logo
NatWest boss thanks British taxpayer for 2008 bailout after government sells remaining shares

NatWest boss thanks British taxpayer for 2008 bailout after government sells remaining shares

Yahoo30-05-2025

The Chairman of NatWest has thanked British taxpayers for bailing out the bank during the 2008 financial crisis, as it returns into private ownership after 17 years.
Rick Haythornthwaite, who succeeded Sir Howard Davies as chairman in April last year, expressed "gratitude to the taxpayer" for rescuing the bank, adding that the company had not forgotten "the lessons of the past" even as it pushes for changes to regulations that were introduced after the .
Mr Haythornthwaite said the bank was in a reflective mood.
"It's about a desire to express gratitude to the taxpayer. They not just rescued this bank, they protected millions of savers, of businesses, of homeowners.
"From the bank's standpoint, it gave us the opportunity to completely restructure into a much safer and stronger bank."
He spoke to Sky News as the government completed the sale of its remaining stake in the bank, formerly known as RBS, 17 years after a £46bn taxpayer-funded bailout that left the state with an 83% stake in the bank.
Sky News' city editor Mark Kleinman broke the news at the weekend that the selloff was imminent and predicted that the taxpayers would lose about £10.2bn on the bailout.
The government confirmed a £10.5bn loss on Friday.
The government began unwinding its stake in 2021 and completed the sale today, posting a final loss of £10.5bn, and closing the door on one of the most turbulent periods in British economic history. It was also one of the most controversial periods.
The bank bailouts, orchestrated by Alistair Darling and Gordon Brown, attracted public anger and scrutiny of the excessive risk-taking that took place in the City.
A swathe of new regulations were implemented following the crisis, including new rules that forced banks to ring-fence their core retail banking arms from their investment arms, as well as a cap on bonuses.
Read more from Sky News:
While at the time the changes were viewed as necessary, Mr Haythornthwaite said the regulatory "pendulum may have swung too far."
He said Britain had high-quality regulation, but there was scope to eliminate duplication in some areas. He said the current regime was compounding costs and inhibiting growth.
"The regulator stepped in very necessarily 17 years ago and raised the standards it expects of banks, of their leaders, of people working in those places. It made demands of the culture and demands of its service to customers. All that is very right," Mr Haythornthwaite said.
"Inevitably, the pendulum can swing slightly too far. One may question whether it's swung slightly too far, but I use the word 'slightly'."
The Chancellor is receptive to his arguments. In her search for economic growth, Rachel Reeves is eyeing up the City.
In a Mansion House speech last year, she said that some of those post-2009 reforms had "gone too far."
The bonus cap, first implemented by the EU, has already been lifted, and major banks, including NatWest, are now calling for an end to ring-fencing too. The Chancellor has said she is "open-minded" about the idea.
Some may be more nervous about that idea, less than two decades after the biggest bank bailout in history, but Mr Haythornthwaite said: "We're not going to forget the lessons of the past," adding: "This is not about triggering a race to the bottom.
"It's very clear to me that this is a very different place. There's a focus on the ethics of running a bank, of really focusing on customers," he said.
"This is not a place where we are looking for quick wins to serve the few."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dawn, there is nothing funny about October 7
Dawn, there is nothing funny about October 7

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dawn, there is nothing funny about October 7

Dawn French has become the latest 'national treasure' to betray a complete lack of understanding of the conflict in the Middle East. Following hot off the heels of that other self-styled Professor of Palestine, Gary Lineker, the comedian insisted there was nothing 'complicated' or 'nuanced' about the ongoing war in Gaza. In a video posted on X, she put on a whiny childish voice to mock Israelis over invoking the October 7 attacks, in which 1,195 people were murdered. Credit: X/@Dawn_French 'Bottom line is no,' she insisted. Then, in a childish voice: 'Yeah but you know they did a bad thing to us. [Serious voice] Yeah but no. [Childish voice] But we want that land and there's a lot of history and urgh… [Serious voice] No. [Childish voice] Those people are not even people are they really? [Serious voice] No.' Like so much of French's output, she appeared under the illusion that she was being funny. In fact, it amounted to an obnoxious and offensive piece of useful idiocy, dressed up as performance art. Imagine being so warped that you would dismiss the rape and murder of Israeli women – the slaying of children and babies – as 'a bad thing'. The implication is that Israel does not have a right to defend itself. That it has acted disproportionately. But there is nothing remotely proportionate about recording a video about Gaza without even mentioning Hamas. Almost everyone and everything you can think of is funnier than Dawn French. What's truly hilarious is that these luvvies think they have enough expertise to emote on such issues. Like your average 'Free Palestine' ranting student marcher, her infantile outburst appeared to have largely been informed by things she's seen on social media. Anyone with any actual knowledge of the region understands that it is, in fact, an extremely complex issue with a very chequered history. Oh, and that it involves terrorists. Stunts like this do nothing to advance the debate. They simply debase it with ignorance and intolerance. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.

Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%
Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hegseth says Nato allies ‘very close' to raising defence spending target to 5%

The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Nato allies were 'very close, almost near consensus' to an agreement to significantly raise targets for defence spending to 5% of GDP in the next decade. The Trump administration official indicated he expected the increased target to be agreed at a summit in The Hague later this month – and confirmed that the headline figure was to be split into two parts. 'This alliance, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities. That combination constitutes a real commitment,' he said. Hegseth was speaking at a press conference at Nato headquarters in Brussels after the morning session of an all-day meeting of defence ministers from the 32-country transatlantic military alliance. 'I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there,' Hegseth told reporters. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to Nato.' Nato's current target level for military spending, agreed at a summit in Cardiff in 2014, is 2% of GDP, but Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that European allies and Canada do not spend enough compared with the US. In an attempt to avoid Trump wrecking the first Nato summit of his second term, the alliance's new secretary general, Mark Rutte, proposed a 3.5% plus 1.5% target, though there is some ambiguity about the target date. Initial reports suggested that Rutte wanted allies to hit the target from 2032, though earlier this week British sources suggested the date could be 2035. Sweden's defence minister said he would like to see the target hit by 2030. Only Poland currently exceeds the 3.5% target for hard military spending at 4.32%, according to Nato figures, while the US defence budget, the largest in the alliance, amounts to 3.4% of GDP, at $967bn (£711bn). The UK spends 2.33% of GDP on its military, but has pledged to increase that to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% some time in the next parliament. Earlier this week the prime minister, Keir Starmer, declined to set a firm date for the UK achieving 3% as he unveiled a strategic defence review. Related: Why is defence such a hard sell? The same reason Starmer is struggling in the polls | Martin Kettle Rutte will visit London on Monday to meet Starmer before the summit. Downing Street said the prime minister and the secretary general would 'talk about how we ensure all allies step up their defence spending now in order to respond to the threats that we face now'. Germany's defence minister, Boris Pistorius, said Berlin would need up to 60,000 additional troops to meet new Nato targets for weapons and personnel. 'We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy,' the minister said on Thursday. Germany, which currently spends 2.12% of GDP on defence, had been singled out by Trump as a laggard in spending, though until Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Berlin had been reluctant to be a leader in European military spending, partly due to the memories of the militarism of the second world war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store