Elon Musk may not be the president, but he still has cards to play against Trump
So declared Elon Musk's former friend and business associate Philip Low, who has known the Tesla and SpaceX tycoon for 14 years, in a recent interview with Politico.
Those remarks seemed to be borne out last week when Musk renewed his on-again, off-again feud with Donald Trump by attacking Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" and proposing to form a new political party — which he now claims to be moving forward with.
Trump responded in kind, suggesting he would "take a look" at revoking Musk's citizenship and that he "might have to put DOGE on Elon".
As The Independent reported last month, there are a great many ways that Trump could try to hurt Musk, from targeting his companies with federal investigations to deportation or even criminal investigations.
But Musk is not without cards to play. Through his vast wealth, his business empire, and his ability to martial a zealous online fanbase, he has plenty of ways to make life difficult for his erstwhile "buddy".
So if the world's richest person really wants this fight, what punches could he throw?
A money hose for Trump's opponents
The first and most obvious weapon in Musk's arsenal is his vast wealth: an estimated $405 billion, according to Forbes.
In the 2024 election, Musk plowed $295 million into supporting Republican candidates, chiefly Trump himself. That's a huge amount in American politics, but it's chump change for today's mega-rich.
For context, across the whole of 2023 and 2024, the total amount of money raised by all presidential candidates was only $2 billion, according to the Federal Election Commission. Congressional candidates raised $3.8 billion, while PACs raised a more respectable $15.7 billion.
Matching those amounts wouldn't be trivial for Elon Musk, because like most of the world's richest people his wealth is tied up in stocks that can't easily be unloaded all at once. Still, based on Wednesday's share prices, he could pay for the entire 2024 election cycle by liquidating just one fifth of his reported $130 billion stake in Tesla.
We have a sense already of how Musk might use this money. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he said on Monday.
He's suggested he'd donate to Republican representative Thomas Massie, a persistent critic of Trump's. And there's still another $100 million Musk previously promised Trump that he could decide to withhold.
He could even give money to Democrats, who will likely take it (although Trump has threatened 'serious consequences' in that scenario). They are politicians, after all.
Then there's Musk's proposed new party, dubbed 'the America Party'. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' he said on Saturday. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.'
In a follow-up tweet, he suggested the party would be a 'centrist' entity aiming to slash government spending, cut regulations, stimulate technological progress, increase birth rates, and support 'free speech' (though Musk himself has a troubled relationship with that last term).
Musk's proposed strategy is to 'laser-focus' enormous effort on just a few Senate and House districts, in the hope of acting as a tiebreaker in tight votes between Republicans and Democrats.
In general, the USA's first-past-the-post electoral system means third parties find it almost impossible to get a seat in Congress. The America Party would need a sizeable grassroots contingent in order to get any campaigns off the ground.
Meanwhile, Musk's notion that 80 percent of the USA agrees with his opinions seems disconnected from reality. The polling expert Nate Silver puts his net favorability rating at a weighted average of -18 percent, which is considerably worse than Trump himself.
Nevertheless, his billions mean the new party won't want for resources. And even if third parties don't win, they can still leech votes from larger parties and force them to change their policies.
Of course, money isn't everything — as Musk himself found out when his attempt to sway the Wisconsin Supreme Court election in March and April crashed and burned. Luckily for him, it's not his only asset.
Musk's cult of personality rivals Trump's own
Musk's overall popularity may have dropped dramatically since the election. But his pull with Republican voters specifically was still very high as of early June.
That's testament to his ability to build and maintain a fanatical fanbase. Like Trump, he has a knack for inspiring loyalty and whipping up his supporters against new targets, as well as a keen instinct for controversy.
And also like Trump, he doesn't need to be popular with all Americans to cause trouble for his enemies. He only needs enough dedicated partisans on his side.
'Elon has wooed enough of Trump's supporters to be an actual threat politically,' Musk's old friend Philip Low told Politico. "[Trump] doesn't realize the battle that he has on his hands."
Musk's ownership of X, formerly Twitter, will help him there. Having already turned the social network into a hub of the MAGA media universe — and reportedly tweaked its algorithms in favor of his own posts — he now has enormous control over the conservative information stream.
Given how many Americans now essentially live in a parallel media universe, maintained by fake news entrepreneurs and skewed social media algorithms, that gives him influence over what Trump's base even believes to be reality.
Granted, Trump remains the unquestioned ruler of the GOP. And when polls pit Musk against Trump directly, Republican voters largely side with the king. Yet Musk's combination of financial and social capital makes him a powerful ally to anyone within the party hoping to chart their own course.
