logo
India's smartphone and chip ambitions on track amid tariffs uncertainties

India's smartphone and chip ambitions on track amid tariffs uncertainties

The Hindu3 days ago
The announcement of a 50% tariff on exports to the U.S. from India has triggered concerns across the tech industry. On paper, it sounds like a direct threat to India's growing role in smartphone assembly and its emerging semiconductor ambitions, but in reality, the near-term impact is much smaller than headlines suggest. The structure of electronics manufacturing, the nature of global supply chains and India's unique position in this sector mean that the country's growth trajectory remains largely intact — at least for now.
'The imposition of 50% tariffs structure on India will have distinct impact across electronics exports from India to US, including smartphones, and other electronics assembled in India. In particular, the net impact will be governed by the proposed Trump's 100% tariff on inbound semiconductors supply chain,' said Dr. Danish Faruqui, the CEO of Fab Economics, a U.S. based boutique semiconductor Fab/OSAT Greenfield projects implementation and investment advisory firm.
US President Donald Trump's April 5 executive order excludes smartphones, tablets, laptops, servers and telecom equipment from reciprocal tariffs. Therefore smartphone exports to the U.S. from countries like India, China and Vietnam are insulated from reciprocal tariffs. This includes the current 50% tariff on India.
'The only constant with the U.S. tariffs has been the change of status quo dynamically over the last 4-5 months, therefore such reprieve from US tariffs on smartphone is not a guaranteed insulation,' Dr. Faruqui said.
(For top technology news of the day, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today's Cache)
'This [tariff] is more of a negotiation tactic putting pressure to achieve leverage in overall trade negotiations which would be on completely different items,' said Prachir Singh, Senior Research Analyst at Counterpoint.
Manufacturing math
It is important to note that setting up electronics manufacturing and supply chain ecosystem is a complex and tedious process that involves huge capital investments. It requires multiple layers of suppliers like chip fabrication units, printed circuit board assembly lines, camera modules makers, display panels manufacturers, batteries makers, connectors, packaging firms, testing experts and logistics handlers. And setting this up takes decades to mature. Once they are in place, they cannot be dismantled and rebuilt in another country.
'Electronics supply chain and manufacturing is inherently complex and takes decades to be built. It is nearly impractical to pressure OEMs and supply chain to setup operations in USA,' Prachir added.
Moving manufacturing in response to tariffs is unrealistic. For a company like Apple, which relies on precision ecosystem, moving production to a different place would mean years of planning and billions of fresh investment.
In the meantime, Apple faces some pressure due to tariff imposition by the U.S. on India. 'Apple could absorb some of the extra cost, at least temporarily. However, a 35 to 40% jump in the retail price of an iPhone in the U.S. is not something either Apple or the U.S. government would want or accept as normal,' said Prachir. iPhones are already premium products and a sudden price spike could hurt sales volumes and consumer sentiment.
As per Fab Economics, Global smartphone industry is not reacting well to tariff impositions resulting in demand softening in multiple world regions including US. iPhone shipments to the U.S. declined by 11% year-on-year to 13.3 million units in Q2'2025 wherein Apple reported $800 million in tariffs and forecasted $1 billion in tariff in Q3'2025.
Most of the iPhones assembled in India and exported to the U.S. are currently exempted from the 50% tariffs (25% for now). There will be no immediate disruption to India's iPhone production lines or to Apple's export plans from the country.
India's position
Even with the uncertainty around tariffs, India remains ahead of several competing manufacturing hubs. 'Compared to Vietnam, India has a far larger domestic consumer base, which means production is not entirely dependent on exports. Compared to China, India offers geopolitical diversification for global brands seeking to reduce their reliance on one country,' explained Prachir.
Factors like strong export potential with schemes like production linked incentive (PLI) and huge internal demand due to a large young population, make India a rare market. This makes India a strategic choice for electronics manufacturing in the long term.
The latest tariffs move looks less like an attempt to dismantle existing manufacturing patterns and more like a negotiation tactic before an upcoming trade deal between India and the U.S. For India, this 50% tariff is more of a background noise than an immediate operational challenge. As long as major export items like iPhones remain exempt, the impact will be muted.
