
The renters refusing to be ‘trapped' by homeownership
Each government has tried to lure voters with policies to boost homeownership. It's a rite of passage in a country obsessed with property.
For some young people, the soaring cost of buying of a home has shut them out entirely and consigned them to renting whether they want to or not.
Young people are buying their first homes later and later, marooned from the property market by high prices and mortgage rates.
But for others, who might be able to afford to buy a home, those years of saving and sacrificing to put down roots are not worth it. This group is mobile, less likely to have children and wary of commitment.
Some argue that the stability that comes with owning a home was once a selling point. Now, however, it would be an albatross around their necks.
So, they are swearing against homeownership for good.
'I've always seen mortgages as a bit of a trap'
Hayley Knight, 37, runs a communications agency. She currently rents a room at a friend's house in Islington and has no desire to ever buy a house.
'I've always seen a mortgage as a bit of a trap. I've rented for years, [though] it's not necessarily a cheaper option.'
For some, buying property represents being tied to one place when they crave flexibility. Knight adds: 'I set my business up on the basis of it being purely remote and being able to work from anywhere in the world.
'I don't want any of the commitment [of owning a home] – it doesn't fit into the lifestyle that I have.'
Maisie Bamford, 34, rents a flat in Leicester, having previously lived in London. She has no plans to buy a home for the foreseeable future.
'I'm happy here, and it's affordable to me. My life goals have changed – buying a property isn't something that's so important to me any more. I'd rather use my savings for life experiences, having extra money in the bank in case I ever want to travel or move to a different part of the UK.
'[Renting] gives me much more freedom, I don't want to be tied down to a specific location. Even if you buy somewhere and rent it out, you still have to be around to manage it.'
Elle Sherwood, 24, grew up in Twickenham, south west London, but has moved out and rents in a shared house. She does not envision wanting to buy property in the future.
'Renting gives me choice and flexibility, without the huge financial commitment of buying a property. Also, as my dad's only child, I wouldn't want to be tied down to an area if something happened to him and I had to up sticks. Not being tied to any one space is huge to me.'
A lack of ties
Part of that desire for freedom is a lack of ties to one location – and for the growing number of young people opting not to have children, the need for a permanent home is diminishing.
The age at which women have children has been steadily increasing for decades. In 2023, women were 30.9 years old at childbirth, which has generally been increasing since the mid-1970s.
More than a third of teenagers do not want to have children in the future, according to research by University College London.
Bamford says: 'Not planning on having children in the near future has shaped [my decision not to buy a house] too.
'More and more people my age are choosing not to have children. Often people settle down near parents and grandparents because they have kids. I don't have that, and a lot of my friends feel the same.'
Knight says: 'I don't want children, but if I were to start a family, I wouldn't want to bring them up here. I don't think there's much of a sense of community in the UK any more – everyone is out for themselves.'
The lure of a life abroad
The rise of remote working has made it much easier to leave the UK. And as real wages have stagnated while the cost of living and homeownership has soared, combined with the highest tax burden since the Second World War, this is an increasingly attractive option for many young people.
Nearly three quarters (72pc) of 18- to 30-year-olds would consider living and working in another country in the short or long term, according to the British Council's Next Generation UK 2024 report.
Bamford adds: 'If you can work remotely and have a better quality of life, why wouldn't you? When people say they want to live by the beach or somewhere hot, I just think, why not do it?'
Tristan Van Den Berg, 25, says that there is a growing awareness among his peers of the better quality of life available in other countries at a much lower price. 'If you earn £1,500 a month, you can go and live in Thailand in a two-bed flat with a pool – it's incredible.'
This lies in stark contrast to what you see in the UK, adds Knight. She says: 'Seeing house prices in other countries compared to what you get in the UK is crazy.
'A friend of mine paid £650,000 for a two-bedroom flat in Wimbledon. In Spain, I saw a two-bedroom flat with a pool, private beach access and a mountain view for £150,000 near Malaga.
'You don't get anything for your money in the UK, even outside of London – especially with the stamp duty increase and interest rates where they are.'
A lack of faith in the future of Britain's economy is another reason young people might feel put off laying down roots in the form of bricks and mortar, adds Knight.
'We are an island. We no longer have EU support, the economy is sinking, it's worrying. The cost of living is ridiculous. I came back from three years of travelling in October, and I was shocked by how much prices of everything had gone up in such a short period of time.'
The cost of homeownership
It's not just the price of getting on the ladder which is putting off would-be buyers, but the costs associated with owning and maintaining a home.
Owner occupiers' housing costs (OOH) rose quickly between 2021 and 2024, and continue to rise faster than inflation. Renters are increasingly aware of what they would be taking on if they bought property, explains Bamford.
