logo
Police called to Mt Eden after person reported injured

Police called to Mt Eden after person reported injured

RNZ News15-05-2025
Police were called to an address on Milton Road.
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
Police have been called to a home in Mt Eden after a person was reported injured.
But police said their staff had attended the address on Milton Road and could not substantiate the report.
They said they were not aware of anyone being injured.
More to come...
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NZ mum and son in 'good spirits' since release
NZ mum and son in 'good spirits' since release

Otago Daily Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Otago Daily Times

NZ mum and son in 'good spirits' since release

A New Zealand woman detained in a United States immigration facility for weeks with her six-year-old son is recovering at her Washington home after being released, her lawyer says. Sarah Shaw and son Isaac were detained at the Canadian border more than three weeks ago because she mistakenly tried to leave and re-enter the US without both parts of her visa approved. While she was legally able to work in the US and was employed by the state of Washington, the paperwork she needed to travel was pending - something she did not realise at the time. She had dropped her two older children off in Vancouver, Canada to catch a direct flight home to New Zealand. Isaac had all the correct paper work, but was taken with Shaw to the Dilley Immigration Centre in Texas. In the weeks following, Shaw's case got global media attention and the pair were released over the weekend. Shaw's lawyer Minda Thorward told RNZ's Checkpoint programme today that mum and son seemed to be "doing well" since their release and sent her a photograph of the pair together in which they seemed to be "in good spirits". "I talked to Sarah a little bit, but I think she was trying to spend the weekend recovering and recuperating and kind of just laying low, but I'll be talking to her again soon." Being detained was a traumatic experience generally speaking, Thorward said. "It's gonna have some traumatic impact, [that's] especially true for children... in a place like Dilly there's nothing to do... you have limited access to your lawyer, it's hard to talk to family, sort of isolating, a very difficult experience. "I hope it won't have any lingering effects, but you never know with kids... just depends on the specific child, but I hope not." It was unlikely there would be any legal repercussions for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Thorward said. "Unfortunately there's such a broad discretion in terms of what ICE and border control can do at the border. We can't really sue or anything like that, I mean we could sue to get them out of detention..." She hoped Shaw would not be targeted further by ICE. "Because of the continued media attention and broad community support... I'm really hopeful for a positive outcome for her case, but there's so much uncertainty in immigration law right now we just can't predict what's going to happen. "But, I think the fact so many journalists are interested in this case is a really good thing, and I think we should not turn our backs, and we need to continue to shine a light on these abuses of discretion. "I think continuing to allow for the public to see what's happening is what really needs to happen." In terms of why Shaw's case had garnered so much attention from the media and wider public, Thorward said she believed part of it was down to the fact she was a "young, pretty, white, single mum". "I think because she just really was someone who had really tried to do everything right, had checked all the right boxes as far as she knew, I'm not exactly sure but that's my theory." International pressure was what saw Isaac and Shaw released, Thorward believed. "All of the media attention, the New Zealand consulate being involved, it's a very high-profile case and ICE was very under the microscope here and they just caved to that pressure." Thorward said Donald Trump's administration wanted to dramatically expand detention and it was likely those who would feel the worst of it were people of colour and marginalised communities. "I think the people who will be targeted are people of colour and other marginalised communities... they will be a lot more vulnerable to abuse. "I think it's going to be a really dangerous time in the US."

Supreme Court judges grill Crown in David Tamihere appeal
Supreme Court judges grill Crown in David Tamihere appeal

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Supreme Court judges grill Crown in David Tamihere appeal

