Semiconductor ETFs Mixed on News of Intel CEO Hire
FTXL, the First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF rose more than 2% initially, even as broad-market ETFs slipped, before closing with a gain of 0.8%. The fund allocates nearly 9% of its holdings to Intel—the most of any ETF. Intel is the third-biggest holding in the fund.
Wall Street is cheering the move as a sign that the company is ready to make a turnaround and revitalize the business, which has slumped in comparison to its competitors and the broad market.
Source: etf.com
Other ETFs initially benefited from Intel's rise Thursday before falling back.
TINY, the ProShares Nanotechnology ETF rose by more than 2% in morning trading before ending slightly in the red, while CHPS, the Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF, lost 0.2%. Intel is a top-10 holding in both funds.
SOXX, the iShares Semiconductor ETF, and SMH, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, ended mildly lower after the initial jump as well. Both funds hold less than 4% of Intel.
Semiconductors have struggled this year as investors have questioned if aggressive growth from companies like Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) can be maintained.
Source: etf.com
After leading the market for most of last year, semiconductor performance faltered in November as supply and growth concerns weighed down the sector. SMH, the largest semiconductor ETF, has slipped by about 10% so far this year, compared to a 6.4% decline in SPY, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
But chipmakers like Nvidia have said they expect robust growth as demand for AI and cloud computing remains high. The company gave strong guidance on revenue forecasts for the first quarter during its fourth-quarter earnings report.
Last week, President Donald Trump announced a $100 billion investment from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) in American chip manufacturing to build five new factories in the U.S. The president has called advancing American semiconductor manufacturing a matter of "national security."
Editor's note: This article has been revised with closing stock prices as of March 13, 2025, and other edits.Permalink | © Copyright 2025 etf.com. All rights reserved
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's tax law could cause Medicare cuts if Congress doesn't act, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficits caused by President Donald Trump's tax and spending law could trigger automatic cuts to Medicare if Congress does not act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Friday. The CBO estimates that Medicare, the federal health insurance program for Americans over age 65, could potentially see as much as $491 billion from 2027 to 2034 if Congress does not act to mitigate a 2010 law that forces across-the-board cuts to many federal programs once legislation increases the federal deficit. The latest report from CBO showed how Trump's signature tax and spending law could put new pressure on federal programs that are bedrocks of the American social safety net. Trump and Republicans pledged not to cut Medicare as part of the legislation, but the estimated $3.4 trillion that the law adds to the federal deficit over the next decade means that many Medicare programs could still see cuts. In the past, Congress has always acted to mitigate cuts to Medicare and other programs, but it would take some bipartisan cooperation to do so. Democrats, who requested the analysis from CBO, jumped on the potential cuts. 'Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway,' said Rep. Brendan F. Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, in a statement. 'American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump's attacks on Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.' Hospitals in rural parts of the country are already grappling with cuts to Medicaid, which is available to people with low incomes, and cuts to Medicare could exacerbate their shortfalls. As Republicans muscled the bill through Congress and are now selling it to voters back home, they have been highly critical of how CBO has analyzed the bill. They have also argued that the tax cuts will spur economic growth and pointed to $50 billion in funding for rural hospitals that was included in the package.
