Coffee Improves Your Mood – But Only If You Drink It At This Time
But these potential benefits have caveats. They seem to be capped at about two-and-a-half to three cups a day, for instance; coffee without full-fat milk and sugar seems more likely to prevent dementia and increase longevity than creamier, sweeter brews.
And now, a paper recently published in the journal Scientific Reports has found that when you drink your coffee affects its possible mood-improving properties too.
What time should I drink coffee if I want to improve my mood?
The researchers looked into whether (and when) caffeine might improve your mood.
Caffeine helps to block adenosine receptors (adenosine makes us tired and has also been linked to anxiety and depression).
So the scientists wanted to look at whether drinking coffee early in the morning, when people are often tired and groggy due to sleep inertia, made a difference to how beneficial caffeine was to their mood.
They analysed data from two experience sampling method studies from Germany. These involve participants recording their experiences through questionnaires and surveys in real time.
The studies, which took 15 and 29 days respectively and involved a total of 236 participants, recorded the time, caffeine intake, and emotional status of those involved.
After using multilevel models to analyse the results, the researchers discovered that, 'The association between caffeine consumption and positive [emotional] affect was strongest within the first 2.5 hours after awakening'.
A small but noticeable increase in mood benefits was also noted when people drank coffee 10-12.5 hours after waking.
Time of caffeine consumption did not seem to influence the negative effects of coffee, either.
Lots of research suggests morning is the best time to drink coffee
This paper is not the only one to find benefits to drinking coffee earlier in the day.
Research from the European Heart Journal found that, in comparison to people who didn't drink coffee at all, morning coffee drinkers were 16% less likely to die of any cause and 31% less likely to die of cardiovascular disease.
But people who drank coffee throughout the day had the same risk as those who did not drink coffee at all.
In an editorial that accompanied the paper, Professor Thomas F. Lüscher said that, 'Overall, we must accept the now substantial evidence that coffee drinking, particularly in the morning hours, is likely to be healthy.
'Thus,' he added, 'drink your coffee, but do so in the morning!'
Related...
Your Coffee May Lead To These Brain Changes During Sleep
Coffee May Make You Live Longer, But Only If You Drink It This Way
Coffee May Have Surprising Ageing Benefits For Women, Study Finds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Her dogs kept dying, and she got cancer. Then they tested her water.
Her dogs kept dying, and she got cancer. Then they tested her water. ELKTON, Md. - Debbie Blankenship's wheelchair carved perfect lines in the grass as she rolled into her backyard garden, passing a wooden arch filled with small grapes, a bush with plump blueberries and yellow crates filled with sprouting potatoes. She stopped at a dirt patch with a burial marker for her beagle - the latest of her dogs to die of cancer. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. 'They are all buried back here. It's like a pet cemetery,' she said, catching her breath from navigating the hilly terrain. Gazing at the burial site, she spoke about her own long battle with cancer. For decades, Blankenship chalked up her health problems, including losing her right leg to an infection, to bad luck. Then in 2023 she received a phone call from W.L. Gore & Associates, which makes waterproof membranes such as Gore-Tex and a host of other products. Gore wanted to test Blankenship's well water for PFOA, a highly toxic 'forever chemical' that was used to make PTFE, commonly known as Teflon. 'That's when the light went off,' she said. She and her dogs were the only members of the household to drink the well water. Her husband and children always drank bottled water. Gore's offer to test Blankenship's well came after a former employee named Stephen Sutton sued the company in 2022, claiming the company's negligent use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS, harmed workers and the surrounding community. The litigation triggered a public water crisis: A class-action lawsuit was filed the following year, and Maryland filed suit in 2024. These stable chemical compounds tend to persist indefinitely in the environment, as well as in the human body. They have been linked to serious health problems including high cholesterol, cardiovascular disease, infertility, low birth weight and certain cancers. The lawsuits claim that the company knew for decades that its use of these chemicals endangered public health and the environment but hid that fact from the state and the nearby community. Gore has denied concealing information about the presence of PFOA in its materials or any potential risks. Maryland's Department of the Environment and Cecil County declined to comment, citing the pending litigation. In a statement made when the state filed its lawsuit, Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown (D) said, 'It is unacceptable for any company to knowingly contaminate our drinking water with these toxins, putting Marylanders at risk of severe health conditions.' Gore said in a statement that it has never manufactured PFOA and that only 'trace levels' were present in raw materials purchased from suppliers. The company said all its vendors must now certify their materials are made without it. 