kintzler were All-Stars for the Twins in the 2000s, but Nathan is still an easy choice for the closer spot on this team.
Advertisement
Acquired from the San Francisco Giants in 2004 as part of the A.J. Pierzynski trade, Nathan was a four-time All-Star in his seven seasons in Minnesota, racking up a franchise-record 260 saves with a 2.16 ERA and .186 opponents batting average.
Nathan struggled in limited playoff action, but few closers in MLB history have been as consistently dominant in the regular season. Not only does Nathan lead all Twins pitchers in Win Probability Added since 2000, his 24.6 WPA is more than the No. 2 and No. 3 relievers combined. — Gleeman
(Photo of Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau: Charles Krupa / Associated Press)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
25 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
‘Star Wars: Starfighter' Adds ‘Frankenstein' Star Mia Goth
As much as we'd love to see a Star Wars movie that just stars Ryan Gosling, Star Wars: Starfighter was never going to be that. He needs co-stars, aliens, droids, and now the very first of those may have come into view. The InSneider reports, and io9 has confirmed, that Mia Goth, the actress best known for her roles in Pearl, X, and MaXXXine, who'll soon appear Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein and Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey, has been cast in the film. No word on what the role is, but reporter Jeff Sneider writes it is the same one Anora-star and Oscar-winner Mikey Madison was circling before moving along. This story is developing…
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
Patti LuPone's drama is dividing the Broadway community ahead of the Tony Awards
Patti LuPone may have apologized for some recent controversial remarks, but that doesn't mean the curtain has dropped on the drama. The actress sparked a major backlash after disparaging comments she made about fellow Broadway stars Kecia Lewis and Audra McDonald in a recent interview with the New Yorker. LuPone referred to Lewis as a 'b**ch' and said McDonald was 'not a friend.' Hundreds of performers from Broadway and other theater communities then wrote a letter in which they characterized LuPone's comments as 'degrading and misogynistic—it is a blatant act of racialized disrespect.' 'It constitutes bullying. It constitutes harassment,' they wrote. 'It is emblematic of the microaggressions and abuse that people in this industry have endured for far too long, too often without consequence.' The group called for LuPone to be disinvited from industry events, including Sunday's Tony Awards. LuPone apologized last weekend on social media, posting a statement in which she said she hoped to be able to speak with the pair to make 'sincere apologies.' 'I am deeply sorry for the words I used during The New Yorker interview, particularly about Kecia Lewis, which were demeaning and disrespectful,' Lupone wrote. 'I regret my flippant and emotional responses during this interview, which were inappropriate, and I am devastated that my behavior has offended others and has run counter to what we hold dear in this community.' The controversy ahead of the Tony Awards has raised interest in the event, sparking conversation about whether LuPone, who has long reigned as Broadway star, will make an appearance. But not everyone feels harshly towards her. Actress Mia Farrow has garned a Tony nomination for the Broadway play 'The Roommate' in which she costars with LuPone. In a recently published interview with Deadline, Farrow talked about her 30-year friendship with the woman she dubbed the 'goddess of Broadway.' 'We live near each other. Always have. Two of our kids were in the same class at school, at the same school, her son and my son, and I met her on New Year's Eve, actually,' Farrow told the publication. 'She and her husband gave a New Year's Eve party, and Steve Sondheim, who was one of my oldest friends, 50 years, he invited me to come to the party at Patti's 30 years ago, and that's how I met Patti.' Farrow, who mentioned the New Yorker interview in her conversation with Deadline without addressing the controversy, said working with her neighbor and friend was a positive experience. 'Patti and I never had a negative moment, by the way,' Farrow said. 'Working together didn't change our friendship. I think our friendship is deeper now.' 'Abbott Elementary' star Sheryl Lee Ralph, who is also a decorated Broadway performer, most notably playing the role of Deena Jones in the original 1981 production of 'Dreamgirls,' weighed in as well. 'Why not be nice?' Ralph said of LuPone. And while Ralph said she was 'not going to judge' LuPone, she did have some words of wisdom for the 'Evita' star. 'It was a moment where maybe you want to zip it,' she said. 'Inner thoughts don't always have to be outer thoughts, that might have been one of those moments.' British weekly conservative magazine writer Ella Whelan penned a piece with the headline, 'Patti LuPone is a diva – not a racist.' 'LuPone is notorious for putting the broad in Broadway – her loud mouth is infamous,' Whelan wrote, noting some of her other outspoken comments. 'Forget white privilege, this is diva privilege – when you're that good an entertainer, you can pretty much say what you want,' Whelan added. The 78th Annual Tony Awards, hosted by 'Wicked' film star and Tony, Grammy and Emmy award-winner Cynthia Erivo, will be broadcast live on Sunday, June 8 at 8 p.m. ET on the CBS Television Network and streaming on Paramount+ in the US.
