logo
Workplace Trust Is A Language. Here's How To Speak It.

Workplace Trust Is A Language. Here's How To Speak It.

Forbes28-07-2025
Trust is the language of modern leadership. getty
Workplace trust is fraying. Only 1 in 5 U.S. employees strongly trust their leadership, and 63% fear leaders may purposely mislead them. But it's not just leadership we mistrust — it's each other. Some coworkers light us up, others drain us. That's trust, too. And while it can feel elusive, trust isn't lost forever — or one-size-fits-all.
Uncertainty fuels fear and fatigue. Layoffs, political pressure, and daily headline whiplash make people question: Do leaders mean what they say? Can I trust their decisions? Tensions and frustration simmer, spill into careless comments and reactive choices, and quietly erode relationships.
Yet trust fuels everything companies care about: engagement, innovation, retention, and performance. Without it, people self-protect. Productivity drops. Turnover rises. And high-trust companies? They deliver up to 286% higher shareholder returns .
As Brené Brown says, trust is earned in the smallest of moments. And in my experience, those moments are where your presence, your assumptions, and your willingness to repair matter most.
Trust in the workplace is rarely lost all at once. It erodes quietly when questions go unasked, feedback goes unspoken, and credit goes unshared. Motives get second-guessed. Energy fades. Collaboration gives way to cautious compliance. Over time, even high-performing teams slip into quiet resignation.
It fractures further when feedback is vague, decisions lack context, leaders disappear in moments of uncertainty — or when a a blind eye is turned. It also breaks down between colleagues through misunderstandings, unmet expectations, and the stories we start telling ourselves when communication misses the mark.
When trust breaks, control rushes in, and control breeds fear, compliance and burnout, not performance. Gallup estimates that low engagement costs the global economy nearly $9 trillion annually. That's the price of workplaces where trust is in short supply.
Trust gets built in micro-moments of connection: how feedback is given, how people feel heard, how people show up when things get hard. It grows when we say what we mean and try not to let each other down. And it's not just about being trustworthy, you must also be trusting. Believing in others' ability to rise matters just as much as showing up yourself.
That's why understanding how different people experience trust is essential. Minda Harts, author of Talk to Me Nice and workplace consultant, shared a personal experience that shaped her perspective: 'I had a manager early in my career who never gave me feedback. I started questioning whether he valued my work or if I even belonged on the team. My trust language is feedback — I need specific input to feel trusted and valued. But he didn't know that. We were both trying, but speaking completely different languages.'
She added: 'How can people build trust if they don't know what you need from them?' Read The Signals Of Workplace Trust
As Minda explains: 'That's what trust is: a language. When someone speaks one language and you keep speaking another louder, communication doesn't improve. But we do this with trust all the time.'
She adds: 'A leader might think they're building trust by being transparent, but if their employees' trust language is follow-through, all that transparency means nothing if commitments aren't kept.' That's why understanding and speaking someone's trust language matters just as much as what you say.
In a tech-driven world that flattens emotion, quietly erases what makes us unique, and distances us, human connection stands out. Trust thrives on proximity, authenticity, logic, and empathy, and wobbles when any of those are missing. It's communicated in intentional moments: how often we engage, the words we choose, the care behind our actions. We tend to trust those who show up consistently and with vulnerability — sharing openly, owning their missteps, and being emotionally present — and who speak in ways that resonate, not those we only hear from through impersonal leadership talking points.
When leaders understand how people experience trust, they can transform tension into collaboration. And the payoff is real. Research from Paul J. Zak , founding director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies, found that employees at high-trust organizations are: 74% less stressed
50% more productive
76% more engaged
It even increases joy. And who doesn't want more of that? The 7+1 Trust Languages at Work
Leadership is tested — and proven — in how we earn, show, and speak trust.
In his book Trusted Leader, David Horsager identifies eight pillars of trust: clarity, compassion, character, competency, commitment, connection, contribution, and consistency. These are the qualities leaders need to cultivate trust.
But how do those values show up in everyday team interactions? In Talk to Me Nice , Minda adds a practical layer: seven trust languages that translate those values into action. 'The biggest mistake leaders make is trying to repair trust using their language,' she says. For some, trust looks like transparency — explaining decisions and sharing context. For others, it's follow-through — keeping commitments and delivering on promises. Minda outlines seven trust languages that help leaders better connect with their teams: Transparency — Explaining not just what decisions are made, but why.
— Explaining not just what decisions are made, but why. Security — Creating intellectual, psychological, and physical safety so people can speak up without fear.