From fiscal hawks opposed to Trump's spending spree to centrists with one eye on their purple state majority, there are plenty of people in Congress who won't always back Trump 100 percent. Musk can boost and sustain them, helping them resist the eye of Sauron effect that Trump has traditionally used to beat his coalition into line.
Musk's influence crosses countries and industries
Other threats are more esoteric. NASA would be pretty stuck without SpaceX, which currently offers the only reliable way of ferrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. Musk's satellite business Starlink is relied on by governments and militaries across the world, including some U.S. agencies.
Having helped kickstart China's world-leading electric vehicle industry, he also has a serious fanbase in China — and good relationships with the Chinese Communist Party. "Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you," said one user on the Chinese social network Weibo on Wednesday.
Most juicily of all, he has information. Musk spent months at the heart of the Trump administration, attending cabinet meetings and undertaking highly controversial projects. What might he have learned or witnessed during that time that could damage Trump politically?
We got a taste of that when Musk accused Trump of being "in the Epstein files". That's nothing new: we've known since 2015 that Trump was in Jeffrey Epstein's address book (which is not evidence of wrongdoing), and his ties to the child-abusing financier are long documented.
Yet as Trump knows all too well, in today's politics truth has only a passing relevance to how much chaos a lurid allegation can cause.
None of these factors are a slam dunk for Musk. His born-again MAGA conversion has trashed his former reputation as an apolitical business genius, and toxified his image among Democratic voters.
Getting more involved in politics would only prolong investors' disquiet about his ability to focus on running Tesla and SpaceX. Trying to dish dirt on Trump could also tempt revenge in kind, which could be dangerous given the sheer range of allegations about Musk's personal life.
Most of all, to misquote a line from the early 19th century writer Hilaire Belloc that Musk seems to be fond of: whatever happens, Trump has got the nukes, and Musk does not.
Then again, when has the near certainty of adverse consequences ever stopped Elon Musk?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Brazil Plans Cheap Credit, Debt Delays for Firms Hit by Tariffs
Brazil is finalizing proposals to help companies mitigate the effects of steep US tariffs with debt extensions, cheaper credit and support for workers' salaries, according to an official with knowledge of the plans. The package is the cornerstone of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's efforts to counteract the 50% tariffs Donald Trump threatened to impose on Brazilian goods, and will target relief at sectors that weren't among the nearly 700 exemptions the US leader outlined last week.
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Cloudflare vs. Perplexity: a web scraping war with big implications for AI
When the web was established several decades ago, it was built on a number of principles. Among them was a key, overarching standard dubbed 'netiquette': Do unto others as you'd want done unto you. It's a principle that lived on through other companies, including Google, whose motto for a period was ' Don't be evil.' The fundamental idea was simple: Act ethically and morally. If someone asked you to stop doing something, you stopped—or at least considered it. But Cloudflare, an IT company that protects millions of websites from hostile internet attacks, has published an eye-opening exposé suggesting that one of the leading AI tools today isn't following that principle. Cloudflare claims Perplexity, an AI-powered ' answer engine,' is overriding website requests not to crawl their content by spoofing its identity to hide that the requests are coming from an AI company. Cloudflare launched its investigation after receiving complaints from customers that Perplexity was ignoring directives in files, which are used by websites to signal whether they want their content indexed by search engines or AI crawlers. Perplexity's alleged behavior highlights what happens when the web shifts from being rooted in voluntary agreements to a more hard-nosed business environment, where commercial goals overrule moral considerations. 'The code of honor around crawling and files is a charming remnant from when the web was collaborative and based on community standards,' says Eerke Boiten, a cybersecurity researcher at De Montfort University in the U.K. Cloudflare's position as a market leader in web protection means that, for now at least, it's still possible to preserve some remnants of that morality, Boiten says. Boiten believes the sense of ethical cooperation online is fading fast, noting that many large AI companies show little regard for where or how they obtain their training data, often operating in murky ethical territory. While he sees OpenAI as generally respectful of the established norms, he's far less optimistic about others. 'Perplexity trying to scrape their way around any defenses feels like it will be the norm rather than the exception,' he says. Perplexity's alleged conduct stands out as particularly bold, especially given that the company is already facing a lawsuit over unauthorized content scraping. Dow Jones Company—the parent of the Wall Street Journal and New York Post — filed a lawsuit in October 2024, alleging that Perplexity 'copies on a massive scale' their content. (The case is ongoing.) The BBC also sent a letter in June to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, threatening legal action for scraping its content without permission unless the company stops and either compensates for the data already accessed or deletes it entirely. Perplexity told the Financial Times that the BBC's case was 'manipulative and opportunistic' and reflected a 'fundamental misunderstanding' of copyright law. Perplexity did not respond to Fast Company 's request for comment on this story. But Boiten, for his part, anticipates an escalating arms race between those trying to protect online content from AI-driven web scraping and the companies attempting to do just that to improve their models. 'Cloudflare applying machine learning to spot Perplexity's patterns, and acknowledging that publication of all this likely means Perplexity will come up with new decoys,' he says. Cornell Law professor James Grimmelmann says the legal limits of scraping content without permission—or bypassing files—remain unclear, but Cloudflare's findings could expose Perplexity to more lawsuits. 'There is a loose judicial consensus that it is okay to scrape sites when their files allow it,' says Grimmelmann, 'but Perplexity seems determined to fuck around and find out whether the reverse is true.'
