logo
Chris Bowen says government could slap green tariffs on carbon intensive imports whilst stating Australia remains ‘on track' to achieve 2030 renewables target

Chris Bowen says government could slap green tariffs on carbon intensive imports whilst stating Australia remains ‘on track' to achieve 2030 renewables target

Sky News AU2 days ago

Energy and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen has stated the Albanese government is considering enforcing targeted levies on carbon intensive imports and reiterated Australia was on track to meet its 2030 emission reduction targets despite new figures indicating otherwise.
After Environment Minister Murray Watt controversially decided to approve Woodside's North West Shelf gas project extension until 2070, the government has faced increased scrutiny about its climate and environmental commitments.
Mr Bowen, appearing on the ABC's Insiders program said the government was open to considering new policies if needed to meet its targets, including leveraging targeted tariffs to ensure companies were not offshoring emitting activities and avoiding Australia's climate laws.
The energy minister said the government would have 'more to say' about its plan to impose green tariffs on a range of emission-intensive imports including cement and steel.
Labor launched a review into the practice known as carbon 'leakage' and 'carbon border adjustment mechanisms' (CBAM's) which seek to protect local industry from imports which are not adhering to Australia's emission standards and maintain competition in the energy transition.
The review, which was handed down to Mr Bowen earlier this year indicated that clinker, cement and lime were prone to high leakage levels, whilst ammonia, glass and steel posed a moderate risk.
Despite not publishing the contents of the Jotzo review nor indicating if the government would consider its recommendations, Mr Bowen said that any levies would be specific and that he would not pre-empt the call.
'I urge against sweeping generalisations about policy settings and, you know, what could be the case is obviously we look at particular sectors, first around cement and lime,' he said.
"We have been clear that we want to ensure Australian industry is best placed to compete in a decarbonising world," he said.
"What could be the case is we look at particular sectors first around cement and lime, [which] are places that we looked at in particular, but I'm not going to get in front of the process.
Mr Bowen remained coy on altering liquified natural gas agreements to initiate an east coast gas reservation plan, in a similar vain to that proposed by the Coalition during the recent federal election campaign.
As concern for gas shortages in the coming years increases, Mr Bowen was asked if the government was considering enacting its gas security mechanism to establish an east coast reservation, of which Resources Minister Madeleine King stated in recent days was under review.
'We made clear that there are a number of policies that are up for review,' Mr Bowen said.
'They're coming to their review time and the gas mechanism, the gas code we'll look at those and see what more can be done.'
However, when pressed if Labor was contemplating altering the rules governing the wholesale gas market, Mr Bowen said the government would not modify existing contracts to bolster supply to the east coast.
'No, we have a very clear matter of principle that we don't agree with sovereign risk. We don't agree with retrospective policy actions. I think that is uncontroversial, that is good governance.'
He also remained confidant that Australia would achieve its 2030 target of 82 per cent renewable energy generation, despite numerous industry magnates raising the alarm about the government's renewables timeline and green hydrogen programs.
'We're now at 46 per cent renewables in the last quarter last year and 43 per cent in the first quarter of this year. It moves from quarter to quarter,' Mr Bowen said.
'The 82 per cent target does have challenges. I never suggested it's a linear line.
The federal government will be required in the coming months to legislate it's 2035 emission reduction targets, which will be finalised once the Climate Change Authority, chaired by former NSW Liberal Treasurer Matt Kean hands down it's advice.
With the 2035 target yet to be unveiled, Mr Bowen said the governments approach would be 'ambitious and achievable'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it
Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it

The Age

time12 minutes ago

  • The Age

Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it

Our productivity growth, the only reliable way to raise living standards, is sclerotic. We now rank 27 out of 31 OECD countries, with the UK and US achieving three times and eight times our growth rate respectively. And with the future of our resource exports growing cloudy, the 'lucky country' might be starting to run out of luck. Jump-starting Australian innovation would give us a chance to break out of this uninspiring position and provide a path to a more prosperous future. Frustratingly, we're on track to squander this opportunity. While competing destinations have launched ambitious programs like the Choose Europe for Science Initiative, backed by €500 million ($881 million), Australia has dragged its feet. A recent proposal to tax unrealised capital gains has spooked start-ups and their investors, and Labor's ongoing desire to cap foreign student numbers actively harms our chances. Loading To reverse course and win the war for global talent, we require a bold, coordinated, 'big push' strategy to ensure that Australia offers the most compelling alternative to the US as a place to discover scientific breakthroughs, develop technologies and build companies. Our big push strategy should target the four key types of individuals that define the best innovation ecosystems: world-class researchers; risk-taking entrepreneurs; high-skilled technical workers and promising young students. We can target each talent category with two types of policy levers. First, make it as easy as possible to choose Australia. For top talent and their families, getting an Australian visa should be a fast and seamless experience. Labor's National Innovation Visa is a good start but is too restrictive; it could be significantly expanded, for example by removing the 'invitation only' requirement and introducing a fast track for affected Harvard scholars. Supply-side housing action to address the ongoing crisis, such as zoning reform, is long overdue to make Australia welcoming to new migrants. Select new arrivals could merit limited financial support to smooth the transition, and for top professors who bring research affiliates in tow – think of the benefits we have seen from international researchers like Professor Michelle Simmons basing their careers in Australia – tailored incentive packages would provide excellent bang for the public buck. Second, invest in the success of Australian-based innovators. For scientists, that means aggressively reversing the decline in R&D funding that Robyn Denholm, chair of the ongoing National R&D Review, has called a 'national emergency'. Opportunities to fund 'shovel-ready' research projects cut by the US are plentiful. For entrepreneurs and high-skilled workers, selective support for companies in high-potential or strategic sectors such as public offtake agreements, can support the growth of new products and businesses. These policies can be targeted at places where Aussie innovators have already proved their strength. Hubs such as Melbourne's biotech district, Sydney's SaaS (Software as a Service) scene, or the Gold Coast's growing space industry provide natural focal points for new talent to coalesce and amplify. Labor's historic election victory has given them a rare licence to invest in a better, more exciting future. For Albanese and Chalmers, who have publicly committed to solve our productivity crisis, this opportunity to boost innovation in Australia couldn't have come at a better time. They should seize the chance to do so.

Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it
Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it

Sydney Morning Herald

time12 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it

Our productivity growth, the only reliable way to raise living standards, is sclerotic. We now rank 27 out of 31 OECD countries, with the UK and US achieving three times and eight times our growth rate respectively. And with the future of our resource exports growing cloudy, the 'lucky country' might be starting to run out of luck. Jump-starting Australian innovation would give us a chance to break out of this uninspiring position and provide a path to a more prosperous future. Frustratingly, we're on track to squander this opportunity. While competing destinations have launched ambitious programs like the Choose Europe for Science Initiative, backed by €500 million ($881 million), Australia has dragged its feet. A recent proposal to tax unrealised capital gains has spooked start-ups and their investors, and Labor's ongoing desire to cap foreign student numbers actively harms our chances. Loading To reverse course and win the war for global talent, we require a bold, coordinated, 'big push' strategy to ensure that Australia offers the most compelling alternative to the US as a place to discover scientific breakthroughs, develop technologies and build companies. Our big push strategy should target the four key types of individuals that define the best innovation ecosystems: world-class researchers; risk-taking entrepreneurs; high-skilled technical workers and promising young students. We can target each talent category with two types of policy levers. First, make it as easy as possible to choose Australia. For top talent and their families, getting an Australian visa should be a fast and seamless experience. Labor's National Innovation Visa is a good start but is too restrictive; it could be significantly expanded, for example by removing the 'invitation only' requirement and introducing a fast track for affected Harvard scholars. Supply-side housing action to address the ongoing crisis, such as zoning reform, is long overdue to make Australia welcoming to new migrants. Select new arrivals could merit limited financial support to smooth the transition, and for top professors who bring research affiliates in tow – think of the benefits we have seen from international researchers like Professor Michelle Simmons basing their careers in Australia – tailored incentive packages would provide excellent bang for the public buck. Second, invest in the success of Australian-based innovators. For scientists, that means aggressively reversing the decline in R&D funding that Robyn Denholm, chair of the ongoing National R&D Review, has called a 'national emergency'. Opportunities to fund 'shovel-ready' research projects cut by the US are plentiful. For entrepreneurs and high-skilled workers, selective support for companies in high-potential or strategic sectors such as public offtake agreements, can support the growth of new products and businesses. These policies can be targeted at places where Aussie innovators have already proved their strength. Hubs such as Melbourne's biotech district, Sydney's SaaS (Software as a Service) scene, or the Gold Coast's growing space industry provide natural focal points for new talent to coalesce and amplify. Labor's historic election victory has given them a rare licence to invest in a better, more exciting future. For Albanese and Chalmers, who have publicly committed to solve our productivity crisis, this opportunity to boost innovation in Australia couldn't have come at a better time. They should seize the chance to do so.

One-in-five Aussies expected to have ticket in Oz Lotto's $70m jackpot
One-in-five Aussies expected to have ticket in Oz Lotto's $70m jackpot

West Australian

time24 minutes ago

  • West Australian

One-in-five Aussies expected to have ticket in Oz Lotto's $70m jackpot

One-in-five Australians are expected to have a ticket in Oz Lotto's mouth-watering $70m jackpot draw. It will be the second biggest lottery prize on offer in Australia this year and the fourth biggest Oz Lotto jackpot in its 31-year history. Ticket sales are expected to peak about 6.55pm on Tuesday – about 35 minutes before the draw closes – when more than 4100 tickets will be sold in a single minute, The Lott spokesman Matt Hart said there had been three Oz Lotto division one winning entries totalling $185m so far in 2025, and they were eagerly awaiting their fourth winner. 'We'll be standing by ready to reach out to any registered division one winner immediately after the draw on Tuesday night, so make sure you register your ticket to The Lott Members Club for the chance to receive that winning phone call,' he said. 'If one person takes home the entire $70m prize, they'll be crowned the second-biggest Australian lottery winner so far in 2025 and Oz Lotto's second-biggest individual lottery winner ever.' Mr Hart said previous winners greeted news of their multimillion-dollar prize with stunned silence, hysterical laughter and tears of joy. 'Who knows how someone might react on Tuesday night if they win the entire $70m jackpot,' he said. 'The last time we had a $70m Oz Lotto draw was in April, and on that occasion it was won by a 15-share Queensland syndicate, each receiving more than $4.7m. 'Will history repeat itself on Tuesday night or will the Oz Lotto jackpot remain unclaimed and soar higher for next week's draw?' The most frequently drawn Oz Lotto winning numbers are 47, 21, 28 and 33, while the least frequently drawn include 34, 26, 45 and 43. More than three-quarters of the Oz Lotto division one winning entries in 2024 were QuickPick entries – where the lottery terminal randomly selects the numbers. Almost a third of Oz Lotto division one winning entries in 2024 were System entries – which allows you to play more numbers in a single game. Tickets in Tuesday's draw can be purchased at licensed lottery outlets, online from or via The Lott mobile app.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store