US budget deficit projected to be $1 tn higher over next decade
The U.S. federal budget deficit is projected to be nearly $1 trillion higher over the next decade than the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated in January, due to new tax and spending measures as well as tariffs, a budget watchdog said Wednesday.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's latest forecasts show a cumulative deficit of $22.7 trillion from fiscal 2026 to 2035, compared to the CBO's January forecast of $21.8 trillion, which was based on laws and policies that were in place before U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January.
The CBO, Congress' non-partisan budget referee agency, said on Monday that it will not issue its customary mid-year budget update this year and will issue its next 10-year budget and economic outlook in early 2026, offering no explanation for the move.
The CRFB, which advocates for deficit reduction, projected a $1.7 trillion deficit in fiscal 2025 or 5.6% of gross domestic product (GDP), down slightly from $1.83 trillion in 2024 and the CBO's 2025 projection of $1.87 trillion in January. But it said deficits steadily rise over the decade, reaching $2.6 trillion or 5.9% of GDP by 2035.
The new CRFB estimates include the budget effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill, as well as Trump's tariffs that are currently in place. But like CBO, they do not include the dynamic economic effects on growth from these changes, a forecasting rule that has drawn criticism from the Trump administration.The group projects the tax cut and spending bill to increase deficits, including interest, by $4.6 trillion through 2035, adding another year to the CBO's $4.1 trillion cost estimate through 2034. But CRFB estimates that this will be offset by $3.4 trillion worth of extra import duty revenue over the next decade due to Trump's new tariffs that are currently in place.
New rules restricting eligibility for health insurance subsidies will reduce deficits by another $100 billion through 2035, and Congress' rescission of prior funding to foreign aid, public broadcasting and other programs would save another $100 billion if sustained over a decade, CRFB said.Net interest payments on the national debt will total $14 trillion over the decade, CRFB projected, rising from nearly $1 trillion or 3.2% of GDP in 2025 to $1.8 trillion or 4.1% of GDP in 2035.
The forecasts are based on legislative and tariff changes since January but keep CBO's economic forecasts unchanged. Under an alternative scenario forecast by CRFB, the budget picture looks far worse, boosting deficits nearly $7 trillion higher than the CBO baseline. This scenario would see a significant part of Trump's tariffs canceled if the Court of International Trade's ruling against many of Trump's new tariffs is upheld, cutting $2.4 trillion from revenues over a decade.
The alternative scenario also assumes extension of a number of temporary tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including tax breaks on overtime, tips, Social Security income and car loan interest, higher state and local tax deduction allowances and full expensing of factory investments, adding $1.7 trillion to deficits over 10 years.
CRFB's alternative scenario also ditches the CBO's projection of a decline in 10-year U.S. Treasury yields over the decade to about 3.8%. If that interest rate stays at the current level of about 4.3%, interest costs would grow by about $1.6 trillion through 2035, CRFB said.
The total 2035 debt-to-GDP ratio would grow from 118% in the CBO January baseline to 120% under the CRFB's projected baseline scenario and 134% under the CRFB's alternative scenario.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
A week of summits reveals Trump is closer to Moscow than Europe
Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to be resisting a bilateral meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy, casting doubt over whatever hopes for peace may have been generated by a week of summit diplomacy. That bilateral meeting is supposed to be the next step in a process inaugurated by US President Donald Trump last Friday, when he and Putin met in Alaska. European leaders told Trump in a follow-up meeting in Washington on Monday that if Putin doesn't cooperate, more sanctions should be imposed on the creaking Russian economy. The week of meetings did nothing to lessen hostilities in Ukraine, where Russia appeared to try to deal a decisive blow to Ukrainian defenders ahead of the Trump-Putin summit, but was instead pushed back from previously captured territory. It also maintained a steady rain of drones and missiles on Ukraine's cities every day. Ukraine, too, kept up pressure on Russia, continuing a highly successful series of strikes against refineries and oil depots that have deprived Russia of 13 percent of its refining capacity. On the battlefield A day ahead of the Alaska summit, Russian forces attempted a major push towards Dobropillia, a city in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region that lies just 15km (9 miles) north of Pokrovsk, a target Russia has prioritised since last summer. Ukrainian General Staff spokesman Andriy Kovalev said reserves had stabilised the situation. On Friday, Dnipro Group of Forces spokesman Colonel Viktor Trehubov confirmed Russian infiltrators had been cleared from Pokrovsk and a group of outlying villages. Geolocated satellite imagery also confirmed this on Saturday. 