— Creating intellectual, psychological, and physical safety so people can speak up without fear. Demonstration — Modeling expected behaviors instead of merely telling others what to do.
— Modeling expected behaviors instead of merely telling others what to do. Feedback — Offering clear, actionable input rather than vague praise.
— Offering clear, actionable input rather than vague praise. Acknowledgment — Recognizing contributions in ways that matter personally to each individual.
— Recognizing contributions in ways that matter personally to each individual. Sensitivity — Being emotionally aware and thoughtful about timing during challenging conversations.
— Being emotionally aware and thoughtful about timing during challenging conversations. Follow-through — Consistently doing what you say you'll do.
While David Horsager's research points to 'connection' as one of the eight pillars of trust, I see it as an essential language of trust, too. We can't shortcut the moments that build trust: stay interviews, coaching conversations, meaningful celebrations, thoughtful feedback, and those small, unexpected check-ins that quietly say 'I see you.'
When I asked which of these languages leaders neglect most, Minda didn't hesitate: 'Sensitivity, hands down. We've gotten so focused on 'efficiency' and 'getting things done' that we've forgotten people are human beings first, and employees second.'
She shares examples of leaders delivering harsh feedback via email, announcing layoffs in all-hands meetings, or making major changes with no emotional context. For employees whose primary trust language is sensitivity, this doesn't feel impersonal but rather a betrayal. As Minda puts it: 'How and when you communicate matters as much as what you communicate.' How To Re-Earn Workplace Trust
When workplace trust breaks, it echoes. And when it breaks within the very functions meant to model it — leadership and HR — the fallout runs deeper. Take the "kiss cam" scandal: Astronomer's CEO resigned after being caught on camera in what appeared to be a personal entanglement with the company's chief people officer, sparking headlines and shaking internal trust. HR's role is to safeguard culture and steady people through uncertainty. When that trust collapses, it can feel like the ground disappears.
Like in any relationship, workplace trust will face ruptures. But those moments don't have to define your work reputation or relationships. What sets trusted colleagues and great leaders apart is their willingness to face conflict, engage in honest repair, and pursue deeper understanding.
So where do you begin? By naming where trust has broken and owning your part. That starts with honest self-reflection.
Minda recommends that you ask your teams two questions:
1. What does trust look like to you?
2. What would make you feel most supported right now?'
Then listen. Someone might need more transparency about decisions, another might want acknowledgement for their extra hours, and someone else might need sensitivity around a health issue. You don't have to fix everything, but understanding how each person defines trust is a powerful first step.
Another practice I use often: Pause. Breathe. Reflect. Ask yourself, "Am I responding to what's actually happening or to the story I'm telling myself?" When I feel myself slipping into impatient, fire-breathing mode, I take a moment. Do I need a walk? A quick breathing exercise? Should I text my husband or a friend to sanity-check my assumptions?
Then, check in, especially with the person you're struggling to connect with or your team after a big decision or shift. Ask these two questions: "How did that land for you?" 'What's still on your mind?'
These practices matter even more in make-or-break moments: public crises, layoffs, or when companies pull back from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. As Minda puts it: "It's devastating because it breaks multiple trust languages at once. Pulling back on inclusion breaks follow-through and acknowledgment. For marginalized employees, it feels like a fundamental breach."
In my experience working with senior leaders and teams, I've seen how deeply trust and DEI are connected. When companies retreat from DEI, employees wonder: Do I still belong here? Were those promises only performative? Will I be next?
This is where leadership can re-earn trust: Name the reality. If DEI initiatives are shifting, say so clearly. Silence breeds mistrust.
If DEI initiatives are shifting, say so clearly. Silence breeds mistrust. Keep checking in. Don't assume everyone feels equally safe. Ask what's changed for them and what support they need.
Don't assume everyone feels equally safe. Ask what's changed for them and what support they need. Match words to actions. Don't just say belonging matters. Show it through decisions, resources, and daily behavior.
Trust may not bounce back overnight, but it can be restored with consistency, care, honest conversation, and the courage to meet the moment with humanity. Trust Is The Language Of Modern Leadership
Leadership today demands trusting relationships and a deeper awareness of how people work and feel, and you need to nurture those connections and instincts before urgency takes over. Trust steadies people in uncertain times, and it's spoken and reinforced in everyday moments: giving feedback, acknowledging what people carry or when you have let them down, staying honest when the answers aren't clear. As Minda says, 'Titles don't build trust. People do.'
Workplace trust is the foundation of how we live well, lead well and create organizations worth believing in — places that light us up, not burn us out.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ali Velshi: The jobs numbers aren't ‘rigged.' Trump owns this economy.
Ali Velshi: The jobs numbers aren't ‘rigged.' Trump owns this economy.

