logo
Sainsbury's embroiled in dupe row as independent flavoured butter brand accuses supermarket giant of making 'carbon copies' of its products

Sainsbury's embroiled in dupe row as independent flavoured butter brand accuses supermarket giant of making 'carbon copies' of its products

Daily Mail​13-05-2025

Sainsbury's has become embroiled in a bitter copycat spat with an independent butter brand.
The British supermarket is facing claims from Sublime Butter that its new Taste the Difference butter range, released last week, comprises 'carbon copies' of its products.
Sublime Butter offers premium butters in flavours such as garlic and herb and garlic, rosemary, and mint at prices of up to £4.95.
While the brand has found success at various retailers and is stocked in Harrods and Selfridges, it has claimed that Sainsbury's has 'gone and accidentally made carbon copies of the ones we sent you last year.' Sainsbury's has denied the claims.
Sublime Butter founder Tony Ho told The Grocer that Sainsbury's contacted his brand in July last year to consider stocking them, which led to conversations about flavours and them sending 'loads of samples', said Ho.
Ho, who has approached the Groceries Code Adjudicator over the matter, said the retailer then went radio silent without offering an explanation as to why.
Taking to Instagram, the brand publicly directed a letter to Sainsbury's after the retailer 'ghosted' their attempts of direct communication.
'Your 'new' range of flavoured butters look great,' the statement said, continuing, 'Particularly the Chimichurri and the Truffle, Parmesan & Black Pepper ones. Did you come up with those yourselves? Be honest now.
'Because it seems like you've gone and accidentally made carbon copies of the ones we sent you last year. You know, the ones you pretended you wanted to stock? We won awards for ours though.
'Not to cry over spilled milk but as a small producer, we're sick of having giant supermarkets swoop in, ask for samples, and then rip us off.
'We're good people working hard to make something we're proud of. We love what we do. We find joy in helping people to eat better. Bad sportsmanship from big players means that it's increasingly difficult to do.'
Sublime Butter concluded the post by urging Sainsbury's to develop 'original' products in the future, writing, 'Imitation is the greatest form of flattery, so thank you. But also: stop and think.
'Take the £££s you've spent copying us and make something original. Go out on a limb.
'All these supermarket price wars and you've all forgotten the one true basis of any good brand: stand for something. Then, maybe you won't have to stoop to following in other people's wake.'
A Sainsbury's spokesperson told MailOnline, 'There is no truth in these claims. We value our supplier relationships deeply - every supplier is an essential partner to our business and no matter their size or scale we are committed to fair treatment and trusted partnerships.
'We launched our Taste the Difference flavoured butter range in response to growing customer demand for more flavourful butter and joined several other retailers with launches in this category, based on customer insights and following well-established flavour trends in the market.
'Our own label product development process operates entirely separately and the team has no contact or discussion with suppliers over the brands we stock.'
It comes after Aldi encountered dupe allegations after an independent company accused the supermarket giant of ripping off its product last year.
Joe Moruzzi, managing director of Surrey-based brand Pleese, claimed the supermarket giant had designed a dupe of his brand Freezecakes.
Taking to Instagram the the dessert company shared a clip saying Aldi even 'had the cheek' to call their dupe the same name, just dropping the 's' and used its slogan, 'It's not ice cream', which Pleese claims it has trademarked.
Freezecakes, available in Waitrose, Co-op and Consort Frozen Foods, are frozen cheesecakes in a tub, made from 40 percent cream cheese with flavoured sauces and biscuit pieces.
FEMAIL understands the product is not currently on sale in Aldi and the supermarket giant was in touch with Pleese.
Joe claimed that he was alerted to the Aldi product when customers sent them photos via social media.
Commenting on a picture of a very similar cheesecake product found in Aldi, which was shared by uknewestfoods on Instagram, one person said, 'The nerve! Freezecakes are an amazing little company. Get f**** Aldi.'
Another wrote, 'Oh that is so naughty to rip off a new fledgling company, I supported you with the Colin/Cuthbert cake, but this is low! Very disappointed in you!'
Meanwhile, another said, 'This is not cool at all. Ripping off a small business so blatantly, make sure you pick up the original, and best from @freezecakes'
Speaking to FEMAIL, Pleese boss Joe said, 'Initially I thought great, the frozen dessert category is growing, I then looked closer and saw Freezecakes and 'it's not ice cream', two names and phrases we use and have trademarked. They're also exactly the same flavours.
'We're all about growing the category, but when large companies just copy tiny companies like for like it's disheartening for us and potentially off putting for new entrepreneurs.
'We're here to stand up for small businesses and I hope this is a note to encourage any copycat ideas to be less intrusive and detrimental to small brands that have worked so hard and made many sacrifices to get to where they are.'
A Pleese employee took to Instagram to address the controversy saying, 'For those that don't know us, we are Pleese and we had to concept for a Cheesecake dessert that could be eaten like ice cream back in 2017.
'We started making overload cheesecakes which were loved by all, and we even made one for The Queen.
'Fast forward to 2020, we finally had the concept of creating a frozen cheesecake that could be eaten like ice cream from a tub, layers of cheesecake with biscuit chunks, fancy inclusions and sauces, we sold these via our website.
'Three years later we finally launched in the supermarkets and we were over the moon as we are still a startup brand with less the five employees. '
After receiving snaps of the dupe from their loyal followers on social media the Pleese team said they had a feeling it was going to happen.
They said: 'Products get duped all the time, but we are the little guys, we are not a massive company with thousands of staff. 18 months ago we were still making this product by hand in a little kitchen in Redhill.
'The thing that got us was the name, Freezecake, not Freezecakes with an S, singular, that and 'it's not ice cream' which is trademarked by us, is featured on their tub.
The brand said they refuse to be 'bullied' and want to 'raise awareness' for all the small brands this is happening to.
FEMAIL understands the product is not currently on sale in Aldi stores.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