'India's smartphone exports to US to remain tariff free by the virtue of proposed Trump's 100% tariff imposition plan on semiconductors that plan to exempt or provide favourable rates to companies having US manufacturing operations or having committed roadmap for US manufacturing operations: both Apple and Samsung qualify for such preferential treatment which represent over 80% of India's smartphone exports to US,' said Dr. Faruqui.
India itself is a huge market. If the tariffs pose a challenge, the local demand can act as buffer.
India's smartphone user base continues to expand with nearly 900 million smartphone users. Affordable 5G plans and cheap AI devices areexpected to drive this growth even further. For makers, serving India alongside exports creates a more balanced portfolio. This is something smaller manufacturing hubs like Vietnam lacks.
Impact on other players
While Apple's position is relatively secure for now, other manufacturers could feel less confident. Samsung recently spoke about making India a key global export hub for its devices. If the tariffs environment remains unpredictable, such expansion plans might be slowed down.
'There is a need to have long term clarity as it could create doubts in the minds of other phone makers like Samsung who recently said they wanted to make a key exports hub,' said Faisal Kawoosa, Chief Analyst, Techarc.
Similarly, emerging smartphone brands or component suppliers considering India as a base may hesitate until they see consistent policy signals from both the U.S. and India. In manufacturing, investment timelines often stretch over a decade or more. Companies prefer to commit where they can reasonably forecast market access and costs.
Even if the tariffs impact is limited, the uncertainty it creates can shake the supply chain. With trade rules changing without warning, suppliers may face challenges in planning, sourcing raw materials and deciding the pricing for the end buyers. Electronics sector, which is running on wafer-thin margins and demand is highly price-sensitive, such unpredictable move can disrupt the market.
'Such commotion stresses supply chain which makes pricing unpredictable,' added Faisal.
Semiconductor
India is also taking huge strides in semiconductor manufacturing by building chip fabrication facilities that are more complex than smartphone assembling units. It involves huge capital expenditure, sanitised manufacturing environments and extremely precise logistics for raw materials like silicon wafers, rare gases, and photolithography equipment.
India has made investment to attract semiconductor makers, but these projects could take years to become operational. For global players considering where to place their next fabs or advanced packaging units, policy stability is just as important as infrastructure. Frequent shifts in trade dynamics could complicate those decisions, even if they do not stop them outright.
'Due to Trump's administration semiconductor tariffs enactment there will be distinct tailwinds for players in the U.S. allied countries, including beneficiaries of the U.S. Chips Act who are pursuing manufacturing operations on the U.S. soil, while major headwinds for non-allied or adversarial countries,' said Fab Economics.
Manufacturers will continue to invest in India as long as they believe that the rules of the game will not shift unpredictably. This stability must come from both domestic policy and international trade relationships.
Conclusion
Despite the 50% tariffs, India's smartphone and semiconductor ambitions remain largely on track, thanks to exemptions for key electronics export items, a resilient and growing domestic market and a strong competitive position against rivals in Asia.
'India, even with these flip flop on tariffs, is still in the best position against China or Vietnam as a go to destination for manufacturing ecosystem for electronics and eventually semiconductors from both export and huge domestic consumption perspective. It will eventually be a two horse race: India and China,' said Prachir.
The risk does not lie on the current tariffs, but the uncertainty it represents. Stable or predictable policies, both domestically and internationally, will be critical to keep investment flowing and supply chains resilient. India has the opportunity to cement its status as one of the world's top electronics manufacturing destinations. The challenge will be to ensure that short-term trade talks do not distract from that long-term goal.
'India currently holds largest share of smartphone supply to the U.S., inching towards half of its smartphone supply, which makes any tariffs imposition on Indian origin smartphone inbound supply chains directly resulting in price expulsion impacting end users in the U.S., an unwanted outcome for Trump administration,' believes Fab Economics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Putin's Jet!': Alaska Becomes the Center of the Universe for One Weekend
‘Putin's Jet!': Alaska Becomes the Center of the Universe for One Weekend

Hindustan Times

timea minute ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Putin's Jet!': Alaska Becomes the Center of the Universe for One Weekend

