Why new-home prices are falling in summer 2025 – and where buyers can find deals now
For home shoppers holding out for better prices, now might be the time to start looking.
Prices in many of the country's most popular markets — including markets in Florida, California, and Texas — have fallen significantly, reports NewHomeSource.
'New-home prices can come down for one of two reasons,' says Ali Wolf, chief economist for NewHomeSource.
See More: The 2025 housing market: What it means for new home buyers
Reason one : A builder begins building communities further away from city centers. "Those shifts alone could lower prices without home prices actually falling," said Wolf.
Reason two : Market response.
'If affordability gets stretched too much or consumer confidence weakens and buyer demand slows, home prices can come down as builders try to 'find the market,'' Wolf says.
See More: Here's how U.S. tariffs may affect home prices in 2025
What's Happening with the New Home Market in 2025
According to April 2025 data from Zonda, several markets have seen prices fall considerably from their recent peaks, opening the door for:
More affordability/greater buying power
Better deals
Builder incentives
While homes in many markets remain expensive, the recent drops signal a fundamental shift in buyer leverage.
'You will find some good value in the new home market today, especially compared to resale properties,' said Wolf.
The latest data reveals several trends and patterns emerging related to pricing in the new-home market:
Florida's Price Declines: In 50 metros analyzed by Zonda, five of the top 10 markets with the biggest price drops were in Florida:
Jacksonville (-22.3%)
Naples (-21.9%)
North Port (-19.2%)
Cape Coral (-14.2%)
Miami (-13.7%)
San Francisco's Double Dip: New-home prices in San Francisco were 18.2% below their peak of approximately $1.2 million. It was also the lone market where April 2025 prices were below 20219 levels (down 15.1%).
Cooling Pandemic Hotspots: Salt Lake City (-15.4%) and Austin (-14.2%), which had significant booms in the pandemic, saw prices fall well below their peaks.
At the Peak: Philadelphia, San Jose, and Port St. Lucie were the only markets analyzed to reach a new pricing peak in April.
San Jose also earned the distinction as the most expensive market analyzed, with an average new-home price of $1.8 million.
Nearing the Top: Home prices in Orlando, Baltimore, Minneapolis, Nashville, and Los Angeles were all within 3% of the peak in April.
See More: Creative ways first-time buyers are securing homes in 2025
What Does This Mean for You?
The declines in prices mean that markets that may have felt out of reach for would-be buyers are now more accessible. At the very least, these markets now come with better terms.
Bottom line: For shoppers who have been on the fence, now may be the time to revisit areas they were previously priced out of and take advantage of builder incentives.
That said, urgency matters; these lower prices may not last. As the market adjusts, today's opportunities could turn into tomorrow's regrets.
NewHomeSource is a platform for new home listings with homebuilder reviews.
This story was produced by NewHomeSource and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The airline industry's dirty secret: Clean jet fuel failures
By Joanna Plucinska, Joe Brock, Marleen Kaesebier and Paul Carsten PARAMOUNT, California (Reuters) -In 2019, Scott Kirby, the chief executive of United Airlines, hailed its new contract with green jet fuel producer World Energy as an example for the aviation industry to follow in its drive to cut emissions. Six years later, that collaboration is dead. Boston-based World Energy was one of the first companies in the world to produce commercial quantities of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), a type of renewable fuel made from sources such as used cooking oil, agricultural residues and other waste. Its Paramount refinery near downtown Los Angeles had been a rare success story, supplying millions of gallons of SAF a year to airlines such as United Airlines and fellow U.S. carrier JetBlue Airways. The plant, which began operations in 2016, was central to the carriers' pledges to help the airline industry switch to a blend of 10% SAF by the end of this decade. But the refinery quietly ceased operations in April. And World Energy's plans for a second plant in Houston have stalled amid a lack of commitment from the industry, according to Chief Executive Gene Gebolys. "Some airlines were engaged in a pretty disingenuous effort to put out press releases" overstating their commitment to SAF projects, Gebolys said, without naming any companies. "People sometimes said too much in the past and did too little." Still, Gebolys acknowledged that some airlines have made a genuine effort to support SAF producers, while governments also needed to step up with stronger incentives to drive