Nigel Farage should do his bit to keep the peace
Nowhere is this strategy more dangerously deployed than in issues of migration, race and crime, so often shamelessly conflated by the Reform UK leader with a studied and long-experienced hand. It is done almost instinctively. Once, he even blamed being late for a 'meet-the-Ukip leader' event in Wales on traffic jams on the M4 caused by immigration, rather than, say, the infamous bottleneck at Newport.
Rather more grievously, his actions in the aftermath of the horrific Southport murders a year ago did nothing to calm tempers and stop the wild social media speculation that the person responsible was a Muslim asylum seeker who'd more or less just arrived in Britain, via a small boat.
He plainly has no regrets and is approaching the disclosure of details concerning the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton in the same reckless manner. He and his Reform UK colleagues on Warwickshire County Council are demanding, as Mr Farage did last year, that the immigration status of those involved be released by the police. The justification, once again, is that there is a 'cover-up' – a serious allegation made without foundation – and people are being denied the truth, presumably through some sense of misguided political correctness.
Mr Farage implies, as he did last year, that this 'cover-up' – which he presumably sees as a deliberate attempt to deceive the public – only serves to create confusion and inflame feelings. In fact, of course, it is he who is creating additional tension, adding to a sense of injustice and the fear that the police are more interested in defending perpetrators than defending victims, despite the obvious truth that those accused have been caught and taken into custody by those same police, doing their duty.
It is difficult to see why the migration status of everyone arrested on a serious offence should be automatically released, as Mr Farage suggests, even when it is immediately known for sure. If the person involved is a refugee, for example, accepted for indefinite leave to remain, then that does not make them 'more guilty' or their offence 'more serious' simply by the fact that they may have escaped from torture or some war zone. There is a strong probability that migration status will be equated to race, which is even less relevant. The only possible valid use of immigration status in the criminal justice system is if the person is convicted. At that point, the question of deportation does arise.
The fact is that someone's immigration status can affect the feelings of many perfectly law-abiding and worried people demonstrating outside 'migrant hotels' (real or imagined) up and down the country on legitimate grounds. They are not all fascists or racists, still less pathologically violent. They are angry and fearful at what they learn from the news and the speculation on social media, and they deserve to be told the facts.
But there is just the suspicion that immigration status can, in some grotesque, emotionally-charged way, lead to violence and mob rule. It is, quite simply, wrong and criminally so, to attempt arson on a hotel with human beings inside, whatever the circumstances. It doesn't help anyone or solve anything.
If a rapist comes from a family that can trace its English origins to Anglo-Saxon times, that should make people no more or less angry than if the criminal has only lived here for a matter of weeks and is from some country in Africa or the Middle East. Race should play no part in justice, even mob justice.
It would be refreshing, statesmanlike and a genuinely great public service if Mr Farage and those like him used their public platform to call for calm and peaceful protest, and not display so much apparent tacit support for angry, violent reactions in tense demonstrations. His warnings sound too much like self-fulfilling prophecies, as when he declared a few weeks ago: 'I don't think anybody in London understands just how close we are to civil disobedience on a vast scale in this country.'
Given what happened last July and early August, the opposite is surely true: ministers and police chiefs are all too well aware of such a possibility. The difference is that, unlike Mr Farage, they don't seem to be talking it up.
It would make a useful change if Mr Farage didn't make everything into a 'cover-up' and accept that, in many cases, details are withheld for sound legal reasons concerning a fair trial and the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act 1981.
The police should not have to break the law and risk upsetting a trial and letting the guilty go free simply because of the threat of a riot if they don't, or accusations of 'two-tier policing'.
What's more, Mr Farage shouldn't call for the resignation of chief constables, or any other officers, who are trying to keep the oaths they took to uphold the laws set down by parliament and the King's peace. Standing up for the police, defending the independent judiciary, condemning violence and respecting human rights are, in fact, the patriotic British things to do at times such as these.
