
Climate extremists make our kids despair — and groom them to join the left's crusades
Extreme privilege and fame have never been a recipe for emotional stability, but today's Hollywood offspring seem especially unequipped to face reality.
Case in point: Ramona Sarsgaard, the 18-year-old daughter of actors Maggie Gyllenhaal and Peter Sarsgaard, who was arrested this month for criminal trespass during a pro-Palestinian protest at Columbia University's Butler Library.
This wasn't her first foray into activism. Sarsgaard has been a committed climate crusader since childhood.
At just 13, she gave a speech at Amnesty International's Ambassador of Conscience award ceremony in honor of Greta Thunberg.
Like Thunberg, Ramona has built her identity around the belief that climate catastrophe is not only inevitable but imminent.
Sarsgaard marched in the Youth Climate Strike in New York and, according to her mother, is among the many children who 'aren't able to push out of their minds the dire situation that we're in.'
She's not alone: An entire generation has been raised to believe they are living through the end of the world — and their mental health reflects it.
Just this week Violet Affleck, 19, daughter of Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck, published an essay in Yale University's 'Global Health Review' describing a heated conflict with her mother earlier this year.
'I spent the January fires in Los Angeles arguing with my mother in a hotel room,' she wrote — in fights triggered by Garner's shock at the devastation.
'As a lifelong Angelena and climate-literate member of Generation Z,' Violet explained, 'my question had not been whether the Palisades would burn but when.'
She went on to call climate change an 'existential and accelerating' crisis.
It's clear she wasn't just debating a hot topic with her mother — she was evangelizing a worldview that sees environmental collapse as a given.
If that mindset sounds extreme, that's because it's being carefully cultivated.
Affleck's worldview was deliberately drilled into her by climate activists, who have groomed an entire generation to join their crusade.
At institutions like Yale, climate anxiety is treated as a developmental inevitability.
An advice column in a Yale newsletter a few years ago instructed parents and caregivers to lead even the youngest children through therapeutic climate exercises, like imagining their favorite animal being impacted by climate change and speaking from its perspective.
Just imagine launching that conversation with your 4-year-old: 'Think of Peter Rabbit. Now imagine Peter has run out of food and dies because he's too thirsty, has no grass to eat, and no shade to take refuge in as temperatures soar.'
You couldn't come up with a more traumatic lesson for a young child to engage in if you tried —yet the 'experts' at Yale recommend it as a therapeutic template to explain to children that the world is ending.
The consequences of this approach are measurable.
A global 2021 study on climate anxiety found that in 31 of 32 countries, distress about climate change was linked to poorer mental health.
In another survey of 10,000 young people across 10 nations, three-quarters said 'the future is frightening,' and more than half believed that 'humanity is doomed.'
And yet the same activists, media outlets and global institutions that amplify climate alarmism are now wringing their hands over the youth mental-health crisis.
A pair of Stanford University psychiatrists, discussing the 2021 anxiety study on the World Economic Forum website, sought to normalize what they called 'climate distress' — defining it as a troubling blend of dread, sadness, powerlessness and anger.
It's 'a normal and appropriate thing to feel,' they claimed, in the face of 'hurricanes, droughts and floods, and clear evidence that our planetary boundaries are being overshot.'
But let's be honest: These experts are reporting on the very fire they helped start.
And they need that fire to keep the recruits engaged and energized to stay in the fight.
Sarsgaard, Thunberg and Affleck are the natural products of a culture that's fed kids a steady diet of existential panic.
Raised in privilege, surrounded by wealth and educated at elite institutions, these young women nonetheless see themselves as doomed.
The first two already boast criminal records — and Affleck, by her own account, has become so unbearable a scold that her family may opt to shelter in place next time disaster threatens, rather than crowd into a cramped hotel room with her truculent presence.
They're fighting an existential battle to save the planet — one they've been convinced is rapidly coming to an end.
And as Sarsgaard demonstrates, they're easy prey for those pushing the next leftist cause du jour.