'We dispute the allegations in the lawsuit filed by the State of Maryland and deny the allegations in the Sutton matter,' said Amy Calhoun, a spokeswoman for Gore. - - - Poisoned wells Gore has helped anchor Elkton's economy for more than 50 years. The privately held company, based in Delaware, operates 14 facilities in and around Cecil County. It reports $5 billion in revenue, employs more than 3,100 residents and has created a deep relationship with the community. A wooden sign near the entrance of Kenmore Elementary School reads: 'In partnership with W.L. Gore & Associates.' A thin line of trees is the only barrier separating the school from Gore's Cherry Hill facility, where PTFE was received in powder form and transformed into products. Blankenship's husband, Richard, who suffers from Alzheimer's, worked at Gore for nearly 40 years. Water samples taken from Blankenship's well in May 2023 showed PFOA concentrations of 3.4 parts per trillion (ppt), according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post, below the Environmental Protection Agency's maximum contaminate level of 4 ppt. However, the agency has said that there is no safe level of exposure and that small amounts of the chemical can cause serious health impacts, including cancer. Other well water samples from Blankenship's neighbors across the street from Gore's Cherry Hill site revealed PFOA concentrations as high as 800 ppt, according to tests conducted throughout 2023 by Gore and the Maryland Department of the Environment. Groundwater samples from the site were as high as 1,300 ppt. Monitoring wells near Gore's Fair Hill site contained concentrations of 1,800 ppt, while a nearby stream had PFOA concentrations of 740 ppt. Gore's Calhoun acknowledged 'some isolated numbers' at high concentrations in well water but said the impact on groundwater at the Cherry Hill facility was 'limited.' 'We do know now that a limited amount of PFOA has been released as part of our historic operations and in concentrations that by today's standards are higher than acceptable,' she said. 'Most importantly, Gore is committed to addressing the issue.' The scope of the contamination from Gore's facilities is not yet known. Sutton alleges in his suit that Gore knew by the late 1980s, through its own groundwater testing, that pollution from its Cherry Hill plant could travel to neighboring properties. Philip Federico, an attorney at Brockstedt Mandalas Federico who represents Elkton residents, said in a statement that the firm filed suit because Gore knew about the risks of PFAS for four decades and continued dumping toxic chemicals into the community. 'Today, both the residents and agricultural interests of these communities are dealing with the life-altering consequences of PFAS exposure, including cancer, reproductive and fertility challenges, developmental delays, hypertension, and more,' Federico said. Gore said it eliminated PFOA from its supply chain in 2014. DuPont and other manufacturers agreed to phase out the chemical in the United States by 2015 under a voluntary agreement with the EPA. In recent years, the chemical industry has reached large settlements with states and local communities over PFAS contamination of public water supplies. The EPA estimates that more than 158 million Americans are exposed to PFAS through their drinking water. Unlike water from public water utilities, private wells are not subject to federal water regulations. Gore offered Blankenship and other residents within sampling areas around its facilities the choice of filtering their well water or connecting their homes to the local water utility. The company said it has installed 84 filtration systems and connected 13 homes to the utility. While Blankenship is waiting for the county hookup, she is drinking bottled water provided by Gore and uses rainwater in her garden. Linda Birnbaum, a former director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, said that based on the water sample results near the Cherry Hill plant, many of the nearby wells should be capped and closed because 'it would be very difficult to clean them up.' 'If this was a public water supply, those would have to be remediated,' she said. 'In many of the wells, their levels of PFOA are of concern.' - - - Chemical dreams Mark Strickler, 68, who moved to Cherry Hill after landing a job at Gore more than 40 years ago, said he sometimes dreams he is back on the production line. That is where he used to scoop up white PTFE powder and mix it with graphite and other materials to make fibers for industrial weaving applications and products such as dental floss. He said he was told by his supervisor that the chemicals were safe. He recalled some 'pretty nasty' times, when the odor from the chemicals gave him headaches or the PFAS-soaked scrap material would leave his hands numb for half an hour. Even so, Strickler said he recalls his time at Gore with fondness. Then he wakes up to a harsh reality of the drinking-water contamination in his community. 'It was a surprise to me,' Strickler said. 'I'm disappointed in the company for polluting, when I thought they were more concerned about the culture of the company.' Despite his disappointment, Strickler said he considers Gore a good employer. After an aneurysm years ago, a graft created by Gore was inserted in his heart during one of his five heart operations, three of which required him to be 'cut open like a lobster.' Blankenship, who wakes up in pain that she can only compare to that of childbirth, praised Gore even though she believes the company's operations could have contributed to her health problems. 'They've taken care of us. They were good to us. They're good to their employees,' she said. Richard was still working at the company when they heard about the class-action lawsuit. Last month marked the couple's 49th wedding anniversary. Instead of treating her illnesses in the hospital, she wanted to spend whatever time she has left at home with her husband. 'I'm tired of my body being invaded by tests and needles,' she said, sitting in a wheelchair on her porch. 'I'm just tired of battling, so I'll take my chances. I've laid it all on Jesus' feet.' Now she makes sure her dog drinks only from the three-gallon water jugs Gore delivers every month, saying she was determined to end the cycle. 'It was really too late,' Blankenship said. 'That's why I said the next dog we got, she will never drink the water.' Related Content Ukraine scrambles to roll back Russian eastern advance as summit takes place Her dogs kept dying, and she got cancer. Then they tested her water. D.C.'s homeless begin to see the effects of Trump's crackdown Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aging Can Spread Through Your Body Via a Single Protein, Study Finds
