Trump Accounts 'Backdoor Way' to Privatize Social Security: Scott Bessent
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said new investment savings accounts for young Americans could help privatize Social Security.
Speaking at an event hosted by right-wing news outlet Breitbart on Wednesday, Bessent described the president's new "Trump accounts"—which offer a one-time $1,000 government contribution paid into a special account—as a "backdoor for privatizing Social Security."
Social Security—often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics due to its fundamental importance—is a federally administered social insurance system that pays out benefits, mostly for retired and disabled Americans.
The comments have sparked fierce reaction from Social Security advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers.
What Did Bessent Say?
"But in a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security," Bessent said at the event. "Like, Social Security is a defined benefit plan paid out that—to the extent that if all of a sudden these accounts grow, and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement—then that's a game changer too."
He later clarified in a post on X that the new accounts "are an additive benefit for future generations, which will supplement the sanctity of Social Security's guaranteed payments." He added: "This is not an either-or question: our Administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money."
A Treasury Department spokesperson told Newsweek via email: "Trump Accounts are an additive government program that work in conjunction with Social Security to broaden and increase the savings and wealth of Americans. Social Security is a critical safety net for Americans and always will be. This Administration has not just fought tirelessly for seniors but is also fighting for the next generation. Under President Trump's leadership, more Americans will reap the benefits of our booming economy than ever before."
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks during a ceremony for U.S. National Day at the World Expo 2025 on July 19, 2025, in Osaka, Japan.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks during a ceremony for U.S. National Day at the World Expo 2025 on July 19, 2025, in Osaka, Japan.
Tomohiro Ohsumi/GETTY
What Are Trump Accounts?
The accounts, which are seeded with a $1,000 contribution from the federal government, let parents of children born during 2025 through 2028 contribute up to $5,000 annually for each child, with additional contributions allowed from employers. The money must be invested in portfolios linked to U.S. stock indexes, following a structure similar to individual retirement accounts.
Withdrawals are penalty-free after age 59½, or earlier if used to pay for college costs or a first home purchase. They were signed into law as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic spending legislation.
Reaction
There has been no shortage of reaction to Bessent's comments, particularly from groups that advocate for the preservation of Social Security benefits and retired and/or disabled Americans.
"That is a terrible idea," said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works. "Unlike private savings, Social Security is a guaranteed earned benefit that you can't outlive. It has stood strong through wars, recessions, and pandemics. The American people have a message for Trump and Bessent: Keep Wall Street's hands off our Social Security!"
"President Trump should promptly denounce Treasury Secretary Bessent's promotion of a 'backdoor' way to privatize Social Security," Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, adding that the American people "do not want their hard-earned Social Security benefits handed over to Wall Street."
Democratic lawmakers also seized on Bessent's comments.
"Like every Republican administration going back multiple generations, Trump and his billionaire cabinet want to privatize Social Security to give their Wall Street buddies a payday," Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden said. "This would be a disaster for seniors and for all Americans who will rely on Social Security for a dignified retirement, and it's a guarantee that Republicans would follow up privatization with brutal cuts that would drive vulnerable people into destitution."
Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed said on X that privatizing Social Security would turn it "from a dependable safety net to a risky profit center for moneyed special interests at the expense of everyday Americans."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump orders a 35% tariff for goods from Canada, citing a lack of cooperation on illicit drugs
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has raised the tariff rate on U.S. imports from Canada to 35% from 25%, effective Friday. The announcement from the White House late Thursday said Canada had failed to 'do more to arrest, seize, detain or otherwise intercept … traffickers, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.' Trump has heckled Canada for months and suggested it should become its 51st U.S. state. He had threatened to impose the higher tariff on Canada if no deal was reached by Friday, his deadline for reaching trade agreements with dozens of countries. Earlier Thursday, the president said Canada's announcement it will recognize a Palestinian state would 'make it very hard' for the United States to reach a trade agreement with its northern neighbor. Trump has also expressed frustration with a trade deficit with Canada that largely reflects oil purchases by America. Prime Minister Mark Carney had tempered expectations over tariffs, saying Ottawa would only agree to a deal 'if there's one on the table that is in the best interests of Canadians.' In a statement released early Friday, he said he was disappointed by Trump's actions and vowed to diversify Canada's exports. 'Canada accounts for only 1% of U.S. fentanyl imports and has been working intensively to further reduce these volumes,' he said, pointing to heavy investments in border security. Carney added that some industries — including lumber, steel, aluminum and automobiles — will be harder hit, but said his government will try to minimize the impact and protect Canadian jobs. Canada was not included in Trump's updated list of tariff rates on other countries announced late Thursday. Those import duties are due to take effect on Aug. 7. Trump sent a letter to Canada a few weeks ago warning he planned to raise duties on many goods imported from Canada to 35%, deepening the rift between the two North American countries that has undermined their decades-old alliance. Some imports from Canada are still protected by the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which is up for renegotiation next year. The White House's statement said goods transshipped through Canada that are not covered by the USMCA would be subject to a 40% tariff rate. It did not say where the goods might originate. President Donald Trump said Thursday that there would be a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico after a call with that country's leader, Claudia Sheinbaum, keeping 25% tariff rates in place.