If he cares about the cohesion of communities and the rule of law as deeply as he claims, Mr Farage should do his bit to keep the peace as well.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Reform UK police chief's 'dark heart of wokeness' claim under fire
Rupert Matthews, who has defected from the Tory Party to Nigel Farage's rightwing outfit, claimed the UK needs 'to cut the dark heart of wokeness out of our criminal justice system'. Reform UK's new police and crime commissioner is under fire for calling the police's plan to tackle racism an 'abomination'. Rupert Matthews, who has defected from the Tory Party to Nigel Farage 's rightwing outfit, claimed the UK needs 'to cut the dark heart of wokeness out of our criminal justice system'. And he branded the Police Race Action Plan (PRAP) "the very epitome of two tier policing'. But experts slapped down his comments for 'fundamentally misrepresenting' the plan, which was created to address evidence that minority communities are treated differently by police. It comes after Nigel Farage came under pressure to distance himself from 'racist' Ant Middleton rant. In a Reform UK press conference on Monday, Mr Matthews, the Leicestershire and Rutland PCC, said: "The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) recently sponsored the abomination that is the Police Race Action Plan. That concluded that people should be treated differently depending on which ethnic group they came from. 'That is a disgrace and the very epitome of two tier policing. We need to cut the dark heart of wokeness out of our criminal justice system and allow the police and courts to get back to what they're supposed to be doing, which is keeping our communities safe." Abimbola Johnson, the head of the police racism watchdog, told The Mirror: 'The suggestion that the Police Race Action Plan asks for people to be treated differently depending on their ethnicity fundamentally misrepresents the purpose and findings of the programme. 'The uncomfortable truth is that racially minoritised communities, particularly Black people, are already treated differently by our policing system. The intention of PRAP is to deal with those disparities. 'Unfortunately, there are people in power, like Mr Matthews, who use their position to undermine progress rather than push policing towards improvement in key areas such as anti-racism.' Last year, Black people were more than five times more likely to be stopped and searched than their white counterparts, while Black children remain six and a half times more likely to be strip-searched than white children. PRAP was first established in 2020, against the backdrop of George Floyd's murder by a US police officer and the worldwide Black Lives Matter protests that followed. But policing has long had a difficult history with black communities. In 1999, the Macpherson Report found that institutional racism contributed to the police's botched investigation into Stephen Lawrence's 1993 murder in London. It was a watershed moment in facing up to racism in the police. But progress has been slow. In 2023, Baroness Louise Casey's report after the murder of Sarah Everard by a serving Metropolitan police officer again found the force was institutionally racist. The Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board, of which Ms Johnson is the chair, last month(JUL) found some improvements in its latest assessment of PRAP, including reforms to data collection of vehicle stops. But it warned issues still remain elsewhere, including serious data gaps when it comes to body-worn video cameras. Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, chairman of the NPCC, said: 'It remains the fact that Black communities have the lowest levels of confidence in the police, are three times more likely to be subject to police use of force, while Black children are disproportionately likely to be reported missing to the police. 'If communities don't trust the police, they won't come forward when they need help or support us with things like information to support our investigations. This then has implications for everybody. Improving confidence in the police benefits policing for everyone, and that is the driving force behind everything we are trying to do.' When contacted by The Mirror, Mr Matthews said: 'I believe that if you want to restore trust and confidence in the police then you need to treat everyone the same, no ifs, no buts. "The same rules should apply across the board. Background or indeed any other so-called difference should have absolutely no effect on the implementation of those rules. It should not take a national Plan and associated budget of millions in order to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.'
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Yorkshire Water boss paid 'extra' £1.3 million from firm's offshore parent company despite 'dire' environmental record and hikes to bills
A water company boss was handed more than £1.3 million in 'extra' pay from an offshore firm, despite its abysmal record on pollution and increasing household bills. Chief executive Nicola Shaw pocketed two payments of £660,000 in the last two years from Yorkshire Water's parent company Kelda Holdings, in addition to her salary with the beleaguered utilities firm. Yorkshire Water was allowed to raise average annual household bills by 41 per cent last year, and this summer introduced a hosepipe ban for its 5.5 million customers. It was ordered to pay £40 million in the spring to address its 'serious failures' over wastewater and sewage, and was also separately fined nearly £1 million last month for polluting a watercourse with chlorine, causing the death of hundreds of fish. Yorkshire Water is one of the six water companies currently banned from paying bonuses under Government action designed to prevent bosses who 'oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes' from receiving extra money. But figures showed Ms Shaw received just over £1.3 million between 2023 and 2025 