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ali Velshi: The jobs numbers aren't ‘rigged.' Trump owns this economy.

This is an adapted excerpt from the Aug. 2 episode of 'Velshi.' On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released an alarming monthly employment report, exposing that the United States' job market is much more fragile than many had expected. Only 73,000 net new jobs — that's new jobs created, minus jobs lost — were added in July. But worse were the revisions to the two previous job reports. May's jobs report was revised from 144,000 jobs to only 19,000. June's 147,000 jobs were mostly a mirage, too; it turns out only 14,000 jobs were added that month. That's 258,000 fewer jobs than previously thought. The average for the last three months is 35,000, far fewer than the 150,000 or more needed for job growth to keep up with population growth in this country. Now, revisions to government statistics are normal in subsequent months. It's the nature of large numbers. They happen regularly, but they almost never show this dramatic a shift. It was a bad report, no doubt about it. It was particularly bad for a president who, in political terms, owns this job market and this economy, which has been roiled by the chaos of his tariffs and trade wars. But instead of addressing the numbers and the challenge they present, Donald Trump said they were fake and fired the head of the department that collects them. The president baselessly claimed the jobs numbers were 'rigged' and accused the fired commissioner of inflating numbers for the Biden administration and sabotaging them under his own administration. Trump baselessly claimed that jobs reports were overstated during the previous presidency to prop up Joe Biden and are now being underestimated to hurt Trump. The president has zeroed in on the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, labeling her a 'Biden appointee' and ignoring the fact that she was confirmed in the Senate by a bipartisan vote of 86-8, with six senators not voting. Among the 86 yeas was now-Vice President JD Vance. This is becoming a common refrain for Trump. He has also accused Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, of being a Biden appointee. But Trump is the one who elevated him to the position in 2017. Friday also marked the president's self-imposed, but often delayed, deadline for reaching trade deals with countries across the world. Back in April, Trump claimed he had already struck 200 deals, despite the fact that there aren't even 200 countries in the world. The number of deals before the Aug. 1 deadline was closer to eight, though you could arguably consider the European Union, which is a single trading bloc, as 27 countries. Deals were struck with the European Union, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Korea, the United Kingdom and Vietnam, and talks are ongoing with Mexico and China. Nowhere close to 200. That was just a lie. An executive order signed by Trump late Thursday outlined tariff rates for 69 countries, including several changes from the rates announced on 'Liberation Day' in April. Smaller countries like Lesotho and Guyana were originally hit with massive tariffs, simply because they are poor countries that sell more to America than they buy and as a result have large trade deficits with America, but those rates have since been cut. The day before, Trump also jacked up tariffs on Brazil to 50% for what he views as the political persecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial for attempting a coup in 2022. Trump has called that trial a 'witch hunt.' Forget a deal with one of the U.S.' oldest and biggest trading partners, Canada. The White House is upping the ante on our neighbor to the north, announcing a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, up from 25%. That's on goods not included in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. Plus, on Wednesday, the Commerce Department said gross domestic product, or GDP, which is the largest measure of economic activity we have, increased at a 3% annual rate in the second quarter. Some journalists jumped on that exciting top-line number, one that seems far more impressive than the first quarter's GDP increase of just 0.5%. But if some of those journalists had taken about 45 seconds to look under that shiny hood, they'd have found a far less impressive rebound than it initially seemed. Here's why: That upward swing in GDP growth came from a massive and fully expected decline in imports, after a massive and fully expected increase in imports in the first quarter in anticipation of tariffs. Lots of money left our economy to bring goods in before the first tariff deadlines in April, so when imports sharply dropped, the smaller resulting trade deficit boosted the GDP growth figure. But that's not so much evidence of economic prosperity as it is the result of a math equation and how GDP is calculated. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

A top designer was banned from Dribbble. Now he's building his own competitor.
A top designer was banned from Dribbble. Now he's building his own competitor.

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A top designer was banned from Dribbble. Now he's building his own competitor.

