
Japan Reacts to Trump Tariff Threat
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A senior Japanese official sidestepped U.S. President Donald Trump's warning that higher tariffs were coming for Tokyo because he did not see a trade deal happening, despite ongoing talks between the two countries.
Trump said talks were stuck due to a Japanese refusal to accept U.S. rice imports in exchange for selling millions of cars into the American market, which the president called an "easy" demand for Tokyo to accept, Reuters reported.
He said Japan could face a tariff of 30 to 35 percent if no deal is made, higher than the 24 percent reciprocal tariff Trump had originally imposed, and then paused, in early April. The tariff pause ends on July 9.
"We are aware of President Trump's remarks, but we would like to refrain from commenting on every statement made by U.S. government officials," Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki said at a press briefing on Wednesday, July 2.
"Having said that, I would like to mention that Japan and the United States are continuing sincere and earnest consultations vigorously, and during Minister Akazawa's recent visit to the United States, it was agreed to continue vigorous consultations between Japan and the United States.
"Japan intends to continue sincere and earnest discussions vigorously toward realizing an agreement that benefits both Japan and the United States."
Ryosei Akazawa is Japan's economic revitalization minister and has been leading the trade talks with the U.S. on behalf of Tokyo, regularly visiting Washington.
This is a developing article. Updates to follow.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says deal for ceasefire in Gaza is closer after Israel agrees on terms
CAIRO (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump says Israel has agreed on terms for a new 60-day ceasefire with Hamas and that Washington would work with both sides during that time to try to end more than 20 months of war in Gaza. Neither side has accepted the proposal announced Tuesday by Trump, who has admonished Hamas that if the militant group does not buy into the offer, its prospects will get worse. It's not clear what conditions Israel agreed to. The efforts to reach a truce are unfolding in the wake of powerful Israeli and American strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, which has long supported Hamas, and just days before Trump is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington. Here's a look at the situation and the challenges it might present. Details of the proposed ceasefire are just beginning to emerge. But rather than being completely new, the potential deal seems to be a somewhat modified version of a framework proposed earlier this year by Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Trump said Tuesday in a social media post that Qatar and Egypt have been working on the details and would deliver a final proposal to Hamas. An Egyptian official involved in the ceasefire talks told The Associated Press that the proposal calls for Hamas to release 10 more hostages during the two-month period — eight on the first day and two on the final day. During that period, Israel would withdraw troops from some parts of Gaza and allow badly needed aid into the territory. The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. The group is believed to still have some 50 hostages, with fewer than half of them thought to be alive. The Egyptian official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to reporters, said a sticking point over how aid would be distributed had been resolved with Israel. He said both sides have agreed that the United Nations and the Palestinian Red Crescent would lead aid operations and that the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund would also continue to operate. The unraveling of Iran's regional network of proxies, capped by the blow inflicted on Iran during the recent 12-day war with Israel, has left Hamas weaker and more isolated in the region. Iran was a key backer of the militant group, but its influence has waned, and it's now preoccupied with its own problems. At the same time, Trump has made it clear to Israel that he wants to see the Israel-Hamas war end soon. While he has been supportive of Netanyahu, Trump had tough words for Israel in the opening hours of last week's ceasefire with Iran, when he pressured Israel to scale back its response to an Iranian missile attack. That could help persuade Hamas to embrace a deal. A diplomat briefed on the talks said there is now a 'big opportunity' to reach an agreement. 'The indications we're getting are people are ready.' He said Trump's harsh talk toward Israel has 'given a bit of confidence to Hamas' that the U.S. will guarantee any future deal and prevent a return to fighting. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing behind-the-scenes diplomatic contacts. The Egyptian official said Israel has not yet agreed to a proposal to withdraw its forces to positions held in early March after a previous ceasefire officially expired. Since then, the Israeli army has seized large swaths of Gaza to put pressure on Hamas, and it's not clear whether Israel is ready to return to those same positions. An Israeli official characterized the agreement as a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory. The mediators and the U.S. would provide assurances about talks on ending the war, but Israel is not committing to that as part of the latest proposal, said the official, who was not authorized to discuss the details of the deal with the media and spoke on condition of anonymity. The Egyptian official said Hamas will have to review the proposal with other factions before submitting an official response. One point that does seem to have been ironed out is the question of who will administer Gaza. Israel has said Hamas cannot run the territory, and the Egyptian official said the proposal would instead put Gaza under a group of Palestinians without political affiliations known as the Community Support Committee once a ceasefire is reached. Potentially complicating the effort, Netanyahu reiterated his hard-line position Wednesday, vowing that 'there will be no Hamas' following the 60-day ceasefire plan. A previous ceasefire agreed to in January established three phases, but the two sides never made it past phase one. During that time, however, there were multiple exchanges of Hamas-held hostages for prisoners held by Israel, and critical humanitarian aid was able to reach Gaza. When phase one expired on March 1, Israel sought to extend it while Hamas argued that phase two should go ahead as planned. The second phase would have compelled Hamas to release all the remaining living hostages in exchange for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and a full Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. That was always seen as difficult, because it would have forced Israel to choose between its two main war goals — the safe return of the hostages and the annihilation of Hamas. On March 18, Israel broke the ceasefire with new airstrikes and resumed hostilities. In Gaza, residents expressed hope that this time, a ceasefire will bring an end to the war. 'We are seriously tired,' said Asmaa al-Gendy, who has been living in a tent camp in Deir al Balah with her two children. The family has been displaced and starved and endured 'every form of torture in the world.' ___ Rising reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writers Josef Federman in Jerusalem and Wafaa Shurafa in Deir al Balah, Gaza Strip, contributed to this report.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Did Vistra Stock Drop Today?