They represent an entire generation driven off the deep end by their own manufactured anxiety.
We told kids the world was ending. They listened.
Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Huge pro-Israel summit in Texas canceled over threats
A massive pro-Israel conference in Texas has been canceled over 'threats from violent Jihadists' — even after changing venues over security concerns, organizers said. The Israel Summit, scheduled for next Monday through Wednesday in Dallas, switched locations due to 'indirect and direct threats made by American, pro-Hamas, Jihadist groups, who issued calls to 'target' the Israel Summit,' the organizers said in a statement. But anti-Israel activists outed the new venue and planned to protest the event, according to Luke Hilton from the Israel Guys, which was co-hosting the event. 'This is America in 2025,' former US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who was one of the slated speakers for the event, wrote on X. AFP via Getty Images 'Honestly, it feels like it's no longer safe for Jews and Christians who support Israel to publicly,' he said. He said law enforcement uncovered other threats on the dark web to 'target' the event — which was set to host some 1,000 attendees. 'After the two Israeli embassy staffers were murdered in Washington, DC, two weeks ago and then last week people were firebombed in Colorado, to me and to all the rest of us on our team, the word 'targeting' — that's a call to violence,' Hilton said. The three-day summit is run by pro-Israel Christian organizations and was expected to feature former US officials, members of the Israeli government and survivors of Hamas' Oct. 7 terror attack. Ten days before the Israel Summit was set to kick off, Dallas authorities said the threat level had been elevated, said Josiah Hilton, also of Israel Guys, according to Jewish New Syndicate. That forced the event's organizers to come up with 'a mandatory security plan with a substantial budget estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars,' leaving them to find a new location. They then found a 'new and significantly safer location just north of Dallas' with 'top-tier private security, with additional support from local law enforcement and coordination with the Texas governor's office.' But ultimately they had to cancel after the Palestinian Youth Movement Dallas outed the new spot as 'an isolated compound owned by staunch Israel ally evangelical televangelist Kenneth Copeland' under the campaign 'Texas un-welcomes the genocide summit.' 'This is America in 2025,' former US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who was one of the slated speakers for the event, wrote on X. He added: 'Law enforcement was completely cooperative but the threats were of a nature that required cancellation. When @POTUS says we need to take our country back, this is a good example of what he means!'


Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump could knock NY's climate goals over the edge
New York state was already struggling to meet its aggressive climate targets before President Donald Trump took office. Now it's locked in a showdown with the president and his antagonism toward environmental policies, writes Benjamin Storrow. Within weeks of taking office, Trump targeted a state plan to limit the number of gasoline-powered cars and trucks entering Manhattan. He reversed his decision to cancel a major offshore wind project in exchange for building a pair of natural gas pipelines the state had previously rejected. And that's on top of federal policies, such as killing generous clean energy tax incentives, that will make it harder for New York to go green. 'New York has been a leader on climate and this administration is coming after progressive climate policy,' Raya Salter with the state's Climate Action Council told Ben. 'That's why we need for our state to fight and push harder than ever and be the model that this country and the world needs.' But even without Trump, it's an uphill battle. Only a quarter of the state's electricity is produced with clean power, lagging far behind its goal of 70 percent by 2030. Natural gas companies are challenging the state's ban on gas hookups in new buildings. And New York's climate pollution from transportation remains stubbornly high, continuing to account for 40 percent of its greenhouse gas emissions. Rising energy costs are only complicating matters. While most of the country saw natural gas prices fall in 2024, New York and New England were exceptions. Gas prices in New York increased by 14 percent compared with 2023. That has created a political pressure point for Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul, who said she is open to new gas pipelines to lower costs for consumers. While Hochul disputes it, Trump contends he secured Hochul's openness to pipelines by agreeing to lift his stop-work order on an offshore wind project. Environmental activists worry the move will further imperil the state's climate targets. 