Anger as return of MV Caledonian Isles delayed again
But after it had arrived in Ardrossan Harbour, CalMac announced on Thursday that last minute issues had been picked up during sea trials, meaning it would be delayed until at least Tuesday this week.
However, the latest update is that the ferry will not be back in action until Saturday at the earliest because of a problem with the gearbox.
It has left locals in Ardrossan furious, with dozens of campaigners planning to stage a protest over the ongoing problems with both the ferry and the harbour at Holyrood on Thursday.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes asked to intervene in Ardrossan Harbour talks
In a post on Facebook about the latest Caledonian Isles delay, the Save Ardrossan Harbour group said island communities had been left "stranded".
The group said: "Enough is enough.
"This is just the latest failure in a long line of letdowns caused by CMAL's aging fleet and chronic lack of forward planning. They've ordered ferries that don't fit key harbours and allowed the fleet to decline to a shameful state—leaving Scotland's island communities stranded, frustrated, and ignored.
"To make matters worse, stalled negotiations with Peel Ports have gone nowhere. The situation is unacceptable and growing worse by the day."
Members of the Save Ardrossan Harbour group and the Arran for Ardrossan Harbour campaign – which represent locals either side of the route – are due to gather at Holyrood to demand action is taken over the dilapidated harbour which has needed an upgrade for years.
The MV Glen Sannox and its sister ship the MV Glen Rosa – which is due to come into service next year – are both too large to berth at Ardrossan.
This has resulted in the Glen Sannox having to travel to Arran from Troon since January, which has added about 20 minutes onto each leg of the journey.
READ MORE: SNP minister clashes with BBC Scotland host over Scottish independence
The Glen Sannox is only about to carry out three daily return sailings to Arran from Troon compared to the five that are possible from Ardrossan. While the MV Alfred has been providing extra support when needed, its capacity is much smaller.
There have been no ferries running from Ardrossan for five months, which has left businesses in the town concerned about their future.
The Scottish Government promised seven years ago that Ardrossan would remain the main gateway to Arran and pledged to fund the multi-million-pound upgrade required to accommodate the new ferries.
But the project was paused in 2023 amid concern over rising costs and disagreements over how the bill should be split between the three partners: Peel Ports, North Ayrshire Council and the Scottish Government.
Communities on both sides of the Firth of Clyde are keen to see Ardrossan remain the gateway to Arran given many people in the town travel to the island for work, while Arran residents have medical appointments in Ardrossan.
In February, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop revealed that money had been set aside to take Ardrossan Harbour into public ownership.
But since then, campaigners have lost faith in the progress of negotiations since a meeting with CMAL, Transport Scotland, Peel Ports and CalMac.
Wyllie Hume, chair of the Arran for Ardrossan Harbour group, told the Sunday National he had written directly to Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes to ask her to intervene in the negotiations, but the Scottish Government has said it is "wholly appropriate" CMAL leads the talks on ministers' behalf.
The Save Ardrossan Harbour group post went on: "Are you happy with this situation? If not, it's time to act.
"Join us in protest at the Scottish Parliament this Thursday, 19th June."
The group says there will be a free bus running from Ardrossan at 9.30am which will leave Edinburgh later on at 3pm.
CMAL and CalMac have been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
22 minutes ago
- Daily Record
East Kilbride Labour leader rallies town to ‘win our future back' ahead of Holyrood election
Joe Fagan said Scottish politics was not working for the Scottish people and called for new ideas to make East Kilbride 'new' again. Labour's candidate to become East Kilbride's next MSP rallied supporters to 'win the town's future back' – ramping up the campaign for the Holyrood election next year. Addressing supporters from the local Labour Party and beyond at East Kilbride Arts Centre, Joe Fagan said Scottish politics "was not working for the Scottish people" and called for new ideas to "make East Kilbride 'new' again" and put the Scottish Parliament back to work for Scotland. Rallying supporters, Fagan said: 'East Kilbride is where I live, where I grew up, where I went to school, where I first joined a trade union. It's the place I fight for week-in, week-out as a councillor and a local leader. It would be an honour to speak for my home town in the Scottish Parliament. And I promise then I when I speak for East Kilbride, we will not be ignored.' The East Kilbride MSP seat has been held by SNP MSP Collette Stevenson since 2021. Fagan is the councillor for East Kilbride Central North and Leader of Labour in South Lanarkshire. He grew up in St Leonards and East Mains and attended St Bride's High School. Analysing the problems facing the town, he said: 'East Kilbride is Scotland's first and most successful New Town, built on the promise of good jobs and good homes, where generations of working people came to make a better life and give a better start to their families. Many still do. The town is still growing. But it's not new anymore. 'East Kilbride was disfigured by the privatisation of our most important assets – our industrial estates and our town centre – when the Development Corporation was wound up by the Major Government 30 years ago. East Kilbride lost something of its identity when the Tories abolished our district council, as many suburban towns did, but few with as strong a sense of place or civic pride as East Kilbride. 'East Kilbride lost something of its community when the real consequence of the Right to Buy set in, unprecedented growth in a transient private rented sector now larger than the social rented sector in many of our most established communities. East Kilbride lost industries we built through the New Town years as the world changed and industrial policy was neglected. 