VIDEO: Angus provosts past and present clash over £32k salary
Monifieth Conservative Craig Fotheringham was voted into the role as a coalition administration appointed its top figures this week.
It followed last month's successful vote of no confidence in the previous SNP ruling group by a Conservative/Independent/Labour alliance.
However, a special meeting of the full council to decide key posts turned into a seven-hour marathon.
It was peppered with political bickering.
The low point was a row over claims of 'gerrymandering' by the new administration regarding committee changes.
Council standing orders were suspended for business to continue beyond the usual three-hour limit.
And at 7pm – five hours after it started – the meeting was adjourned for an hour as Forfar's VE Day 80th anniversary commemoration was held outside the Town and County Hall.
When it resumed, Monifieth Conservative councillor Mr Fotheringham clashed with former Provost Brian Boyd.
It came as elected member salaries were agreed – including the Provost's remuneration of £32,540.
Councillors' pay was recently increased following a national review, including a £50,000-a-year wage for new Angus leader George Meechan.
Mr Boyd told Mr Fotheringham: 'I do note you have actually increased your salary by £5,000.
'When I was the Provost of Angus, I took a normal convenership role because I wanted to look after the people of Angus.
'And as I said once before, I managed to get the expenses down to £858, whereas under your watch they were up at £17,000.'
Mr Fotheringham interjected: 'Right, that's enough, that's quite enough, that's quite enough.
'The reason I think that you took less money was the previous administration appointed two deputy leaders.
'The Provost is entitled to 75% of the leader's salary.'
However, he was corrected by former SNP administration leader Bill Duff and officials that there is no link between the wages of the Provost and deputy council leaders.
'Okay, my apologies, that was a misunderstanding by me,' said Mr Fotheringham.
Conveners of the authority's key committees were appointed during the special meeting.
Opposition councillor David Cheape secured the chairmanship of the area's planning committee after winning a cut of the cards for the development standards role against administration nominee Gavin Nicol.
The committee conveners are:
Family, Education and Justice – Heather Doran
Civic Licensing – Ross Greig
Communities – Tommy Stewart
Development Standards – David Cheape
Housing – Jill Scott
Policy & Resources – George Meechan
Scrutiny & Audit – Bill Duff
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
‘Tattletale' Kemi Badenoch got a fellow pupil expelled after catching him cheating in exam
Kemi Badenoch has said that she was a 'tattle-tale' in school, revealing that she got a fellow pupil expelled after she caught him cheating in an exam. During an interview with Amol Rajan in his Interviews... series released on Thursday (7 August), the Conservative leader said that when she was '14 or 15' she stood up in the middle of a test and called out a boy who was breaking the rules. 'I've always hated cheating. I've done all the work and then there's some people who are copying notes and why should they get away with it?,' she said. She shared that she received no praise for 'snitching' on her fellow pupil, with one student telling her: 'You don't belong here.' Rajan quipped 'no wonder you were so unpopular back in school'.
The National
27 minutes ago
- The National
SNP call for Keir Starmer to 'immediately' sack Rushanara Ali
The MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney has previously been vocal on renters' rights and has spoken out against 'private renters being exploited". READ MORE: As Ian Blackford considers a return, it's time to look at political comebacks Under Labour's Renters' Rights Bill, the UK Government plans to bring the private rented sector within the minimum standard set for social housing, and would ban landlords who end a tenancy to sell a property from re-listing it for six months. SNP Westminster depute leader, Pete Wishart MP, said: 'Once this shameful story broke, Labour's homelessness minister should have immediately resigned. The fact that she still hasn't means this is now a direct test of Keir Starmer - he needs to sack her immediately. 'It is a statement of the blinding obvious that a homelessness minister who made money by putting people on the street can't stay in office. 'If this Minister is still in post by the end of the day it will expose how weak the Prime Minister is and just how out of touch this UK Labour Government are. 'This time last year the public were learning of the free clothes given to the Prime Minister, now we are hearing about a Labour minister profiteering by putting tenants on the street. "The last year has exposed example after example that this UK Labour government aren't on the public's side – they are up to their necks in sleaze every bit as deeply as the Tories they replaced. 'For those of us in Scotland, this is the same story of Westminster sleaze on repeat - it is one more reminder why it is so important that we take our future into our own hands and become an independent country.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
I'm not fan of Kate Forbes but this is a far wider problem
