logo
Beauty Is Pain: 1 in 10 Americans Are Going Into Debt To Look Good—How You Can Save

Beauty Is Pain: 1 in 10 Americans Are Going Into Debt To Look Good—How You Can Save

Forbes16-07-2025
Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations.
The U.S. beauty industry raked in nearly $63 billion in 2023, but many Americans are struggling to balance rising costs and keeping up with recent beauty standards. New tariffs could push those expenses even higher.
The average American spends $897 on their appearance each year, with men averaging $728 and women averaging $1,064, according to a survey by Advanced Dermatology. Alarmingly, the survey also finds 1 in 10 Americans have taken on an average of $1,342 in debt to keep up with their appearance with beauty products, services or procedures.
With tariffs threatening more price hikes on your favorite beauty products, now is the time to rethink your beauty budget—and maximize your purchases.
As Trump's tariffs shake up the global market economy, experts anticipate disruption in beauty supply chains, leading to rising costs. Beauty products are heavily reliant on a healthy trading relationship with China, which has become increasingly strained in Trump's second term.
Kimber Maderazzo, a marketing professor at Pepperdine University and global strategy executive for brands like Procter & Gamble and Estée Lauder, told Marie Claire that tariffs would have a pronounced effect on not just raw material sourcing and packaging, but also injectables.
'Providers could face rising costs on imported products, leading to higher treatment prices, potentially reducing patient demand or compressing already tight operating margins,' said Maderazzo.
Trump's proposed tariffs on China (baseline 10% tariff) and South Korea (25% tariff) will have a pronounced adverse effect on the U.S. beauty economy, which brings in $2.6 billion in trade surplus.
Over 25,000 beauty products circulated in the U.S. mass market are primarily from China, and the increased tariff costs could get passed onto consumers at checkout. Korean products, which are the top imported cosmetics in the U.S., will likely also be harder and more expensive to source—and for consumers to purchase.
Beauty budgets can quickly snowball out of control. The average American spends $492 annually on facial care alone, with women averaging $600—and that doesn't include extras like nails or haircare, whose costs can add up month after month.
Unlike other financial 'investments,' beauty is a 'depreciating asset by design,' notes Katie Gatti Tassin, author of 'Rich Girl Nation: Taking Charge of Our Financial Futures. 'Unlike investing in actual capital—which will grow with time, it will become more valuable—when you invest in beauty, the opposite is happening,' Tassin told CNBC. 'It's going to require more and more cash to extend that half-life.'
So how can you keep your beauty spending from eating into your financial future—without forgoing your favorite treatments?
Set a beauty budget—and your expectations. Tally up how much you're spending on your beauty purchases each month (especially those random trips to Sephora) and compare it against your income. Is your beauty spending sustainable? Is it achieving the aesthetic goals you've internalized for yourself? Make adjustments or temper expectations as needed.
For those who like the joys of beauty maintenance but hate the high price tag, there are ways to keep expenditure low. Shoppers can utilize credit card portals to save money on purchases they would make anyway.
Many credit card companies like Chase and Capital One Shopping offer enticing deals if consumers make online purchases through their portals, which often offer discounts from suppliers like Sephora and Ulta. A quick scroll on the portal will display all of the available offers.
To redeem, consumers can either add the offer to their card and purchase from the retailer using the bank's participating card or click through to the site directly on the portal and check out with their bank card. A few minutes to check for offers before you make your quarterly shopping haul could save you some cash.
If you're one of 10 Americans in beauty debt, consider putting yourself on a spending detox from new aesthetic purchases. Tackle any debt that you may have full on to avoid paying interest for an extended amount of time. If you have no debt but still feel the need to do a spending detox, consider putting the money you would spend on beauty purchases into a high-yield savings account to make gains on your money and start building a safety nest.
Read More: 10 Best High-Yield Savings Accounts Of July 2025: Up To 3.80% APY
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Chinese electric carmaker Zeekr eyes pan-European growth despite tariffs, acting CEO says
Exclusive: Chinese electric carmaker Zeekr eyes pan-European growth despite tariffs, acting CEO says

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive: Chinese electric carmaker Zeekr eyes pan-European growth despite tariffs, acting CEO says

