logo
Donald Trump just revealed his new tariff plan. Here's what you need to know

Donald Trump just revealed his new tariff plan. Here's what you need to know

RNZ News4 days ago
By Elisabeth Buchwald, CNN
An extra edition of Japanese daily newspaper is published reporting that the United States of America and Japan had agreed on a 15 percent tariff in Osaka City.
Photo:
AFP / Takumi Harada
President Donald Trump just set new tariffs for every country around the world, solidifying his extreme break with America's long-standing trade policy.
Tariffs on the vast majority of goods America imports are set to rise - even from the handful of countries that negotiated individual trade deals. The higher tariffs continue Trump's reversal of the decades of globalisation that made America's massive services economy the envy of the world - but contributed to its long decline in manufacturing.
With just a few hours to go before its self-imposed August 1 trade deadline, the White House provided key details about its new trade policy late Thursday - and, along with it, its new tariff plan.
Here's what to know about the latest set of tariffs:
The White House announced Thursday that the "universal" tariff for goods coming into the United States will remain at 10%, the same level that was implemented on April 2.
But that 10% rate will apply only to countries with which the US has a trade surplus - countries to which the United States exports more than it imports. That applies to most countries, a senior administration official said.
A 15% rate will serve as the new tariff floor for countries with which the United States has a trade deficit. About 40 countries will pay that new 15% tariff. That tariff will be lower for many of those nations than the April 2 "reciprocal" tariffs, but it will be higher for a handful.
And more than a dozen countries have tariff rates that are higher than 15%, either because they agreed to a trade framework with the United States or because Trump sent their leaders a letter dictating a higher tariff. The senior administration official said those countries have among the highest trade deficits with the United States.
The White House identified 26 countries whose goods will be subjected to US tariffs greater than 15%. A senior administration official claimed these countries have excessive trade deficits with the United States.
In addition, Mexico and [Canada will continue to face higher tariffs Canada will continue to face higher tariffs] for goods that are not exempt under the US-Mexico-Canada free-trade agreement. Mexico on Thursday agreed to a 90-day continuation of the current 25% tariff rate the US currently places on those items. Non-exempt Canadian goods imported to the United States will face a 35% as of Friday at 12:01 am ET - up from a 25% tariff previously.
The new tariff regime will not go into effect Friday, as had been expected.
Instead, the tariffs will be implemented on August 7 to give Customs and Border Protection sufficient time to make the necessary changes to collect the new duties.
Canada's tariffs are an exception - those will go into effect Friday.
The only major trading partners that didn't see tariff rates change on Friday were the United Kingdom, China and Mexico. Trump signed a trade framework with the UK and China. However, the deal signed with China expires in less than two weeks, which means those tariffs could soon increase.
With Mexico, Trump had threatened to raise tariffs to 30% at 12:01 am. But after a conversation with Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, on Thursday, he extended Mexico's previous tariff rate for another 90 days.
Over the past month, Trump announced a handful of other trade agreements. It's unclear whether they'll be finalized, but it appears those countries might have avoided rates above what's in their deals.
For instance, goods from the European Union were set to face 30% tariffs. The agreement reached over the weekend, however, calls for 15% tariffs for most goods. That's the same rate goods from South Korea and Japan will be taxed at.
That's still higher than the 10% rate goods have been tariffed at since April, though.
That's a question actively being debated. Trump has cited the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose country-specific tariffs.
In May, the Court of International Trade found Trump overreached his legal authority doing so. Oral arguments for the administration's appeal kicked off Thursday, and a panel of judges appeared skeptical that Trump had the power to levy tariffs using those emergency powers.
Of particular issue was the unprecedented use of the IEEPA to levy tariffs, especially because the law makes no mention of tariffs to begin with.
Several judges also questioned Trump's rationale behind declaring an economic emergency. The president has previously stated that US trade deficits with other countries, that is, when the US imports more than it exports, merit a national economic emergency requiring tariffs to correct.
Judge Raymond Chen, however, questioned: "Can the trade deficit be a extraordinary and unusual threat when we had trade deficits for decades?"
It may take weeks, or even months, before the appeals court reaches a verdict. After that, it could still be challenged before the Supreme Court. Regardless of the ultimate outcome, Trump has plenty of levers to pull to roll out new tariffs and keep many in place.
Technically, he did. New tariff rates were set to go into effect Friday - and they will now mostly go into effect August 7.
The president has given no indication he'll pause these tariffs any further, though.
However, he's said that about past tariff deadlines only to extend them later on. In short, everything, including the tariff rates that just went in place, is subject to change at the publishing of a Truth Social post.
The tariff changes evoke Trump's "Liberation Day" in April, when he similarly hiked import taxes across the board. The move threw financial markets into chaos and stoked fears of a global recession.
Trump ultimately delayed the "reciprocal" April tariffs hours after they took effect, later setting August 1 as the new deadline for trade agreements on pain of higher tariff rates. The president told some countries what rates they would face on that day absent new agreements but appeared to leave other nations in the dark.
Inflation has stayed relatively tame through Trump's earlier tariff rounds, but that could change as higher rates kick in. Already, companies including Procter and Gamble and Walmart have said tariff-related price increases are underway.
- CNN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas governor threatens arrest of Democrats absent at redistricting vote
Texas governor threatens arrest of Democrats absent at redistricting vote

