logo
Karnataka proposes a new Devadasi legislation with clauses on paternity test, right to property

Karnataka proposes a new Devadasi legislation with clauses on paternity test, right to property

The Hindu23-07-2025
In a bid to strengthen the legislation against the centuries-old Devadasi system, the Karnataka government is working on introducing a new law. It intends to do away with the need for the father's name in application forms and government identity cards, besides recognising the right of the child of Devadasi to identify the father by provisioning DNA test to prove paternity.
The new legislation, Karnataka Devadasi (Prevention, Prohibition, Relief and Rehabilitation) Bill, is currently being discussed to replace the more than four-decade-old Karnataka Devadasi (Prohibition and Dedication) Act, 1982. Devadasis and their children have been for long seeking a comprehensive legislation that could end the evil system and provide for proper relief and rehabilitation.
'Legitimate child'
Among other proposed provisions in the legislation, being drafted with the assistance of the Centre for the Study of Social Inclusion, National Law School of India University (NLSIU), are that any child of a Devadasi will be deemed as a 'legitimate child' and will have the right to property with inheritance and succession following the Hindu Personal Law. The proposed legislation also provides the option for unwilling children of a Devadasi not to be compelled to declare the name of their father while applying for government identity cards such as such as passport, PAN, Aadhaar, and driving licence.
Since the Karnataka Devadasi (Prohibition of Dedication) Act, 1982
33 cases reported
FIR lodged in 22 cases
Conviction in four cases
Seven cases in trial stage
Acquittal in 11 cases
Providing the right to maintenance to the child, the proposed law puts the burden of disproving paternity on the person named as the father of the child. The provision provides the right to be availed of by a male child until he is a minor and a girl child until marriage. It suggests DNA test to establish paternity upon refusal after the child approaches the taluk committee seeking recognition of paternal bond. However, provision is also made to the person indicated as father to retain the right to disprove claim of paternity through appropriate biochemical evidence.
Penal clause
While the existing law has set punishment to be a maximum of three years for those performing, permitting, taking part or abetting the performance of any ceremony or act for dedicating women as a Devdasi, the proposed law increases the imprisonment term to a maximum of five years with minimum imprisonment to be two years and a fine of ₹1 lakh.
Survey of Devadasis
1993 – 22,873
2007 - 46,660
2025 - Fresh survey ordered by the SHRC to be conducted before October
Ballari and Vijayanagara districts estimated to have around 9,000 Devadasis
'The new Bill was first proposed in 2018 after experts deliberated on the lacunae in the existing legislation. There is a need to overhaul the legislation to protect the interests of Devadasis. Consultations were held with Devadasis and their children before the proposed Bill was drafted,' said R.V. Chandrashekar, a researcher at the Bengaluru-based NLSIU.
Consultation process
Sources said that the inter-departmental consultation is almost complete, and the proposed Bill could soon be brought before the Cabinet ahead of it being piloted in the legislature.
Among the many other perceived benefits of the Bill is comprehensive rehabilitation for Devadasis, many of whom do not have land or house of their own, and are struggling with both social and acute economic backwardness, besides battling health issues. Activists say that while only 46,660 Devadasis have been identified, a large number remain outside the list based on which benefits, including pension, are being provided by the government.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi HC seek NIA's stand on MP Engineer Rashid's plea challenging terror funding charges
Delhi HC seek NIA's stand on MP Engineer Rashid's plea challenging terror funding charges

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Delhi HC seek NIA's stand on MP Engineer Rashid's plea challenging terror funding charges

The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought the NIA's stand on a plea by Baramulla MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh challenging framing of charges against him in a terror funding case. The high court also called for the trial court record in the matter and listed the plea for further hearing on October 6.(HT Photo/Representational Image) A bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Shalinder Kaur issued notice to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Rashid's plea and granted time to the agency to file its reply. The high court also called for the trial court record in the matter and listed the plea for further hearing on October 6. Besides, Rashid's regular bail plea in the case is also pending in the high court. Earlier, the high court had issued notice to the NIA only on the aspect of delay of around 1,100 days in filing the plea challenging framing of charges against him. Rashid's plea challenging a trial court's order asking to bear travel expenses of ₹1.44 lakh per day for attending the session in custody between July 24 and August 4, and seeking interim bail was listed before the bench Thursday. The division bench was of the view that these two pleas be heard by the same bench which had previously heard a similar plea filed by him during the Budget session. The court said the pleas be listed before a division bench comprising Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, subject to the orders of the division bench. On March 25, a division bench of Justices Chandra Dhari Singh and Justice Bhambhani had asked Rashid to deposit ₹four lakh with the prison authorities as travel expenses for taking him to Parliament to attend the Budget session "in-custody". Rashid has been lodged in Tihar jail since 2019 after he was arrested by the NIA under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in the 2017 terror funding case. On March 21, the trial court dismissed Rashid's second regular bail application. In the appeal against the decision, the J-K MP said he has already spent over five years in custody and the delay in trial, which was unlikely to be concluded soon, entitled him to be released on bail. The bail plea also contended that the allegations against him were baseless as he was never involved in secessionist and terrorist activities. 'The appellant is a mainstream political leader of J&K having been elected twice as an MLA and recently as an MP. Due to his passionate engagement in mainstream politics, he became a potential target for those who preached separatist ideologies including militant outfits, labelling him as a traitor,' the pleas submitted. 'A mere political comment made on the hanging of Afzal Guru showing disapprobation of the measures of the government or criticising a judgement of the Courts cannot be construed to mean as an association with terrorists much less any association which has a nexus with the commission of any unlawful or terrorist activity,' it submitted. Rashid also sought bail to enable him to attend the Lok Sabha sessions, saying his presence was imperative as he represented 45 per cent of the Kashmir valley and had been 'assigned the role to act as a bridge between Parliament and the people of his constituency'. The Baramulla MP, who defeated Omar Abdullah in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, is facing trial in a terror funding case with allegations that he funded separatists and terror groups in Jammu and Kashmir. According to the NIA's FIR, Rashid's name cropped up during the interrogation of businessman and co-accused Zahoor Watali. After being chargesheeted in October 2019, a special NIA court framed charges against Rashid and others in March 2022 under Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 121 (waging war against the government), and 124A (sedition) of IPC and for offences relating to terrorist acts and terror funding under UAPA.