'It's going to be hard to reach the goals if you keep building infrastructure to expand [natural gas] consumption,' said Ira Joseph, a longtime gas analyst and senior research associate at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy. Thank goodness it's Friday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: James Bikales breaks down why the auto industry's powerful trade group isn't taking a public position on Republicans' megabill. Power Centers Life after bromance: What's next for DOGE?The very public internet feud between Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk this week has thrown the fate of Musk's Department of Government Efficiency operation into question, write Robin Bravender and Hannah Northey. Trump downplayed the significance of the pair's blowup Thursday evening. But some federal employees are hopeful that DOGE will lose power within the administration after its early push to slash funding and fire employees. The fracas also raises questions about whether Musk's allies who remain in the DOGE operation will stick around, or might leave — or be nudged out — sooner than they had planned. How one climate tech company is hanging onThe bloodbath that Republicans are making of federal incentives for climate projects has stopped — for now — at the border of House Speaker Mike Johnson's district, writes Debra Kahn in Currents, POLITICO's climate column. That's where Heirloom Carbon is planning to build its first commercial-scale plant capable of extracting carbon dioxide from the air, by way of shallow trays of crushed limestone that absorb the planet-warming gas. In Other News Poaching prevention: To save rhinos, conservationists are removing their horns. Smoke knows no boundaries: What Canada's fires mean for the U.S. in the future. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Trump's mad dash to unleash more mining and burning of 'beautiful clean coal' across the U.S. is running face-first into unfavorable market realities. The Transportation Department formally started the process of rewriting the Biden administration's fuel economy standards for cars and trucks, which it says are legally flawed. Forest Service employees who accepted Trump's offer to resign will still be allowed to take on wildfire assignments this summer, according to a new agency memo. That's it for today, folks. Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend!


Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Elon Musk's Secret Weapon in His War With Donald Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. It was barely an hour after Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt last summer when Elon Musk declared his full support. The post on X, his social media platform, landed fast and took off like one of Musk's rockets: "I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery." Musk—once ridiculed by Trump for leading companies that made "driverless cars that crash" and "rocketships to nowhere"— slapped a red MAGA hat on his profile photo, lit up X with pro-Trump memes, and used his platform's reach to carpet-bomb swing states with political propaganda dressed as engagement. By sundown, Trump's digital war room was headquartered on X, and Musk looked like the unofficial campaign manager. Ten months later, he detonated that alliance in real time. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk joins U.S. President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk joins U.S. President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. Photo byEvery political strategist in Washington could see it coming. Musk, the richest man in the world, doesn't share power. Trump, the most unrelenting figure in American politics, doesn't forgive disloyalty. Their mutual dependency—money for clout, platform for power—was a high-speed arrangement that seemed destined for a crash. For almost three years, Musk used X, formerly Twitter, to help rebuild Donald Trump's public image and support his 2024 presidential run. He reinstated Trump's account that had been banned after January 6, shared meme after meme mocking Democrats, chatted with MAGA influencers and hosted live conversations with Trump and others. Within months, Musk had reshaped the platform's algorithms to favor a content ecosystem that amplified Trump's message, according to social media researchers. "A lot of the far right returned to Twitter because all of a sudden it looked like a safe space," said Giulio Corsi, a researcher at the University of Cambridge in Britain who has been studying X's recommendation system. His findings were blunt: inflammatory posts, particularly those containing false or misleading links, surged in reach. "Tweets expressing right-leaning political bias see heightened amplification compared to the baseline model," Corsi wrote in a case study examining 2.7 million posts on X in early 2023. But the platform's bias wasn't just anecdotal. A Wall Street Journal analysis found that new users interested only in non-political topics were still bombarded with Trump-aligned content, and that pro-Trump accounts appeared twice as often as those favoring Vice President Kamala Harris during last year's presidential election. The Washington Post also reported that Republican congressional accounts received billions more views