Dribbble has permanently banned dozens of designers from its platform following a new effort to pivot to a marketplace and chase monetization. This includes one of the platform's most well-known designers, Gleb Kuznetsov, founder of the San Francisco-based design studio Milkinside. Dribbble deleted his account with its over 210 million followers because he shared his contact information with prospective clients through the platform in violation of its new rules. Remarked Kuznetsov in a post on X, 'I brought 100,000+ monthly users. 15 years of work. 12,000+ shots. All instantly deleted, because a client asked for my email. One warning. No appeal.' Fed up with the changes at the company, which helps product, UX, web, and other digital designers showcase their portfolios and find new clients, Kuznetsov says he's been talking to investors about launching a competitor. Shortly after his social media post, Dribbble users expressed their shock and anger over the decision, crediting Kuznetsov as being one of their biggest inspirations and lamenting that the platform would make such a misguided move. Dribbble, meanwhile, says Kuznetsov was actually warned multiple times that he was violating the new rules and the email was the final notice. Dribbble's pivot to a marketplace The issue has to do with a more recent policy change first announced on March 17, 2025. In an email shared in March with Dribbble's some 750,000 approved designers — meaning those who are authorized to communicate with others on the platform — the company said it was no longer allowing designers to share their contact information with prospective clients until after their client sent payment through its platform. The company positioned this change as one meant to protect designers from non-payment, as well as one that allows Dribbble to continue to sustain its business. The announcement was also posted to social media and the company blog. However, Kuznetsov claims that non-payment isn't a very common problem, and really, this update is about Dribbble attempting to take a larger cut of designers' business. Dribbble doesn't dispute that. Before the policy change, Dribbble made money in one of two ways. Starting in September 2024, Dribbble began pivoting to a marketplace that connected designers and clients. Designers could communicate freely on the platform and then either share a 3.5% revenue cut on clients they converted, or they could pay for a Pro subscription to skip the rev share. In March, the company tightened the rules further, saying that anyone finding clients on Dribbble would need to offer the platform a cut of their revenue. 'It went from it was optional to use our transactional features to it was required for non-advertisers to use our transactional features, if they were on Dribbble, to find clients,' explains Dribbble CEO Constantine Anastasakis, in an interview with TechCrunch. 'If a user is on Dribbble to find inspiration or to get feedback on their work, or to talk shop with their peers, none of this affects them,' he added. The exec, who joined the company after working at direct-to-consumer lender Lower, video marketplace Pond5 (exited to Shutterstock), and freelancer marketplace Fiverr, was hired last April to pivot Dribbble into a marketplace. While the company is profitable under parent company Tiny, it's still a small 20-person team and isn't reliant on venture backing to serve its 7.5 to 10 million monthly unique visitors. 'Dribbble was something that really accelerated our business dramatically back in the day,' Kuznetsov told TechCrunch. Before Dribbble, there was no platform where designers could share their work wth others, he says. It helped designers receive feedback that came specifically from their peers and allowed newer designers to learn from those at the top of the industry. Kuznetsov is now part of the latter group. At Milkinside, Kuznetsov has worked with companies like Apple, Google, Amazon, Scandinavian Airlines, United Airlines, Honda, Mitsubishi, Mercedes-Benz, and other large companies in the Bay Area. As a result, he likely didn't feel that Dribbble would risk banning him for not abiding by the new terms. Anastasakis essentially confirmed this to be true. He told TechCrunch that Kuznetsov received 83 work inquiries since the new terms rolled out in March, and responded to 61. In each message, the site shows a warning that reminds users that contact details should not be shared before project payment. However, Kuznetsov shared his contact information in six messages, which would have displayed a stronger warning at that time. The company then followed up with a warning email on July 22 about his repeated terms-of-service violations, which informed him he was risking permanent suspension. Kuznetsov told us he didn't see this email initially, but Dribbble says it tracked that the email was opened three times before his suspension. 'I believe that Dribbble — it was their goal to hurt me so I can spread that [news] so they can give a harsh lesson to everyone who tries [to break the rules],' Kuznetsov says. Dribbble's CEO Anastasakis confirmed as much to TechCrunch. 'There's there's really no conceivable way in which he did not realize that what he was doing risked permanent suspension of his accounts,' Anastasakis told us. 'I think that ultimately it was that he believed that we wouldn't take action against a designer of his caliber,' he continued. 'As a side note, I actually think that he's done us a big favor as far as getting the word out about how seriously we take the terms.' For Kuznetsov, or any designer who was banned for similar reasons, the only option to come back to Dribbble is by joining as an advertiser, which requires a minimum campaign budget of $1,500 per month for at least three months. A new competitor to Dribbble emerges? Kuznetsov has decided to forge his own path, saying that he's hurt by Dribbble's change. 'It's not going to be a copycat of Dribbble,' he says of his pending startup. Instead, it will be a resource for designers that will also leverage AI. While there has been a lot of backlash about AI models training on creatives' work without compensation, Kuznetsov believes there's a use case for the technology in terms of inspiration, creation, and design. 'It's a big hole right now in the market…Everybody's doing AI startups, but nobody's really doing AI startups for designers,' Kuznetsov notes. 'AI is something that really can elevate our ability to create, and make it on a much higher level of quality. It's going to help us to not only earn more money and grow, but also create something we never even thought was possible to create without a specific skill set.' Kuznetsov says he expects to have an MVP (minimum viable product) ready in three or four months. However, he notes the goal is not to 'kill' Dribbble, even though investors offered him money to do so. 'It's not like that. I'm trying to do something good for the community because I'm a designer. So I know how painful it is to be a designer in this world,' says Kuznetsov. 'We need to be really smart about how we invest our time — how we give our best and give our life to other platforms. Diversification of that investment should be something that everyone should be thinking about,' he adds.