RNZ News

time4 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Texas governor threatens arrest of Democrats absent at redistricting vote

By Julia Harte and Evan Garcia , Reuters US President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott in July. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski US President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott in July. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest Democratic lawmakers who are using their collective absence from the state capital to prevent the legislature from adopting a Republican-backed plan for redrawing Texas congressional districts. The exodus of more than 50 Democrats from the Texas legislature staging a kind of temporary political exile in Democratic-led states was intended to deny Republicans in Austin the quorum necessary to vote on the redistricting plan, championed by President Donald Trump. By redrawing district lines in hopes of flipping some seats in the US House of Representatives currently held by Democrats, the Republican Party aims to protect its narrow majority in next year's congressional midterm elections. Trump has told reporters he expects the effort to yield as many as five additional House Republicans. During Monday's (local time) statehouse session in Austin, the Republican speaker of the Texas House of Representatives issued civil warrants for the wayward Democrats - most of whom have gone to Illinois, New York or Massachusetts - to be brought back to Austin. "To ensure compliance, I ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans," Abbott said in a statement. But the warrants apply only within the state, and breaking quorum is not a crime that would allow Texas authorities to pursue extradition from other states. On Sunday, Abbott cited an opinion by the state's attorney general that Texas district courts may determine whether legislators have forfeited their offices "due to abandonment," saying that would empower him to "swiftly fill vacancies." But even if Abbott succeeded in ousting the absent Democrats, it would take time to hold new elections. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told Fox News on Monday that he expected the Texas Supreme Court to ultimately weigh in on any abandonment cases he files. "And they're obviously a Republican court," he added. In another possible tactic, Abbott said any lawmaker who solicited funds to pay the $500-per-day fine that Texas House rules impose on absent legislators could violate bribery laws. He vowed to try extraditing any "potential out-of-state felons." Adding to the dynamics of the standoff, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he and his state's Democratic-led legislature were ready to "fight fire with fire" against Trump's Texas redistricting maneuver. He said California Democrats were preparing a rare mid-decade congressional redistricting plan of their own that he said could offset any gains Republicans might hope to achieve by redrawing Texas maps. But Newsom said the California plan, assuming it musters the required support of two-thirds of the state legislature, would carry a "trigger" to place it on the November 2026 ballot for voter approval only if Texas moves forward with its plan. Countering Abbott's assertions that Texas Democrats were shirking their duties, Newsom accused Trump and the Republicans of gaming the political system. "These folks don't play by the rules. If they can't win playing the game with the existing set of rules, they'll change the rules. That's what Donald Trump has done," Newsom said. Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the US House, with four vacancies. A stronger Republican majority in the US House would enable Trump to further advance his agenda. The special session in Texas - also called to address flood prevention and relief - was due to reconvene on Tuesday afternoon. Democrats have threatened to stay out of state until the end of the 30-day special session, which began 21 July. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said the current congressional districts in Texas already dilute the voting power of racial minorities in the state, and the new redistricting plan represented "turbocharged racism". Abbott in a Monday morning appearance on Fox News, called Wu's accusation "bogus," saying redistricting would create more Hispanic-majority districts. He argued it also was necessary to give Trump voters in Democrat-majority districts the ability to elect Republicans. A White House official told Reuters that Trump supports Abbott's threat to remove absent Democratic lawmakers and wants "whatever is necessary" done to get the new map passed. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the US Census, but the current Texas map was passed just four years ago by the Republican-led legislature. Mid-cycle redistricting is usually prompted by a change of party control. Under Texas' current lines, Republicans control 25 out of 38 congressional seats, nearly two-thirds of the districts in a state that went for Trump last year by a 56 percent to 42 percent margin. Texas Democratic lawmakers have previously tried the strategy of leaving the state to block a redistricting plan. Some fled in 2021 in a bid to deny Abbott the quorum needed to pass a voting restriction measure. That bill passed after three lawmakers returned, saying they had achieved their goal of bringing national attention to the issue. - Reuters

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon speaks to media in Papua New Guinea
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon speaks to media in Papua New Guinea

RNZ News

time6 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon speaks to media in Papua New Guinea

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is speaking to media during a visit to Papua New Guinea. Luxon was warmly welcomed by Papua New Guinea's prime minister James Marape during his visit to celebrate 50 years of diplomatic ties. Marape thanked New Zealand for its support, as one of the eight countries to diplomatically support Papua New Guinea - a former Australian territory - before it declared independence. Luxon in turn talked of Papua New Guinea's great potential for growth, saying while Australia and New Zealand would both continue to support that growth it would be driven by businesses and community leveraging "great cultural and resource wealth". Papua New Guinea's economy is forecast to grow 4.7 percent in 2025, and trade with New Zealand has grown to more than $70 million by value in the March quarter, with aluminium the top export to the country.