'Russia's intention was to demonstrate strength ahead of Alaska, but in fact, for the occupier, this ends with its destruction,' Zelenskyy said in his Friday evening address. Russia did seize some land. Its Defence Ministry confirmed the capture of Sobolivka near Kupiansk in Ukraine's northern Kharkiv region on Tuesday, and Novogeorgievka in Dnipropetrovsk and Pankovka in Donetsk on Wednesday. Russia also continued its aerial campaign against Ukraine's cities, launching 1,421 missiles between August 14 and 21. Ukraine downed 1,114 of them. Over the same period, it downed 38 missiles out of a total of 62 launched. Ukraine, too, continued its long-range campaign to destroy Russia's ability to wage war. It struck the Lukoil oil refinery in Volgograd on August 14 and the Rosneft Syzran Oil Refinery in Samara region on Friday. Both attacks caused explosions and fires. Ukraine on Friday also struck the port of Olya in Russia's Astrakhan region, through which it says Russia imports drones and other war supplies from Iran. It said the strike had also destroyed the Port Olya 4 vessel, which was carrying Shahed-type drone components and ammunition from Iran. On Tuesday, Ukrainian drones struck a Russian freight train carrying oil through Zaporizhia. Aerial video showed several oil cars burning. Russian authorities said on Tuesday that they had thwarted an attempt to blow up the Crimea Bridge, a major supply route, when they seized a car carrying 130kg (286lbs) of explosives. The car had been 'driven across many European countries' to end up in Georgia, they said. It was then supposed to travel to Russian territory on board a ferry, before being driven across the bridge and detonated. From Anchorage to Washington Meanwhile, Trump appeared to seesaw between the positions of his interlocutors across the two summits. On August 13, Trump had warned of 'very severe consequences' if Putin did not stop the war in Ukraine. He had previously said he was considering a severe package of primary sanctions on Russia and secondary measures on countries buying its oil and gas that is being drafted in the US Senate. After spending just under three hours in talks with Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson near Anchorage on Friday, Trump reversed himself on sanctions, opening a new rift between the US and Ukraine's European allies. 'Because of what happened today, I don't have to think about that. Maybe I have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks,' Trump told Fox presenter Sean Hannity. 'What happened' remained something of a mystery because Putin and Trump took no questions from the media, and the US leader made other concessions. Trump moved away from his demand for a ceasefire, a condition he announced shortly after assuming office. 'The US president's position has changed after talks with Putin, and now the discussion will focus not on a truce, but on the end of the war. And a new world order. Just as Moscow wanted,' Olga Skabeyeva, a prominent Russian state TV host, wrote on Telegram. Trump has previously made another key concession to Moscow, and he repeated it en route to Alaska when he ruled out Ukraine's membership in NATO. Asked what security guarantees Ukraine would receive, he said, 'Not in the form of NATO, because, you know, there are things that will not happen.' Ukraine and Europe agree to none of these concessions, and European leaders said they would accompany Zelenskyy to Washington for a follow-up summit on Monday. Zelenskyy had begun to prepare for another meeting with Trump at least 10 days ago, when the Alaska summit was announced. Last week he agreed five principles with European allies – that a ceasefire was a precondition for peace talks, that sanctions should be strengthened if Russia did not cooperate, that Russia could not have a veto over security guarantees for Ukraine, that the US had to be included as a security guarantor along with Europe, and that no deal concerning Ukraine could be made without Ukraine's consent. During Monday's summit in the White House, European leaders appeared to have won only their last two points. Trump has agreed to make no deals with Putin without Ukraine's consent. 'It's not a done deal at all. Ukraine has to agree,' he told Hannity on Friday. On security guarantees, Trump told reporters ahead of talks, 'They're going to be our first line of defence because they're there, they're Europe, but we're going to help them out also, we'll be involved.' 'The fact that you [Trump] have said 'I am willing to participate in security guarantees' is a big step, is really a breakthrough, and thank you for that,' said NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who was present at the summit. On Tuesday, Trump clarified on the Fox News entertainment network that this did not mean sending US troops to Ukraine, but meant lending air defence support. It was unclear if Trump had agreed to a collective defence with Ukraine, as Zelenskyy and EU leaders have asked. 'We need security to work in practice, like Article 5 of NATO,' said Zelenskyy on Saturday after meeting with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen. Certainly, a gulf continued to separate Trump from the leaders of Europe on the first three points. 'I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire. So let's work on that, and let's try to put pressure on Russia. Because the credibility of these efforts we're undertaking today are depending on at least a ceasefire from the beginning of negotiations,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told Trump. French President Emmanuel Macron told an NBC interviewer it would be 'impossible' for Ukrainian officials to negotiate a peace deal as bombs were falling on their cities. But Trump said a ceasefire was not a part of any of the 'six wars' he claims to have settled. Russia poured scorn on European security guarantees. 'The brainless Gallic rooster can't let go of the idea of sending troops to 'Ukraine',' wrote Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council. 'We cannot agree with the current proposal to resolve issues of collective security without Russia,' said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in a press conference on Wednesday, calling the idea 'utopian'. Macron pointed out that Russia became a security guarantor of Ukraine when recognising its independence in 1991, and that led to the Russian invasion. Russia also appeared to ignore the diplomatic path outlined by Trump and the Europeans, consisting of a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy in the next two weeks, followed by a trilateral meeting that would include Trump. Although White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday that Putin had agreed to the bilateral meeting, there was no Kremlin confirmation as of Thursday afternoon. Instead, Lavrov offered merely to send more senior negotiators to an existing format of bilateral talks with Ukraine that doesn't include the two presidents – an offer echoed by Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov. This appeared to be what Putin had in mind when he expressed faith in Alaska that 'moving along this path, we can reach the end of the conflict in Ukraine sooner rather than later'. 