"Utterly unqualified": Trump BLS pick gets panned by economists left and right
Why it matters: The growing negative consensus among conservative economists is unusual given Antoni's own conservative pedigree.
Driving the news: Trump announced Antoni as the next BLS commissioner weeks after firing the previous head, Erika McEntarfer, which he did after jobs data showed cracks in the economy.
The president's decision to effectively turn the non-partisan agency into an outpost of the White House makes vital economic data unreliable, economists of varying political stripes have said.
What they're saying: Antoni's fellow conservatives criticized his record as chief economist at the right-wing Heritage Foundation's Hermann Center for the Federal Budget.
Antoni's "work at Heritage has frequently included elementary errors or nonsensical choices that all bias his findings in the same partisan direction," Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, told Axios' Courtenay Brown and Emily Peck.
Dave Hebert, an economist at the conservative American Institute for Economic Research (AEI), wrote in a post on X that he's worked with Antoni before and implored the Senate to block the nomination.
"I've been on several programs with him at this point and have been impressed by two things: his inability to understand basic economics and the speed with which he's gone MAGA," Hebert said.
Conservative economists have cited examples of Antoni "appearing to misunderstand" the data he would be responsible for as BLS head.
Daniel Di Martino, a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute, showed an instance of Antoni citing the rising number of Americans who aren't in the labor force without accounting for the role of the aging population.
"This is one of the many elementary errors that show me Mr Antoni is unqualified for the labor market data collection and analysis role he was nominated to," Di Martino wrote on X.
Jessica Riedl, a senior Manhattan Institute fellow, shared another example from X, in which Antoni appeared not to know that the BLS' measure of import prices did not account for the impact of tariffs.
"The articles and tweets I've seen him publish are probably the most error-filled of any think tank economist right now," she wrote. "I hope we see better at BLS."
Economists who lean left also criticized the nomination.
Jason Furman, who chaired the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Obama, wrote on X: "I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner."
Economists also decried Antoni's suggestion that he would suspend the jobs report.
"That would (be) a serious mistake in my estimation. It would only fuel critiques of a politicization of job market data and likely result in volatility across asset classes," RSM US chief economist Joe Brusuelas told Axios.
Friction point: "President Trump selected Dr. E.J. Antoni III to restore America's trust in the jobs data that has had major issues, without any real attempt at resolution, for years," said Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman. "Antoni's education and vast experience as an economist has prepared him to produce accurate public data for businesses, households and policymakers to inform their decision-making."
Catch up quick: Trump condemned the BLS on Aug. 1, claiming that a worse-than-expected jobs report was "rigged."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump-Putin summit spotlights Alaska's strategic importance, vulnerability
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson is a prime midway rest stop for dignitaries on the route from Washington to eastern Asia. WASHINGTON − The summit meeting between President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will focus on ending Putin's war in Ukraine, with Alaska's awesome beauty and vulnerabilities as its backdrop. The two world leaders will meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, the post that crowns Anchorage to its south. It's an installation that teems with airmen and soldiers − plenty of moose and bears, too, befitting its location on the edge of Alaska's vast stretches of black spruce-fringed wilderness. Cold, dark and snowy in the winter, the base gets near round-the-clock sun at summer's peak. It's a prime midway rest stop for dignitaries, like presidents and cabinet secretaries, on the route from Washington to eastern Asia. The flight from the East Coast to the southern coast of Alaska takes roughly eight hours, about the limit for air crews before mandated rest, and a convenient, secure location to refuel. Long before air travel and a superpower summit, U.S. and Russian leaders haggled over Alaska. In 1867, Secretary of State William Seward secretly negotiated with Russian officials to buy the territory of Alaska for $7.2 million. Derided at the time as Seward's Folly, the deal worked out for the Americans. Alaska – its people, awesome landscape and enormous natural resources – joined the union in 1959. Before statehood, the Army established the base that would become Elmendorf-Richardson in 1940 during the runup to World War II. Since then, soldiers and airmen along with smaller contingents from the Navy and Marine Corps have called the base home. In all, the joint base hosts about 30,000 service members, their family members and civilian employees. Its key location – near Russia and close to Arctic resources eyed by China – has made Elmendorf-Richardson and other Alaskan military installations increasingly valuable to the Pentagon. More personnel and money have been streaming into Alaska in recent years to bolster northern defenses. The base takes part in some of the military's most intricate annual war games, featuring sophisticated weapons like the F-22 fighter. Alaska is the land of superlatives. The state is more than twice the size of Texas; its 46,000 miles of shoreline are more than the lower 48 states combined; Denali's snow-capped peak towers over the interior at more than 20,000 feet. Brown and black bears, moose and wolves, roam