England and Wales Population Surges by a Near Record 706,900
The rise of 706,900 people year-on-year, or 1.2%, was the second-largest in records going back to 1949, the Office for National Statistics said.
Net migration totaled over 690,000 as 1.14 million people arrived from outside the UK, eclipsing the 452,200 who left for a country outside the UK. Meanwhile 596,012 people were born and 566,030 died.
The figures will make difficult reading for Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is under pressure to bring down both legal and so-called irregular migration, amid worries about the strain that the rising population is placing on public services such as housing, education and the National Health Service. These concerns have helped to fuel the rise of Nigel Farage's upstart Reform UK party, which is now consistently polling above the ruling Labour party.
Protests around migration to the UK developed into far-right riots in the summer of 2024, and Starmer is keen to avoid a repeat of that situation this year. But already, demonstrations around some of the hotels housing asylum seekers waiting for their claims to be processed — in the Essex constituency of Epping, for example — have descended into violence.
At the start of this year, the ONS said the UK's population would hit 72.5 million by mid-2032, an upward revision of more than 100,000. That meant an increase of 7.3% driven entirely by net migration, as births and deaths roughly equalize.
It assumed the number of people coming to the UK, minus those leaving, would settle at 340,000 per year onwards from 2027-28, up from previous estimates of 315,000.
But since then, Starmer has been cracking down on immigration. He has proposed restricting a number of routes for legal migrants, including entirely ending the recruitment of social care workers from overseas. Hundreds of thousands of people had entered the country through that route since it was launched in 2020, but it had been heavily abused by unscrupulous employers charging would-be recruits.
Earlier restrictions placed on migration by the previous Conservative government prompted net migration to the UK to almost halve in 2024 to 431,000.
The fall was driven by fewer people coming to work and study in the UK. However the number of irregular migrants arriving across the English Channel on dangerous small boats has hit a record in the first six months of this year, causing criticism of Starmer and his plan to 'smash the gangs' of people smugglers.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump tariff blitz unleashes delayed shock to global economy
Bloomberg Live Events Bloomberg Four months after Donald Trump shocked the world and roiled markets by unveiling a placard full of tariff rates at the White House Rose Garden, his revisions unveiled Thursday generated a more subdued response among at an average of 15%, the world is still facing some of the steepest US tariffs since the 1930s, roughly six times higher than they were a year ago. Trump's latest volley outlined minimum 10% baseline levies, with rates of 15% or more for countries with trade surpluses with the far, the global economy has held up better than many economists expected after Trump's initial tariff blitz . A rush to beat the elevated rates spurred a front-loading of exports, aiding many Asian economies and shielding US consumers from price spikes.'For the rest of the world, this is a serious demand shock,' Raghuram Rajan , former India central bank governor and chief economist of the International Monetary Fund , who is now a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, told Bloomberg TV on Friday. 'You will see a lot of central banks contemplating cutting as the rest of the world slows somewhat in the face of these tariffs.'The months of negotiations, marked by Trump's social-media threats against US allies and foes alike, ended with new rates that were largely in line or lower than those on April 2, which were paused after stocks plummeted and bond yields surged. Still, there were some shocks, such as a punitive 39% rate for imports from Switzerland and an increase on some Canadian goods to 35%.Wall Street traders drove stocks to their worst session since May, fuelled by weak jobs and manufacturing data. The S&P 500 fell 1.5% as of 11:17 a.m. New York on US two-year debt — among the most sensitive to changes in monetary policy — slumped 21 basis points to a one-month low at 3.75% as money markets added aggressively to wagers on Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts. The Bloomberg Dollar Index tumbled as much as 1%, snapping a six-day Trump's new rates provide some certainty to manufacturers, plenty of tariff uncertainty remains. The US president is expected to unveil separate tariffs on imports of pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals and other key industrial products in the coming weeks. And US courts are still assessing the legality of the 'reciprocal' past four months have also shown an increased willingness by Trump to use tariffs to settle geopolitical scores. While the 'Liberation Day' rates followed a crude formula linked broadly to a nation's trade deficit, the ensuing numbers appeared more arbitrary. Trump threatened Brazil over domestic politics, India over its ties with Russia and Canada over plans to recognise a Palestinian the new levies go ahead in seven days as planned and if deals on car tariffs with the European Union, Japan and South Korea stick, Bloomberg Economics estimates the average US tariff rate will rise to 15.2% from 13.3% — up significantly from just 2.3% before Trump took office.'It's a very high tariff wall,' said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy of the Hinrich Foundation. 