Malegaon Blast Verdict:‘Prosecution failed to prove…' What did NIA court say while acquitting Sadhvi Pragya, 6 others
Malegaon Blast Verdict:‘Prosecution failed to prove…' What did NIA court say while acquitting Sadhvi Pragya, 6 others

Mint

time14 minutes ago

  • Mint

Malegaon Blast Verdict:‘Prosecution failed to prove…' What did NIA court say while acquitting Sadhvi Pragya, 6 others

A special NIA court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven individuals accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, stating that the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The seven accused linked to the case are former MP Sadhvi Pragya, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya) and Sameer Kulkarni. 'All bail bonds of the accused are cancelled and sureties are discharged," the NIA special court said. The court also directed the Maharashtra government to provide compensation— ₹ 2 lakh each to the families of those killed and ₹ 50,000 to those injured in the incident. On September 29 2008, six people were killed and 95 others injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon City's Bhikku Chowk. Originally, 11 people were accused in the case; however, the court ultimately framed charges against 7, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya. "Prosecution proved that a blast occurred in Malegaon but failed to prove that bomb was placed in that motorcycle," the Judge Abhay Lohati said. It noted further that it came into notice that some of the medical certificates were also manipulated. "Court has come to a conclusion that injured people were not 101 but 95 only and there was manipulation. In some medical certificates," the court said. 'There is no evidence of storing or assembling the explosives in Prasad Purohit's residence, who was another accused in the case,' it mentioned "No sketch of spot was done by the investigation officer while doing panchnama. No finger print , dump data or anything else was collected for the spot. The samples were contaminated so reports can't be conclusive and relied upon," the court said. The court had examined 323 prosecution witnesses and 8 defence witnesses before pronouncing the verdict. The 7 people have been acquitted of all charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Arms act and all other charges.

'Bhagwa ki vijay hui hai': Pragya Singh Thakur reacts after Malegaon bomb blast case verdict; all 7 accused acquitted
'Bhagwa ki vijay hui hai': Pragya Singh Thakur reacts after Malegaon bomb blast case verdict; all 7 accused acquitted

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Bhagwa ki vijay hui hai': Pragya Singh Thakur reacts after Malegaon bomb blast case verdict; all 7 accused acquitted

NEW DELHI: Ex-BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur on Thursday said her acquittal by court not just a win for her but for every 'Bhagwa'. "I have been saying this from the very beginning that those who are called for investigation there should be a basis behind that. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now I was called by them for investigation and was arrested and tortured. This ruined my whole life. I was living a sage's life, but I was made and an accused, and no one was willingly standing beside us. I am alive because I am a Sanyasi," Pragya Singh Thakur told court. "They defamed Bhagwa through a conspiracy. Today, Bhagwa has won, and Hindutva has won, and God will punish those who are guilty. However, those who defamed India and Bhagwa have not been proved wrong by you," she added. The NIA special court in Mumbai delivered its verdict on Thursday, acquitting all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the accused, including Pragya Singh Thakur, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya), and Sameer Kulkarni. The court also ordered Maharashtra government to provide compensation to the victims' families, awarding Rs 2 lakh to the families of the deceased and Rs 50,000 to those injured in the blasts. Throughout the trial, the court examined 323 prosecution witnesses and 8 defense witnesses before reaching its verdict. The accused were acquitted of all charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, the Arms Act, and other related charges. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Judge Abhay Lohati noted, "Prosecution proved that a blast occurred in Malegaon but failed to prove that bomb was placed in that motorcycle". The court also pointed out discrepancies in the medical records, stating, "Court has come to a conclusion that injured people were not 101 but 95 only and there was manipulation. In some medical certificates." The court found no evidence of explosives being stored or assembled at the residence of Prasad Purohit, another accused in the case. "No sketch of spot was done by the investigation officer while doing panchnama. No finger print , dump data or anything else was collected for the spot. The samples were contaminated so reports can't be conclusive and relied upon," the court said. The case dates back to September 29, 2008, when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon City's Bhikku Chowk, resulting in the deaths of six people and injuring 95 others.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store