Justin Trudeau sparks dating rumors after attending Katy Perry's Montreal concert
Photos and fan videos of the former Canadian Prime Minister at the Montreal concert quickly surfaced on X (formerly Twitter), showing him in the crowd during Perry's performance. The sighting follows a recent viral video posted by TMZ that shows Trudeau and Perry enjoying dinner and drinks at Le Violon, a well-known upscale restaurant in the city.
Justin Trudeau is attending tonight's show of 'THE LIFETIMES TOUR'. pic.twitter.com/sCbB2lu4E5 — Katy Perry Today (@todaykatyp) July 31, 2025
The potential new relationship comes shortly after Katy Perry's confirmed breakup with longtime partner Orlando Bloom. The pair, who share a daughter, Daisy Dove, announced earlier this month that they had ended their romantic relationship and would focus on co-parenting.
Trudeau, who stepped down from office earlier in 2025, also separated from his wife, Sophie Grégoire, in 2023 after 18 years of marriage. In a joint statement, the couple emphasized their continued commitment to their children and family despite the separation.
While neither Perry nor Trudeau has confirmed the nature of their relationship, the back-to-back public sightings have left fans buzzing on social media, calling the pairing 'wild' and 'unexpected.' As speculation grows, many are watching closely for the next public appearance from the rumored couple.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sydney Sweeney heckled over ‘racist' American Eagle ad at film premiere
Actress Sydney Sweeney faced public protest at the Los Angeles premiere of her new film Americana, as controversy surrounding her recent American Eagle ad campaign continues to generate backlash. The incident occurred on Sunday night at Desert 5 Spot in Hollywood. Sweeney, best known for her role in Euphoria, arrived on the red carpet wearing a pale yellow gown. As she exited her SUV and was escorted toward the venue, a protester off-camera shouted, 'Stop the ad, that is being racist!' The heckling was captured on video and widely circulated online shortly after the event. TMZ shares video of Sydney Sweeney being 'heckled' over the American Eagle genes/jeans ad at the premiere for her film 'Americana.' — Pop Crave (@PopCrave) August 4, 2025 The protest references Sweeney's American Eagle campaign, which has been criticized by some social media users — particularly on TikTok — for allegedly promoting racially insensitive messaging. The ad featured the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans,' which critics claimed was a thinly veiled play on 'genes,' sparking concerns about implied genetic superiority. Neither Sweeney nor her team has publicly addressed the accusation, and she did not acknowledge the heckler at the premiere. American Eagle, however, released a statement defending the campaign, stating it was about denim and Sweeney's personal story, and rejected the claims as false and defamatory. Despite the outburst, Sweeney continued posing with co-stars Simon Rex and Halsey on the red carpet. The rest of the premiere proceeded without incident. The episode highlights the growing tension between celebrity endorsements and public scrutiny, particularly around sensitive cultural issues.
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Metro Boomin claps back at critics of A Futuristic Summa in fiery tweets
Metro Boomin is hitting back at critics of his latest mixtape, A Futuristic Summa, with a series of bold tweets targeting those who aren't feeling the project. Released on August 1, the double-disc, 24-track mixtape channels early 2000s trap nostalgia—but not everyone's here for it. The St. Louis-born producer took to X (formerly Twitter) and made it clear that the tape isn't for everyone. 'A lot of y'all get no b*tches and it shows,' he tweeted, kicking off a humorous yet heated defense of his work. Metro continued with a barrage of posts targeting fans who didn't grow up partying in the 2000s or who only started listening to rap in recent years. A lot of y'all get no bitches and it shows 😭#AFUTURISTICSUMMA — Metro Boomin (@MetroBoomin) August 3, 2025 'If you started listening to rap music in 2017 then you might wanna sit this one out,' he said, adding that the project is for people who understand the culture of teen parties, collecting numbers, and flexing with tags still on clothes. IF YOU STARTED LISTENING TO RAP MUSIC IN 2017 THEN YOU MIGHT WANNA SIT THIS ONE OUT #AFUTURISTICSUMMA — Metro Boomin (@MetroBoomin) August 3, 2025 The mixtape includes features from early-2010s Southern rap staples like Travis Porter, Roscoe Dash, T.I., 2 Chainz, Young Dro, and more. Lead single 'Slide' featuring Roscoe Dash dropped alongside the announcement on July 4. Metro's tweets suggest the criticism stems from generational disconnects rather than the music itself. His goal with A Futuristic Summa was to recapture a bygone era of club-ready trap, and he's unapologetic about who it's made for.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India's deceit of nuclear programme
Deceitful history of Indian nuclear programme is well-known to the world. On 18 May 1974, India tested its Peaceful Nuclear Explosions (PNEs) at Pokhran under codename 'Smiling Buddha' and underscored this reality that the country had diverted its peaceful side of nuclear programme towards weapon-based nuclear programme. Indian nuclear programme is prestige-driven. Indian PM IK Gujral, during his meeting with US President Clinton in September 1997, asserted, "I told President Clinton that when my third eye looks at the door of the Security Council Chamber it sees a little sign that says only those with economic power or nuclear weapons are allowed. I said to him it's very difficult to achieve economic wealth." The debate surrounding development of India's nuclear programme revolves around the question of whether it was genuinely a peaceful programme with civilian applications or a clandestine effort to develop nuclear weapons. India's nuclear programme involved a pattern of exploiting civilian cooperation to build military capacity. The deception lies in how India used international support for