Soaring food prices prove the Gaza famine is real – and will affect generations to come
Soaring food prices prove the Gaza famine is real – and will affect generations to come

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Soaring food prices prove the Gaza famine is real – and will affect generations to come

By Ilan Noy of Palestinians crowd at a lentil soup distribution point in Gaza City in the northern Gaza Strip on July 27, 2025. Photo: AFP / Omar Al-Qattaa Analysis: The words and pictures documenting the famine in the Gaza strip are horrifying. The coverage has led to acrimonious and often misguided debates about whether there is famine, and who is to blame for it - most recently exemplified by the controversy surrounding a picture published by the New York Times of an emaciated child who is also suffering from a preexisting health condition. While pictures and words may mislead, numbers usually don't. The Nobel prize-winning Indian economist Amartya Sen observed some decades ago that famines are always political and economic events, and that the most direct way to analyse them is to look at food quantities and prices. This has led to decades of research on past famines. One observation is that dramatic increases in food prices always mean there is a famine, even though not every famine is accompanied by rising food costs. The price increases we have seen in Gaza are unprecedented. The economic historian Yannai Spitzer observed in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that staple food prices during the Irish Potato Famine showed a three- to five-fold increase, while there was a ten-fold rise during the Great Bengal Famine of 1943. In the North Korean famine of the 1990s, the price of rice rose by a factor of 12 . At least a million people died of hunger in each of these events. Now, the New York Times has reported the price of flour in Gaza has increased by a factor of 30 and potatoes cost 50 times more. As was the case for the UK government in Ireland in the 1840s and Bengal in the 1940s, Israel is responsible for this famine because it controls almost all the Gaza strip and its borders. But Israel has also created the conditions for the famine. Following a deliberate policy in March of stopping food from coming in, it resumed deliveries of food in May through a very limited set of "stations" it established through a new US-backed organisation (the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation), in a system that seemed designed to fail. Before Israel's decision in March to stop food from coming in, the price of flour in Gaza was roughly back to its prewar levels (having previously peaked in 2024 in another round of border closures). Since March, food prices have gone up by an annualised inflation rate of more than 5,000%. The excuse the Israeli government gives for its starvation policy is that Hamas controls the population by restricting food supplies. It blames Hamas for any shortage of food . However, if you want to disarm an enemy of its ability to wield food supplies as a weapon by rationing them, the obvious way to do so is the opposite: you would increase the food supply dramatically and hence lower its price. Restricting supplies and increasing their value is primarily immoral and criminal, but it is also counterproductive for Israel's stated aims. Indeed, flooding Gaza with food would have achieved much more in weakening Hamas than the starvation policy the Israeli government has chosen. The UN's top humanitarian aid official has described Israel's decision to halt humanitarian assistance to put pressure on Hamas as "cruel collective punishment" - something forbidden under international humanitarian law. Cormac Ó Gráda, the Irish economic historian of famines, quotes a Kashmiri proverb which says "famine goes, but the stains remain". The current famine in Gaza will leave long-lasting pain for Gazans and an enduring moral stain on Israel - for many generations. Ó Gráda points out two main ways in which the consequences of famines endure. Most obvious is the persistent memory of it; second are the direct effects on the long-term wellbeing of exposed populations and their descendants. The Irish and the Indians have not forgotten the famines that affected them. They still resent the British government for its actions. The memory of these famines still influences relations between Ireland, India and the UK, just as Ukraine's famine of the early 1930s is still a background to the Ukraine-Russia war. The generational impact is also significant. Several studies in China find children conceived during China's Great Leap Forward famine of 1959-1960 (which also killed millions) are less healthy , face more mental health challenges and have lower cognitive abilities than those conceived either before or after the famine. Other researchers found similar evidence from famines in Ireland and the Netherlands , supporting what is known as the "foetal origins" hypothesis, which proposes that the period of gestation has significant impacts on health in adulthood. Even more worryingly, recent research shows these harmful effects can be transmitted to later generations through epigenetic channels . Each day without available and accessible food supplies means more serious ongoing effects for the people of Gaza and the Israeli civilian hostages still held by Hamas - as well as later generations. Failure to prevent the famine will persist in collective memory as a moral stain on the international community, but primarily on Israel. Only immediate flooding of the strip with food aid can help now. Ilan Noy is the chair in the Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington. This story was originally published on The Conversation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store