Japanese manga One Piece's ‘Jolly Roger' flag becomes a real-life protest symbol in Indonesia; take a look
The flood of flags came after President Prabowo Subianto urged Indonesians to proudly raise the national red and white flag ahead of Independence Day. Instead, some have opted for Luffy's banner — a decision many see as a direct challenge to the state, a sign of discontent with what is said to be an increasingly centralised government.
In February, thousands of Indonesians took to the streets to protest against budget cuts and legislative changes to allow the military a bigger role in government
A movement under scrutiny
Not everyone has embraced the pirate banner. Deputy House Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad, widely seen as one of Prabowo's closest allies, denounced the displays. 'We must collectively resist such actions,' he had said earlier last week. Member of the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia, Firman Soebagyo of the Golkar Party, went even further, suggesting that flying the flag could amount to treason.
Yet the president's office has taken a softer stance. On Tuesday, State Secretary Minister Prasetyo Hadi said the president had 'no objection' to the flags as a form of 'creative expression.' His office said in a statement, 'However, it should not be used to challenge or diminish the significance of the red and white flag. The two should not be placed side by side in a way that invites comparison or conflict.'
Online, the movement has found fertile ground. Netizens have embraced the imagery, sharing photos of the flag and dissecting its layered meaning. Posts spread not only the visual symbol, but also the political undertones behind raising it — turning the Jolly Roger into a viral emblem of dissent.
Why the Jolly Roger resonates
One Piece, created by Eiichiro Oda in 1997, has become one of the most successful franchises in history, selling over 520 million manga copies and running for more than 1,100 anime episodes. Its appeal in Indonesia is immense, where anime fandom runs deep. In the series, Monkey D. Luffy's crew flies the Jolly Roger as a declaration of freedom and defiance against injustice. For some Indonesians, that symbolism cuts close to home. Many protestors draw a direct connection between the anime's themes and Indonesian citizens' fight for a true democratic state instead of the current facade.
Whether the wave of pirate flags fades after August 17 or continues as a form of protest, remains to be seen. But in spite of what happens in the future, it's clear that One Piece has sailed far beyond entertainment in Indonesia. Here, Luffy's banner is no longer just a fictional icon, it's a statement of rebellion — a purpose most art yearns to serve.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Row over Kalyan civic body ordering closure of meat shops on Independence Day
Thane/Mumbai, Kalyan Dombivli municipal corporation's order banning the sale of meat on Independence Day has triggered a row, drawing sharp reactions from NCP and Shiv Sena leaders who called it an infringement of the food choices of people. Row over Kalyan civic body ordering closure of meat shops on Independence Day Responding to the notice issued by KDMC, NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad on Sunday said he would host a mutton party on August 15 to highlight the "freedom" of subjective food preferences. KDMC stated that all slaughterhouses and shops of licensed butchers of goats, sheep, chickens, and large animals must remain closed for 24 hours from midnight of August 14 till midnight of August 15. The civic body warned of action under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, if any animal is slaughtered or meat is sold during the specified period. When contacted, KDMC Deputy Commissioner Kanchan Gaikwad told PTI that a similar order has been issued every year since 1988 as part of a civic resolution. Gaikwad, who signed the order, emphasised that the move was in keeping with long-standing administrative resolutions to ensure public order and observance of important national occasions. However, the Opposition is not convinced. "I am planning to host a mutton party that day. On the day we got freedom, you are taking away our freedom to eat what we want," Awhad, who represents the Kalwa-Mumbai assembly constituency in Thane district, told PTI. Earlier in the day, Awhad stated on X, "This is too much. Who are you to decide what people will eat and when?" Shiv Sena leader Aaditya Thackeray demanded the suspension of the KDMC commissioner for dictating the food choices of people. "Who is the commissioner to tell people whether they can eat non-veg or not?" he asked. Bhiwandi MP and NCP leader Suresh Mhatre too strongly opposed the restriction, calling it an infringement of people's traditional food habits. "What one should eat and what one shouldn't is a question of the people. The local fishermen community eats vegetarian and non-vegetarian food. Food habits are shaped by customs prevalent in different parts of the state. The ban on the sale of meat is incomprehensible," Mhatre told reporters. He said dietary preferences are deeply tied to cultural identity, particularly in coastal communities like the Agri Koli, and that civic authorities should respect these traditions. Kalyan MLA and Shiv Sena leader Vishwanath Bhoir, however, defended the KDMC's move. "People are not opposing the notice. What's the issue if one doesn't eat meat one day? The Opposition only knows how to criticise," he said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Why they fear the flag: How ‘One Piece' turned into a rallying cry for liberation