France's Mistral launches Europe's first AI reasoning model
France's Mistral launches Europe's first AI reasoning model

Reuters

time13 minutes ago

  • Reuters

France's Mistral launches Europe's first AI reasoning model

PARIS, June 10 (Reuters) - Mistral on Tuesday launched Europe's first AI reasoning model, which uses logical thinking to create a response, as it tries to keep pace with American and Chinese rivals at the forefront of AI development. The French startup has attempted to differentiate itself by championing its European roots, winning the support of French President Emmanuel Macron, as well as making some of its models open source in contrast to the proprietary offerings of OpenAI or Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google. Mistral is considered Europe's best shot at having a home-grown AI competitor, but has lagged behind in terms of market share and revenue. Reasoning models use chain-of-thought techniques - a process that generates answers with intermediate reasoning abilities when solving complex problems. They could also be a promising path forward in advancing AI's capabilities as the traditional approach of building ever-bigger large language models by adding more data and computing power begins to hit limitations. For Mistral, which was valued by venture capitalists at $6.2 billion, an industry shift away from "scaling up" could give it a window to catch up against better capitalized rivals. China's DeepSeek broke through as a viable competitor in January through its low-cost, open-sourced AI models, including one for reasoning. OpenAI was the first to launch its reasoning models last year, followed by Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab a few months later. Meta (META.O), opens new tab, which also offers its models open-sourced, has not yet released a standalone reasoning model, though it said its latest top-shelf model has reasoning capabilities. Mistral is launching an open-sourced Magistral Small model and a more powerful version called Magistral Medium for business customers. "The best human thinking isn't linear - it weaves through logic, insight, uncertainty, and discovery. Reasoning language models have enabled us to augment and delegate complex thinking and deep understanding to AI," Mistral said. American companies have mostly kept their most advanced models proprietary, though a handful, such as Meta, has released open-source models. In contrast, Chinese firms ranging from DeepSeek to Alibaba have taken the open-source path to demonstrate their technological capabilities. Mistral Small is available for download on Hugging Face's platform and can reason in languages including English, French, Spanish, Arabic and simplified Chinese.

Revealed: The spiralling cost of housing foreigners
Revealed: The spiralling cost of housing foreigners

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Revealed: The spiralling cost of housing foreigners

Foreign-born heads of households in London cost Britain around £3.6 billion a year in discounted rent, Telegraph analysis suggests. Nearly half of all social housing in the capital, 48 per cent, is occupied by foreign-born heads of household, data from the 2021 census shows. This is well over the national average of 19 per cent. These households benefit from cheap rents which, when compared to private rent in London, average out at a discount of around £11,600 per year per household. Responding to the figures, Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'This research shows how the huge costs of mass, low-skilled migration are often hidden from the public. When you lift up the bonnet, it's clear that the level and composition of immigration have been hugely economically harmful for decades'. The figures also show some 35 per cent of working age foreign-born heads of households in London's social housing are either unemployed or economically inactive, despite living in one of the UK's most prosperous regions. The most recent ONS figures show that output per hour worked in the capital is approximately 26 per cent higher than the UK average. The figures cast further doubt on the UK's migration policies. Last year, the Office for Budget Responsibility found that low-paid migrant workers were costing taxpayers more than £150,000 each by the time they hit state pension age The proportion of social housing allocated to foreign-born lead residents varies drastically across the capital. A majority of social housing is occupied by a foreign-born lead tenant in 14 of the city's 32 boroughs, with only 10 areas in the capital falling below the level of 40 per cent. Over 60 per cent of social housing in Brent and Westminster is allocated to foreign-born lead residents but this drops to 16 per cent in Havering. To come to the figure of £3.6 billion, The Telegraph matched rents for London's 'general needs' social housing stock across local authority and private registered providers with median private sector rents for properties with equivalent numbers of bedrooms. This suggested that socially rented properties were approximately £11,992 cheaper per year in 2021. Adjusted for estimated service charges, the net discount works out at £11,610. Added up across the city across the whole of the population, this suggests a total subsidy of approximately £7.7 billion. If households headed by foreign-born residents take up a proportional share of this sum, it would amount to roughly £3.6 billion per year in total discounts. Separate data from the English Housing Survey suggests that there is significant variation between ethnic groups with regards to social housing use. Roughly 48 per cent of Black Caribbean households, 40 per cent of Black African households, and 40 per cent of Bangladeshi households in England live in social housing, compared with 16 per cent of White British households, and 5 per cent of Chinese and Indian households.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store