ANCHORAGE, Alaska—Nearly two decades ago, when the presidential nominee John McCain selected then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his Republican running mate, this Far North metropolis was swarmed with media, political consultants and other outsiders. It turns out that was merely a warm-up act. Anchorage now finds itself in a global spotlight, having hosted the much-anticipated summit between President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. 'I thought we had sunk back into obscurity,' joked the veteran Alaska pollster Ivan Moore, referring to the end of the Palin frenzy. Instead, Trump-Putin mania has gripped Anchorage, with hotel rooms and car rentals sold out, and buzz about the historic moment sweeping through tourist destinations, including salmon-fishing spots and the Alaska Railroad depot, where visitors await the scenic ride to Denali National Park and Preserve, famed for its grizzlies and high peaks. Reactions have varied. Some are outraged Alaska would host Putin after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Others hope this marks a step toward peace. But most everyone agrees on one point. This summit—with the deadly war at stake—is perhaps the most notable event to happen in Alaska in modern memory. 'All eyes are on Anchorage,' declared a headline in the Anchorage Daily News, while Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy told a local news station that the event 'puts Alaska on the world map—where we should be.' 'This trip is very big,' said Mike Porcaro, a radio talk show host who said calls about the event flooded his conservative program. 'There have been other high-level meetings, but not of this magnitude.' 'Bucket list' On Friday morning, onlookers gathered on a pier, beneath the flight path to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, to see the plane carrying Putin, and Air Force One, land there. A website for the base, in the wooded outskirts, recommends that new arrivals enjoy a 'bucket list' of experiences including the Moose Run Golf Course and beluga whale watching. But the chance to see the rare joint landings of two world leaders topped that. 'Putin's jet!' local resident Cheryl Shroyer, 73, shouted from an overlook as a large plane believed to be carrying the Russian leader appeared first as a black dot against the snow-capped Alaska Range. The big jet grew larger, gliding over the Cook Inlet before disappearing as trees blocked the view of the base's airfield. At 10:17 a.m. local time, Shroyer shouted again: 'There it is, Air Force One!' as Trump's plane emerged from the clouds. (As it turned out, Putin's plane was another one, which came in after Trump.) Though Anchorage has nearly 300,000 people, it feels like a small town. Many locals drive pickup trucks, and the airport greets visitors with taxidermied grizzly, Kodiak and polar bears. Some Alaskans feel more kinship with Canada than the 'Outside,' local lingo for the Lower 48 U.S. states. Of course, Russia has long ties to Alaska. Once Russian territory, Alaska was sold to the U.S. in 1867 for $7.2 million. Palin, as McCain's running mate, drew late-show ridicule for reportedly saying, 'I can see Russia from my house.' (She actually said Russia is visible from the Alaskan island of Little Diomede island, which is about 2.5 miles from the Russian island of Big Diomede.) As hundreds of reporters and officials descended on Anchorage for the summit, local entrepreneurs seized on the surprise windfall. Some proprietors said it had been a challenging summer, with tourism hampered by a slowdown in foreign travel. David Liles, manager of the Ramada by Wyndham in downtown Anchorage, said occupancy jumped from 60%, with rooms running about $300 nightly, to fully booked, with rooms temporarily between $500 and $1,000. (Among those not getting hotels? Some Russian journalists who arrived as part of Putin's press pool Thursday night and slept on beds inside a sports stadium on the campus of the University of Alaska.) The Ramada price was nothing compared with what the owner of an Airbnb tried to charge: $7,000 a night after canceling a previous offer of $1,500. 'Some people are getting greedy ' Liles said. Autumn hues on the tundra on the Chugach peaks above Anchorage signal the approaching long winter. 'People who make money off tourists only have three months to do it in, so any publicity that brings extra people here is good for the economy,' said Kirill Gashenko, who rents out used cars. They were in hot demand. Cheers and jeers America's political divisions were on full display across Anchorage. 'We're really distraught that Putin is allowed on our soil, period,' said Janice Bunting, 65, watching for planes with her husband, Glenn, from lawn chairs beside a Ukrainian flag. Standing nearby, Jeff Henson, a 61-year-old Air Force veteran, disagreed. He said talking is the only way to resolve the conflict. 'The previous administration had three years,' said Henson, a Trump supporter accompanied by his husky mix, Leo. As the two presidents huddled, hundreds of Putin critics converged on a park near downtown Anchorage and unfurled a 132 foot by 65 foot Ukrainian flag—one of the largest in the world, organizers said. 'I can't think of a bigger F U to Trump and Putin,' organizer Erin Jackson-Hill said over a microphone to cheers. Minutes earlier, a lone man taunted the crowd with shouts of 'U.S.A.! U.S.A.!,' to which a demonstrator, Courtney Moore, shot back, 'Bootlicker!' A giant Ukrainian flag was unfurled at Delaney Park Strip in the heart of Anchorage. For her part, hotel clerk Amber Rookard just wanted the whole summit to go away. 'It just makes everybody uneasy,' said Rookard, who said three FBI agents came in and asked her if she had seen any 'unusual people.' Confused, she answered, 'I see a lot of unusual people.' Still, most locals seemed supportive. Soon after Anchorage was announced as the summit venue, Ivan Moore's Alaska Survey Research conducted a poll of 848 registered voters that found 59% said it was appropriate that Putin was invited to participate in the summit on U.S. soil—even if only 6% gave Putin a favorable rating. Unfortunately, there was little time for the two leaders to enjoy the outdoor adventures for which Alaska is revered. The incoming planes passed a line of fishermen at a creek known for its salmon. That might have caught the eye of Putin, who has been pictured fishing shirtless. At the Alaska Railroad depot, Steve Richmond, an Oregon resident visiting with his wife, suggested that Trump and Putin follow the group and see the park's famed wildlife. 'They should take advantage of being in this area,' Richmond, 74, said, as the train whistle blew nearby in preparation for departure. Write to Jim Carlton at