'Land for peace' Reuters reported that Putin had demanded the unoccupied parts of Ukraine's eastern regions of Luhansk and Donetsk ahead of the Alaska summit, in return for a few pockets of land Russia has seized and a freezing of the front line in the southern regions of Zaporizhia and Kherson. The sources were two unnamed White House officials. There was no mention of what would happen in other parts of the front; Ukraine is also currently defending its northern regions of Kharkiv and Sumy. Trump later told Hannity that he and Putin had 'largely agreed' on a territorial deal in Alaska. 'I think we're pretty close to a deal,' he said, adding, 'Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'.' According to Reuters, Zelenskyy did say no. European leaders continue to stand on principle, saying no land can be won through aggression, and Ukraine shouldn't be asked to cede any territory to Russia as part of a formula known as 'land for peace'. 'Once we recognise part of Donbas [as Russian territory]… There is no more international order,' Macron said, using a term that refers to the regions of Luhansk and Donetsk. 'This isn't compliant with the UN Charter. And the day after, our collective credibility, the US, Europeans, permanent members of the Security Council, will be totally zero.' But Trump mentioned this month that any peace deal will involve a 'land swap' between Russia and Ukraine. Trump also appeared willing to concede large tracts of Ukrainian land to Russia. Vladimir Zharikhin, a Kremlin-affiliated expert, suggested Trump had ruled out as impossible the return of Crimea to Ukraine, calling it de facto recognition of its possession by Russia. Despite its ongoing war, Russia insists that 'Neither Crimea, nor Donbas, nor Novorossiya as territories have ever been our goal,' Lavrov told the Rossiya-24 TV channel. 'We never spoke about seizing any territories,' he said. 'Our goal was to protect the people, the Russian people, who had lived on these lands for centuries, who discovered these lands,' Lavrov said. Yet Russia has never offered to give up occupied territories.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
New York appeals court tosses $515m civil fraud penalty against Trump
An appeals court in New York has thrown out a civil fraud penalty that would have cost United States President Donald Trump and his business associates nearly half a billion dollars, calling the fine 'excessive'. On Thursday, a five-judge panel in New York's Appellate Division rendered its decision after weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months. In its ruling, the panel cited the Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution, which prohibits the government from levying unduly harsh penalties on its citizens. The case stems from a civil suit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who argued that Trump had inflated his financial records in order to secure advantages with insurance companies, banks and other financial institutions. In February 2024, a lower court had ordered Trump to pay $355m in penalties, an amount the appeals court called into question. That amount has since grown to about $515m due to accumulating interest. 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' two of the panel's judges, Dianne T Renwick and Peter H Moulton, wrote in one opinion.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Uganda agrees deal with US to take in deported asylum seekers
Uganda has agreed to take in nationals from third countries who may not get asylum in the United States but do not wish to return to their countries of origin, Kampala's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. The ministry said on Thursday that the agreement is based on the conditions that those seeking asylum do not have criminal records and that they are not unaccompanied minors, adding that details of the deal are still being worked out. US President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, with his administration seeking to increase removals to third countries, including by sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and the southern African kingdom of Eswatini. At roughly 1.7 million, Uganda already hosts the largest refugee population in Africa, according to the United Nations, and is the latest East African country to announce such a deal with Washington, joining Rwanda and South Sudan. 'This is a temporary arrangement with conditions including that individuals with criminal records and unaccompanied minors will not be accepted,' Vincent Bagiire Waiswa, the ministry's permanent secretary, said in a statement. He also stated Uganda's preference that 'individuals from African countries shall be the ones transferred to Uganda'. 'The two parties are working out the detailed modalities on how the agreement shall be implemented,' he said. It was not clear if the agreement had been signed, but the ministry statement said it had been 'concluded'. The announcement comes a day after a senior Ugandan official denied media reports saying that the country had agreed to take in people deported from the US, saying it lacked the facilities to accommodate them. Foreign Affairs Minister Henry Okello Oryem told the Associated Press news agency that while Uganda has a benevolent refugee policy, there are limits. 'We are talking about cartels: people who are unwanted in their own countries. How can we integrate them into local communities in Uganda?' he asked. He said the government was in discussions about 'visas, tariffs, sanctions, and related issues, not accepting illegal aliens from the US. That would be unfair to Ugandans'. The UN's refugee agency notes that Uganda has a 'progressive refugee policy, maintaining an open-door approach to asylum'. However, the country also saw a 'significant' increase in arrivals in 2024, it said, primarily as a result of Sudan's civil war, but also unrest in South Sudan and the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has taken a number of actions aimed at speeding up deportations of undocumented migrants to third countries. In July, the US deported five men with criminal backgrounds to Eswatini and sent eight more to South Sudan. Trump's administration also deported hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador, where they were kept in a high-security jail with poor conditions before being returned to Venezuela. Rights experts have warned that the deportations risk breaking international law by sending people to countries where they face the risk of torture, abduction and other abuses.
