Modi vows strong response to any 'terrorist attack'
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has vowed to respond strongly to any future "terrorist attack". Photo: Indian Press Information Bureau via AFP
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowed on Monday to respond strongly to any future "terrorist attack", and warned that New Delhi would not tolerate "nuclear blackmail" in the event of further conflict with Pakistan.
A weekend ceasefire appeared to be holding, after four days of intense jetfighter, missile, drone and artillery attacks -- the worst violence between the two nuclear-armed neighbours since 1999.
US President Donald Trump on Monday said American intervention had prevented a "bad nuclear war".
"We stopped a nuclear conflict... millions of people could have been killed," he told reporters at the White House.
Modi, in a televised address to the nation -- his first since hostilities began last Wednesday -- said Pakistan has chosen to attack rather than help it fight "terrorism".
"If another terrorist attack against India is carried out, a strong response will be given," he said.
The alarming spiral towards all-out war began before dawn on Wednesday, when India launched missile attacks destroying what it called "terrorist camps" in the Pakistan-administered part of Kashmir.
"If Pakistan wants to survive, it will have to destroy its terror infrastructure," Modi said.
The conflict followed an April 22 attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir which killed 26 civilians.
India accused Pakistan of backing the attack, but Islamabad denied involvement. (AFP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump considers punitive tariffs, China builds space debris device: SCMP daily highlights
Catch up on some of SCMP's biggest China stories of the day. If you would like to see more of our reporting, please consider subscribing US Vice-President J.D. Vance said that President Donald Trump is 'thinking' about slapping new tariffs on imports from China in response to the country's purchases of Russian oil. China has condemned Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City, urging an immediate halt to military operations in an emergency United Nations Security Council session on Sunday. A nurse takes care of a newborn baby at a hospital in Taizhou, in China's eastern Jiangsu province, on May 12, 2023. Photo: AFP In a major effort to tackle its deepening demographic crisis, China has launched a nationwide childcare subsidy scheme – the first of its kind by the central government.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
India must learn the lessons of US trade deal failure
The failure of trade negotiations between India and the United States after five intense rounds of talks marks a critical moment in the bilateral relationship between the two nations. The US tariff on Indian goods now stands at an eye-watering 50 per cent – 25 per cent effective from August 7, and a further 25 per cent levied to penalise India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The additional tariff, announced last week, is expected to take effect on August 27. With bilateral trade valued at over US$190 billion and India's ambition to increase it to US$500 billion by 2030, both sides will have much to lose as the stand-off escalates. India, one of the world's fastest-growing economies, offers an enticing market of 1.4 billion people, while the US, the world's largest economy, wields significant influence in setting global trade standards. The breakdown of negotiations reveals vulnerabilities in both sides' negotiation strategies, political miscalculations and the impact of broader geopolitical factors. Lessons must be learned if the relationship is to be mended. The negotiation process had begun with optimism. Indian officials, encouraged by US President Donald Trump's statements about a potential 'big' deal, were confident they could secure a rate of 10 to 15 per cent while eliminating tariffs on steel, aluminium and automotive products, according to a Reuters report. These moves reflected India's confidence as an emerging economic power with strong bargaining leverage. However, this confidence proved to be a double-edged sword. Trump's statements, interpreted as positive signals, prompted India to harden its stance, Reuters said.
AllAfrica
8 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's tariffs just hit—so what happens next?
Donald Trump's new international trade tariffs have landed. Some are lower than others, some deals have been done, but overall they are the highest they have been in 100 years. They are also unprecedented in the era of the rules-based trade system that has been in place since 1945. So what happens next? That's a tricky question to answer given that the US president has already pressed the pause button on this economic policy before. But assuming that doesn't happen again straight away, we can make some confident predictions about the consequences. First off, the immediate economic effect will be felt by American consumers. JPMorgan, the biggest bank in the US, estimates that 60% of the cost of Trump's tariffs will be passed directly on to his fellow citizens. And that's just the start. Most goods bought in the US, whether they're electrical items, cars, medical devices, processed foods or makeup sets, are made up of dozens of components, sourced from multiple countries. A finished product may therefore be 'tariffed' several times before it reaches the shelf, adding to the final price rise. Medium-sized businesses are likely to feel the most pain. They have neither the global reach to reorganise their supply chains quickly nor the deep margins to absorb new costs. That means higher prices for the goods they produce. As a result of all of this, things will get more expensive and consumer spending will fall. It's too early to quantify the drop, but survey data shows that households are already cutting back. Businesses will also cut or delay investment in new plants, staff and product lines, as more of their revenue goes on covering higher import taxes. These effects will be inflationary, pushing prices up. They will also be 'recessionary' – in other words, they could cause a recession by cooling demand and investment. The political irony here is striking. Trump's election victory was fueled in part by voter frustration over high inflation early in Joe Biden's presidency. By the time of the election in November 2024, inflation had eased – but the perception that Biden was linked to higher prices (often discussed with reference to the price of eggs in the grocery store) lingered. Now Trump's policy choices look set to drive up prices again, while also risking a significant economic downturn. A US recession would have global consequences. Mexico, China, Canada, Germany and Japan – the countries that export the most goods to the US – are particularly exposed. Together with the US, these economies account for roughly half of global GDP. If US economic activity slows, and its key suppliers follow, that would be enough to trigger a global contraction. The price of eggs can rise and fall. ArturTona / Shutterstock via The Conversation There's also the risk of renewed supply chain delays. Faced with uncertainty about demand, companies will slow or stop new orders. Then, when consumers start buying again, the components needed may not be in stock, delaying production and pushing up costs further. These disruptions tend to cascade through multiple sectors, meaning the impact will be widely felt around the globe. So how long can this tariff regime hold? In April, Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs were rolled back within days under pressure from American businesses that were suddenly paying more for vital imports. Since then, very few countries have signed deals with the US, and the ones that have secured broad agreements rather than binding treaties. That means the political backlash from businesses and consumers could once again force the administration to retreat. For now, the US is testing how far it can push this experiment in protectionism. But the risks are clear: higher prices at home, slower global growth, and a political gamble that may prove costly. Maha Rafi Atal is Adam Smith senior lecturer in political economy, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
