Censorship Surge in India Undermines Independent Journalism
On May 8, the prominent social media platform X said it was forced to block more than 8,000 accounts in India following executive orders from the government. Those affected by the ban told Frontline that it 'blatantly violates the law of the land' and that the 'irrational censorship sets a bad precedent for free speech in a democracy'.
During heightened tensions between India and Pakistan—the two nuclear neighbours and arch-rivals—several leading web portals, YouTube channels, and individual X handles have been suspended. Among the foremost portals whose X accounts remain withheld include Maktoob Media and BBC Urdu.
In the case of the online news portal The Wire, the website was blocked on May 9 on the government's orders. According to an internet service provider, The Wire was 'blocked as per the order of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology under the IT Act, 2000'. Later in the day, the website was again accessible to readers after over 12 hours had passed. The Wire then issued a statement wherein it said that according to the response they received from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B), the website had been blocked on the basis of a request regarding a piece citing a CNN report on the ongoing India-Pakistan border tensions. While The Wire stated that it had removed the said piece from public view, it added that it would present its case in front of the designated authority and reserved its right 'to challenge this unconstitutional attack on freedom of press'.
Siddharth Varadarajan, founding editor of The Wire, on May 9 said: 'We protest this blatant censorship at a critical time for India when sane, truthful, fair and rational voices and sources of news and information are among the biggest assets that India has.' He accused India's major television news channels of indulging in 'fake news' and 'dangerous reporting' in sensitive times. He added that The Wire has been 'one of the largest Indian news platforms that has been reporting on the emerging situation with responsibility and restraint. The blocking order is unconstitutional. It is an attack on press freedom and on the right of every Indian to access information.'
Individual journalists also targeted
Besides this, individual accounts of senior journalists such as Anuradha Bhasin and Muzamil Jaleel have been made inoperative with effect from May 9.
Anuradha Bhasin, who originally hails from Jammu, is the managing editor of Kashmir Times, an English-language newspaper that was earlier published from both Srinagar and Jammu, and the author of A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370 (2022). Bhasin, who currently lives in the US, said that the blocking of her X handle in India 'came as a huge surprise'.
'It is shocking. The scale at which the voices are disappearing is distressing. Mostly, those banned are the sane voices and professional journalists who sift fact from fiction. But those who sensationalise and further amplify the fake narratives during sensitive times are enjoying the government's patronage,' Bhasin told Frontline. She articulated that during war hysteria, it is critically important to have voices of reasons and restraint, not sensationalism.
Also Read | Operation Sindoor and the war at home
According to X, it received executive orders from the Indian government requiring the social media platform to 'block over 8,000 accounts in India, subject to potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment of the company's local employees. The orders include demands to block access in India to accounts belonging to international news organizations and prominent X users.' It further said that, in most cases, 'the Indian government has not specified which posts from an account have violated India's local laws. For a significant number of accounts, we did not receive any evidence or justification to block the accounts. To comply with the orders, we will withhold the specified accounts in India alone. We have begun that process. However, we disagree with the Indian government's demands.'
The Wire is not the only major platform to face suspension. At the time of writing this piece, BBC Urdu's account on X (@BBCUrdu) was also withheld. Shockingly, even the Global Affairs account of X was temporarily suspended only a day after it became known that the government had ordered the platform to block over 8,000 accounts. When X users tried to access these accounts, they could only see a blank screen that read 'Account Withheld'.
X has received executive orders from the Indian government requiring X to block over 8,000 accounts in India, subject to potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment of the company's local employees. The orders include demands to block access in India to… — Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) May 8, 2025
'Blocking entire accounts is not only unnecessary, it amounts to censorship of existing and future content, and is contrary to the fundamental right of free speech. This is not an easy decision, however keeping the platform accessible in India is vital to Indians' ability to access information,' X Global Affairs said in a statement, adding it believes that 'making these executive orders public is essential for transparency – lack of disclosure discourages accountability and can contribute to arbitrary decision making. However, due to legal restrictions, we are unable to publish the executive orders at this time. X is exploring all possible legal avenues available to the company.' X encouraged all those adversely impacted by these blocking orders to 'seek appropriate relief from the courts'.
