Kooyong election results: Teal doctor Monique Ryan - who doesn't answer journalists' questions, has a rogue husband who tears down candidates' signs - celebrates victory after being pooed on by a bird on election day
Teal independent MP Monique Ryan has retained her inner Melbourne seat after a fraught election campaign, including an investigation by the electoral taskforce.
With 56.1 per cent of the vote counted, the former paediatric neurologist held an estimated lead of about four per cent in affluent Kooyong over Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer.
'We're still waiting for some data to come in,' she told supporters at the Auburn Hotel late on Saturday night.
'But it seems pretty clear that despite the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, this band of brothers has overcome the Brethren.'
The comment was a clear swipe at members of secretive Christian sect the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, which was campaigning for Ms Hamer.
While Ms Hamer is yet to concede, Dr Ryan concluded her speech with 'let's have a party' as Tina Turner's River Deep Mountain High blared through the venue.
Earlier on Saturday, Dr Ryan experienced a 'good luck' omen when a bird pooed on her outside Glenferrie Primary School in Hawthorn, where she would cast her vote.
But the road to re-election has been chaotic over the five-week campaign with Dr Ryan facing a series of controversies.
The MP told Nine News on election day that the streets in her electorate had been 'tense' up until the last fortnight.
'There was more tension then there normally would be [at polling booths], it felt uncomfortable,' she said.
A week before election day, April 27, Dr Ryan came under fire after footage emerged of two campaign volunteers claiming they were told by the Hubei Association to support her.
The group has previously been accused of working with the Chinese Communist Party's United Front Department, a foreign influence operations agency.
As a result, the Australian Electoral Commission referred it to the Electoral Integrity Assurance Taskforce, a move which was welcomed by the Teal MP.
The drama surrounding her campaign kicked off in March when her husband, Peter Jordan, was filmed removing a sign backing Ms Hamer.
'I unreservedly apologise for removing the sign. It was a mistake,' Mr Jordan later told Daily Mail Australia.
'I believed the sign was illegally placed, but I should have reported my concerns to council.'
Dr Ryan also issued her own apology, saying it should not have happened.
In a video that circulated on social media in April, leading spine neurosurgeon Professor Greg Malham could be seen tearing down one of her corflutes.
'Just finishing the job, boys. Always gotta bury the body,' he said to the camera after stomping on the sign multiple times.
Prof Malham apologised for his behaviour and agreed to fully co-operate with an independent investigation by Epworth Healthcare, the private hospital he works with.
Dr Ryan also endured a series of painful media interviews while campaigning, including being laughed at by an ABC presenter after failing to answer a simple question.
Referring to independent MP Allegra Spender paying social media content providers 'to make videos talking about the great things she is doing', Insiders host David Speers asked Dr Ryan if she had a problem with that.
The Teal MP at first looked confused at the question, then fumbled over an answer, eventually saying: 'We pay to generate the content we put to the voters.'
A week later, she then turned her back on a Sky News reporter as she attempted to ask her about Ms Spender's social media content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
a day ago
- Western Telegraph
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Nearly 20 families and several faith schools brought the legal challenge (Aaron Chown/PA) Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.
North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.
Rhyl Journal
a day ago
- Rhyl Journal
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.