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Suffers Major Legal Blow Over Migrant Protections
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump suffered a legal setback Thursday after a federal judge ruled against his administration's efforts to end Temporary Protected Status for tens of thousands of migrants. The decision extends protections for more than 60,000 people from Central America and Asia, including Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua, halting plans to revoke their legal status. Temporary Protected Status shields certain immigrants in the U.S. from deportation and allows them to work legally if their home countries are deemed unsafe due to disasters or political unrest. The protection can be extended by the Homeland Security secretary. Kristi Noem moved to end TPS for tens of thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans, arguing their home countries were now safe and that they had made "significant progress" in recovering from 1998's Hurricane Mitch, one of the deadliest Atlantic storms in history. But U.S. District Judge Trina L. Thompson said the administration ended the migrant status protections without an "objective review of the country conditions" such as political violence in Honduras and the impact of recent hurricanes and storms in Nicaragua.
CNBC
7 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: New Trump tariffs (August remix) have dropped
The first time U.S. President Donald Trump unveiled his "reciprocal" tariffs on the rest of the world, the April 2 event had a cinematic, even grand, quality. It took place at the White House Rose Garden. There was a live band playing, according to The Wall Street Journal. Trump hoisted huge physical charts of his tariff rates, which were helpfully color-coded for visual clarity. This time, Trump's updated "reciprocal" tariffs, released the night before they come into effect on Aug. 1, seemed in comparison stripped of pomp and glamor. The White House's executive order popped up around 7 p.m. ET, just as people in the U.S. were getting off work. There was no live event, no big chart and certainly no entertainment — just a stern website with a black-and-white table. That austerity — and, one might even say, stealth — surrounding the recent announcement suggests two things. First, the White House could be aware that the dramatic shock of tariffs has less power to sway trade deals when staged a second time. The "90 deals in 90 days" that trade advisor Peter Navarro had promised in April are, after all, nowhere in sight. Trump, however, still left ajar the door to making "some kind of a deal." Second, the U.S. might actually be pleased with the effects of its higher-than-expected tariffs on countries without deals, and is willing to keep levies at those levels. In June, the U.S. Treasury Department reported an unexpected surplus thanks to tariff revenue, which were more than four times higher from a year ago. And economists aren't as alarmed by tariff-driven inflation as they once were. All that's speculation, of course. The order could have been released in this low-key fashion simply because the Rose Garden is now more like a Concrete Path. Or perhaps Trump doesn't want the penguins on the Heard and McDonald islands to hear about his levies this time. The U.S. rejigs tariff rates ahead of Aug. 1 deadline. Trump's executive order also imposed a 40% duty on all goods considered to have been transshipped to America. Here's how Asian leaders are reacting to the announcement, made Thursday evening stateside. The S&P 500 falls, retreating from an intraday high. Microsoft shares, however, rose around 4% to push the company's market cap above $4 trillion. Asia-Pacific markets — and tech giants, in particular — fell on Friday as investors digest latest tariff developments. Apple beats expectations for profit and revenue. The Cupertino-based company's iPhone sales grew 13% year over year, while overall revenue rose 10% in its fiscal third quarter, the fastest growth since December 2021. Amazon's gloomy guidance overshadows its earnings. Even though the company surpassed Wall Street's estimates for its second-quarter results, its expected operating income for the current quarter wasn't as high as analysts had hoped for. [PRO] Novo Nordisk's stock plunge isn't that surprising. On Tuesday, the firm's shares fell as much as 26% after it slashed its full-year guidance — and appointed a new CEO. Here's why companies tend to make both announcements simultaneously. Tariff turmoil: How global CEOs are shifting gears In interviews with CNBC this earnings season, CEOs across industries sent a clear message: tariffs are no longer just a political tactic. As trade rules grow more uncertain and tariffs resurface in policy discussions, business leaders say they're rethinking everything from where factories are located to how products are priced. The old "just in time" model is giving way to something more cautious: make goods closer to the buyer, ask for exemptions where possible, and stay alert to shifting consumer habits. —