Somewhere far from the Grand Line, a pirate flag from Eiichiro Oda's Japanese manga and anime series, One Piece, has been making a divisive kind of landfall. Across Indonesia, ahead of the country's Independence Day on August 17, the Strawhat Pirates' Jolly Roger — the flag of Monkey D. Luffy and his fictional crew — had been hoisted beside doorways, pinned to the backs of vehicles, and flown in place of the national red and white. The image of the iconic grinning skull in a straw hat has spread far enough to catch the attention of the state. For many it was a wordless declaration that the state had been failing its people. A deputy house speaker condemned the flag as an 'attempt to divide the nation.' Another lawmaker hinted at treason. One senior aide to President Prabowo Subianto warned that the symbol, flown beside Indonesia's red-and-white, could undermine the national flag itself. If you know One Piece, you probably see it already. In the iconic world Oda has built since 1997 — of colourful pirates of all shapes and sizes fighting back against corrupt marines, genocidal monarchs, and a 'World Government' that erases history — the Jolly Roger is precisely the emblem you would fly if you loved your country but could no longer stomach what its rulers had made of it. The pirate story about friendship and treasure has long been a parable about dismantling tyranny. And if Luffy and his Strawhats existed in our world, the same officials who drape themselves in jingoist patriotism would likely call them what they routinely brand so many dissidents of oppression in the struggle for liberation. Conjuring the 'enemy' History is replete with moments when the label 'terrorist' has been stretched to fit whatever shape power needed it to. British colonial administrators used it to discredit Indian revolutionaries; apartheid South Africa applied it to Nelson Mandela. The word's elasticity has long allowed those in authority to blur the line between 'public enemy' and 'liberator'. One Piece's World Government perfects this technique, though the story also acknowledges that violence and extremism are real forces in the world, not simply fictions conjured by propaganda. In the series, the state's propaganda machine works tirelessly to recast dissent as danger. Archaeologists on Ohara, guilty of preserving forbidden history; the people of Alabasta, resisting a manufactured insurgency; the Shandians of Skypiea, holding on to land in the face of forced displacement — all are folded into the same caricature as 'enemies of peace'. In the broadcasts of the marines' war correspondents, like Big News Morgans, state violence is sanctified and its victims are rendered villains. And yet, the Strawhats are not innocent of the charge that they are a threat to the established order. They have torched government flags, attacked fortified bases, and aided revolutions in occupied territories. Before the eyes of the whole world, they have declared open war on the World Government. By the definitions in a government dossier, these are acts of terrorism. What One Piece insists on however, is that such acts cannot be divorced from the conditions that provoke them, and that sometimes the refusal to accept a peace built on the backs of the oppressed is a moral imperative. After all, buried deep in the rarely-leafed pages of the Geneva Conventions (namely Additional Protocol I to Article 1(4)) grant armed resistance to colonial domination or alien occupation the dignity of national liberation and self-determination. Which means, unlikely as it sounds, that even a silly, rubber boy with a dream operates in compliance with international humanitarian law. A politics of liberation The genius of One Piece is that it wears its politics on its sleeve while masquerading as a funny pirate story. Luffy is no Robin Hood, content to topple one bad king and prop up another. Dense and blockheaded he may be, the Strawhat captain seeks nothing less than the liberation of the global oppressed and the destruction of the order that props up oppressors in the first place. Time and again, the series drags the Strawhats into conflicts where the moral stakes are absolute. On Fish-Man Island, systemic racism has festered for centuries, pitting species against each other. In Dressrosa, a king recognised by the World Government is in fact a warlord who tortures and enslaves his people. In Ohara, the state commits a full-scale genocide to prevent the truth from escaping. You can draw parallels without even trying. The teaching guide Oda's work has inspired among activists and educators likens the actions of the World Government to atrocities being commited in real time, in the real world. It is also no accident that the worst crimes in One Piece are the ones committed under the veneer of legality. The marines' white coats are tailored for plausible deniability. And so to read the series as apolitical is to ignore its very essence, that law and order are meaningless when they serve only the powerful. Gaza and the Strawhats In its peculiarities of distilling moral clarity into more bite-sized food for thought, the Internet has been asking: would Luffy free Palestine? For One Piece fans, the answer is almost too obvious to bother with. Set the Strawhats down in Gaza and they'd treat the siege as just another unjust island to liberate — slipping food through blockades, toppling watchtowers, and unmaking walls. And they'd probably do it knowing full well that, in the eyes of the powers they'd crossed, they would definitely be branded criminals, extremists, or worse. Since late 2023, Israeli military operations in Gaza have killed thousands of civilians, destroyed hospitals and water systems, and forcibly displaced and starved more than a million people. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have reported patterns of conduct consistent with crimes against humanity and, in the judgment of the International Court of Justice, with acts that have consistently met the legal definition of genocide. Under the logic of the World Government, Palestinians who resist this — whether by protest, or by breaking the siege, or by armed struggle — should be labeled terrorists. It is the same logic that sees no contradiction in flattening entire districts for 'security' while denouncing stone-throwing as barbarism. It is the same logic that would put Luffy's wanted poster on every wall from Tel Aviv to Washington. One can argue the tactics, the morality, and the timing of any particular act of resistance. But the broad truth remains that the oppressors have always reserved for themselves the right to decide who is 'legitimate' and who is an 'enemy of peace.' In One Piece, as in Gaza, that propogated legitimacy has less to do with justice than with obedience. Why they fear the flag This is probably why, in Indonesia, the Strawhat flag's sudden ubiquity has unsettled the political class. It's clearly not just a bit of pop culture silliness or an act of otaku indulgence. It's been a direct reminder that allegiances are not owed to governments simply because they wave the right flag. And it's a symbol that has always said: our loyalty is to freedom and not to you. When symbols like the Jolly Rogers or the keffiyeh emerge, they become threats precisely because they travel faster than the official rhetoric. They offer a shorthand for solidarity and a visual language that can't be easily co-opted. Governments can try to confiscate them and make them illegal, but in doing so, they inadvertedly confirm what their critics have been saying all along: that their authority depends on controlling what people do, and more dangerously, what they can imagine. 'One Piece isn't political' There has nevertheless been a particularly frustrating strain of denial among some fans who insist that One Piece is just an adventure, and that politics is something imported into it by overzealous critics. The vapidity behind this thought is to liken Animal Farm to a children's book about talking animals. It is to ignore that the series has, for more than two decades, depicted imperialism, systemic racism, propaganda, ethnic cleansing, and slavery as the very engines of its plot. The politics of One Piece have never been incidental, in fact, one could argue they are its very marrow. Oda's villains have always been strong in ways that mirror the worst habits of our own world. And his heroes have always been kind in ways that threaten the hierarchies we take for granted. It's not unlike the moral spine that runs through James Gunn's Superman, where the recent conversations around what the cape and the crest stand for have been far simpler, and far more subversive, than the partisan readings imposed on them. Strip away the stand-ins and you're left with a hero who refuses to weigh human lives on the scales of alliance or convenience, who will stop a massacre whether it comes from a sanctioned ally or a sworn enemy. In that sense, Luffy and Superman share a dangerous trait in the eyes of the powerful with their loyalty to the stubborn idea that the vulnerable should be protected, even if it means being called the villain by those doing the harm. If Luffy's world ever bled into ours, you could imagine his ship turning up anywhere the strong have taken over or made a prison of someone else's home. In Palestine, Sudan, the Congo, Ukraine, Xinjiang, Rakhine, Tibet, Tigray, Ireland, Syria, Artsakh, and Kurdistan — the names would change with the wind, but he would keep sailing until no one's freedom depended on the permission of their oppressor.
News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Row over Kalyan civic body ordering closure of meat shops on Independence Day
Thane/Mumbai, Aug 10 (PTI) Kalyan Dombivli municipal corporation's order banning the sale of meat on Independence Day has triggered a row, drawing sharp reactions from NCP (SP) and Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders who called it an infringement of the food choices of people. Responding to the notice issued by KDMC, NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad on Sunday said he would host a mutton party on August 15 to highlight the 'freedom" of subjective food preferences. KDMC stated that all slaughterhouses and shops of licensed butchers of goats, sheep, chickens, and large animals must remain closed for 24 hours from midnight of August 14 till midnight of August 15. The civic body warned of action under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, if any animal is slaughtered or meat is sold during the specified period. When contacted, KDMC Deputy Commissioner (Licenses) Kanchan Gaikwad told PTI that a similar order has been issued every year since 1988 as part of a civic resolution. Gaikwad, who signed the order, emphasised that the move was in keeping with long-standing administrative resolutions to ensure public order and observance of important national occasions. However, the Opposition is not convinced. Earlier in the day, Awhad stated on X, 'This is too much. Who are you to decide what people will eat and when?" Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray demanded the suspension of the KDMC commissioner for dictating the food choices of people. 'Who is the commissioner to tell people whether they can eat non-veg or not?" he asked. Bhiwandi MP and NCP (SP) leader Suresh Mhatre too strongly opposed the restriction, calling it an infringement of people's traditional food habits. 'What one should eat and what one shouldn't is a question of the people. The local fishermen community eats vegetarian and non-vegetarian food. Food habits are shaped by customs prevalent in different parts of the state. The ban on the sale of meat is incomprehensible," Mhatre told reporters. He said dietary preferences are deeply tied to cultural identity, particularly in coastal communities like the Agri Koli, and that civic authorities should respect these traditions. Kalyan (West) MLA and Shiv Sena leader Vishwanath Bhoir, however, defended the KDMC's move. 'People are not opposing the notice. What's the issue if one doesn't eat meat one day? The Opposition only knows how to criticise," he said. PTI MR COR ARU NSK view comments First Published: August 10, 2025, 21:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