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Brave The Awkward: Because Real Connection Requires Embracing Discomfort
We've never been more connected—yet we've rarely felt more alone. Chances are, you've witnessed it too: a group of young people sitting around a table at a restaurant, each staring at their phones instead of conversing with each other. They'd sooner take a selfie and post it than lay down their devices and talk about the insecurity that's driving their deep need to be seen and validated by 'likes' on the latest post. I call this the connection paradox: surrounded by communication tools, yet starved of real connection. At the heart of this paradox? Our growing reluctance to brave the awkward moments that real connection demands. The technology that's connected us has made it too easy to avoid the discomfort of genuine connection. The technology that's connected us has made it too easy to avoid the discomfort of genuine connection. We've become masters of impression management but amateurs at vulnerability. We filter our flaws, script our replies, and polish our professional personas—all while dodging the discomfort of direct, human-to-human interaction. From awkward silences to unresolved tensions, most of us would rather scroll, text, or disappear than risk a moment of raw, honest connection. The pressure to look like we've got it together—to say the right thing, to be perceived the right way—is amplified by status anxiety. Social psychologist Amy Cuddy calls this "presence under threat"—when fear of judgment overrides our ability to be authentic and present. Our natural need for approval has made us vulnerable to technologies that exploit our insecurities. Just last week, I heard through a mutual friend that someone had misinterpreted something I'd said. My first thought was to send a text, explaining the misunderstanding. But I caught myself and picked up the phone. Within five minutes, what could have become a drawn-out misunderstanding was resolved through the warmth of actual conversation where she could hear the tone of my voice—something that would have taken days of back-and-forth messages, if it could be resolved at all. Yet I constantly hear of people having conflicts via text exchanges because it feels safer. The data tells the story: in 1990, 75% of Americans had a best friend and only 3% had no close friends at all—today, those figures have plummeted to 59% and 12% respectively Digital communication can never replace the human When we choose AI-scripted messaging over less polished but fully human conversation—when we trade authenticity for something sanitized and 'perfect'—we cut ourselves off from the deep connection we crave and the many benefits it brings. We end up in carefully controlled exchanges that protect our ego but starve our soul. I call it the 'timidity tax'—the hidden cost we pay in our relationships, workplaces, and communities when we avoid the awkwardness of showing up fully human. In the end, it's our raw edges—not our perfection—that give others something real to hold onto. Younger generations are particularly vulnerable. While they may be fluent in memes and emojis, many haven't developed the interpersonal muscles needed for meaningful dialogue, emotional nuance, or face-to-face disagreement. The pandemic made this worse. Just when many young people should have been building the relational skills essential for navigating life's complexities, they found themselves isolated at home, tethered to devices that promised connection but delivered only its shadow. Those formative years—when resilience is built through awkward conversations, messy disagreements, and the trial-and-error of human interaction—were replaced by the sanitized safety of screens. Here's the thing: if the quality of our relationships is determined by the quality of the conversations we have within them, then those who've never learned to navigate the awkward terrain of addressing tension or sharing a personal challenge will struggle in the years ahead. They're entering marriages, friendships, and yes—workplaces—without the conversational courage needed to work through inevitable disagreements constructively, express vulnerability, or build the level of trust needed to sustain relationships over time. The more we rely on technology, the more we must practice what makes us human This connection crisis isn't contained to our personal lives—it's reshaped how we work too. A recent Gallup report revealed that only 23% of employees strongly agree they feel connected at work. According to McKinsey, Gen Z reports the highest levels of anxiety and loneliness in the workplace. This isn't coincidence—it's the predictable outcome of a generation that knows how to post but not how to pause, reflect, and connect through discomfort. Think about the executive who sends three carefully crafted emails instead of making a two-minute call that could resolve the issue. Or the team member who stays silent in meetings—not because they lack ideas, but because they fear saying the "wrong" thing might damage their reputation. The result? Declining engagement, rising burnout, and teams that struggle to collaborate beyond surface-level interactions. In the end, our willingness to express vulnerability will be our greatest source of strength, connection, and true security in a GenAI world that's increasingly scripted and superficial. Online relationships are more prone to becoming less human—reduced to performative exchanges that lack the messy authenticity of real connection. Digital interactions, no matter how frequent or clever, cannot replicate the subtle dance of in-person communication: reading between the lines, sitting with uncomfortable silences, or finding resolution through the shared vulnerability that is felt when two people occupy the same physical space. Connection doesn't happen by accident—it happens through shared discomfort, mutual vulnerability, and the courage to show up without a script. It requires us to step away from our screens and into the uncertain territory of genuine human interaction, where miscommunication is possible, feelings might get hurt, and resolution isn't guaranteed with the click of a button. The connection we crave most lays the other side of the awkwardness we least want to risk. If we want to build relationships and communities that unite people across generations, identities, and perspectives, we must be willing to 'brave the awkward'. That means embracing the awkward silences, leaning into our nervous vulnerability, and starting the conversations we'd sooner avoid. This requires courage—the courage to lay our vulnerability on the line, to show up fully, speak honestly, and risk the judgment we fear. It demands connection built on empathy, trust, and our common humanity. In a world where we can quickly curate our communication, outcomes won't be shaped by those who can say the smartest thing in the most polished way. Rather it will be shaped by those willing to brave the awkward and say the real thing—even when their words don't come out perfectly, even when the silence stretches too long, and even when there's no emoji to capture what needs to be said. Actually, especially then.