tundra and black spruce forests. Temperatures routinely drop to 50 degrees below zero in the interior, where Fort Wainwright sits on the edge of Fairbanks. Dim sunlight smudges skies for only a few hours in the depth of winter. Cabin fever can be very real. In the summer, it truly is the Land of the Midnight Sun. Perpetual daylight has its downside, disrupting sleep, leading to irritability – and worse. Alaska routinely ranks among the nation's leaders in alcohol abuse and suicide. In recent years, Alaska's strategic, remote location has exposed its vulnerabilities. Suicide among soldiers spiked to alarming levels. Reporting by USA TODAY revealed a shortage of mental personnel to help them. The Army and Congress intervened, dispatching dozens of counselors and spending millions to improve living conditions for troops there. Suicide rates declined. Efforts by Chinese spies to gain access to Alaskan bases hasn't, however, USA TODAY has reported. The bases contain some of the military's top-end weaponry, sophisticated radars to track potential attacks on the homeland and missiles to intercept them. Russia, too, regularly probes America's northern flank. As recently as July, 22 the North American Aerospace Defense Command detected Russian warplanes operating in the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone. When aircraft enter the zone, they must be identified for national security purposes. The Russian planes remained in international airspace, a tactic they employ regularly. Mildly provocative, the flights are noted by NORAD but not considered a threat. Meanwhile, global warming has thawed permafrost beneath runways and rising water levels have damaged coastal facilities requiring remediation costing tens of millions of dollars. A skeptic of climate change, Trump could view for himself its effects, including cemeteries eroded by rising sea levels disgorging coffins of flu and smallpox victims from more than a century ago. The potential release of ancient pathogens from melting permafrost has captured the Pentagon's attention, too. Alas, Alaska may have been Putin's last, best choice for a summit. His brutal, unprovoked invasion of neighboring Ukraine has made him an international pariah. Denied entry into Europe, he and Trump could not repeat their summit in Helsinki, the capital of Finland that is now a member of NATO − due mainly to the invasion. Luckily for Putin and Trump, Anchorage is a delightful city, cool in midsummer and far from the death and destruction Putin he has wrought in Ukraine.
USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
What is Trump's approval rating? See states where he is most, least popular
President Donald Trump's approval ratings nationally are in the red, but for about half of the states, more people approve of his job peformance. State legislatures could determine Trump's political future. Texas' push to redraw its Congressional map to add more Republican seats has dragged the states into a bit of a standoff, as heavy hitter Democratic states threaten to do the same if Texas moves forward. That's because Democrats are looking to take back control of the U.S. House in the midterm elections, and doing so would subvert Trump's efforts for his last two years in office. While Trump's approval rating nationally remains historcially low, a look at state-by-state survey results show a more complicated picture. Here is what we know: More: Did Trump remove the Rose Garden? He has pushed these White House renovations Trump has positive approval rating in 27 states Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states. That is according to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters. The number of states is unchanged from July's update. Trump is most popular by Morning Consult in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance, and least popular in Vermont, where 64% disapprove of his job performance. But his approval is net negative in two states with gubernatorial races this fall: New Jersey and Virginia, according to Morning Consult. In Texas, 53% of voters approve of Trump's performance while 44% disapprove. In California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to counter changes in Texas' redistricting, 41% approve of Trump's job peformance while 56% disapprove. California is Trump's seventh worst rating among the states, according to Morning Consult. What is Trump's approval overall? RealClearPolitics Poll Average shows Trump's approval rating was becoming more negative throughout the first few weeks of July before buoying toward the end of the month. Aggregated polls by the New York Times show a similar trend. As of Jan. 27, Trump received a +6.2 percentage point approval rating, but as of March 13, it flipped to slightly negative, the RealClearPolitics graphics show. The approval rating reached its most negative on April 29 at -7.2 percentage points, which fell around Trump's 100-day mark. It came close to that low again on July 22 and 23 at -7.1 percentage points, as the controversy over Epstein carried into its third week. His average approval rating margin as of Aug. 12, according to RealClearPolitics, is -5.4 percentage points. The approval margin according to the New York Times aggregator on Aug. 12 is -8 percentage points. How does Trump's approval rating compare to previous presidents? A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in July of his first years in office − both as the 45th and 47th presidents − are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations. In a Gallup poll conducted from July 7-21, 37% approved of Trump's job performance. Here is how that compares to other presidents in July of their first year of their term, according to Gallup: Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump deploys National Guard for D.C. crime but called Jan. 6 rioters ‘very special'