'The cost is going to be significantly higher for American companies and American consumers who will respond surely by buying less.'Applying model results used by the Federal Reserve in the first trade war, Bloomberg Economics calculates the 12.8-percentage-point hike in the average tariff since Trump came back into office could cut US GDP by 1.8% and lift core prices by 1.1% over a period of two to three create downside risks for exporters that rely on US demand Economics reckon Canada and Mexico, which has an additional 90 days to negotiate, are 'well placed to weather the storm' thanks to carve outs for compliant goods compliant with the USMCA trade deal. The EU, Japan and South Korea — all with 15% rates — also come off better than by contrast, was hit hard with a tariff of 39% on its products. The franc was initially among the worst performing major currencies on Friday after the announcement, but it rebounded after weaker-than-expected US jobs Trade Representative Jamieson Greer cast the negotiations with Switzerland as complicated in a Bloomberg Television interview Friday, noting that the country has a large trade deficit with the US and pointing to its pharmaceutical industry exports.'They ship enormous amounts of pharmaceuticals to our country. We want to be making pharmaceuticals in our country. So this is a challenging situation,' Greer more broadly indicated that talks would continue with many economies eager to lower the rates Trump is setting.'I woke up this morning to a number of trade ministers texting me and emailing me,' he said. 'I'm always going to talk to these folks, and you know, if they have proposals, you know, I'll talk to them and I'll brief the president.'Thursday's tariff news didn't apply to China. Trump is set to make a call on whether to extend a tariff truce after talks wrapped in Stockholm this week. A Chinese official earlier said the two sides agreed to keep levies at their current levels for now, part of a trade truce after President Xi Jinping's government cut off the US from rare earth magnets in the wake of the April 2 did include a provision to impose a 40% additional tariff on goods deemed to be transshipped, a measure that appeared aimed at China, but it lacked clarity on how such a ruling will be made.'This provides a bit more clarity but there remains substantial uncertainty for manufacturers,' said Jonathan Kearns, Sydney-based chief economist at money manager Challenger Ltd. 'We've seen numerous changes in the US tariff regime to date and there could always be more. Companies will be wary of investing and setting plans while uncertainty remains.'Kearns, a former central bank official, said he expects greater pass through to the US consumer in the months on Friday downplayed concerns about the lack of clarity over transshipped goods.'Sometimes when companies say we want certainty, what they mean is we want a different outcome,' he said on Bloomberg Trump administration is hoping the new tariff regime will bring in revenue, shrink the trade deficit and spur companies to set up factories on US shores — all without driving up prices or cratering since Trump's Rose Garden rollout in April, he's faced criticism for over promising on trade deals after he and aides vowed to broker numerous agreements, with at least one pledging '90 deals in 90 days.' Economists are also warning US households will pay a price — with the blow depending on how the burden is split between exporters prepared to eat slimmer margins to retain sales and their US importers.'Unlike Trade War 1.0, when Chinese exporters and the RMB bore the brunt of the adjustment, this time round since tariffs are universal with minimum rate of 10%, there would likely be some pass-through to the US consumers,' said Selena Ling, an economist at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. in Singapore. 'This may complicate the picture for the Fed.'Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell this week shrugged off pressure from the White House and rejected arguments for an interest-rate cut from two dissenting officials, maintaining that the central bank needed to stay on guard against inflation risk, while the labor market remained the jobs report for July, released Friday, showed strong evidence of a slowing labor market — prompting Trump to renew his attacks on the Fed chief for not lowering rates, and investors to step up bets on a cut at the next to be seen is whether the US levies spur more tariff barriers around the globe. While the EU has placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and others have mulled similar curbs on cheap Chinese goods, most have eschewed Trump's protectionist push.'While we haven't returned entirely to a 'law of the jungle' system, we have taken several huge strides back in that direction,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.'Don't assume this is the end of the story,' he added. 'Trump regards this as an ongoing reality show. More 'deals' or further tariff increases are almost certain to follow.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
Trump says he will 'release everything' related to Epstein Files amid reports of FBI redacting his name
Amid backlash, US President Donald Trump said that he will 'release everything' related to the Epstein Files. Trump's proclamation came after reports emerged that the FBI is redacting his name from the document before public release read more The clamour for releasing the Epstein files has overshadowed Trump's desperate bid to highlight the success of his first six months in power because it's not his rivals but his own base, which is up in arms. File image Hours after an explosive report revealed that the FBI 'redacted' US President Donald Trump's name from the Epstein Files, the American leader said that he wants to release 'everything" about the document revealing the ill-deeds of convicted sex offender and British financier Jeffrey Epstein. The proclamation from the president came amid growing backlash even among Republicans over his administration's reluctance to release the files. Trump's recent comment also marked a flip-flop from his previous assertion when he questioned the 'fascination" of his supporters with the case, dubbing it 'pretty boring stuff'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During an interview with Newsmax, the president also gave an insight into Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's conversation with the deceased sex offender's convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, which went on for nine hours at a federal prison estate in Florida. 