from Kelda, in addition to her Yorkshire Water salary of around £689,000 per year - remuneration which was reduced by about one-third after she decided to forgo her bonus before the Government performance-related pay ban came in. The Kelda money is 'a fixed fee for investor-related work' performed by Ms Shaw for the parent company 'and complies fully with expectations and reporting requirements', Yorkshire Water said. Including the offshore company payments, she has been awarded more than £3 million in total pay over three years since she joined the firm in 2022, according to analysis first reported by the Guardian. Ofwat, the water regulator, is now investigating. Ms Shaw's earnings have infuriated environmental campaign groups. Amy Fairman, head of campaigns for River Action, said: 'Yorkshire Water has just been fined over £900,000 for polluting a watercourse with millions of litres of chlorinated water, killing hundreds of fish, yet its CEO is quietly handed an extra £1.3 million through an offshore firm. 'This is business as usual in a system that rewards environmental destruction and shields those responsible. 'Until executives are held criminally accountable, not just cushioned by shareholders, nothing will change. 'And unless we see a complete overhaul of the water industry, one that finally ends the failed privatisation experiment, this scandalous cycle will continue.' The Ilkley Clean River Group has now written to Kelda chairman Vanda Murray, asking her to justify Ms Shaw's pay given Yorkshire Water's dismal record under her watch. The campaigners wrote: 'To the customer, the additional payments to Ms Shaw look like a way of "working around" the fact that bonuses were causing public outrage and subsequently banned by government. 'There is in effect no change to eye-watering salaries at the top of Yorkshire Water.' A Yorkshire Water spokesman said Ms Shaw's work for Kelda Group included 'investor engagement, financial oversight, and management of the Kelda Group, which is recognised by a fee of £660,000 paid by shareholders'. He added: 'This is a conscious governance decision: we do not believe that work done on investor-related activities should be paid for by Yorkshire Water customers' bills. 'This fee, which has remained unchanged year on year, reflects the critical importance of the work during this period that was led by Nicola in securing long-term investment for Yorkshire Water. 'We remain focused on our long-term commitment to delivering better outcomes for customers, communities, and the environment across the region.' It was reported tonight that Ofwat's chief executive David Black is due to resign, ahead of the watchdog's planned abolition by ministers.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Worker at Berkshire psychiatric hospital where girl, 14, died, had no experience, inquest hears
A support worker with a false identity who left a vulnerable 14-year-old girl unwatched in a secure psychiatric ward during his first shift had never worked in a hospital before, the teenager's inquest has heard. Following the death of Ruth Szymankiewicz, police found the support worker had 'stolen' the false identity, had a fake passport and was able to get the shift at the hospital through an agency after brief training. CCTV footage played to the inquest jury on Tuesday appeared to show Ruth going into her room at Huntercombe hospital in Maidenhead, Berkshire and closing the door, though she was supposed to be under 1:1 observation. The footage suggested Ruth was left alone and unobserved in her room for 15 minutes. There was no sign of the support worker. While in her room, Ruth is believed to have carried out an act of self harm that led to her death. After 15 minutes another staff member went into her room and raised the alarm. Sgt Francesca Keen of Thames Valley police told the inquest that the support worker tasked with watching Ruth at that time arrived in the UK about three months before and stole the name Ebo Acheampong from a 'completely innocent man'. He signed up with a healthcare recruitment agency called Platinum. Keen said: 'They felt they had checked his ID and were dealing with a legitimate person.' The inquest heard his training consisted of a day or day-and-a-half course, much of which was e-learning. The day after completing his training, he was given what Keen said was his 'first and only shift' at Huntercombe and in the evening was put in charge of watching Ruth, who had a serious eating disorder. Keen was asked if there was anything to suggest he had worked at any other hospital before. She replied: 'No.' The officer said that the worker had claimed he left Ruth alone to help with another emergency nearby. But the CCTV footage played in court showed no evidence of this. Five days later, the man flew from the UK for Ghana via Heathrow. The officer said police now knew his true identity but did not have evidence to charge him and he could not be extradited. Ruth's parents, Kate and Mark Szymankiewicz, a GP and a consultant surgeon, have strongly criticised the standard of care at Huntercombe, which was run by the company Active Care Group and has now closed. They are also critical that Ruth was being detained more than 70 miles from their home in Wiltshire. In a statement read out in court, Mark Szymankiewicz said he felt Ruth was 'in limbo' – Huntercombe was not an appropriate place for her but there was nowhere else for her to go. The jury heard an extract from Ruth's notebook in which she claimed there was 'non existent' therapy at the hospital and said staff slept on their shift. She described it as the 'shittest mental institution'. Ruth's parents are concerned she had unchecked access to her mobile phone. The inquest was told that in the weeks before her death she did research on methods of suicide and how many calories were in food including eggs, slices of toast and cereal. The hearing at Buckinghamshire coroner's court continues. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at