On Jan. 6, 2021, a pro-Trump mob committed a month's worth of crime in the span of about three hours. The FBI has estimated that around 2,000 people took part in criminal acts that day, and more than 600 people were charged with assaulting, resisting or interfering with the police. (Citywide, Washington currently averages about 70 crimes a day.) But President Donald Trump's handling of the most lawless day in recent Washington history stands in sharp contrast to his announcement Monday that he needed to use the full force of the federal government to crack down on 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals' in the nation's capital. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up After a prominent member of the Department of Government Efficiency, known by his online pseudonym, 'Big Balls,' was assaulted this month, the president took federal control of Washington's police force and mobilized National Guard troops. His team passed out a packet of mug shots, and Trump described 'roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' Advertisement President Trump speaks at a rally near the White House in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, before some supporters marched to riot at the US Capitol. KENNY HOLSTON/NYT That was nothing like the message he delivered to the mob of his supporters on Jan. 6, when he told them, as tear gas filled the hallways of the Capitol: 'We love you. You're very special.' 'If we want to look at marauding mobs, look at Jan. 6,' said Mary McCord, the director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law and a former federal prosecutor. 'If you want to look at criminal mobs, we had a criminal mob and he called them peaceful protesters.' Advertisement In one of his first actions upon retaking the presidency, Trump issued a sweeping grant of clemency to all of the nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the Capitol attack. The president issued pardons to most of the defendants and commuted the sentences of 14 members of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia, most of whom were convicted of seditious conspiracy. He has sought to rewrite the history of the riot and called those arrested 'hostages.' He has selected a passionate defender of Jan. 6 rioters to run the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, and his administration even hired a former FBI agent who was charged with encouraging the mob to kill police officers. The agent, Jared L. Wise, has been named as an adviser to the Justice Department task force established to seek retribution against Trump's political enemies. 'He is showing one-sided support for violence that supports his political agenda,' said Robert A. Pape, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago who has studied the Jan. 6 defendants for more than four years. Pape said the hiring of Wise only underscored the message sent by the pardoning of the rioters. 'What he is doing, of course,' Pape said, 'is sending the signal to everybody that you will not just be pardoned, he will not just give you moral support, but he will reward you with high-level positions and opportunities.' Advertisement Trump has also shifted his position on police officers who used deadly force, based on the circumstances involved. Casting himself as a champion of the police, Trump issued full and unconditional pardons this year to two D.C. police officers who were convicted after a chase that killed a young Black man in 2020. But Trump took the opposite view of the use of deadly force during the Capitol riot, condemning the police officer who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt and calling the officer, who is Black, a 'thug.' The president's crackdown on Washington was put in motion by an assault against 19-year-old Edward Coristine, who was part of Elon Musk's job-slashing effort. Trump shared a photograph that appeared to show Coristine sitting in the street around 3 a.m., bleeding and shirtless. Two teenagers have been arrested in the case. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City,' Trump said. Crime in Washington is declining, a point many Democrats have made as they railed against Trump's actions as federal overreach. Last year, violent crime hit a 30-year low. 'Donald Trump delayed deploying the National Guard on January 6th when our Capitol was under violent attack and lives were at stake,' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker, wrote on the social platform X. 'Now, he's activating the DC Guard to distract from his incompetent mishandling of tariffs, health care, education and immigration — just to name a few blunders.' Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested that Trump's takeover of Washington's police force was unjustified. 'As you listen to an unhinged Trump try to justify deploying the National Guard in DC, here's reality: Violent crime in DC is at a 30-year low,' she wrote on social media. Advertisement Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, hit back at critics of the president's crackdown. 'I think it's despicable that Democrats cannot agree that we need more law and order in a city that has been ravaged by violence, crime, murders, property theft,' Leavitt said. Pape said that while Coristine's injuries were troubling, they were similar to those suffered by police officers on Jan. 6. The indictments against Jan. 6 defendants, Pape said, were full of photos of 'cops getting beaten up unbelievably with metal poles and all kinds of things, and they're being beaten pretty severely.' McCord said she believed Trump's takeover of the Washington police would most likely be 'performative' and not make a lot of difference functionally on crime. 'This feels like very much a way to send a message: I have control. I can use it, and I will use it,' she said. But the move also reeks of hypocrisy, McCord said. 'It's the hypocrisy of saying essentially that he supports our police, our law enforcement across the country, and wants to enact policies that support the police,' she said, 'yet that didn't apply when it came to all of the law enforcement officers on Jan. 6.' This article originally appeared in .