'With the cost of living, and everything being more expensive, I hear stories about friends who have bought and there are so many more things you're responsible for. If my boiler breaks, my landlord comes and sorts it out.'
Sherwood adds: 'In Twickenham, there are lots of flooding issues; even if I could afford a house there, there are loads of costs that could come up and be a massive burden because of that. Then I'd be tied to the property because I'd have that mortgage.'
While Sherwood acknowledges that she is foregoing a degree of financial stability that comes with a mortgage, she prefers alternative approaches when it comes to investing for the future.
'So much could change [in the coming decades] from regulations, to [property] market fluctuations, to personal circumstances. I would rather invest in stocks and liquid assets for a sense of financial security.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
27 minutes ago
- Finextra
Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance
Barclays has followed HSBC in withdrawing from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), claiming that the departure of a host of other global lenders means the organisation "no longer has the membership to support our transition". 1 Founded in 2021, the UN-convened NZBA requires members to commit to "transition the operational and attributable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to align with pathways to net-zero by 2050 or sooner". At its peak it had around 150 members, including most of the world's largest banks. However, that number has dwindled in the last few months. At the beginning of 2025, ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, a host of US banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, pulled out of the global climate-focused alliance. The American banks quit amid attacks from Republicans on "woke" capitalism, with the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Jim Jordan, claiming that financial environmental alliances have created "a climate cartel". Now, UK-headquartered HSBC and Barclays have joined their US counterparts. Barclays says it is committed to its "ambition" to be a net zero bank by 2050. Says a statement: "Our targets to mobilise $1 trillion of Sustainable and Transition Financing and for financed emissions remain unchanged. We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients." Earlier this week, the CEO of Standard Chartered, Bill Winters, hit out at banks that have rowed back on their climate commitments. 'People that said a lot of stuff, but [when] it was fashionable to say it, [and] who are saying either nothing or the opposite now: shame on them,' said Winters, according to the Guardian.


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers
Drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation for taking out a car loan after a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court, experts have warned. Industry analysts also said on Friday that banks will 'breathe a sigh of relief' after the Supreme Court ruled they are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. Nevertheless, the financial watchdog has said it is still considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who potentially receive compensation. Lawyers have also indicated that some consumers should still consider pursuing their claims over 'unfair' treatment. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, went to the UK's highest court to challenge a Court of Appeal ruling which found 'secret' commission payments paid by buyers to car dealers in agreements before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent were unlawful. The ruling last year found three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, should receive compensation. But in a decision on Friday, justices at the UK's highest court overturned the Court of Appeal, though some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Lawyers for the lenders told the Supreme Court at a three-day hearing in April the decision was an 'egregious error', while the Financial Conduct Authority intervened in the case and claimed the ruling 'goes too far'. However, the judges upheld a claim brought by one driver under the CCA that his relationship with the finance company had been 'unfair', awarding him the commission amount of £1,650.95 plus interest. Lizzy Comley, chief operating officer of consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, said the ruling still reinforces the right of many consumers to pursue claims. She said: 'This landmark ruling is positive news for the millions of people who have lost money due to the car finance mis-selling. 'The court confirmed that for years, consumers have potentially been unfairly overcharged on car finance agreements, and this ruling reinforces their right to pursue justice and recover the compensation they deserve.' However, others have said that the ruling will make it harder for most claims. Nicola Pangbourne, partner at Kennedys law firm, said: 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation. There's now quite a few hurdles they've got to get through.' Industry experts have suggested the ruling will be broadly seen as a success for lenders, who had been preparing for significant compensation payments. Caroline Wayman, global head of financial Services at PA Consulting, said: 'Lenders will breathe a sigh of relief at the ruling, but it should still be a wake-up call for firms to scrutinise any large, undisclosed commissions in their business. 'Firms should ask themselves whether it still feels justifiable or could be considered unfair, particularly if they haven't disclosed commercial ties to the broker and it won't be enough to expect customers to have read and understood the fine print.' On Friday, a spokesperson for the Financial Conduct Authority said after the ruling that it would confirm whether it will consult on any such scheme by 8am on Monday. They said: 'We want to bring greater certainty for consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible.'


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Isak negotiations in the balance
It was a busy Friday, with Liverpool making a first official bid for Alexander Reds have tabled an offer of £110m, which was rejected by Newcastle Liverpool are prepared to walk away from negotiations and BBC Sport understands they do not think a deal for Isak is achievable this summer as it can read more on the saga here and get fan thoughts and opinion on the page below.