'I think [Blanche] probably wanted to know, you know, just to get a feeling of it, because we'd like to release everything, but we don't want people to get hurt that shouldn't be hurt,' Trump told Newsmax host Rob Finnerty. 'I want to release everything,' the president declared. 'I just don't want people to get hurt.' BREAKING: Trump says he wants to release 'everything' related to Epstein files… Wait… So Obama didn't 'write them' and it's not a 'hoax,' after the FBI redacted his name? — Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) August 2, 2025 'Todd went in, and I think he just wants to make sure that innocent people aren't hurt,' Trump added. However, the president maintained that he hasn't spoken with his deputy attorney general about Maxwell and doesn't know if there are plans to release a transcript of the interview. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD FBI reportedly redacted Trump's name from Epstein Files While the Trump administration often boasted about being 'transparent', an explosive report revealed that the president's name was redacted from documents surrounding the investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as the administration prepared for their potential public release. According to a report by Bloomberg, an investigator in the case reportedly blacked out Trump's name and the names of other high-profile figures, claiming that the information constituted an 'unwarranted invasion of privacy". In a previous report from The Wall Street Journal, it was mentioned that Attorney General Pam Bondi told the president that his name was in the files back in May. The matter garnered public anger in July after the Department of Justice and the FBI declined to release any additional documents. Public scrutiny of Trump's connections to Epstein and the financier's crimes and circumstances of his death intensified soon after the memo was released. In February this year, the White House handed over binders of largely publicly available Epstein-related documents to several far-right influencers in an apparent effort to prove that the administration was being transparent about the files. At that time, Bondi called the release of the documents the 'first phase' and went on to tell Fox News that other documents, including the so-called 'client list', are sitting on her desk for review. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, in the July memo, the FBI and DoJ backtracked and said that there is 'no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials' despite demands from MAGA supporters and allies for full accountability. Hence, it remains unclear whether the Trump administration would ever release the full Epstein Files.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
Cornell nears $100 mn White House deal to restore frozen research funds
One of the issues still under discussion is whether the pact would call for a resolution monitor to supervise how Cornell is carrying out changes required by the US Bloomberg By Akayla Gardner and Nacha Cattan The White House is eyeing a settlement of as much as $100 million in negotiations with Cornell University about an agreement that would reinstate hundreds of millions of dollars in frozen federal research funding, according to people familiar with the matter. A deal could be announced as soon as next week, said the people, who asked not to be named because the talks are private. One of the issues still under discussion is whether the pact would call for a resolution monitor to supervise how Cornell is carrying out changes required by the US — an arrangement accepted by Columbia University in a landmark $221 million deal last month. An agreement would make Cornell the latest Ivy League school to settle with President Donald Trump as the White House probes US colleges over allegations they mishandled antisemitic incidents on campus after the October 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel and the Jewish state's retaliatory response in Gaza. Brown University announced a $50 million deal with the government this week. The Cornell terms are still under discussion and subject to change. One of the people familiar with the talks characterized $100 million as the maximum, while another described it as within the range of $100 million. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said that additional settlements with universities are likely to use the Columbia agreement as a roadmap. That deal included a cash fine for civil-rights violations and a wide set of policy changes. In addition to mounting probes of antisemitism on campus, the administration has also pushed colleges to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion programs and criticized them for political bias against conservatives. The government agreed to restore funding to the University of Pennsylvania after the school reached a deal limiting the participation of transgender athletes in sports. The broad-based push for change has fueled concerns that the government is impinging on academic freedom and seeking to use the universities to advance its own viewpoints and agenda. Harvard University, the primary target of the Trump's pressure campaign, has filed two lawsuits challenging the government's efforts to freeze research funding and block international student enrollment. But the funding freeze has been taking a toll. Cornell warned in June that the pullback of US funding would force it to adopt 'financial austerity in all areas.' Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff said at the time that job cuts would likely be required, in addition to restrictions on discretionary spending and hiring. Cornell's $10.7 billion endowment is one of the smaller funds in the Ivy League.