progress. The termination of United's fuel purchase contract with World Energy - and the closure of the Paramount refinery - have not previously been reported. United Airlines said it ended its relationship with World Energy "a few years ago", without providing a reason. A JetBlue spokesperson said World Energy has been a "valued partner" since 2020 and it will continue working with the company. World Energy's struggles mirror the plight of dozens of clean fuel startups, according to a Reuters review of the sector. Nearly 20 years after the first commercial flight powered partly by biofuels made the short hop from London to Amsterdam, Reuters found that the airline industry's plans to go green before regulators start penalising them are little more than a pipe dream. NO CLEAR PATHWAY The International Air Transport Association (IATA), a global body that represents 340 airlines, forecasts SAF will account for 0.7% of total jet fuel this year, up from 0.3% in 2024. Air passenger traffic, meanwhile, is expected to rise 6% this year, IATA says. IATA has set a goal of net zero emissions by 2050, a target that would require airlines to ramp up SAF use to 118 billion gallons annually, a more than 300-fold increase from current production. Airline industry leaders point to a wave of new SAF initiatives they say will spark a boom similar to the rapid rise of electric vehicles and solar energy. However, the aviation sector has yet to publish a comprehensive roadmap or a transparent database of upcoming SAF projects that would allow regulators and the public to assess the credibility of these projections. To scrutinise the industry's claims, Reuters built its own database of airline SAF initiatives - offering the most comprehensive view yet of the sector's faltering green progress and revealing that the industry has no clear pathway to hitting net zero targets. While airlines have announced 165 SAF projects over the past 12 years, only 36 have materialised, Reuters found. Among those, Reuters uncovered problems at three of the largest - including World Energy - that exemplify the systemic challenges plaguing the SAF sector. Of the remaining projects, 23 have been abandoned, 27 are delayed or on indefinite hold, 31 have yet to produce any fuel, and 4 are SAF credit deals, where no physical fuel is delivered. For the other 44 projects, Reuters was unable to find any public updates since their initial announcements. If all the pending projects announced by airlines reached their maximum potential, it would only add 12 billion gallons of SAF production, the Reuters analysis found. That's about 10% of what's needed to hit the net zero target. Airlines pin the problems on the oil industry, saying it isn't producing enough fuel. "These guys are the cause of the problem, and they've got to start playing their part," said Willie Walsh, director of IATA, the global airline lobby, and a former chief executive of British Airways and its parent International Airlines Group. At the moment, SAF costs three to five times more than jet fuel and some oil company executives argue that there is limited demand from airlines at current prices. "I'd like there to be a shortage. I actually see an overcapacity," Bernard Pinatel, the head of downstream and marketing and services at TotalEnergies, told a press briefing in June. PARAMOUNT 'RESET' The Paramount refinery, which used cooking oil and animal fat from a local abattoir to make fuel, repeatedly stumbled in its efforts to expand and all 35 employees were laid off in April, two sources with direct knowledge of the matter said. The future of the plant is uncertain, the two people said, after World Energy's partner, Air Products, withdrew from the project in February, citing challenging commercial conditions tied to the expansion and operations. Air Products, a U.S. industrial gases and chemicals company, had been slated to lead a $2 billion expansion of the site. World Energy CEO Gebolys said Paramount's closure was a "reset" because the refurbishment was over budget and behind schedule. He said it would come back online, without giving a time frame. He declined to comment about the layoffs. According to more than a dozen people directly involved in the sector, airlines play minimal roles in the execution of projects and, in most cases, their only commitment is to buy SAF when their partners produce it. What's more, airlines are making bold projections about SAF use and emissions reductions based on unproven technologies or early-stage projects run by startups with no experience of commercial production, Reuters found. Of the 36 projects that have produced any SAF, all but one rely on the Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) process to convert waste oils, fats and grease into jet fuel. HEFA was the technology used at Paramount. However, HEFA plants are severely constrained by the limited availability of suitable raw materials and cannot meet the industry's long-term fuel demands, three industry specialists said. IATA chief economist and sustainability executive Marie Owens Thomsen disputed the idea airlines only play a minimal role, saying they were striking SAF purchase agreements and investing in new technologies, supporting early-stage innovation and collaborating with research institutions. She also said alternative ways of making SAF needed to be developed alongside HEFA, as this process alone would not be sufficient to produce enough fuel to hit net zero by 2050. 