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Treasury sets limits on remaining wind and solar tax credits
The Treasury Department issued guidance on Friday that narrows which wind and solar energy projects can receive the remaining tax credits that were largely eliminated under the Republicans 'big, beautiful bill.' The legislation passed by Republicans last month axes the credits for projects that don't begin producing electricity by 2028. However, it contains an exemption for projects that begin construction over the next year. Under the law, those projects would remain eligible for the subsidies even if they don't produce electricity under the specified time frame. The Trump administration's new guidance, however, sets further restrictions on which projects are considered having begun construction. It says that construction of these projects must be 'continuous.' It also defines 'having begun construction' as having done 'physical work of a significant nature.' This includes activities like manufacturing equipment and excavating land to begin placing equipment in it. But it excludes activities like only having done surveys, test drilling or excavation for purposes of altering the landscape. The guidance also says that even if the project meets those other requirements, it still must produce electricity by the end of the fourth calendar year after it begins construction. The renewable energy industry criticized the guidance, saying it would slow the buildup of low-carbon energy sources. 'This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power. American families and businesses will pay more for electricity as a result of this action, and China will continue to outpace us in the race for electricity to power AI,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a written statement. Climate advocates hurled similar criticisms. 'The Trump administration's new tax credit guidance represents yet another senseless attack on clean energy that will drive up electricity costs, make our energy grid less reliable, harm our economy and lead to more deaths and disease from harmful air pollution. The guidance places significant new obstacles on solar and wind projects,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel, Environmental Defense Fund, in a written statement. The maneuvers come after disagreements between more moderate and conservative Republicans over how rapidly to eliminate the credits. President Trump apparently told House Freedom Caucus members he would further restrict the tax credits if they supported his bill. After it passed, he issued an executive order telling the Treasury Department to take a strict approach to limit the tax incentives. Trump has also in recent weeks used other policies to go after renewables, including efforts to slow federal approvals of wind and solar projects. Even before it came out, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and John Curtis (R-Utah), who are more supportive of renewables than many of their GOP colleagues, raised concerns about the Treasury guidance.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
One of America's most respected investors says the ‘Magnificent Seven' isn't overvalued — the rest of the market is
Despite a handful of tech stocks contributing to most of the S&P 500's gain this year, esteemed investor Howard Marks doesn't think the 'Magnificent Seven' stocks look overvalued. Instead, he views the rest of the stock market as potentially problematic. Marks is the co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, an investment firm with a history of generating returns through deals in distressed credit and equities. He has written a handful of books about investing and gained the respect of investing legend Warren Buffett. Homeowners rush to refinance as mortgage-rate plunge opens window of opportunity I'm a senior who barely survives on $1,300 a month. No way could I live on $1,000. Intel's stock pops. Will Trump come to the rescue with unprecedented government help? In a recent memo, Marks shared his current thoughts on how investors should think about value, and how that relates to the market right now. Value is tied to an asset's fundamentals, he argued, saying it matters over the long run, regardless of what the market is doing at a given moment. Marks pointed to a memo he wrote about the dot-com bubble in January 2000, and in January 2025 he published another note about current valuations, titled 'On Bubble Watch.' Here's how he views the dangers in markets when things become too optimistic or pessimistic: 'When the majority of investors are optimistic, they cause price to rise and potentially exceed value. And when the pessimists reign, they cause price to decline and potentially fall short of value.' Marks notes that the S&P 500 SPX returned 58% over the course of 2023 and 2024, and just over half of those gains came from the 'Magnificent Seven' stocks, which are Apple AAPL, Microsoft MSFT, Alphabet GOOG, Amazon AMZN, Meta Platforms META, Nvidia NVDA and Tesla TSLA. While that was historically unusual, Marks said he didn't think those seven stocks were overvalued, using price-to-earnings as a metric to measure value. 'Because of these companies' greatness, their stocks are highly valued, and there's a popular perception that their elevated valuations are responsible for the S&P 500's unusually high average p/e ratio. The fact is their p/e ratios average out to roughly 33. This is certainly an above-average figure, but I don't find it unreasonable when viewed against what I believe to be the companies' exceptional products, significant market shares, high incremental profit margins and strong competitive moats,' he said. However, when looking at the rest of the S&P 500 companies, Marks saw some valuations that weren't justified. 'Rather, I think it's the average p/e ratio of 22 on the 493 non-Magnificent companies in the index — well above the mid-teens average historical p/e for the S&P 500 — that renders the index's overall valuation so high and possibly worrisome,' he said. You can read more, here, on his views on fundamentals, sentiment, prices, valuations and more. But here's a final nugget: 'The existence of overvaluation can never be proved, and there's no reason to think the conditions discussed above imply there'll be a correction anytime soon. But, taken together, they tell me the stock market has moved from 'elevated' to 'worrisome.'' CoreWeave's lockup is about to expire. What that could mean for the stock. 'I am a senior citizen': My car needs $3,500 for repairs, but only has a trade-in value of $6,000. Do I bother fixing it? Dow ends just shy of record after touching new intraday high, as Buffett gives Wall Street a boost