Take note of the name: ReHMGB1. A new study pinpoints this protein as being able to spread the wear and tear that comes with time as it quietly travels through the bloodstream. This adds significantly to our understanding of aging. Short for reduced high mobility group box 1, ReHMGB1 triggers senescence in cells, permanently disabling them. It doesn't just do this locally; it can send damaging signals throughout the body, particularly in response to injuries or disease. "An important question in aging research is why senescent cells increase with age," write the study authors, led by researchers from the Korea University College of Medicine. Related: The team says their findings could help develop ways to keep us healthier for longer. If we can block or control this protein's signals, it might slow the cascade of cellular decline that comes with age. "This study reveals that aging signals are not confined to individual cells but can be systemically transmitted via the blood, with ReHMGB1 acting as a key driver," says Korea University biomedical engineer Ok Hee Jeon. The researchers were able to identify ReHMGB1 as a critical messenger passing on the senescence signal by analyzing different types of human cells grown in the lab and conducting a variety of tests on mice. When ReHMGB1 transmission was blocked in mice with muscle injuries, muscle regeneration happened more quickly, while the animals showed improved physical performance, fewer signs of cellular aging, and reduced systemic inflammation. The next step would be to see how this process could be disrupted, and this particular type of aging signal kept more localized – so the health conditions that come with old age might not be as damaging. "By blocking this pathway, we were able to restore tissue regenerative capacity, suggesting a promising strategy to treat aging-related diseases," says Jeon. This process is only one contributor to aging out of many, but the signals that ReHMGB1 spreads are particularly important in terms of our bodies becoming dysfunctional over time and less able to carry out repairs. It's also worth bearing in mind the useful functions of ReHMGB1 in the body: alerting our biological systems to damage and indicating that repairs are needed. Any kind of intervention will have to take that into consideration. We know that, generally speaking, populations are living for longer than ever before, and that's putting both our bodies and scientific research into uncharted territory. The various routines built into our cells must continue to function when years ago our bodies would have long given up. Related: From where we live to the genetics we're born with, there are many contributors to aging and lifespan. By learning more about how these work, we'll be better able to manage them – and perhaps extend life further. "Building on current research in these areas will be essential to understanding the therapeutic potential of redox-sensitive HMGB1 in aging-related diseases and its role as a systemic mediator of senescence," write the researchers in their published paper. The research has been published in Metabolism. Related News New Genetic Test Predicts Children With Future Risk of High BMI This Diet Helps Lower Dementia Risk, And We May Finally Know Why A Signal of Future Alzheimer's Could Hide in The Way You Speak Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Say These Are the Worst Ultra-Processed Foods You Can Eat
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." The American Heart Association just released a big report on ultra-processed foods. Some ultra-processed foods are healthier than others, according to the organization. Experts say it's still important to limit how much ultra-processed foods you eat. Ultra-processed foods have been a hot topic in nutrition, with a government report released in May linking this food category to a range of chronic diseases. Now, the American Heart Association (AHA) has released a new scientific advisory statement, breaking down the best and worst ultra-processed foods you can eat, and their impact on health. This echoes a growing argument in the nutrition and health community, especially given that up to 70% of our food supply is made up of ultra-processed foods. 'Ultra-processed foods are such a large part of the American diet, and whatever we can do to steer our diet toward healthier options would be beneficial to our cardiovascular health,' says Cheng-Han Chen, M.D., interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA. Meet the experts: Danbee Kim, M.D.,, nutrition expert, weight loss surgeon, and assistant professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School; Cheng-Han Chen, M.D., interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA; Keri Gans, R.D., author of The Small Change Diet; Kathleen Moore, R.D.N., a registered dietitian nutritionist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center So, which ultra-processed foods are considered 'healthier' and what does this mean for your diet going forward? Doctors and a dietitian explain. What are ultra-processed foods? The levels of food processing are classified under something called the NOVA scale. This scale lumps foods into these four main categories: Unprocessed and minimally processed foods: This includes foods that are in their natural state or barely altered, like strawberries, carrots, and milk. Processed culinary ingredients: These ingredients are created through minimal processing, like pressing, refining, grinding, or milling. The category includes things like olive oil and