'EXERCISE IN FUTILITY' Aviation accounts for 2.5% of global emissions of planet-warming gases such as carbon dioxide. This figure is expected to rise as air traffic more than doubles from 2019 levels by 2050 and fuel use rises 59%, according to environmental advocacy group Transport & Environment (T&E). By painting a picture of imminent breakthroughs and success in producing SAF at scale, airlines can bolster their green credentials while deflecting pressure for more disruptive interventions, such as stricter emissions caps or higher carbon taxes, the group said. "This is first and foremost about justifying never-ending growth and pretending that you can do that without heating the planet more and more - which you cannot do," said Almuth Ernsting, a campaigner with advocacy group Biofuelwatch. Failing to find a solution could prove costly. Under new EU rules, airlines face escalating mandates to use SAF on flights departing from EU airports. The mandate starts with at least 2% of their fuel in 2025, climbing to 6% by 2030, and eventually hitting 70% by 2050. European SAF mandates are expected to cost airlines $2.9 billion in additional fuel purchases and compliance expenses this year, according to IATA estimates. The return to power of U.S. President Donald Trump could further hamper the industry's green transition. Trump has pledged to roll back many incentives his predecessor, Joe Biden, offered to SAF and other green energy projects. As projects flounder in the United States, the U.S. airline industry has pinned hopes on a new SAF bonanza in Panama. It's already hitting the skids, Reuters found. SGP BioEnergy, headquartered in New York, pledged in 2022 to build the world's largest SAF facility, in collaboration with the government of Panama. The plant is to make green fuel from industrial hemp oil and used cooking oil. Due to start this year, production has been pushed back to 2027. SGP BioEnergy Chief Executive Randy Letang said the delay was largely due to airlines showing less interest in backing SAF projects than in the past. Panama's energy secretary did not respond to a request for comment. After the plant opens, the company may switch to making renewable diesel for trucks and ships, because those industries showed more enthusiasm than aviation, Letang said. "We're only going to take it so far with SAF until we determine whether or not the airlines are actually serious about making the commitments for this fuel," he said. Letang said airlines were competing to announce their own marquee projects, when producers actually needed consortiums made up of many carriers to invest in large-scale projects. "That's how you build this industry. Without that, it's an exercise in futility, quite frankly," he said. "The airlines could do a lot more." A few years ago, Letang was striking big SAF deals with major airlines through his previous biofuels venture, SG Preston. In 2016, JetBlue announced a 10-year commitment to buy commercial volumes of green fuel from SG Preston, calling it one of the largest such deals in history. JetBlue said in 2021 it would double down on the deal as it pursued a target to use SAF for 8% of its fuel needs by 2023. Australia's Qantas Airways signed a similar 10-year deal with SG Preston in 2017 for 8 million gallons of SAF annually starting in 2020 to help power flights between Los Angeles and Australia. The deals were based on SG Preston's plan to build five plants across North America - two in Ohio and one each in Indiana, Michigan, and Ontario. None has been built. SG Preston filed for bankruptcy in 2022, according to company filings. A spokesperson for Letang's current firm, SGP BioEnergy, said the two companies had no affiliation. NEW TECHNOLOGY While most SAF projects rely on HEFA, British startup Velocys uses Fischer-Tropsch technology, which converts waste such as garbage, wood chips, or flared gas into clean fuel. IAG - the parent of British Airways, Iberia, Vueling and Aer Lingus - has been an enthusiastic backer, announcing four major SAF initiatives with Velocys over the past 15 years. But despite producing SAF in pilot projects, none of the Velocys projects has reached commercial production. Its challenges began in 2010 with a project to turn methane from a London landfill into jet fuel. That venture collapsed when its main backer went bankrupt. Since then Velocys has attempted