logo
Protesters interrupt Dutton's NSW south coast campaign stop

Protesters interrupt Dutton's NSW south coast campaign stop

SBS Australia29-04-2025

Listen to Australian and world news, and follow trending topics with .
TRANSCRIPT:
Protesters interrupt Peter Dutton's campaign stop on the New South Wales South Coast;
Mark Carney to remain Canada's Prime Minister - thanks to Donald Trump;
Australia's Alex de Minaur caught up in Spain's mass blackout. The opposition leader has cancelled a press conference this afternoon after unionists disrupted the event by pretending to check for radiation. Peter Dutton was going to appear alongside the Liberal candidate for Gilmore, Andrew Constance, who is making his second attempt to win the electorate won by Labor's Fiona Phillips with just 373 votes in 2022. It's understood a group of three men from the South Coast Labour Council came to the event at Sanctuary Point, dressed in hazmat suits in a demonstration against the leader's policy on nuclear energy. They told onlookers they were searching for "the member for Fukushima". "Under a Dutton government, he's saying 'Nuclear is it.' Get used to the face masks, get used to the radiation suits because this is energy in Australia under a Dutton government." A teenager has been charged after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's office was vandalised for what is the third time during this year's election campaign. It's understood his Brisbane office was splattered in red paint and covered with posters criticising his stance on a number of issues, including his opposition to public housing initiatives, his stance on the war in Gaza, and links to mining billionaire Gina Rinehart. Police say the 18 year old woman was arrested after being tracked by the dog squad, and has been charged with causing wilful damage. Mr Dutton has described the vandalism as outrageous. "We can have disagreements, that's fine, but we need to do it better than we have at the moment... I don't want to see a situation where we've got people who are being intimidated." The Australian Electoral Commission has referred a video to its integrity taskforce amid concerns of foreign interference in this Saturday's federal election. In the video, two people wearing Monique Ryan T-shirts say that a community organisation which has historical links to the Chinese Communist party's foreign interference operation told them to vote for the teal MP. A spokesperson for the A-E-C has said the agency became aware of the footage when it was published on Monday [[28 April]], and that a review has been launched. Canada's Liberal Party has retained power in the federal election. The Liberals have been projected to win more of Parliament's 343 seats than the Conservative Party, though it remains unclear if they would win enough to have an outright majority government. The party had been heading for a crushing defeat until U-S President Donald Trump started attacking Canada's economy and suggested it should become the 51st state, stoking a surge in nationalism in infuriated Canadians. Toronto resident Reid Warren says Trump's actions and the response of Canada's conservative party were a large part of the reason for his vote. "I don't think there is a better choice right now. I know people believe in Poilievre but it's the same, like, soundbites that you get from anybody else. It sounds like mini-Trump to me." Four children have been killed after a car crashed an after school program in the US. Chatham Police Department Deputy Chief Scott Tarter says a car hit three people outside a school in the Illinois [[illa-noy]] town of Chatham before hitting another person as it rammed through the building and exited out the other side. Illinois State Police say those killed were between the ages of four and 18. The Deputy Chief says the circumstances of the crash remain unknown, and investigators are yet to determine if the accident was intentional. "We have an officer at the hospital with this, I'm gonna call him a suspect at this time, because that's clearly what they are. An arrest and any charges at this time, I can't confirm that." The police officer who first responded to last year's Bondi Junction shopping centre stabbing rampage has testified on day two of the inquest about how she pursued the killer and stopped him in his tracks. Inspector Amy Scott has told the inquest she chased the 40-year-old attacker without waiting for backup, because she wanted to eliminate the threat as quickly as possible. Two civilians commonly referred to as the "bollard men" have also told the Bondi stabbing inquest about their actions on that fateful day. But Silas Desperaux and Damien Guerot have told reporters outside the inquest in Sydney they do not consider themselves to be heroes - just men who did what needed to be done. DAMIEN: "I was like (we have) two choices, we escape or we go. Silas was like going, we go, we find the bollard. And we just follow him. And that time I would say my mind switched and we got full adrenaline." Australian tennis star Alex de Minaur has found himself among the millions of people impacted by a mass power outage across Spain and Portugal. The Australian No.1 was preparing to play his third round match in the Madrid Open when the lights went out across the Iberian peninsula.
All play has been since cancelled after a delay of more than four hours.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it
AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it

The Australian national security establishment's worst nightmare has arrived. The Trump administration is putting AUKUS to a review. A review many fear will put the $368 billion submarine deal to the sword. Led by Elbridge Colby, defence undersecretary and noted AUKUS sceptic, the Pentagon's review will assess whether the deal meets the president's 'America First' agenda. It was always very unlikely that any presidential administration would be willing to hand over some of the crown jewels of the US Navy's fleet to Australia, which is what the first part of the deal involved – the United States giving Australia control of some Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines. We don't know much about the details of the deal, but we do know that the US always had a get out clause there. It's up to the president to decide whether to hand them over, and really, why would they? Now, it's possible the Trump administration will tank the whole thing. And we can safely assume that won't mean handing back the $800 million Australia has already invested, no strings attached, in the US shipbuilding industry in the vain hope that would accelerate production rates. AUKUS was always a disastrous deal for Australia. We were never likely to get any submarines, and all the deal does is tie us ever closer to an increasingly volatile and aggressive America. AUKUS would not have made Australia safer. It would have made us more vulnerable and compromised our ability to make independent decisions about our own security. Trump has given us an opportunity to get out. We should take it. Australians already knew that Trump is not to be trusted. Polling by The Australia Institute done back in March found that more Australians considered the US president a bigger threat to global peace than the leaders of the world's two most powerful authoritarian states in Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Almost half (49 per cent) said they felt less secure since the election of Trump.

AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it
AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

AUKUS is a disaster for Australia. Trump has given us an out – let's take it

The Australian national security establishment's worst nightmare has arrived. The Trump administration is putting AUKUS to a review. A review many fear will put the $368 billion submarine deal to the sword. Led by Elbridge Colby, defence undersecretary and noted AUKUS sceptic, the Pentagon's review will assess whether the deal meets the president's 'America First' agenda. It was always very unlikely that any presidential administration would be willing to hand over some of the crown jewels of the US Navy's fleet to Australia, which is what the first part of the deal involved – the United States giving Australia control of some Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines. We don't know much about the details of the deal, but we do know that the US always had a get out clause there. It's up to the president to decide whether to hand them over, and really, why would they? Now, it's possible the Trump administration will tank the whole thing. And we can safely assume that won't mean handing back the $800 million Australia has already invested, no strings attached, in the US shipbuilding industry in the vain hope that would accelerate production rates. AUKUS was always a disastrous deal for Australia. We were never likely to get any submarines, and all the deal does is tie us ever closer to an increasingly volatile and aggressive America. AUKUS would not have made Australia safer. It would have made us more vulnerable and compromised our ability to make independent decisions about our own security. Trump has given us an opportunity to get out. We should take it. Australians already knew that Trump is not to be trusted. Polling by The Australia Institute done back in March found that more Australians considered the US president a bigger threat to global peace than the leaders of the world's two most powerful authoritarian states in Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Almost half (49 per cent) said they felt less secure since the election of Trump.

Opinion: Rubber stamp democracy leads to gun laws but 42nd Parliament gives glimpse of what is possible
Opinion: Rubber stamp democracy leads to gun laws but 42nd Parliament gives glimpse of what is possible

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

Opinion: Rubber stamp democracy leads to gun laws but 42nd Parliament gives glimpse of what is possible

After four long years of rubber-stamp democracy in the WA Parliament's Upper House, this month we got a brief glimpse of what might be possible in the 42nd Parliament. A Liberal motion, supported by the Nationals and the entire crossbench, was successful in sending the Firearms Act 2024 to a review committee. While the March State election did return Labor to power with a substantial majority in the Assembly, Labor lost control of the Legislative Council which they had used to brutal effect, cutting short debate and ramming through laws without the scrutiny that the house of review, the Legislative Council, is supposed to provide. With overwhelming numbers in the Legislative Council in the 41st Parliament, Labor had been able to pass any piece of legislation they wanted — whenever they wanted. Despite this power they also declared 11 Bills urgent, cutting short debate. The era of Labor arrogantly ignoring the purpose of the Parliament and hiding Bills from proper interrogation came to an end last week just three days after newly elected MLCs took their seats in the chamber. Last week Liberal MLC Nick Goiran moved a motion to refer the Firearms Act 2024 to the Standing Committee on Legislation. The motion directed the committee to report on: · problems that have emerged from the implementation and operation of the legislation; · whether all provisions are consistent with fundamental legislative principles; · recommended amendments that will ensure the legislation's workability and effectiveness. It would be difficult to argue with any of those sensible suggestions. In my opportunity to speak on the motion I said: 'We have an opportunity, members — not just the Opposition and the crossbench, but also Labor members — to put right the mistake that was made in the last Parliament by not scrutinising this piece of legislation appropriately. I urge members to give that some consideration — some serious consideration. Let the Standing Committee on Legislation do what it does best in this, the 42nd Parliament.' Why did this referral need to happen? Well, despite Labor promising that 'the law will be subject to the full scrutiny of Upper House debate, as is normal practice', they allowed consideration and examination of only 11 clauses of a Firearms Bill that contained 492 clauses. Not exactly gold standard transparency, which was another Labor broken promise. What did some of those 481 unexamined clauses contain? Just a very brief sample from the hundreds of important clauses that Labor didn't think worthy of examination: Section 150, 'General matters for consideration' states: Without limiting the matters to which the Commissioner may have regard for the purpose of forming an opinion as to whether a person is a fit and proper person, the Commissioner may have regard to any of the following — (a) the person's conduct and behaviour; (b) the person's physical and mental health; (c) the person's views, opinions and attitudes; (d) the person's way of living or domestic circumstances. I would have welcomed the opportunity to discover how the Commissioner might determine my attitudes or views when considering if I am a fit and proper person to hold a firearm licence. There are also clauses relating to the storage of firearms, health checks for firearm owners and what defines a farm or a farmer where discussion and explanation from the government could have been useful. Labor chose not to bother. They chose to push the Bill through the last Parliament and ignore genuine concerns. The Liberal motion received support from across the political spectrum because it is sensible and allows the Parliament to do its job. Greens MLC Brad Pettitt, a supporter of reform to the Firearms Act, added his support for the referral noting concerns from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners regarding the impact on RACGP members having to deal with the health checks. The Legislation Committee now can recommend changes that will improve the workability of this Act for all stakeholders and achieve the goals of community safety. Even the Labor Party supported the referral to the committee. Possibly because they realised the error of their ways, or more probably because they didn't want the embarrassment of losing a vote so early in the life of the new Parliament. Either way, democracy is the winner. The newly-elected Legislative Council might have fewer regional members because of Labor's electoral law changes before the last election, but it now has an opportunity to hold the Government to account. Steve Martin is a WA Liberal member for the Agricultural Region and a farmer at Wickepin

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store