peaceful purposes, while developing and later openly declaring nuclear weapons, without being held fully accountable like other NPT-defying nations. India began its nuclear programme in the 1940s and 1950s with so-called declared peaceful intentions. Homi Bhaba, famous Indian physicist, led the foundation of the Indian nuclear programme. Initially, the country gained international cooperation from Canada and the US under the promise that the nuclear material and technology would not be used for weapon purposes. However, India viciously diverted plutonium from a reactor supplied by Canada for 'Smiling Buddha' tests. Indian scientist Raja Ramanna, who led these so-called PNEs, lately confirmed this assertion in 1997: "The Pokhran test was a bomb, I can tell you now An explosion is an explosion and a gun is a gun, whether you shoot at someone or shoot at the ground I just want to make clear that the test was not all that peaceful." In 1968, US National Security Archives also recorded that, while visiting Trombay's Canada-India Reactor, Canadian inspectors were unnerved by data suggesting that India was heading towards developing a nuclear device. This declassified US State Department telegram revealed that Canadian nuclear experts told US diplomats about reactor fuel which had been irradiated at a low enough level to produce weapons grade plutonium. According to them, if India wanted, it could produce up to 12 kilogram of plutonium a year. Another set of US-declassified documents revealed that long before India detonated a nuclear device in May 1974, the US Intelligence Community was monitoring and analysing Indian civilian and military nuclear energy activities. US State Department official George McGhee indicated to Secretary of State Dean Rusk that people throughout the State Department seriously contemplated helping India to acquire a nuclear explosive. It was proposed that "it would be desirable if a friendly Asian power beat Communist China to the punch" by detonating a nuclear device first. Another CIA intelligence report observed in 1964 that India had all of the elements necessary to produce a nuclear weapon and it had a capability to assemble a bomb quickly. India did not plan to complete the work on a bomb initially because Indian government was convinced that the Chinese would not have an offensive capability for at least five years. India was relying on President Johnson's assurances for aid in the face of any threat by China. While mentioning Indian role towards nuclear non-proliferation regime, former Indian Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva Amandeep Gill added that India was championing the debate on asserting worldwide moratorium on nuclear testing. However, the world witnessed that the country later backed off from signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) as it tested its nuclear weapon device in May 1998. Furthermore, after the Indian PNE in 1974, a nuclear suppliers group named the London Suppliers Group (now the Nuclear Suppliers Group or NSG) was established to strengthen nuclear exports and safeguards which met for their first meeting in Nov 1974. Yet the NSG, at the behest of the Bush Administration, agreed in Sept 2008 to exempt India from some of its export guidelines. Ironically, the world remains ignorant of this fact that the very same NSG which was formed in response to 1974's nuclear tests granted a "clean waiver" to India. Since then, India has concluded numerous nuclear cooperation agreements with foreign states. An alarming situation is that these civil nuclear deals are helping India to freely build up its domestic uranium reserves for weapon grade nuclear material. Many studies acclaimed the fact that India operates world's fastest growing nuclear programme. For instance, a Harvard University study suggested that India has the capacity to produce 2261-2686 nuclear weapons. According to another study, India has sufficient material and technical capacity to produce between 356 and 492 nuclear weapons. A study published by Bulletin of Atomic Scientist estimated that India has the capacity to produce many more nuclear weapons than commonly thought: 1,044 nuclear weapons (914 plutonium-based and 130 uranium-based nuclear weapons), obtained from different reactors. Therefore, its unsafeguarded nuclear material and spent fuel pose serious regional and global concerns for proliferation. In addition, nuclear modernisation of India further makes it obvious that New Delhi is expanding its hegemonic designs beyond this region. India is in a process of increasing its ICBMs missile ranges including Agni V (5000km plus) and Agni VI (10,000km-12,000km). This indicates the country can potentially target US territory too. Similarly, India's entry into Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) is also providing an edge to India for extending its missile ranges and accessibility towards dual-use military technologies. It is certain that New Delhi's membership to the group disturbs the balance of power in the region as India is modernising its missile and space programme. As a result, contrary to ground realities, the US and other foreign states have turned a blind eye towards India. Washington is preparing India as a so-called 'net security provider' in Indian-Ocean Region - as a counterweight to China. For this, the last 10 years of Indo-US defense cooperation has been strengthening Indian military muscle and directly causing regional security implications. All in all, Indian brinkmanship to the South Asian region offers dangerous security implications. India's regional dominance is evident in its stance on military modernisation and strategic expansion. Post-Pahalgam incidents reveal that extra-regional forces have also played a crucial role in regional dynamics of South Asia. The BJP-led Hindutva leadership still remains vulnerable to potential nuclear risks in the region. Hence, a dialogue on regional peace and security in South Asia and resolution of the Kashmir dispute should be a priority for international community. Mahvish Malik The writer is a Visiting Senior Research Associate at Strategic Vision Institute, Islamabad