to build its own plants - including in Oklahoma - but it has proven too costly and technically challenging. After shutting the Oklahoma plant, Velocys shifted focus to two new projects: one at Immingham in northeast England and another in Mississippi. British oil major Shell and IAG initially backed Velocys's English venture, and the British government awarded a 27 million pound ($37 million) grant in 2022, then another 3 million pounds in July. However, Shell backed out in 2021 to pursue its own SAF ventures. Shell declined further comment. While IAG has no purchase deal with Velocys, it maintains a partnership and expects production to begin in 2029. Velocys Chief Executive Matthew Viergutz remains optimistic, saying the company has learned from past setbacks. However, the Mississippi project is on hold pending clarity on U.S. SAF regulations. The Immingham project was meant to start supplying British Airways last year. The plant site is a dusty field, empty but for a blue portable toilet lying on its side. Velocys has yet to sell a drop of green jet fuel to IAG or any other airline. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mortgage and refinance interest rates today for August 11, 2025: The 30-year rate stays under 6.5%
Current mortgage interest rates have seen some small changes. According to Zillow, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is sitting at 6.44% while the average 15-year fixed mortgage rate is 5.73%. According to data from Zillow, rates have increased since this time last year despite earlier optimism that they might go down. Experts also predict that rates will stay above 6% through the next few quarters. According to the Fannie Mae July Housing Forecast, the organization doesn't expect mortgage rates to hit 6% until Q3 2026. Read next: 2025 housing market — Is now a good time to buy a house? Current mortgage rates Here are the current mortgage rates, according to the latest Zillow data: 30-year fixed: 6.44% 20-year fixed: 6.16% 15-year fixed: 5.73% 5/1 ARM: 6.75% 7/1 ARM: 6.58% 30-year VA: 6.07% 15-year VA: 5.57% 5/1 VA: 6.09% Remember, these are the national averages and rounded to the nearest hundredth. Learn more: 8 strategies for getting the lowest mortgage rates Current mortgage refinance rates These are today's mortgage refinance rates, according to the latest Zillow data: 30-year fixed: 6.48% 20-year fixed: 6.31% 15-year fixed: 5.71% 5/1 ARM: 7.19% 7/1 ARM: 7.08% 30-year VA: 5.91% 15-year VA: 5.57% 5/1 VA: 5.93% Again, the numbers provided are national averages rounded to the nearest hundredth. Although it's not always the case, mortgage refinance rates tend to be a little higher than purchase rates. Read more: The best mortgage refinance lenders right now Refinance interest rates Up Next Up Next Mortgage payment calculator You can use the free Yahoo Finance mortgage calculator to play around with how different terms and rates will affect your monthly payment. Our calculator considers factors like property taxes and homeowners insurance when estimating your monthly mortgage payment. This gives you a better idea of your total monthly payment than if you just looked at mortgage principal and interest. But if you want a quick, simple way to see how today's rates would impact your monthly mortgage payment, try out the calculator below: 30-year mortgage rates today Today's average 30-year mortgage rate is 6.44%. A 30-year term is the most popular type of mortgage because by spreading out your payments over 360 months, your monthly payment is relatively low. If you had a $300,000 mortgage with a 30-year term and a 6.44% rate, your monthly payment toward the principal and interest would be about $1,884, and you'd pay $378,377 in interest over the life of your loan — on top of that original $300,000. 15-year mortgage rates today The average 15-year mortgage rate is 5.73% today. Several factors must be considered when deciding between a 15-year and 30-year mortgage. A 15-year mortgage comes with a lower interest rate than a 30-year term. This is great in the long run because you'll pay off your loan 15 years sooner, and that's 15 fewer years for interest to compound. However, your monthly payments will be higher because you're squeezing the same debt payoff into half the time. If you get that same $300,000 mortgage with a 15-year term and a 5.73% rate, your monthly payment would jump to $2,488. But you'd only pay $147,843 in interest over the years. Dig deeper: How much house can I afford? Use our home affordability calculator. Adjustable mortgage rates With an adjustable-rate mortgage, your rate is locked in for a set period of time and then increases or decreases periodically. For example, with a 5/1 ARM, your rate stays the same for the first five years, then changes every year. Adjustable rates usually start lower than fixed rates, but you run the risk that your rate goes up once the introductory rate-lock period