Labor politician goes rogue and launches a fiery attack on the party's leadership
Anthony D'Adam accused fellow NSW Labor MPs of 'bullying behaviour' in a caucus meeting where he criticised Premier Chris Minns for his handling of a pro-Palestine demonstration on the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday.
Before police adopted a formal position on the protest, Mr Minns called for it to be scrapped, saying it would bring chaos to Sydney's streets.
Anthony D'Adam lambasted Chris Minns over his handling of a pro-Palestine demonstration.
Despite his opposition, a number of state Labor MPs, including Mr D'Adam, were part of the crowd of more than 100,000 people that marched across the bridge.
Mr D'Adam said he used a caucus meeting on Monday to make 'pointed criticisms' about the premier's position on Palestine and protests.
'I was howled down, abused and told I should resign from the Labor Party, and a motion was moved to gag me from speaking,' he said in parliament on Thursday night.
'In my entire time in parliament, I have never witnessed such an event.
'No apology has been received for the bullying behaviour I was forced to endure. It is deeply disturbing that the caucus appears incapable of entertaining dissenting views and took the step that it did.'
Mr D'Adam, who has been in NSW parliament since 2019 and worked for decades in the union movement, said a growing intolerance of dissenting views within Labor had produced 'a stale groupthink'.
'But my experience has been that the party is increasingly centralised and authoritarian in its disposition,' he said.
While Mr D'Adam has regularly used parliament to criticise government policies, particularly crackdowns on protests, none has been so damning of the premier and party culture.
He is not the only NSW Labor MP to openly criticise the premier in recent weeks.
Fellow MPs Stephen Lawrence and Sarah Kaine, who were also part of the weekend bridge march, have argued Mr Minns' largely anti-protest stance runs counter to Labor Party values.
'I am a member of the Labor Party, not the Liberal Party. Our party is founded on protest and collective action,' Mr Lawrence said.
D'Adam pictured said he was bullied by his fellow MPs on Monday in a Labor meeting
A well-known advocate for the Palestinian people, Mr D'Adam claimed he was stopped from speaking on the topic at last year's state Labor conference.
Labor's national party platform
Federal leaders, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, have yet to recognise Palestinian statehood despite moves from similar counties like France, Canada and the United Kingdom to do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Palestine Action terror ban risks ‘I am Spartacus' moment, Labour peer warns
A Labour peer has warned that the government's ban on Palestine Action is at risk of becoming an 'I am Spartacus' moment, suggesting the decision to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation was disproportionate. Shami Chakrabarti, a former shadow attorney general and civil liberties campaigner, urged the government to 'think again', warning that the group's ban may lead to more people, not fewer, taking to the streets to support it. She said her concerns are 'greater now even than they were before' after more than 500 people were arrested over the weekend, demonstrating in support of the group. An "I Am Spartacus" moment – from the 1960 film, Spartacus - refers to a situation where a group of people collectively claim to be one person, often in solidarity or defiance, to protect that individual or to confuse an authority figure. The Metropolitan Police confirmed on Sunday that 532 arrests were made, 522 for displaying an item in support of a proscribed organisation at the march in central London over the weekend. Asked whether the government had got it wrong on the issue, Baroness Chakrabarti told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I'm afraid that my concerns are greater now even than they were before. This is in danger of becoming a sort of 'I am Spartacus' moment where more people, not fewer people, are taking to the streets.' She added: 'There are blurred lines now… some people are, as always, protesting about the horrific events they're watching unfold in Gaza, but others think they're standing up for civil liberties because this ban was disproportionate.' The Labour peer warned that 'even criminal damage is not terrorism'. 'Spraying paint on airplanes, which is a serious criminal damage, is not the same as being the IRA or al Qaeda or a group that actually wants to blow people up. 'And so we've got more people taking to the streets, a bigger headache for the police. Frankly, I'm very sympathetic to the police on this issue. I think it may be time to think again.' It comes just days after she told The Independent that the 'proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions' – a reference to Margaret Thatcher's unpopular policy that triggered civil disobedience and riots. The group hit the headlines earlier this year when four members were accused of causing around £7m worth of damage to aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. The mass detention of protesters on Saturday is thought to be the highest number of arrests made by the Metropolitan Police in a single protest event since the poll tax riot of 31 March 1990. Earlier this week, MPs from across the political divide warned of an excessive use of counterterrorism powers that was riding roughshod over the right to peaceful protest, after it emerged that many of those held were aged over 60. Meanwhile, civil liberties groups, including Amnesty and Libert,y said the arrests were 'disproportionate to the point of absurdity' and that the government's terrorism laws were a threat to freedom of expression. Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the mass arrests as 'madness', saying Palestine Action was not 'equivalent to real terrorist groups like al-Qaeda or Islamic State'. Lord Hain, who led the anti-apartheid movement and the Anti-Nazi League in Britain during the 1970s and 1980s, went on to warn that the ban will 'end in tears for the government'. 