David Tamihere. Photo: RNZ Supreme Court judges have grilled the Crown case in double convicted murderer David Tamihere's appeal in the High Court at Auckland. Tamihere was convicted in December 1990 of murdering Swedish tourists Urban Höglin and Heidi Paakkonen. His lawyers are appealing an earlier Court of Appeal ruling that found a miscarriage of justice but upheld his convictions. Crown lawyers began there submissions on Tuesday, with lawyer Fergus Sinclair giving the panel of judges background about Tamihere's movements through the bush around the Coromandel Peninsula, and the discovery of Höglin's body. Crown prosecutors Fergus Sinclair and Rebecca Thomson. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The Crown case at the original trial was that Tamihere was living in the bush when he murdered the couple near Crosbies Clearing north of Thames. "We know Mr Tamihere's last two trips involved spending time in the Wentworth Valley, and on trip one, spending days on that Eastern side," Sinclair said. "Multiple witnesses established that." Evidence had been presented at trial that two trampers identified Tamihere as a man they encountered at Crosbies Clearing with a young woman. Sinclair said Tamihere partly acknowledged and partly fictionalised trips he had taken around the area at trial, to conceal that he had been near to where Höglin's body was found. "Trip one, he said, North from Thames, has spent a long time around the Coromandel area, but he didn't," he said. "He went South, then East into the Wentworth, back the same way after more than a week." The second trip, Sinclair said, Tamihere claimed to have again gone North from Thames to the 309 Road, then down the main road almost to Thames, but swerved up Tararu Creek Road to where the couple's car was to steal it, but this too was wrong, instead claiming Tamihere had gone South and back to the Wentworth Valley. "It's not possible to forget that your last two journeys were to an entirely different part of the region," Sinclair said. "So much time spent in a completely different place, in the opposite direction." Sinclair referenced the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeal. "Mr Tamihere lied to conceal his presence in the Wentworth Valley, and did so because he knew police might find evidence there," he said. "The only evidence is the body, the only reasonable conclusion is that Mr Tamihere knew about the body." Chief Justice Dame Helen Winkelman sits alongside other Chief Justices. Photo: POOL/Stuff Sinclair faced scrutiny from the judges regarding whether claims Tamihere had lied had been put to him at trial. "It's a fundamental issue with the Crown's case," Chief Justice dame Helen Winkelmann said. "You're taking us and saying 'Mr Tamihere lied'. Statements are made contextually, lies, as juries are instructed, must be assessed contextually, if it's said to be a lie it must be put to the witness that it's a lie, it must be part of the case that it's a lie... "What are we to make of the fact that these things that you are now saying are lies, were to a greater or lesser extent not pursued at trial?" she asked. Sinclair said this was the fresh evidence exercise. "The issue is, does it disclose a miscarriage, and it is the Crown responding to a defence theory," he said. "The body is found, we now see more things, does it give rise to a miscarriage that is the issue." More scrutiny was put on the Crown's case by Justice Sir Joe Williams, who said their case came down to whether or not Tamihere had lied. "His lie, you say, is the thing that binds all of this together, Crown stands or falls on that lie," he said. "Without it you lose." David Tamihere's lawyers, James Carruthers (L) and Murray Gibson (R). Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Earlier on Tuesday, Tamihere's lawyer James Carruthers asked the question if his trial would have turned out differently if a fundamental error had not occurred. He quoted a case which said questions needed to be asked on what course a trial would have taken, if errors had not been made. "It's interesting to ask here what the course of the trial might have been like had it not started off in completely the wrong direction," Carruthers said. "And as we can see from the Crown's amended case, it would have taken on an entirely different complexion." Tamihere served more than 20 years of a life sentence in prison before being released on parole in 2010. He has always denied even meeting the pair and there have been lingering questions around the convictions. In 2020 the then Governor General, on advice from former Justice Minister Andrew Little, granted Tamihere a rare Royal Prerogative of Mercy. The case was referred back to the Court of Appeal to rule on whether there may have been a miscarriage of justice. That court, in July last year, found there was - but upheld Tamihere's murder convictions because there was evidence beyond reasonable doubt he murdered the tourists. This, in turn, was appealed to the Supreme Court which is hearing the case now. The hearing continues on Wednesday. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Litter of puppies dumped in Taranaki's national park, DOC investigating
Litter of puppies dumped in Taranaki's national park, DOC investigating

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Litter of puppies dumped in Taranaki's national park, DOC investigating

The seven puppies were found by a member of the public in roadside vegetation in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki. Photo: DOC / SUPPLIED A Department of Conservation investigation is underway after a litter of seven puppies was found dumped in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki. The puppies, estimated to be about six weeks old, were discovered by a member of the public in the national park on 10 August. DOC ranger Cameron Hunt said aside from the disregard for the puppies' welfare, releasing pets or other animals on to conservation land was an offence under the Conservation Act and the National Parks Act. DOC could issue an infringement notice or prosecute anyone found responsible for bringing a domestic pet into national park or conservation land. Hunt said the man who found the puppies was heading up Manaia Rd to the maunga to enjoy a recent snowfall when he spotted something black and white moving in the roadside vegetation. "At first glance, he thought it was a puppy but carried on driving. He then turned around and headed back to confirm his suspicions - and discovered the litter of seven puppies." The puppies were found in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki. (File photo) Photo: Supplied/DOC The puppies - thought to be a collie-working dog cross breed - were handed over to the SPCA, where they were vet checked, vaccinated and treated for worms. They were in extremely good condition and had been well fed prior to being found, but would not have survived the night in the freezing snowy conditions. Cameron said the puppies would eventually be made available for rehoming. "Someone made a deliberate decision and effort to abandon these puppies in the national park, and to do so would've required some sort of vehicle making a brief stop on the roadside. "We're hopeful anyone who saw what happened will contact us and share any information such as the make, model and colour of a vehicle - and better still a registration plate - or possibly descriptions of people they saw." He urged anyone who knew about the dumping of the puppies to contact 0800 DOC HOT and quote CLE-Works number CLE-9642. Any information passed on will be treated confidentially. Earlier this month, DOC publicised the case of a Northland woman who flagrantly breached the "no pets" rules and photographed herself with her six dogs in Tongariro National Park. One of the photographs showed the woman and a dog in front of a "no dogs" sign. In August 2022, DOC visitor centre staff encountered visitors carrying jacket-wearing cats in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki , and in December 2023 a man was pictured with a domestic pet cat in the national park. Cameron said keeping pets such as cats, rabbits, ferrets, and others out of protected spaces, was essential to protect endangered species and pets were safe. "Domestic pets can spread diseases our wildlife has not been exposed to and cannot be protected from. These can devastate our taonga and the ecosystems they depend on. Dogs, in particular, pose a serious threat to kiwi and whio, both of which are found in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store