Grocery Outlet Raises More Than $5 Million for Local Food Banks Through Fifteenth Annual Independence from Hunger® Campaign
Grocery Outlet Raises More Than $5 Million for Local Food Banks Through Fifteenth Annual Independence from Hunger® Campaign

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Grocery Outlet Raises More Than $5 Million for Local Food Banks Through Fifteenth Annual Independence from Hunger® Campaign

EMERYVILLE, Calif., Aug. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: GO) ("Grocery Outlet" or the "Company") today announced the completion of its 15th annual Independence from Hunger® Food Drive, which successfully raised over $5 million to support local food banks. From June 25 to July 31, more than 540 locally owned and operated Grocery Outlet stores received donations through in-store and online contributions nationwide. Stores also collected pre-assembled grocery bags that were allocated to local food banks. 'I am incredibly proud of our team at Grocery Outlet for raising more than $5 million in efforts to combat food insecurity,' said Jason Potter, CEO of Grocery Outlet. 'I'm inspired by the dedication and generosity of our local partners. Together, with the help of our guests, we helped provide meals for families in need.' According to the USDA's most recent food security survey, an estimated 18 million families across the US are struggling to put food on the table, and local food banks are stepping in to provide much needed support. Grocery Outlet, through its Independence from Hunger campaign, is committed to ensuring that families have access to affordable, high-quality meals. Since its launch in 2011, Independence from Hunger has collected over $30 million in cash and food donations. Customers were able to support the campaign in numerous ways: Give $5, get $5. Donating $5 or more in a single transaction in-store or online to receive a coupon for $5 off a future purchase of $25 or more. Purchasing a pre-made bag complete with an assortment of groceries selected by the local food agency and then placing it in a collection bin at the front of the store. Making a monetary donation in-store at the register to benefit that store's local food agency partner. Donating online by visiting Online donations supported the San Francisco Bay Area community through Grocery Outlet's partnership with Alameda County Community Food Bank. Each Grocery Outlet store partnered with a local food bank to support fundraising and community outreach efforts. Online donations were directed to the Alameda County Community Food Bank, Grocery Outlet's partner in the San Francisco Bay Area. Additionally, several participating suppliers, including Conagra Brands, Kellanova and Wayne-Sanderson Farms made product donations that were distributed to regional agencies. No administration or collateral fees are deducted from the funds collected by Grocery Outlet. For more information on the Independence from Hunger campaign and Grocery Outlet, visit About Grocery OutletBased in Emeryville, California, Grocery Outlet is a high-growth, extreme value retailer of quality, name-brand consumables and fresh products sold primarily through a network of independently operated stores. Grocery Outlet and its subsidiaries have more than 540 stores in California, Washington, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Idaho, Nevada, Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, Georgia, Ohio, Alabama, Delaware, Kentucky and Virginia. INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACTS:Ian Ferry(510) 244-3703iferry@ Ron Clark(646) 776-0886ron@ MEDIA CONTACT:Layla Kasha(510) 379-2176lkasha@ in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store