Prevailing atmosphere of censorship
Another victim of this censorship was Maktoob Media, a news platform that extensively covers stories of the minorities. On May 8, the X account of Maktoob Media was made inoperative. Shaheen Abdullah, the deputy editor of the organisation, told Frontline that the ban 'blatantly violates the law of the land and the whole idea of free media. It is an attempt to muzzle and choke independent media outlets. Moreover, it is a sign how press freedom is deteriorating in India.'
In terms of press freedom, India ranks at 151 out of 180 countries as per the 2025 World Press Freedom Index released by the Paris-based organisation Reporters Without Borders (RSF). Similarly, the US-based Freedom House in its 2025 report (titled 'Freedom in the World 2025') said that in terms of Global Freedom and Internet Freedom, India remains 'partly free', scoring 63 and 50 points respectively out of 100.
Abdullah was of the view that the government had either already prepared a list of journalists, media outlets, and YouTube channels or used any specific AI tool to get data about major independent and credible media outlets and individuals that it intended to block. 'We did not receive any prior notification explaining the reasons behind the decision. It is a dangerous precedent. Imagine, we are not able to report facts. Everything is controlled,' Abdullah told Frontline, adding 'we are definitely challenging the illegal ban and irrational censorship in the court of law'.
'Anybody who gives accurate analysis of the situation and deals with objective facts is banned. On the other hand, anybody who screams on television screens and disseminates fake news is rewarded and decorated.'Pravin SawhneyEditor, FORCE
Furthermore, he said that his news platform has to fight for its existence and for independent journalism to highlight different perspectives so as to amplify the forgotten voices. He argued that, in the prevailing atmosphere of censorship, 'every expression entails a cost'.
Internet service providers said the sites are 'blocked as per the order of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology'. Moreover, the I&B Ministry directed all OTT platforms, digital streaming services, and intermediaries operating in India to 'immediately discontinue all web series, films, songs, podcasts, and any other media content originating from Pakistan'. Earlier, the Instagram accounts of renowned Pakistani film and television actors like Fawad Khan and Mahira Khan were blocked in India.
'One of the worst autocratizers'
In yet another development, a recent video on India-Pakistan escalation and aerial strikes uploaded on YouTube by Pravin Sawhney, editor of the defence magazine FORCE, was also blocked. In the video, Sawhney, a defence analyst and a former Indian Army officer, had been critical of the government's recent decision to use air strikes against Pakistan.
'Anybody who gives accurate analysis of the situation and deals with objective facts is banned. On the other hand, anybody who screams on television screens and disseminates fake news is rewarded and decorated,' Sawhney told Frontline, adding 'blocking credible accounts, individuals, and channels shows that the government is in a panic mode.' However, he said there was no point in challenging the ban legally.
Also Read | India vs Pakistan: Why 'settling the score' still decides the fight
The X accounts of two news portals run by Kashmiris, Free Press Kashmir and The Kashmiriyat, were also suspended 'in response to a legal demand by the government'. Qazi Zaid, who runs Free Press Kashmir, said that he was not aware of any specific post or news story that may have violated the social media platform's policies or local laws. 'Our reportage is consistent with journalistic standards and public interest reporting. Without transparency from the platform regarding the triggering content or legal basis, we are unable to confirm what specifically led to this action.'