'We are seeing retired magistrates, retired and serving doctors and all sorts of people being arrested and now effectively being equated with terrorists such as al-Qaida, which is absolutely wrong', he said. 'It's going to get worse [for the government] because I don't see people from that 'middle Britain' background who have joined these protests in such large numbers to suddenly decide that all is OK.' But home secretary Yvette Cooper defended the police and suggested those who were arrested may not 'know the full nature of this organisation'. After the arrests, Downing Street defended the move to ban the group, saying it was 'violent', had committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, and that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had found the organisation had carried out three separate acts of terrorism. 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear: this is a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury and extensive criminal damage,' Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman said on Monday.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labor says Hamas tries to ‘manipulate facts' after terrorist group welcomes Australia's Palestine recognition decision
The federal government has condemned Hamas for seeking to 'manipulate facts for their own propaganda' after it was reported the terrorist group had welcomed Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. Anthony Albanese announced on Monday that Australia would recognise Palestine at the United Nations next month, joining more than 140 countries – about three-quarters of UN membership – who already recognise a Palestinian state. The prime minister has said Hamas 'will be excluded from the process' of a future Palestinian state. He also justified Australia's decision to recognise Palestine by saying Hamas would be opposed to the move and a two-state solution, and said one of his pre-conditions for recognition was for a Palestinian state to be demilitarised and grant no governance role to Hamas. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Nine newspapers reported on Wednesday that the Hamas co-founder and senior official Sheikh Hassan Yousef welcomed Australia's decision to recognise Palestine, praising Australia's 'political courage' and calling on other countries to 'follow Australia's example'. Nine also reported that Yousef rejected calls to demilitarise or for Hamas to be excluded from future elections. Responding to Nine's report, a government spokesperson urged caution in publicising the words of a listed terrorist group. 'What Australia has done is contribute international momentum towards a two-state solution, which Hamas opposes. We are supporting the Arab League's efforts to isolate Hamas,' the spokesperson said. 'Hamas always tries to manipulate facts for their own propaganda. Media have a responsibility to make professional judgments to not promote propaganda of terrorist organisations to get cynical headlines.' The shadow foreign minister, Michaelia Cash, accused the government of handing Hamas a 'massive propaganda victory' in joining the vast majority of global governments in recognising Palestine. Cash said Albanese should 'hang his head in shame after being praised today by the terrorist group Hamas for his decision to recognise a Palestinian state'. 'Mr Albanese has emboldened a terror group who murder civilians in cold blood and still hold 50 Israeli hostages in tunnels under Gaza. All Australians should be appalled at the massive propaganda victory Mr Albanese has handed Hamas on a platter,' she said. 'Mr Albanese should explain whether he'll still pursue recognition knowing it has the clear endorsement of terrorists.' The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, again pledged a future Coalition government would revoke recognition of a Palestinian state. 'The prime minister said that the reason for his decision was because Hamas would not support it. He used his interpretation of Hamas' position as justification for making a decision, and that is clearly turned completely upside down today, with the Hamas co-founder praising our prime minister for this decision,' she said. Greg Barton, a professor of Islamic politics at Deakin University, told Sky News that Hamas faced isolation by Arab leaders, but that the group was 'trying to spin that in a different way, you'd expect that'. 'It's now very clear, I think, that the recognition of Palestine is completely decoupled from any support for Hamas,' he said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion '[Hamas] have excluded themselves from any future because of their actions in the terror attack on 7 October 2023 and the international community have made that very clear.' Albanese, speaking in Brisbane on Wednesday before the comments were reported, again strongly condemned Hamas. 'The Arab League, the countries around the region, as well as the international community have made it very clear Hamas has no role … The Arab League have made it very clear that Hamas must lay down its weapons,' he said. Asked about future elections, Albanese said: 'Hamas will be excluded from the process. We've made that very clear ... We exclude terrorists, we exclude Hamas. Very clearly.' Albanese said on Tuesday that the international community, including critics such as the Arab League, could block Hamas from future governance roles, but did not explain how. Shahram Akbarzadeh, a professor of Middle East politics at Deakin University, said Australian pre-conditions for recognising Palestine raise 'lots of challenges', chief among them how to deal with Hamas. He said barring Hamas from a future governing role is 'widely accepted' by Arab leaders, but the 'practicalities' are difficult. 'That's going to be a much harder proposition than disarming Hamas … it will involve a lengthy process of checks and balances,' Akbarzadeh said. The Israeli embassy in Australia has strongly condemned the government's move. A statement on X, attributed to the ambassador, Amir Maimon, read: 'Rewarding those who use terror as a political tool sends the dangerous message that violence brings political gain.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Famous influencers to wage ‘ground war' on Australian government over social media ban, documents reveal