The party of government shouldn't be entertaining the notion that the hard-won rights of minority groups are debatable, and I won't be convinced that's a controversial stance to take. I think the presence of those views has unforgivably given rise to those narratives and allowed them to feel at home in a space they should not have been welcomed. An important preface. However, it's impossible to consider her decision in isolation. Whether her views are congruent with the foundations of the SNP or not, it raises serious questions for the party and Scottish politics more widely. Already, 23 SNP MSPs had announced their intention to stand down in 2026, with 14 of them women. A list inclusive of party giants like Nicola Sturgeon and Shona Robison as well as fresh faces like Natalie Don-Innes, representing more than 60% of those stepping down and almost a quarter of the SNP's current parliamentary group, and that's alongside resignations from other parties. It's not a case of a few gentle career transitions or a generational refresh, it's a systemic across-the-board retreat from political life. A gendered haemorrhaging of experience and talent. READ MORE: John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel Forbes is just the latest in what could be described as a mass exodus of women from Holyrood, and more specifically from the SNP benches. While I don't always agree with her politics, her decision is a really uncomfortable one. Politics has become a punishing and thankless environment for women in Scotland, especially those who dare to be ambitious. It's to the shame of everyone involved. Even more uncomfortable when you consider that it wasn't so long ago Scotland was internationally recognised for its gender balanced representation in political life, a sore contrast to the reality heading into 2026. Even just looking to the last Holyrood election in 2021, which saw a record number of women elected to our national parliament. Or even more nostalgically to the heydays of the mid-2010s, when three of Scotland's major parties were headed by women. Sturgeon for the SNP, Ruth Davidson for the Tories and Kezia Dugdale for Labour. I remember watching First Minister's Questions at the time and feeling like I was witnessing something big and out of the ordinary. Like progress was not only in front of us in the short term, but had taken root. It was what we understood to be normal in Scotland, even if it wasn't the case more broadly around the world. We're now watching that progress, which was so intentional and meaningful, be unravelled and in large part due to the neglect of those with the power to change it. Forbes has decided to step down because the job demands too much of a mother to a young child. Was it naive of me to hope that gone were the days women would have to sacrifice the careers they worked tirelessly to build because those careers aren't accommodating of family life? It would seem so. (Image: Colin Mearns) If elected politics can't be a place of work flexible enough to accommodate family priorities, it's not working for the benefit of us all. That's just one issue cited as a reason. Others speak of burnout from an unsustainable workload, relentless abuse and a lack of support to handle it, misogyny both from external sources and internal mechanisms that are setting women up to fail. Our female political leaders are communicating en masse that they are no longer willing to tolerate what politics demands of them. The cost is too high, and the return is too low and it's no longer enough for these announcements to be met with lacklustre statement after lacklustre statement loosely expressing disappointment but understanding. We are sleepwalking into a regression that will be as hard to undo as it was the last time. Michelle Thomson MSP, one of those stepping down, described politics as being 'generally very misogynist'. She went on to say: 'I don't think the SNP can be complacent about their own internal mechanisms.' She's absolutely right. Long gone are the days of the gender balance mechanisms championed by Sturgeon, which we are told did their job in 2021 and therefore cannot be repeated. It's almost as if when women aren't represented in the highest offices, gender equality begins to slip back down the priority list. Just two years after the departure of Sturgeon and four since a record number of women were elected to Holyrood, candidate selections for 2026 are already demonstrating a backwards trend, with women making up just 42% of confirmed SNP candidates. A number that isn't final by any means and still has the potential to decline before the election rolls around. The party still completely lacks any kind of system for dealing with harassment or providing meaningful support to those facing the relentless abuse that has become synonymous with politics in Scotland. I say that from experience as a woman in the party, who has faced that abuse for years now. Support is impossible to come by, even when you ask for it. I don't believe there is a single party in our political atmosphere that is tackling this effectively, but as the party of government, it's not amiss to expect the SNP to lead by example. It's this environment, and the lack of support that allows it to freely continue, that is driving women away from our public life. It's not just women who lose out and it's not just part and parcel of being in politics like we are led to believe, it's the strangling of our democracy. When Parliament becomes a place where only certain types of people can survive and be heard, decisions naturally stop being about the many and start being about the same few. That's how representation works, and it's where we're heading if the passive acceptance of this trend continues. So yes, Kate Forbes might never have been the future of feminist politics in Scotland. But her decision to go is emblematic of a much bigger problem. A system that failed her as it has her colleagues and as it will the women coming up behind them if nothing changes. Our leaders of today would do well to look to the example of leaders gone by – who were living proof that progress is possible and sustainable – before it's too late. The time for listening is now, to the women choosing to stay and to those choosing to leave, or we are going to find our politics drowned once again under the weight of a political culture built primarily for and upheld by men. If we don't, 2026 will mark a huge step back for gender equality in Scotland. A reality that was supposed to be behind us.
