logo
NC: Foolishly speeding toward a fiscal cliff

NC: Foolishly speeding toward a fiscal cliff

Yahoo05-06-2025
The seal of North Carolina in the Senate chamber features a cornucopia as a symbol of abundance. But 15 years of budget cutting have left the state far from prosperous. (Photo: Galen Bacharier/NC Newsline)
If you get a chance, check out a recent essay authored by retired Legislative Fiscal Analyst Richard Bostic. It was posted by Raleigh's News & Observer.
In it, Bostic, who spent 31 years advising state legislative leaders, issues a loud and clear warning about the fiscal cliff toward which our state is speeding.
His simple and straightforward message: it's imperative that GOP lawmakers rethink their massive, planned cuts to corporate and personal income taxes.
And his reasoning is equally straightforward.
Several core public structures and services – schools, state employee pay and retiree benefits, infrastructure – are already inadequate even as our population is growing and aging.
Now add the looming threats of climate change, federal funding cuts and an economic downturn and the picture grows even more ominous.
The bottom line: As Bostic observes, delaying or repealing planned tax cuts isn't just about balancing a spreadsheet — it's about protecting our schools, our infrastructure and our people. State lawmakers should heed this insightful warning.
For NC Newsline, I'm Rob Schofield.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump officials cast a wider net for Powell replacement at Fed
Trump officials cast a wider net for Powell replacement at Fed

Politico

time10 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump officials cast a wider net for Powell replacement at Fed

The list suggests officials are aiming to present President Donald Trump with a diverse set of options to replace Powell, whom Trump has relentlessly pressed to lower interest rates, and they aren't ruling out picking a Fed insider for the job. The selection process is especially challenging because whoever fills the seat will have to balance the central bank's inflation-fighting credibility with Trump's expectation that his calls for lower rates will be taken into consideration. The new chair will also lead an institution with thousands of employees tasked with not only setting interest rates, but also regulating banks and overseeing the payments system. Jefferson, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, has been a less visible presence than other recent vice chairs at the Fed but has consistently garnered bipartisan support. He was confirmed by the Senate as the central bank's No. 2 in an 88-10 vote. Many of the people under consideration have publicly said the Fed should cut borrowing costs — Waller and Bowman, both Trump appointees, dissented from a decision to hold rates steady last month — but have also emphasized the importance of the institution's insulation from short-term politics. Bullard said on CNBC on Tuesday that he would accept the job 'if we set it up for success, if we protect the value of the dollar, [to] be the reserve currency — that'll give us lower interest rates over time, if we aim for low and stable inflation, and if we can respect the independence of the institution under the Federal Reserve Act.' Bullard and Sumerlin's candidacies were first reported by the Wall Street Journal, and the new internal Fed candidates were earlier reported by Bloomberg News. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a CNBC interview last week that a formal process for choosing Powell's successor has kicked off but did not a provide a timeline for when the choice might be made. In the meantime, Trump has nominated his chief economist, Stephen Miran, to an open position on the Fed, though the term for that slot ends in January. Miran has argued that the central bank should be subject to more political control.

There is 'good doubt' about Trump's BLS head nominee EJ Antoni
There is 'good doubt' about Trump's BLS head nominee EJ Antoni