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How Tesla's Autopilot verdict could stifle Musk's robotaxi expansion
A court verdict against Tesla last week, stemming from a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, could hurt its plans to expand its nascent robotaxi network and intensify concerns over the safety of its autonomous vehicle technology. A Florida jury ordered Musk's electric vehicle company on Friday to pay about $243 million to victims of the crash, finding its Autopilot driver-assistance software defective. Tesla said the driver was solely at fault and vowed to appeal. The verdict follows years of federal investigations and recalls related to collisions involving Tesla's autonomous-vehicle technology, and comes as CEO Elon Musk seeks regulatory approval to rapidly expand the robotaxi service across the U.S. 'The public perception of this verdict or things like this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, 'We just can't let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence',' said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and an expert on legal issues in the mobility sector. Tesla could have a tough time convincing state regulators that its technology is road-ready, threatening Musk's goal of offering robotaxis to half the U.S. population by year-end, legal experts and Tesla investors said. Expanding its robotaxi service is crucial for Tesla as demand for its aging lineup of EVs has cooled amid rising global competition and a backlash against Musk's far-right political views. Much of Tesla's trillion-dollar market valuation hinges on his bets on robotics and artificial intelligence. Success in the self-driving realm will require winning the confidence of regulators and potential customers on the full-self driving (FSD) software that underpins Tesla's robotaxis, analysts said. 'The timing (of the verdict) for Tesla in light of the FSD rollouts and robotaxis is awful,' said Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman. 'Now there's essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla's business is not safe and maybe the safety that the company advertises isn't what it's cracked up to be.' The FSD is an advanced version of Autopilot. Autopilot, which was been updated since 2019, controls speed, distance and lane centering on highways, while the FSD can operate on city streets, helping the vehicle make automatic turns and change lanes. 'This case does not have direct implications for Tesla's FSD roll-out,' analysts at Piper Sandler said in a note on Sunday, citing the modern iterations of the software. A spokesperson on behalf of Tesla acknowledged the company had received a request for comment from Reuters but had not provided one by the time of publication. Regulatory road ahead Perfecting autonomous vehicles has been harder than expected. The high costs of hardware, years of trial and error, and regulatory hurdles have forced many players to close shop or pivot, including General Motors' Cruise unit. Musk, however, has pursued what he calls a simpler and cheaper path, relying only on cameras and AI instead of pricey sensors such as lidars and radars used by Alphabet's Waymo, Amazon's Zoox and others. After years of missed deadlines, Musk rolled out a small robotaxi trial in June with about a dozen Model Y crossover SUVs in Austin, Texas, each overseen by a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. While Musk has said Tesla was being 'super paranoid about safety', he has also pledged to expand the service fast and make it available for half of the U.S. population in the next five months – a stark contrast to Waymo's cautious years-long rollout. Until Tesla's entry, Waymo was the only U.S. firm to operate a paid, driverless robotaxi service. Tesla is currently awaiting approvals in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. California's department of motor vehicles declined to comment on the impact of the verdict on regulatory approval. Nevada said it held talks with Tesla about a robotaxi program several weeks ago, while Arizona said it was still considering Tesla's request for certification. Both did not comment on the verdict. Florida did not respond. Tesla has typically either won other Autopilot litigation or resolved the case with the plaintiffs out of court. The Florida verdict stands out. Several such cases are pending. The case involved a Model S sedan that went through an intersection and hit the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it. The driver had reached down to retrieve a dropped cellphone and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign before the crash. The jury found that Tesla's Autopilot had a defect and held the company partially responsible, despite the driver admitting fault. 'It's going to take time to get regulators to move forward and time being more than the end of the year,' said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor. 'From an image standpoint, it's a black eye.' —Abhirup Roy, Reuters The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