almond flour. Processed foods: Foods in this category are changed from their natural state. They usually have sugar, oil, salt, or other substances added. Canned tuna and some cheese fall under this umbrella. Ultra-processed foods: Ultra-processed foods contain ingredients like artificial colors and flavors, preservatives for shelf stability, and other ingredients to preserve texture. Many packaged foods are considered ultra-processed. What did the report say? The report doesn't have great things to say about ultra-processed foods, calling them a 'growing public health challenge.' Even more, 'most ultra-processed foods overlap with foods high in saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium, which are already targets for cardiometabolic risk reduction,' the report states. The report lists a link between ultra-processed foods and a range of serious health complications, including heart attacks, stroke, sleep disorders, depression, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. But the report also stresses the importance of identifying 'high-risk' ultra-processed foods subgroups to break down healthier options within this category. By encouraging people to have less of the most harmful ultra-processed foods and steering them more towards 'a small number of select, affordable ultra-processed foods of better diet quality,' people may improve their health risks, the review says. The best ultra-processed foods The AHA stops short of saying that certain ultra-processed foods are actually healthy. But the organization flags some options as being better for you than others. Those include: Low-sodium whole-grain breads and crackers Low-sugar yogurts Tomato sauces Nut- or bean-based spreads Flavored dry-roasted chickpeas Unsweetened, dried fruit-based snacks Unsweetened high-fiber cereal Plant-based meat and dairy alternatives that are low in sodium, added sugars, and saturated fat, like soy milk and tofu 'Some ultra-processed foods can provide essential nutrients,' says Keri Gans, R.D., author of The Small Change Diet. 'In contrast, others are loaded with added sugar, sodium, and unhealthy fats. Knowing the difference helps you choose options that work best for your health and your lifestyle.' These foods 'can actually provide useful nutrients and help people get affordable, convenient foods—especially when fresh options are harder to find,' says Danbee Kim, M.D., nutrition expert, weight loss surgeon, and assistant professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School. Labeling some ultra-processed foods as better than others may also help people make more informed choices, says Kathleen Moore, R.D.N., a registered dietitian nutritionist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. 'Labeling all ultra-processed foods as 'bad' may discourage the consumption of some nutrient-rich convenient options, like whole grain breads, cereals and cereal bars, yogurt, and grab-and-go meals,' she says. 'Sometimes it is useful to use some ultra-processed foods to save time or to incorporate balanced meal options when fresh foods are limited. Knowing which ultra-processed foods are more healthy will help consumers make better choices.' The worst ultra-processed foods The AHA also broke down the least healthy ultra-processed foods. Those include: Chicken nuggets Sausage Hot dogs Sugar-sweetened beverages Liquid cheese products Cookies Candies Gummy fruit snacks Refined grain breads Tortillas Dairy-based desserts like ice cream Ready-to-heat meals made with refined grains, high fats, or processed meats like boxed macaroni and cheese or pizza Tortilla- and potato-based chips Is it OK to eat a lot of 'healthy' ultra-processed foods? While the AHA report called out healthier versions of ultra-processed foods, experts say that still doesn't mean you should load up. 'These can provide beneficial nutrients and fit into a balanced diet,' Gans says. 'However, still pair them with plenty of whole and minimally processed foods for optimal health.' Dr. Chen agrees. 'As much as possible, we should aim to eat whole foods rather than processed foods,' he says. But these foods have an important role for some people, as Moore points out. 'I work with many clients who incorporate ultra-processed foods into their weekly schedules for a variety of reasons,' she says. 'Some cannot seem to find time for breakfast, or have a work schedule that makes sitting down for lunch difficult. I have clients who are busy parents and benefit from a frozen family meal or 'grab and go' meal when sports events make it difficult to eat a home-cooked meal. Overall, I encourage my patients to limit ultra-processed foods to less than half of their overall consumption.' Dr. Kim suggests trying to have these foods in moderation. 'Think of 'healthier' ultra-processed foods as a tool—something you can lean on when they help make your diet more balanced or easier to stick to, but not something to make the star of your plate at every meal,' she says. How to reduce ultra-processed foods in your diet The best way to reduce ultra-processed foods in your diet is to focus on whole foods first, according to Gans. 'Be prepared. Stock your pantry with nutrient-rich staples like canned tomatoes, beans, and oatmeal,' she says. 'Include more fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and whole grains, and make small swaps, like 100% whole-grain bread for white.' In a perfect scenario, Gans says that the first ingredient in the things you eat should be a whole food. While you're at it, Dr. Kim suggests cutting back on the 'worst offenders,' especially sugary drinks, processed meats, packaged sweets, and salty snacks. 'The fewer ultra-processed foods you eat, the better—but it's about progress, not perfection,' Dr. Kim says. 'Swap out the unhealthy ones first, make room for healthier stand-ins when needed, and keep working toward a diet built mostly from whole, real foods.' You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50 Solve the daily Crossword