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

There is 'good doubt' about Trump's BLS head nominee EJ Antoni

President Trump has nominated the Heritage Foundation's chief economist EJ Antoni to be the new commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Antoni will face the Senate before being appointed as commissioner. New Century Advisors chief economist and former Fed economist Claudia Sahm, RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas, and Schwab Center for Financial Research fixed income strategist Collin Martin join Morning Brief with Julie Hyman to discuss the nomination and the future of the BLS. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief. President Trump has now nominated EJ Antoni. He's the chief economist currently at the Conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. He's nominated him as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. There has been a lot of commentary about that nomination, which still has to face the Senate to get through. So I want to bring you guys back in to to talk about this as well. Claudia, let me get your take first, you know, given what we were just talking about, um, what does Antoni do, you know, what does that nomination say? Does it get through? Does it, is does this guy have the chops to to have that job? Right. Well, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that is the one political figure at the BLS. And that it's always the case, the president, you know, nominates, the Senate confirms for that position. I think my biggest concern is that BLS is facing a lot of challenges. It is legitimately hard to run surveys, construct statistics, communicate them to the public, get them out in a timely manner. And frankly, this nominee just doesn't have a lot of experience and background in measurement and statistics. So I'll be really interested to hear what ideas he has on how to fix the problems that he's been a very vocal critic of. Uh, but that's, you know, the BLS needs leadership and they need resources. So, you know, if he's able to, you know, get them those resources and provide that leadership, that'd be excellent. I just, I don't, I don't see it in the record, but you know, we will be surprised there too. As as we all know from probably daily experience in all of our jobs and lives, it's very easy to criticize. It's another thing to fix. Um, Joe, what's your take on Antoni and and what he might bring to the BLS? When his Senate confirmation hearings happen, he should prepare for a withering set of criticism based on his credibility and his qualifications. We all know who EJ is. We all see his work. And there's good doubt around his, his, his background and whether he's able to do this. Let me give you a sense of what's going on, like just with the inflation data, right? Obviously, there's been three big areas where the Feds, excuse me, the BLS has had to impute statistics, because they're no longer collecting because investment in data collection is just not where it needs to be. BLS went back and did a 77-month study. You know what they found was that 18% of the months inflation was uh, revised upward 1/10 of 1%, and in 14% of the months it was revised downward by 1/10 of 1%. You know what that's like? That's like watching the paint dry. You're, if you're expecting major revisions in a granular uh, time series like the consumer price index, you're not going to get it. And that's the problem though, because there But in labor, the revisions have been much larger. Okay. Sure. That's right. But I was using this, we can go to labor, right? Again, you need to invest more. In general, right, in general, it does seem like there is an issue with data collection. Because we haven't been investing in it, right? And the survey response rates following the pandemic, when lots of businesses were wiped out, have dropped to 60% or below. So the way to fix that is to invest in data collection, invest in new methodologies, and then ride with it. But I gotta tell you, even in the big numbers, right, when you take, take a step back and look at the long period of the revisions, I mean, 99% of it's right, right? It's just right now this has been so politicized, right? Because we have a different president with a different point of view, who just clearly is going to be uncomfortable with what the data implies about his own policies. Colin, when it comes to what the market's going to key off of, you know, let's say Antoni gets confirmed, goes in there, does whatever he's going to do. I mean, the market doesn't have a lot of choice in terms of the data that it moves off of, unless we turn to alternative sources of data. I mean, what how do you think this plays out? Yeah, it's going to be difficult because a lot of the BLS data is, is, you know, really good. I mean, not just in the US, but globally, we rely on that data. And I think there, if there was a concern that it was being politicized or manipulated, I'm not saying that's going to happen, but I think there's probably concerns out there. There's a difference between updating methodologies and making sure we're getting the right data, but also making sure that it's not then politicized to get a certain outcome. I think that's going to be really important. There could be a push and pull between what we're getting from data, if it does seem like the methodologies and the processes are changing, when we do have other private services. A lot of times though we kind of disregard those and focus on the government ones. I think ADP is a really good one. ADP comes out up or down, people look at it, they don't really care too much, because they say, well, we're going to look at the BLS data. The real numbers coming out on Friday. We're going to look at the real data. So I think trust is really important. I don't know how we solve for that if there's a lack of trust. Yeah. Joe, real quick. Okay. So we're going to be looking at private label data, ADP, indeed, the Billion Prices Project over at Harvard. There's a plethora of data out there that we're all going to start turning to. And this is going to get different in a way I don't think those who make these criticisms have thought through. Related Videos What July CPI data means for the Fed & what's next for BLS Fed cut isn't the 'easy layup' Trump says it is, CPI data shows Inflation report, BLS pick, China trade extension: 3 Things Why bonds matter now for every investor Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store