Wikipedia loses High Court challenge against UK Government
They argued that compliance with the new law would mean Wikipedia would have to impose verification on people who did not want it or limit the amount of monthly UK users.
But in a judgment on Monday, Mr Justice Johnson rejected those claims, saying there may be ways to work within the law 'without causing undue damage to Wikipedia's operations'.
The Online Safety Act has provisions aimed at reducing the spread of harmful content.
Part of the regulations classify some sites as category one, which is defined by the number of monthly users a site has as well as the systems through which information is shared.
Rupert Paines, for WMF, told a previous hearing that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, who were defending the claim, had made the regulations too broad.
He said that if Wikipedia is to be classified as category one, and verification is to become mandatory for all users, it would make articles 'gibberish' because content from non-verified users would be filtered out.
The regulations were more designed for 'major, profit-making technology companies' such as Facebook, X and Instagram, he argued, while imposing verification on Wikipedia users would be a breach of their human rights.
Cecilia Ivimy KC, for the Government, said ministers reviewed Ofcom guidance and considered specifically whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations and rejected that.
She said they decided that Wikipedia 'is in principle an appropriate service on which to impose category one duties' and how ministers arrived at that choice was not 'without reasonable foundation nor irrational'.
Rejecting WMF and BLN's claims, Mr Justice Johnson said his decision 'does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations'.
Doing so would mean the Government would have to justify the imposition as proportionate, he added.
The judge also said that the decision to make Wikipedia a category one service now lies with Ofcom.
If that happens, it may open a possible avenue for further legal action.
Mr Justice Johnson said: 'Ofcom's decision as to which services fall within category one is a public law decision which is potentially amenable to the court's review on grounds of public law error.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
8 hours ago
- New Statesman
Morgan McSweeney unleashes his Farage strategy
Photo by Henry Nicholls/AFP By the way, Britain has the most expensive energy costs in the developed world. We need to build houses, laboratories, data centres and transport – and we have the most expensive energy costs in the developed world. So, clearly, there is a lot of work to be done on the government's objective of 'abundant clean energy'. There is also a lot of work outstanding on all the other four of Keir Starmer's well-chosen 'missions' and all three of his 'foundations'. Those were, to repeat, economic stability, secure borders, national security, kickstarting growth, future-proofing the NHS, smashing the class ceiling, and making the streets safe. Instead, we are still talking about the Online Safety Act. The Labour party is digging its heels in, and is apparently now shaping its entire cyber-strategy around the legislation. The party has released a new advert accusing Nigel Farage, who has criticised the act, of supporting Andrew Tate. The ad shows a picture of the two men together, originally posted by Tate in 2019, and reads 'Nigel Farage says Andrew Tate is an 'important voice' for men. Andrew Tate said women should 'bear responsibility' for being sexually assaulted.' The party is claiming, in effect, that Farage's approach to online safety will leave young boys open to radicalisation. Not long before, champions of the Act had said Farage's opposition put him on the side of Jimmy Savile. Defending the legislation on Sky News, Peter Kyle, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, said 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Kyle later doubled down on X, posting 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators.' The Tate line may not seem much of a change from the Savile one – it's hard to choose between two such squalid figures. But Labour appears to be pleased with it. The Sunday Times's front page had the details of the ad before it went out. Credit was given to the in-house team at Labour HQ, and an allusion made to a new, macho-sounding 'attack team', designed to undermine Farage and headed by chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. Speaking to the Sunday Times, a senior Labour source proudly said: 'We'll be looking to continue taking the fight to Farage in this area. He's not thought through his approach when it comes to online safety and we'll continue to expose it.' It is hard to know if Labour insiders really believe this about Nigel Farage – if a cack-handed analysis of Tate's popularity really amounts to support for his public statements. It is hard to know if Labour therefore also believe the 525,000 of their citizens who have signed a 'Repeal the Online Safety Act' petition are clamouring to hear more from Andrew Tate – or are 'on the side of predators'. It was similarly hard to know if the party really believed Rishi Sunak did not think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison, as an ad claimed in 2023. But the Online Safety Act seems a very strange law to make this stand around. For one thing, it was a Sunak policy, receiving Royal Assent on 26 October 2023. For another, it is unenforceable, since anyone can dodge the restrictions by downloading a VPN. (It has been reported that children's exposure to pornography has gone up since the law was passed.) And lastly, and again, it serves none of the government's main aims. Perhaps sharper eyes would discern wisdom in the move. After all, Morgan McSweeney is praised for his close sense of popular opinion, and for delivering the huge majority that the government still retains. (Though, if his celebrated ruthlessness forced Corbyn's expulsion, he may be remembered for undoing Labour, not saving it.) There is not such a libertarian streak in Britain as there is in, say, America. And, if it needs pointing out, everyone cares about preventing sexual abuse. If half a million people have declared their opposition to the Act, there may be many more quietly in favour. Labour's resolution may turn out to be prudent. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe There are also seedier explanations to be heard. It is a fairly developed rumour in Westminster, and even more so in the technology sector, that Peter Kyle wants Bridget Phillipson's education brief. If closing off dark parts of the internet is popular with anyone, it is popular with nervous parents. Kyle has more background in education than technology, and was briefly shadow minister for schools in 2021. However well advised, Labour is set on raising the stakes. They are telling voters that opposing the bill amounts to supporting predators. And they are taking measures to escalate awareness of the legislation, associating it directly with the Labour party. The gauntlet seems to be 'if you don't like it, don't vote for us'. And, for better or worse, they are shouting it from the rafters. [See also: Sally Rooney is the conscience of a generation] Related
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Poll: children's exposure to porn higher after Online Safety Act
Well, well, well. According to research by the children's commissioner for England, children's exposure to pornography has increased since the Online Safety Act came into effect. Dame Rachel de Souza noted that a survey had found that more young people said they'd been exposed to porn before the age of 18 after the new rules were introduced compared to the results of a similar survey in 2023. How very interesting. Over a quarter of people said they had seen online porn by the age of 11 – with some rather disturbingly noting they were 'aged six or younger' when asked about their first exposure. Seven out of ten young people said they had seen porn before the age of 18 in 2025, compared with 64 per cent two years ago. The data – taken from a survey of 1,010 children and young people aged 16-21 – found that more vulnerable children now than before said they had been exposed to porn earlier, while the latest survey found that six in ten respondents said they had seen porn online by accident compared to four in ten in 2023. And the rise of social media has taken its toll, with Elon Musk's Twitter being the most common source of pornography for children. Good heavens… A government spokesperson said: 'Children have been left to grow up in a lawless online world for too long, bombarded with pornography and harmful content that can scar them for life. The Online Safety Act is changing that.' But Mr S isn't so sure. Reform leader Nigel Farage was blasted by Labour after a recent press conference for being on the 'same side as Jimmy Savile' after he said his party would repeal the OSA if it got into power. Science Secretary Peter Kyle was first to take aim Farage and No. 10 doubled down. The Reform leader and his head of DOGE Zia Yusuf have both said there must be an alternative way to protect children on the internet, pointing out that young people are more adept at using VPNs to get around online restrictions than the people writing the legislation. And certainly this latest survey weakens the Labour lot's defence of the controversial law…
North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Commissioner: Close loophole allowing children to access online pornography
But a spokesperson added there are no plans to ban tools such as virtual private networks (VPNs) despite England's Children's Commissioner describing this as 'absolutely a loophole that needs closing'. VPNs can allow users to disguise their location online and Dame Rachel de Souza, in a new report published this week, has said the Government must ensure children are not able to use these tools to avoid the age-check process. The Government has previously said that while VPNs are legal in the UK for adults, under the Online Safety Act, platforms have a 'clear responsibility to prevent children from bypassing safety protections', including blocking content that promotes VPNs or other workarounds specifically aimed at young users. Dame Rachel de Souza told BBC Newsnight: 'Of course, we need age verification on VPNs – it's absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Children have been left to grow up in a lawless online world for too long, bombarded with pornography and harmful content that can scar them for life. 'The Online Safety Act is changing that. Let's be clear: VPNs are legal tools for adults and there are no plans to ban them. But if platforms deliberately push workarounds like VPNs to children, they face tough enforcement and heavy fines. We will not allow corporate interests to come before child safety. 'This is about drawing a line – no more excuses, no more loopholes. Protecting children online must come first.' Dame Rachel's latest report on the issue of online pornography and young people's access to it found that the proportion of children saying they have seen pornography online has risen in the past two years, with most likely to have stumbled upon it accidentally. Dame Rachel said her research is evidence that harmful content is being presented to children through dangerous algorithms, rather than them seeking it out. She described the content young people are seeing as 'violent, extreme and degrading' and often illegal, and said her office's findings must be seen as a 'snapshot of what rock bottom looks like'. The report, a follow-on from research by the Children's Commissioner's office in 2023, found a higher proportion (70%) of people saying they had seen online pornography before turning 18, up from 64% of respondents two years ago. The other recommendations in her report included that online pornography should be audited to ensure it meets the same content requirements as offline pornography; the depiction of non-fatal strangulation must be 'outlawed comprehensively'; and there should be a recruitment drive for specialist RHSE (Relationships, Health and Sex Education) teachers and support for teachers to deliver the curriculum. The research for her report was done in May, ahead of new online safety measures coming into effect last month, including age checks aimed at preventing children from accessing pornography and other harmful content.