Electric utility Vistra operates nuclear power plants that can help power an artificial intelligence (AI) future. President Trump wants to promote nuclear power usage. "The Wall Street Journal" warns this may take longer to accomplish than the president thinks. 10 stocks we like better than Vistra › Shares of electric utility and nuclear power plant operator Vistra (NYSE: VST) stock tumbled 4.1% through 12:55 p.m. ET Tuesday after The Wall Street Journal warned investors that President Trump's plan to kick-start a nuclear power renaissance in America "won't be easy." Shares of Vistra have rocketed this past year, up more than 120%, on hopes that artificial intelligence's (AI) insatiable demand for electric power will spur demand for more nuclear power plants to supply that demand -- and on President Trump's promises to support the nuclear sector, including by instructing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to decide on reactor design applications within 18 months of filing. That's an aggressive target, and it may not be realistic. Ordinarily, applications take as long as five years to approve. According to the Journal, it's more likely that nuclear power supply will grow -- if it does grow at all -- through "extending the operating licenses of existing reactors or trying to restart a handful of recently closed reactors." In contrast, past efforts to accelerate construction of nuclear plants, historically, "didn't pan out." Unless this time is different -- as the saying goes -- prospects for Vistra growing dramatically may not pan out either. But this doesn't necessarily mean you should sell Vistra stock. Even based on just what we already know, analysts forecast strong earnings growth for Vistra going forward -- better than 20% annually. That's almost fast enough growth to justify the stock's 27.5x earnings valuation, even without a nuclear renaissance. And Vistra stock's about 20% cheaper when valued on free cash flow than when valued on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) earnings, too. At 23x FCF and paying a modest 0.5% dividend yield, Vistra stock looks almost cheap enough to buy. Before you buy stock in Vistra, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vistra wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $722,181!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $968,402!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Did Vistra Stock Drop Today? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin Rebounds Toward $110K, Presaging What Could Be a Volatile July
Bitcoin BTC is bouncing hard towards $110,000 on Wednesday, shrugging off Tuesday's brief risk-off wave that dragged the price below $106,000. Recently, the largest crypto traded at its strongest price since June 11, around $109,500, up 3.5% over the past 24 hours. The action came as Donald Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam, helping risk assets across the board. The Nasdaq at midday is ahead 0.8%. Under the deal, the U.S. will impose a 20% tariff on goods from Vietnam and a 40% levy on transshipped goods—products routed through Vietnam on their way to the U.S. U.S. exports, in turn, will face no tariffs when entering the Vietnamese market. Boosting crypto sentiment specifically could be the debut of the REX-Osprey Solana + Staking ETF (SSK), the first such crypto staking product available in the U.S. "Volume in $SSK now at $20M, which is really strong, top 1% for a new launch," wrote Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas a short while ago. Balchunas noted that SOLZ — a futures-based SOL ETF that opened for business in March — did just $1 million of volume on its first day of trade. July is shaping up to be a potentially volatile month for bitcoin, driven by Trump administration's policies, according to Vetle Lunde, head of research at K33. Trump is expected to sign a controversial expansionary budget bill dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill" by Friday. The bill, which could widen the U.S. deficit by $3.3 trillion, is seen by some as bullish for scarce assets like BTC, Lunde said. Another key date looming is the July 9 tariff deadline, which could see more aggressive trade posturing from Trump. Thirdly, July 22 is the final deadline for action on long-awaited crypto executive order, with potential updates on the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. "July is crowded with latent Trump volatility," Lunde said. Still, crypto markets are relatively calm without excessive froth, he noted. "There are few reasons to expect a massive broad deleveraging of the crypto market, as crypto-leverage remains contained," he said. "This favors maintaining spot exposure and staying patient as we progress into a period well known for its seasonal apathy."