Trump-Putin Summit Ends Without Breakthrough
Trump-Putin Summit Ends Without Breakthrough

Hindustan Times

timea minute ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump-Putin Summit Ends Without Breakthrough

ANCHORAGE, Alaska—President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin ended their highly anticipated meeting here without announcing a breakthrough, leaving the path toward ending the war in Ukraine unclear. At the end of the over three-hour meeting, the two men offered few details about their talks. 'There's no deal until there is a deal,' Trump told reporters at a news conference following the close of the summit. The typically talkative U.S. president took no questions from the dozens of reporters assembled before him. The president said the delegations made progress on key issues, but added, 'We haven't quite got there.' Trump said he would call members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 'We will probably see you again very soon,' Trump told Putin. The Russian president interjected and offered that their next meeting could take place in Moscow. Trump responded, 'I can see it possibly happening.' Trump had come into the summit seeking Putin's agreement on a cease-fire in Ukraine. But Putin in his remarks gave no indication he was prepared to agree to that demand, repeating that Moscow wanted the root causes of the 3½ year conflict addressed—a term that refers to Moscow's demands for demilitarizing Kyiv and blocking its hopes for membership in NATO. In contrast to the handshakes and smiles that characterized the start of their meeting on the tarmac on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Putin and Trump looked stone-faced during much of the news conference. Putin spoke for roughly eight minutes. Trump then spoke for three minutes, before leaving the room. Even before the meeting officially began, Putin, who has been sanctioned by the U.S. and largely snubbed on the world stage, racked up a series of symbolic wins. Trump waited onboard Air Force One for 30 minutes before the Russian president's plane touched down. The U.S. president greeted his Russian counterpart warmly, applauding as he walked down a red carpet and shook his hand. After posing for photos, both men got into the U.S. president's armored limousine, known as the Beast, giving Putin the one-on-one time with Trump that some of the American president's advisers sought to avoid. Photographers caught the Russian leader smiling as he sat next to Trump in the limo. While it isn't unusual for an American president to invite a foreign leader for an intimate ride in the president's motorcade, the privilege comes after Putin has repeatedly thumbed his nose at Trump's repeated calls to stop the violence in Ukraine. Trump's earlier reception of Putin was markedly different from the way the U.S. president treated Zelensky during a February visit to the Oval Office. Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated the Ukrainian president for not, in their view, showing sufficient gratitude for U.S. support in the war with Russia. Relations between Trump and Zelensky have subsequently improved. But Trump, a former reality-television star who focuses intently on stage-managing his public events, also sent a message to Putin about America's military might. Trump and Putin walked down a red carpet flanked on either side by F-22 stealth fighters and, as the two leaders stepped onto a riser with the words 'ALASKA 2025,' a nuclear-capable B-2 bomber and four F-35 jet fighters roared overhead. As the meeting was in progress, Russian military forces launched new attacks targeting Ukraine's eastern regions, according to the Ukrainian air force. Securing a face-to-face meeting with Trump is a win for Putin, analysts said. The fact that the meeting took place in Alaska, which Russia sold to the U.S. in 1867, is an bonus for the Russian leader. It's 'a Russian revisionist dream come true,' said Celeste Wallander, a senior Pentagon official in the Biden administration. The Russian Foreign Ministry's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram that the meeting signaled to the media a shift in relations between Moscow and Washington. 