
Mayor Brandon Johnson pushes ‘granny flat' ordinance forward
Johnson said he plans to revive his bid to clear the way for garden apartments, attic-to-housing conversions and coach houses. In doing so, he also revives a daunting political fight.
A similar Johnson-backed proposal fizzled out last summer when aldermen from wards filled with single-family homes objected to the potential influx of so-called additional dwelling units.
The mayor argued Tuesday new construction is needed amid a housing affordability crisis.
'We need more units, that's the way we are going to drive the pricing for housing down,' Johnson said at a City Hall news conference. 'It's about creating safe, affordable communities.'
The City Council Zoning Committee could vote on the proposal next week, and send it to the full council July 16.
Changes in zoning and parking requirements caused the construction of additional dwelling units to be banned in Chicago in 1957. Still, many Chicago buildings already include such units, some illegal, some grandfathered in and some constructed during an ongoing pilot program.
Like in his last effort, Johnson's ordinance would allow the additional units to be built, by right, citywide, with no ability for aldermen to stop them on a ward-by-ward basis. But the new ordinance makes a compromise: Only one or two new units could be built each year on each block in areas zoned for detached, single-family homes.
The added limits won tentative support from Zoning Committee Vice Chair Ald. Bennett Lawson, 44th. Allowing by-right additional unit construction is a crucial way to cut tape on development and make housing construction more affordable, he said.
'I'm thinking that this is probably where we are going to land, and it is more of a compromise from where we were last year,' Lawson said. 'I don't see this changing any block in the city radically, very quickly.'
Lawson said some details are still being hammered out and added that he believes opponents of the change could delay a final vote if one comes up next week, potentially stalling debate until September.
The measure's chief opponent last summer, Ald. Marty Quinn, signaled he would once again vie to block it. The ordinance threatens to 'erode the fabric of these beautiful neighborhoods,' the Southwest Side bungalow belt alderman said.
Quinn, 13th, cited parking, garbage, noise and school overcrowding as top concerns he hears about from constituents — each an issue that would worsen if Johnson successfully 'jams ADU's down the throats of aldermen,' he said.
'Those quality of life issues will be accelerated if this is allowed to happen,' Quinn said. 'For the mayor to think he knows best about what the needs are on the Southwest Side, it's not accurate.'
He added that the new per-block limits made the proposal more tolerable, but pointed out that Johnson's proposal would not require homeowners to live in buildings where additional units are built.
'That means investors from New York could come in, buy a single-family home and turn that single-family home into an apartment overnight,' Quinn said. 'This proposal is riddled with blindspots, and I'm trying to sound the alarm as loud as possible.'
Johnson, however, argued that the ordinance's citywide reach is 'critical' to affordability. The mayor sidestepped when asked if his sudden push signaled he had the necessary majority support to pass the ordinance after failing to get such backing last year.
'We will have ongoing conversations with alders. I always go into any battle with confidence we will prevail. That's how I got here,' he said.
But some aldermen say they were caught off guard by Johnson's move. Ald. Matt O'Shea said he still has not seen the actual legislation, despite the administration's calls for a Zoning Committee vote next week.
'I've had no communication discussion on this in months, several months, and then all of a sudden, Sunday, I start hearing from colleagues that the administration wants to hurry up, pass this through,' he said. 'So they are not communicating with anybody, but they want to hurry up to do this. Come on. Put some thought into this.'
O'Shea was unmoved by Johnson's argument that Chicago's need for more housing is desperate enough for community input to be skipped when additional units are being weighed. The mayor should instead focus on reducing construction costs, he said.
'Community should have a say. Elected officials in neighborhoods should have a say. Period. End of story,' O'Shea said. 'Not just blanket change zoning because after two years somebody realized we have a housing shortage.'
Johnson said he hopes aldermen do not become 'narrow or blinded by their own sort of specific space.'