Australia's online safety chief has warned the Albanese government of the imminent 'ground war' by tech giants harnessing 'the most famous influencers' before a social media ban for under-16s later this year. Anthony Albanese announced in July the government's decision to include YouTube in the restrictions set to begin from December, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video platform. The decision followed advice from the eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, that its exclusion was inconsistent with the law's intention given it had similar functionality to other social media sites, such as TikTok and Instagram. In emails to the communication minister's office, Inman Grant said she anticipated the laws would invoke a 'lobbying surge' brought on by concerns the ban would affect advertising revenue, a trove of newly released documents tabled in the Senate on Wednesday show. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Finally, we are anticipating a potential lobbying surge by the currently excluded platform and I expect the ground war will be at the education level – and will also involve the harnessing of the most famous influencers,' Inman Grant wrote to a senior adviser in Anika Wells' office in June after a meeting. 'We all know that this is about monetisation of the millions of under 16's on these platforms who HAVE accounts today – but may then not at commencement. This will have an impact on attracting certain advertisers that may be targeting the 8-15 demographic.' After a meeting with YouTube officials in July, Inman Grant reiterated her advice to the minister to exclude the video platform, noting its key arguments were 'moot'. 'If YouTube is adamant that they are not an age-restricted social media service then any concerns held by Google about the impact of them not being specifically exempted in the rules seem to me to be moot,' she said in an email five days before the government's announcement. 'If the service isn't caught by Part 4A (as Google asserts) then it logically can't be exempted.' Part 4A of the act defines what an age-restricted social media platform is. The documents, which detail the discussions around determining which social media sites the restrictions would be applied to, also show the department's concern about information from meeting with TikTok officials leaking to the media. In a June briefing note ahead of a meeting between Wells' chief of staff and TikTok officials, the department flagged they would 'likely raise the exclusion of YouTube' from the rules. It also warned some information from meetings with the previous communications minister, Michelle Rowland, had been shared with the media. 'In the past, TikTok has sought to exploit perceived misalignments in position between the department and Minister Rowland's office. Statements made in meetings with TikTok have appeared in the media shortly after the meetings,' the briefing note said. TikTok declined to comment. Three days after the meeting with TikTok officials, Wells sought advice from Inman Grant about minor changes to the draft rules, which included YouTube remaining exempt. Inman Grant's advice was delivered the following week offering five options, with the first being to remove YouTube's exclusion. The department agreed with this advice. Wells met with the Wiggles chief executive, Kate Chiodo, on 30 June to discuss their support for YouTube's exclusion from the ban. The department's briefing note confirms thinking in the federal government that YouTube Kids – a video-streaming version of the platform that is accessed by parents or guardians and doesn't allow comments – will likely be excluded from the ban. It said the Wiggles and other early learning content creators were 'highly unlikely to be impacted' by the restrictions because they could still be viewed through YouTube Kids. However, the department did concede the earnings of content creators could be affected. 'While access for Australian children is unlikely to be affected, revenue to creators like the Wiggles could be affected. In particular, while YouTube offers a number of ways for creators to monetise their content, many of these focus on creators' subscriber numbers,' the briefing note said. Inman Grant's advice to Wells included another option to consider re-drafting the rules to ensure platforms can be exempted for both their purpose, as well as the harm they risk. The department agreed with the advice but recommended to Wells they be considered as part of a two-year review of the laws after coming into effect, noting the complexity of the change. After a meeting between Inman Grant and an adviser from Wells' office, the eSafety commissioner said the change was 'critical' given some platforms could 'dial back their policies or eviscerate their trust and safety teams'. 'From my perspective, this is critical from an enforceability perspective and, as I said yesterday, the risk profiles and threat vectors change regulatory on platforms – particularly when they dial back their policies or eviscerate their trust and safety teams,' Inman Grant wrote in June. 'Another trend we have called the platforms on is allowing the veritable 'colonisation' of organised criminals on their platforms to target under-aged users with sexual extortion and other social engineering scams because they are failing (quite deliberately) to prevent 'recidivism' on their platforms by not tackling the mass proliferation of fake and imposter accounts.' Wells arranged a meeting with YouTube's global CEO, Neal Mohan, on 3 July to discuss 'YouTube's desire to be excluded from the social media minimum age obligation', according to the documents. It said Wells was 'seeking information on why YouTube believes it is different from other social media platforms and warrants an exclusion'. The documents also reveal the Snapchat CEO, Evan Spiegel, met with Wells on 30 July to discuss the ban, in a meeting that was facilitated by Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd. Guardian Australia has gone to Snapchat and YouTube for a response.