'For three years, they have been reporting that Russia is in isolation, and today they saw the red carpet, laid to greet the Russian president in the United States,' she wrote. Trump has expressed frustration with Putin in recent months after once claiming his strong relationship with the Russian president could lead to a resolution of the war in just a day. In the days leading up to the summit, Trump played down the prospects for a breakthrough, calling his first face-to-face meeting with Putin in six years a 'feel-out meeting.' He didn't rule out the possibility the talks could fail and he said he was prepared to walk away entirely if Putin refused to work toward peace. Trump said he hoped Friday's meeting would lay the groundwork for a second meeting in the near future in which Putin would negotiate directly with Zelensky toward a cease-fire. But in the hours before the summit, Trump upped the stakes, telling Fox News that he wouldn't be happy if Putin didn't agree to a cease-fire at the meeting. The summit was initially set to begin with a one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin, but it was expanded to include top advisers from each delegation at the U.S. president's request. Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff represented the American delegation, while Putin was joined by Yuri Ushakov, his longtime foreign-policy adviser, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. While Trump and Putin have spoken several times in the last six months, the meeting in Anchorage was the first time they met in person since the Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, in 2019. Russian officials indicated that Putin wanted to push a spectrum of bilateral issues onto the negotiating table, likely in an attempt to water down talks about Ukraine, decouple the conflict from U.S.-Russia ties and avoid the threat of sanctions from the Trump White House. The absence of any binding steps for the Russian side to follow out of the meeting could give Putin a chance to continue prosecuting his war in Ukraine, where Russian troops are gaining crucial footholds in eastern Ukraine, while avoiding any new sanctions on Russian oil. Putin's broader goal of trying to put Russia on an equal footing with the U.S., however, was already achieved just by clinching the meeting, particularly on U.S. territory. 'This meeting elevates Russia in some ways to an equal status to the United States, which is what he has craved,' said Heather Conley, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a former top State Department official on European affairs. Kremlin loyal media had suggested the meeting would carry echoes of the 1945 Yalta Conference in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union managed to carve up Europe into spheres of influence, a scenario Putin would be eager to repeat with Trump. Putin is unlikely to be deterred from his ultimate goal of conquering Ukraine militarily or politically to re-establish the Russian sphere of influence in Europe which Moscow lost with the collapse of the Soviet Union. 'Putin is primarily carrying out this war to end the post Cold War order, that is to return Russia to its place as a great power in the classic sense, with its sphere of influence and the right to establish its own conditions there,' said Ruslan Pukhov, founder of Moscow-based defense think tank Center for the Analysis of Strategies and Technologies. Conflict negotiation is usually a drawn-out process that involves detailed timetables, confidence-building measures and verification over months and years. But little of that is expected to be hammered out in a matter of several hours, leaving the rapid cease-fire agreement that Trump wants an open question. 'The big question is whether any of this is enough for Trump,' said Samuel Charap, a veteran Russia watcher and senior political scientist at Rand Corporation. 'He wants an immediate cease-fire, and that's highly unlikely.' Write to Lara Seligman at Meridith McGraw at and Thomas Grove at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store