Global watchdogs and organisations such as the Sweden-based V-Dem (Varieties of Democracy) Institute have been critical of the Indian government. According to V-Dem's 2025 report titled '25 Years of Autocratization – Democracy Trumped?', globally India has been 'one of the worst autocratizers lately'. However, India has rejected these global reports on media freedom, free speech, religious freedom for minorities, and democracy, etc., describing them as 'motivated'.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence directed all media channels, digital platforms, and individuals to 'refrain from live coverage or real-time reporting of defence operations and movement of security forces'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Your turn will come': What PM Modi told Naval chief soon after India-Pak ceasefire
Anyone who knows Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh, General Upendra Dwivedi, or Admiral Dinesh Tripathi will realize that they are all apolitical yet unafraid to speak their minds to the political leadership when it comes to national security. ACM Singh is a classic test fighter pilot who lives for the day and could not care less if the political leadership gets upset with his bindass attitude. General Dwivedi is a typical OG, dyed-in-wool green, most comfortable when with his troops. He is shy to a point but asserts himself when required and can be ruthless. Admiral Tripathi is a total badass who believes in the lethal power of the Navy and was ready to wipe out Karachi port on the morning of May 10—until the Pakistani DGMO pleaded for peace. PM Narendra Modi with his war cabinet on May 10. The report was presented to a national security team headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, and Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan. One common denominator with all four is that they know how to walk a razor's edge and have the daring to take any decision when it comes to national security—ready to face the consequences. Together, they make a formidable hunting pack. On the morning of May 10, while appreciating the Indian armed forces' response, PM Modi congratulated Gen Dwivedi and ACM Singh. He then looked at Admiral Tripathi and said: 'Humne aapke mooh se niwala cheen liya, aapko mauka phir milega' ('I have snatched the morsel out of your mouth, but your turn will come'). This statement came soon after the Indian Navy was told to stand down from launching a BrahMos missile attack on Karachi port. Unafraid that Pakistan could retaliate with a missile strike on his home state, Gujarat, in response to the Karachi move, the PM gave the three chiefs a total free hand and was prepared for the worst. The three chiefs may have had second thoughts—but not the PM. While many armchair strategists in state-funded think tanks may feel that ACM Singh's remarks in Bengaluru on Saturday were overstated, the fact is that the Air Chief spoke only about confirmed Pakistani aircraft, radar, and AEW&C platform kills during the May 7–10 conflict. He did not account for other hard evidence. National security planners and intelligence agencies know that a hangar housing C-130 Hercules VVIP transport aircraft was hit hard at Chaklala airbase in Rawalpindi on May 10, and two F-16s were destroyed on the ground in Jacobabad. The northern PAF command-and-control network went blind after Nur Khan (Chaklala) was hit at 2.30 am on May 10. ACM Singh also did not include 'half kills' in his remarks. Such was the fear of the Indian Army's M777 Excalibur shells and Warmate loitering ammunition that Pakistani troops abandoned posts near the LoC and fled. The IAF's response forced all prized PAF assets to be moved towards the western border with Iran and Afghanistan. For that very reason, an S-400 missile was used to take out a wide-bodied aircraft 315 kilometers from the Indo-Pak border in Punjab, Pakistan. The hit aircraft was a Saab AEW&C platform, though many in the IAF believe it could also have been a Dassault Falcon 20 ELINT aircraft. If that were not enough, hardly any ship or submarine of the Pakistan Navy was out at sea to counter the Indian Navy's armada, with all enemy vessels moving towards Gwadar in fear of the Indian response. Although PM Modi's critics and sundry professors may taunt him for stopping the armed response due to alleged US intervention, the last Indian BrahMos strike hit Bholari airbase at noon on May 10—after which all mission objectives were complete. Since Field Marshal Asim Munir was DG (ISI) when the Pulwama suicide bombing took place on February 14, 2019, and Army Chief when the Pahalgam Hindu tourist massacre was enacted at the instructions of Rawalpindi on April 22, 2025, it is clear that Pakistan will attempt another terror attack in the Kashmir Valley or the Indian hinterland in the near future. While Munir may get promoted to Pakistan's President or Field Marshal Administrator, it seems that the Indian Navy will get its turn after all.
New Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Assam eviction drives aimed at 'creating narrative' before assembly polls: Experts
On these recent evictions, eminent advocate Santanu Borthakur said: "If it is a forest land, then whosoever stays there for whatever longer period, it does not give them legal rights to settle there permanently. " However, targeting only one community, as seen in the recent cases in Golaghat is "absolutely discriminatory", he added. "The CM's recent comment that no eviction will take place against people from other communities is anti-Constitution and not permitted by law," Borthakur said. In Rengma, 1,500 Muslim families were evicted. The remaining families are from Bodo, Nepali, Manipuri and other communities, who have certificates from the Forest Rights Committee (FRC). According to Kaustubh Deka, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Dibrugarh University, the eviction drive is a significant and sensitive moment for the state, and the whole episode highlights the critical bearing of the state's complex socio-political history. "The government must maintain a fair balance between three aspects. One, the allegation that genuine Indian citizens are being selectively targeted, needs to be addressed in all earnestness. Two, the rights given to people under progressive environmental legislations such as 'Forest Rights Act' need to be respected," he added. Also, care should be taken that the ongoing process doesn't trigger complications in Assam's already volatile border dispute scenario with many of its neighbouring states, Deka said. Talking about alleged encroachments in inter-state border areas in Rengma, advocate Borthakur said that normally in border areas, the government settles people in the buffer zones so that no encroachment takes place from the opposite side. "We can see such habitation in all border areas. Usually minorities, Gorkha and Bihari people, are settled in such locations," he added. Barua too supported his claim and said that in all the border areas with neighbouring states, usually people or communities originally from outside are settled. "The indigenous people usually do not live there. People from communities like Adivasis, Gorkhas and minorities live in such areas," he added. The reserve forests witnessing recent evictions are along Assam-Nagaland border, where people from the neighbouring state had allegedly attempted to occupy land. The evicted people claimed that their previous generation was settled in the forest by the Golap Borbora government in 1978-79 and the AGP government, which came to power in 1985. Borthakur said, "Without considering the historical background, carrying out an eviction is not appropriate. Legally, the government has the power, but the manner in which that power was exercised is not acceptable. It is inhuman and arbitrary." He also stressed that evicting people without rehabilitation is wrong. Echoing similar sentiments, Deka said, "This is against all democratic norms and practices. Utterly inhumane." Even the Supreme Court judgement says that even pavement dwellers can not be evicted without rehabilitation.
Hans India
30 minutes ago
- Hans India
Army Chief Calls Out Pakistan's Victory Claims Over Operation Sindoor Chess Game
Chief of Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi has criticized Pakistan's attempts to portray itself as victorious following Operation Sindoor, describing the strategic military campaign as an unpredictable chess match where India ultimately delivered a decisive checkmate. Speaking at an event at IIT Madras, the Army chief mocked Islamabad's narrative management tactics while explaining the complex nature of the grey zone operation. General Dwivedi compared the anti-terror mission to a strategic chess game, emphasizing the uncertainty both sides faced during the operation. He explained that neither India nor Pakistan could predict the opponent's next move, making it a classic grey zone conflict—one that falls just short of conventional warfare. Despite the risks involved, including potential losses to Indian forces, the Army chief stated that India successfully executed its strategy and achieved victory. The Army chief specifically targeted Pakistan's propaganda efforts, particularly their decision to promote Army Chief Asim Munir to the rank of five-star general and field marshal as a way to project success. He sarcastically noted how Pakistanis would interpret this promotion as evidence of victory, highlighting the power of narrative management in shaping public perception of military outcomes. Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7 as retaliation for the Pahalgam terrorist attack, where Pakistan-based militants killed 26 civilians in Jammu and Kashmir. General Dwivedi praised the political leadership's resolve and strategic clarity, particularly commending the decision-making process that granted the military complete operational freedom. He revealed that during high-level meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on April 23, the leadership declared "enough is enough" and gave the armed forces a free hand to determine appropriate action. The Army chief emphasized the significance of political clarity and confidence shown by the government, describing it as unprecedented. He noted how all three service chiefs were aligned on the need for decisive action, and the political leadership's trust in military judgment enabled effective execution of the mission. Regarding the operation's naming, General Dwivedi highlighted how "Operation Sindoor" resonated with the entire nation and galvanized public support. He mentioned that the widespread national backing led to questions about why the operation was concluded, indicating strong public appetite for such decisive military action. The targeted military campaign involved precision strikes against terrorist infrastructure and camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Indian armed forces utilized a combination of air and missile strikes to hit nine specific targets. While India maintained that the strikes were focused, measured, and non-escalatory, Pakistan attempted retaliatory drone and missile attacks, which were successfully neutralized by India's air defence systems. Military analysts widely consider Operation Sindoor a comprehensive victory for India, both in military and psychological terms. The mission demonstrated India's capability for high-precision, coordinated military action while successfully dismantling terrorist infrastructure and restoring deterrence against state-sponsored cross-border terrorism. The Army chief's remarks underscore the importance of narrative warfare in modern conflicts, where perception often matters as much as actual military outcomes. His criticism of Pakistan's propaganda efforts highlights how different nations attempt to frame the same events to suit their domestic and international audiences, making truth a casualty in information warfare.