China's electric vehicle (EV) company Zeekr is committed to a broad expansion throughout the EU despite tariffs slowing its pace, the company's top European executive has told Euronews. Lothar Schupert, the acting CEO of Zeekr Europe — which is the EV arm of Geely Holdings, one of the Chinese companies targeted by EU tariffs last year — told Euronews' Europe Today the brand was "committed" to Europe. Last October the EU slapped steep duties on China-made electric vehicles (EVs) to offset the effects of Chinese state subsidies, including tax reductions and preferential lending, which Brussels says unfairly undercut European competitors. Decrying the measure as a "naked act of protectionism", Beijing responded with probes into EU-made brandy, pork and dairy, which Brussels then denounced as unfair and unjustified. As expected, Thursday's one-day EU-China summit in Beijing failed to deliver progress on these open fronts. Talks on a potential minimum pricing arrangement in order to remove the tariffs have been underway since April. Asked whether such an arrangement would be acceptable to a company like Zeekr, Schupert simply said they were an advocate of "free trade." He explained that Zeekr had launched its car brand in Europe two years ago, beginning in the Nordic markets, before continuing in Belgium, Switzerland and several others. 'And we're in the middle of the expansion plans at the moment,' he said flagging the company's plans to grow further starting with Germany, the UK, 'and also going forward with France, Italy and Spain." 'At the moment we are preparing. So in the next twelve to twenty-four months, our plans are to be live,' he said. Schubert said 'of course we are opposing against the tariffs', adding they negatively impact consumers. 'The tariffs are hindering us moving in that speed forward since last year,' he explained. But he added that that company has 'done its homework', and is "very much convinced that our sustainable go-to-market approach is now prepared'. "So our commitment is to expand further. Our commitment is to deliver high-level premium products to our consumers in Europe. And independently from the tariffs, our expansion plans goes further." Pressed about EU concerns over the subsidies Beijing pumps into its domestic companies, he said the company had to "gain the trust of the consumers." 'And that is where our main work is on now, launching the markets, creating a brand experience and having a clear relationship to the consumers in Europe, convincing with the products and also attractive pricing and price value proposition where we can be successful.'

CK Hutchison ports deal deadline likely to be extended as US-China tensions weigh, sources say
CK Hutchison ports deal deadline likely to be extended as US-China tensions weigh, sources say

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

CK Hutchison ports deal deadline likely to be extended as US-China tensions weigh, sources say

By Clare Jim, Scott Murdoch and Davide Barbuscia HONG KONG (Reuters) -CK Hutchison's plan to sell most of its $22.8 billion ports business is unlikely to be finalised anytime soon, with political brinkmanship set to continue, and sources saying that a Sunday deadline for exclusive talks was likely to be extended. The Hong Kong conglomerate's plan to sell the business, which would include two ports along the strategically important Panama Canal, to a consortium led by BlackRock and Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping company MSC, has become politicised amid an escalating China-U.S. trade war. Negotiations for the deal, which covers 43 ports in 23 countries, are on an exclusive basis between CK Hutchison, controlled by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing, and the consortium for 145 days until Sunday, as per the terms announced in March. The deal talks, however, are unlikely to collapse if the two parties do not ink a pact by Sunday, with three people close to the ports-to-telecoms conglomerate saying the parties could extend the deadline to continue exclusive negotiations. The first part of the deal - definitive documentation to sell two port operations near the Panama Canal - was also not signed by an April 2 deadline set in the sales announcement. The people declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. BlackRock declined to comment. CK Hutchison and MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, which CK Hutchison said in May was the main investor in the consortium, did not respond to requests for comment. U.S. President Donald Trump hailed the deal as "reclaiming" the Panama Canal, after his administration previously called for the removal of what it said was Chinese ownership of the ports near the canal. But in April, China's top market regulator said that it was paying close attention to CK Hutchison's planned sale and that parties to the deal should not try to avoid an antitrust review. Beijing's stance on the planned deal was made public after pro-China media launched a stinging criticism, saying China had significant national interests in the transaction and it would be a betrayal of the country. "I think at this moment it's not very optimistic that they can directly sell the ports to the consortium," said Jackson Chan, global fixed income senior manager at FSMOne Hong Kong, which has clients holding CK Hutchison bonds. "The market has already digested the news, even if it announces next week that it won't sell anymore, I don't think it'll be a shock because the market understands it wouldn't have a large impact on its operations." DEAL RISKS CK Hutchison shares, which jumped 33% the following two days after the deal was announced in early March, erased all of the gains by mid-April. But since then it regained lost ground along with the rise in the broader Hong Kong market index. The outlook for the deal has been clouded further in recent days, with a separate source telling Reuters that Chinese ports operator China Cosco Shipping Corp (COSCO) was also looking to join the consortium to buy the ports business. COSCO is requesting veto rights or equivalent power in the entity that will take over 43 ports from CK Hutchison, Bloomberg News reported this week, citing people familiar with the matter. COSCO did not respond to a request for comment. The existing consortium would likely allow COSCO into the deal, said Cathy Seifert, an analyst at CFRA Research. "The bigger risk to the deal being consummated, in my opinion, is likely the Trump administration, which is likely to block a deal that would include China," said the New Jersey-based analyst who tracks BlackRock. Ballingal Investment Advisors strategist David Blennerhassett, who publishes on the independent online research platform Smartkarma, said the addition of COSCO in the consortium was likely to enrage Trump. "Trump, who has a handful of issues already on his plate, would be incandescent," he said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

A Failed Microsoft Security Patch Is the Latest Win for Chinese Hackers
A Failed Microsoft Security Patch Is the Latest Win for Chinese Hackers

Wall Street Journal

time11 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

A Failed Microsoft Security Patch Is the Latest Win for Chinese Hackers

Last year, Satya Nadella pledged to make security priority number one at Microsoft MSFT 0.99%increase; green up pointing triangle. A new hack involving China is showing just how difficult that can be. The attack involves several versions of Microsoft's SharePoint software that serve as a document storage platform for customers who don't want to use the cloud. Microsoft released patches for a pair of SharePoint bugs earlier this month, but the fixes were quickly bypassed, allowing China-linked hackers to break into hundreds of organizations, according to security researchers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store