is over. But an ARM could be a good fit if you plan to sell the home before your rate-lock period ends — that way, you pay a lower rate without worrying about it rising later. Lately, ARM rates have occasionally been similar to or higher than fixed rates. Before dedicating yourself to a fixed or adjustable mortgage rate, be sure to shop around for the best lenders and rates. Some will offer more competitive adjustable rates than others. How to get a low mortgage rate Mortgage lenders typically give the lowest mortgage rates to people with higher down payments, excellent credit scores, and low debt-to-income ratios. So if you want a lower rate, try saving more, improving your credit score, or paying down some debt before you start shopping for homes. You can also buy down your interest rate permanently by paying for discount points at closing. A temporary interest rate buydown (as mentioned early in the article) is also an option — for example, maybe you get a 6.5% rate with a 2-1 buydown. Your rate would start at 4.5% for year one, increase to 5.5% for year two, then settle in at 6.5% for the remainder of your term. Just consider whether these buydowns are worth the extra money at closing. Ask yourself if you'll stay in the home long enough that the amount you save with a lower rate offsets the cost of buying down your rate before making your decision. Mortgage rates today: FAQs What are interest rates today? Here are interest rates for some of the most popular mortgage terms: According to Zillow data, the national average 30-year fixed rate is 6.44%, the 15-year fixed rate is 5.73%, and the 5/1 ARM rate is 6.75%. What is a normal mortgage rate right now? A normal mortgage rate on a 30-year fixed loan is 6.44%. However, keep in mind that's the national average based on Zillow data. The average might be higher or lower depending on where you live in the U.S. Will mortgage rates drop down? Mortgage rates are not expected to drop significantly in 2025 — especially over the next couple of weeks while economists keep an eye on inflation, tariffs, and the Federal Reserve. Still, there could be a cut to mortgage rates leading up to the next Fed meeting in September.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walker & Dunlop Arranges $160 Million Loan for Master Planned Community in the Coachella Valley
BETHESDA, Md., August 11, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Walker & Dunlop, Inc. announced today that it has arranged a $160 million loan for a master planned community located in California's acclaimed Coachella Valley in the City of Rancho Mirage. The loan has a $27 million re-advance component for total proceeds of $187 million. Walker & Dunlop Capital Markets, led by Sean Reimer, Aaron Appel, Jonathan Schwartz, Keith Kurland, Adam Schwartz, Dustin Stolly, Ari Hirt, and Christopher de Raet, were exclusive advisors to the borrower, EC Rancho Mirage Holdings Limited Partnership and its affiliates, to arrange the construction financing for the completion of the first phase of the community. Intervest Capital Partners and Builders Capital provided the capital. The master planned community, Cotino™, a Storyliving by Disney™ Community, is expected to contain approximately 1,900 residential units, a 24-acre lagoon with Crystal Lagoons® technology, a voluntary private club, a town center and various other amenities. "Featuring a stunning backdrop of the Coachella Valley's natural beauty and close proximity to Palm Springs amenities, the desire to live in Rancho Mirage remains high," said Reimer, managing director of New York Capital Markets at Walker & Dunlop. "We are honored to work on this community, a groundbreaking project that blends unique lifestyle amenities and award-winning homebuilders. We look forward to seeing this extraordinary community come to life." Walker & Dunlop is one of the top providers of capital to the U.S. multifamily market; in 2024 the firm originated over $30 billion in debt financing volume, including lending over $25 billion for multifamily properties. This vast experience has made them a top advisor on all asset classes for many of the industry's top developers, owners, and operators. To learn more about Walker & Dunlop's broad financing options, visit our website. About Walker & Dunlop Walker & Dunlop (NYSE: WD) is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally. Our ideas and capital create communities where people live, work, shop, and play. Our innovative people, breadth of our brand, and our technological capabilities make us one of the most insightful and client-focused firms in the commercial real estate industry. View source version on Contacts Investors: Kelsey DuffeyInvestor RelationsPhone 301.202.3207investorrelations@ Media: Nina H. von WaldeggVP, Public RelationsPhone 301.564.3291nhvwaldegg@ Phone 301.215.5500 7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300Bethesda, Maryland 20814