than their Democratic counterparts, further illustrating Musk's platform as a potent, asymmetric political tool. Blurred Lines Musk's hands-on management of X's internal mechanics blurred the line between owner and political actor. During the 2024 election cycle, Musk took his control to new political heights, according to Hamed Qahri-Saremi, associate professor of information systems at Cleveland State University. "We are seeing social media platform owners as active political actors, not just neutral hosts that used to be the norm," Qahri-Saremi told Newsweek. "Musk's influence on social media primarily stems from two channels: his structural control as the owner of X, which gives him gatekeeping power over policies, algorithms, and norms—and his personal activity, where he promotes specific narratives and amplifies particular users." This photo of Elon Musk was taken from a video grab taken from a video he posted on his Twitter account on October 26, 2022 when he visited the Twitter headquarters in San Francisco. Musk... This photo of Elon Musk was taken from a video grab taken from a video he posted on his Twitter account on October 26, 2022 when he visited the Twitter headquarters in San Francisco. Musk officially completed his acquisition of Twitter after months of delays. More Photo from Twitter account of Elon Musk/AFP via Getty Images It worked—for a while. After Musk endorsed Trump on X last summer, the platform's energy shifted almost immediately in MAGA's favor. Posts praising Trump surged. Once Joe Biden bowed out, content attacking Kamala Harris—including a viral AI-generated image of her in communist regalia—wasn't just allowed; it was spread by Musk himself. Kamala vows to be a communist dictator on day one. Can you believe she wears that outfit!? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 2, 2024 That shift was reinforced by Musk's overhaul of how information is verified on the platform. He ended Twitter's partnerships with professional fact-checkers, replaced them with "Community Notes"—a crowdsourced system run by anonymous users and algorithms—and removed the traditional verification badges that once signaled a user was who they claimed to be. As a result, misinformation and political propaganda spread more easily, especially from verified accounts who could pay for reach. "Other major platforms, such as Meta, subsequently adopted similar practices earlier this year, resulting in significant shifts in fact-checking content on social media platforms," Qahri-Saremi said. "Third-party, professional fact-checking does not exist on these platforms as it once did." Pull The Plug? He hasn't muted Trump—not yet. But if Elon Musk wanted to, he could do it with a keystroke. As the biggest account on X, with more than 220 million followers, Musk's reach is immediate and absolute. His posts fill the feeds of users who do not follow him. Some who have actively blocked him report that they still see his musings. His Thursday barrage of attacks on Trump—accusing him of lying, reposting calls for impeachment, and floating a Jeffrey Epstein connection over the course of about 40 posts—racked up tens of millions of impressions in a matter of minutes. On X, that means they were likely seen by the majority of active users, whether they followed him or not. That scale matters. According to a recent Pew Research Center study, 59 percent of X users say they rely on the platform as their primary source of news. With a global user base exceeding 500 million, that gives Musk a direct pipeline to shaping how vast swaths of the internet experience political reality. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk shake hands while attending the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship on March 22, 2025, in Philadelphia, Pa. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk shake hands while attending the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship on March 22, 2025, in Philadelphia, unlike Trump—who posts mainly on Truth Social, where the reach is narrower and engagement smaller—Musk controls not just the content, but the code. He can dial engagement up or down, signal boosts with a single retweet, or let critics vanish into algorithmic limbo without ever banning them outright. "He has structural control," said Qahri-Saremi. "That gives him gatekeeping power over speech norms, algorithms, and who gets seen." It wouldn't be the first time Musk reprogrammed the ground beneath his rivals' feet. Kamala Harris began her sprint toward the general election last fall, her campaign claimed posts supporting her began vanishing from timelines. Pro-Harris accounts reported sudden drops in engagement, unexplained suspensions and disappearing trending topics. Musk did not answer their questions at the time. He has denied manipulating the algorithm for political reasons, but now that X is a private company under his full control, that algorithm is a black box visible only to him and the coders who work for him. The code itself remains perhaps Musk's most potent weapon for control of the modern attention economy — should he decide to use it against the sitting president.