'Building more affordable units is not an attack,' he said. 'It's actually a response to an attack against working people in this city, who work very hard to build family and build a community here. I want to make sure those working people stay here.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Think Blas' relationship with the cops was bad? Mamdani will be much worse
For a preview of NYPD-City Hall relations under a Mayor Mamdani, consider one ex-cop's take on the tenure of Zohran's favorite former mayor, Bill de Blasio. In her memoir, 'And Then Came the Blues,' retired NYPD Det. Katrina Brownlee spills on her experiences on Blas' security detail. Spoiler: It was bad. Advertisement Once, she writes, while 'on one of his typical power trips,' Blas called a sergeant to complain after a uniformed cop on his team briefly took off his hat. Overall, the ex-cop 'sensed that the mayor generally did not like police officers.' That's a diplomatic way to convey his open disdain for cops, so deeply rooted that late in 2014, de Blasio claimed he was teaching his black son Dante to fear his dad's own security detail. Advertisement Yes, he wisely hired Bill Bratton as his first police commissioner, but Blas still never missed an opportunity to bash cops to score points with the left. Brownlee recalls that de Blasio could be 'genuinely caring' in private, but his public attitude was so toxic that New York's Finest turned their backs on him repeatedly at the funerals of slain-on-duty officers. If Mamdani, whose record and rhetoric is markedly more anti-cop, wins this fall, relations seem sure to get more dysfunctional. He not only jumped on the 'defund the police' bandwagon in 2020, he called cops a face of 'white supremacy' and the NYPD so 'wicked & corrupt' that it needs to be dismantled, not just reformed. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters De Blasio, that is, pioneered mayoral cop-bashing; Mamdani's generation of lefties is far more rabid. That he's muted his hate for now simply means he figures he's got the anti-cop vote in the bag; saying more before Election Day can only cost him support. But he'd still be de Blasio's heir in the worst possible way. Advertisement Mayor Eric Adams and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch are making steady gains against the crime crisis unleashed by New York's anti-cop pols. Electing a mayor whose relations with New York's Finest are already poisonous is a surefire bet to restart the downward spiral. And the men and women who keep New Yorkers safe deserve better than a mayor who'll never have their backs.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Mamdani's ‘war' against Trump spells bad news for NYC
Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour makes oodles of sense for him — but only at the expense of the rest of the city. Not just because the last thing New Yorkers need is a mayor seeking a war with the White House, since they'd inevitably be the cannon fodder. More: Centering the mayoral debate on countering President Donald Trump encourages everyone to ignore all the issues Mamdani doesn't want voters thinking about, like how to make the streets and subways safe, the public schools functional and the local economy growing. It also prevents any focus on his privilege and inexperience, his cop-hatred, his obsessive loathing of Israel and the unworkability of pretty much his entire 'positive' agenda. Truth is, it mainly appeals to the vanity of his Democratic Socialists and their cheerleaders: Already imagining that their guy's surprise victory (in a Democratic primary) puts America on the brink of a new socialist era, they now get to also dream of Mamdani somehow turning the tide against Bad Orange Man. Except that he can't 'stand up' to Trump (beyond boring bits like the legal efforts to claw back improperly canceled grants that Mayor Eric Adams already has under way). Indeed, no mere mayor of any city can. Check the US Constitution: You'll find no mention of a mayoral power to check the president, Congress or for that matter the Supreme Court. And in the real world, a Mayor Mamdani declaring war on Trump would entail setting City Hall on fire and expecting the White House to burn down. New York City has zero leverage over the federal government, except perhaps 1) Wall Street's money — which socialists can't direct except via their trust funds — and 2) whatever power the national media has left — when the media's already done its damnedest to stop Trump. The feds, meanwhile, can screw New York eight ways to Sunday, starting with cutting back on the hundreds of billions it sends our way. Nor can local government 'withhold' New Yorkers' taxes, as some whiz kids in the Legislature suggest. State Attorney General Tish James, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and a few complacent judges have already waged their worst lawfare against Trump, while then-Mayor Bill de Blasio did what he could against the Trump businesses that remain here. 'Trump-proofing' the city — the new tough talk from progressives around the country — is an empty threat, too: Federal law almost always trumps state and local ordinances. Playing tough guy and talking big is sure to give Mamdani lots of outraged outtakes for his social media. But he is writing checks that the people of NYC will have to pay.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
White House scrapped Biden ship tour after learning ‘how many steps were involved,' emails show
The White House opted against having former President Joe Biden board a vessel during a July 2023 visit to a Philadelphia shipyard after learning 'lots of steps' were required to get on board, newly released emails show. The records, obtained by watchdog group Protect the Public's Trust via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and first reported by Fox News, show Department of Transportation staffers attempting to gather information about Biden's July 20, 2023, trip to the Philly Shipyard and what the president would be doing during his visit. The DOT's Maritime Administration (MARAD) had awarded the Philly Shipyard a contract to build a massive National Security Multi-Mission Vessel (NSMV) years earlier – but the agency learned days before Biden's trip that the White House would not allow the then-80-year-old president to inspect the boat. Advertisement 3 White House officials would not allow Biden, who was 80-years-old at the time, to board a vessel at a Philadelphia shipyard in 2023. AFP via Getty Images 'No visit to the NSMV vessel is planned after the WH realized how many steps were involved to get on the ship,' a MARAD official notified members of Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), quoting a contact the agency had at that shipyard. 'True – lots of steps on grating,' the message continued in a parenthetical note. Advertisement Biden's visit to the Philly Shipyard (PSI), where he met with apprentices and attended a steel-cutting ceremony for an offshore wind farm construction vessel, came just weeks after he took a hard fall at an Air Force Academy graduation ceremony in Colorado. Since the fall, the president had been observed boarding Air Force One using the aircraft's shorter set of stairs. Seven days before the Philadelphia shipyard visit, Biden stumbled on Air Force One's short staircase as prepared to depart Helsinki-Vantaan International Airport in Finland. 3 Biden took a hard fall less than two months before the Philly trip. AP Advertisement 3 The National Security Multi-Mission Vessel being built at the shipyard had too many steps for Biden, according to an email sent to DOT staffers from a MARAD official. Bloomberg via Getty Images The White House's refusal to let Biden board the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel in Philadelphia may not have been the only time the president wasn't allowed to get on a boat over concerns about the number of steps involved. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson claimed in his autobiography, 'Unleashed,' that the White House would not allow Biden to board the British Navy's flagship aircraft carrier – the HMS Prince of Wales – ahead of the 2021 G7 summit in Cornwall. Advertisement The decision left Johnson questioning Biden's 'physical fitness.' 'His staff told us that he would not in fact be boarding our vast aircraft carrier — which we had proudly stationed in the bay — because it had so many steps; and we wondered what that meant about his physical fitness,' Johnson said, according to an excerpt from the former prime minister's book obtained by The Telegraph.