'East Kilbride lost out to austerity as years of government funding cuts to councils deprived us of the resources we need to invest in the fabric of our town and in the quality of people's lives." East Kilbride and Strathaven MP Joani Reid; candidate for the neighbouring Clydesdale constituency, Lynsey Hamilton; and summer by-election winner Davy Russell MSP all joined the event to back East Kilbride Labour's campaign. Scottish Labour aim to build on their momentum following their win in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election in constituencies across South Lanarkshire. Fagan added: 'I don't believe that the forces driving decline are unstoppable. I'm here to push back against them. I believe that the choices we make matter. The choices governments make matter. With the most consequential Scottish election in years almost here, it's time to make East Kilbride matter.' In a rallying call to supporters and undecided voters across the town, Fagan called for today's generation to 'win' the town's future back, saying: 'In 1947, East Kilbride was designated a New Town by the post-war Labour Government - a government and a generation with the vision to build the welfare state, to build industry, to build a National Health Service and to build a New Town for the future. Now it is for this generation to win our future back. 'New homes. New jobs. A new town centre. A new public transport system run for passengers, not for profit. A new deal for councils. A new deal for workers. New leadership for our NHS. New ambition for our schools. New direction for our country. Building back for East Kilbride. Fighting back for East Kilbride. Labour's leading the way - and it's the way to make this New Town new again.'
STV News
38 minutes ago
- STV News
Trans lawyers take Supreme Court ruling on biological sex to European court
A group of transgender lawyers are taking the UK to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) over the Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. ITV News Reporter Sam Holder has the latest Words by Assistant Producer Robbie Boyd A group of transgender lawyers have officially sent a case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), claiming that the Supreme Court hearing on biological sex earlier this year breached their right to a fair trial, ITV News can reveal. In April, the UK Supreme Court ruled that transgender women are not women under the Equality Act 2010, including those holding gender recognition certificates (GRCs). During the process, the court heard from gender-critical groups such as Sex Matters and the LGB Alliance, but no one with a GRC was consulted. Campaigners argue that this omission amounts to a breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to a fair trial, and are now challenging it in the European courts. Filed last week, the application arrives at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on Monday, where judges have six months to decide whether it will proceed. The group bringing the claim, the Trans Legal Clinic, is spearheaded by transgender and non-binary lawyers Olivia Campbell-Cavendish and Oscar Davies, as well as the UK's first transgender judge, Dr Victoria McCloud. Dr McCloud, who stepped down last year, had applied to intervene in the Supreme Court case brought by For Women Scotland against the Scottish government, claiming that it could significantly affect legal protections for transgender women with GRCs, but her application was rejected. Speaking with ITV News, Olivia Campbell-Cavendish said: 'The impact on trans people is horrendous, but actually this affects all of us. 'We need a society where decisions about us aren't made without us. We need a society that is fair and equitable, and so that's why we are doing what we are doing.' Olivia Campbell-Cavendish / Credit: The announcement follows For Women Scotland's decision to sue the Scottish government, accusing ministers of defying April's Supreme Court ruling on sex by failing to provide single-sex spaces in schools and prisons. A spokesperson from For Women Scotland said: 'As far as we understand it, it is the SC's prerogative whether to accept interventions or not, it obviously carefully considered McCloud's application and made a decision based on the value of its content. 'The court is solely concerned with statutory interpretation and does not hear personal testimony or take evidence, and rarely takes interventions from individuals. We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECtHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed.' The Scottish government claims it is awaiting the updated guidelines from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which the UK government is using to implement the Supreme Court's April ruling. However, the lack of current detailed guidance has left businesses and public bodies, including the NHS, unclear on how to comply. Minister for Care Stephen Kinnock told ITV News that the Labour government is 'absolutely dedicated to the rule of law', noting that the Supreme Court must abide by international legal frameworks such as the ECHR. 'If there are individuals who believe that something needs to be challenged, then they can bring an appeal; it is their right to do so,' he said. Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning. For Women Scotland's original challenge and the subsequent Supreme Court ruling have already sparked heated debate. Gender-critical campaigners argue the decision protects single-sex spaces and the rights of women and children, while trans rights advocates say it excludes transgender women from legal protections afforded to other women, creating uncertainty and potential discrimination. The ECHR will now consider whether the claim should proceed, a process that could take several months. If the court allows the case to go forward, it will open the first international legal challenge to the UK Supreme Court's definition of a 'woman' under the Equality Act 2010. From Westminster to Washington DC – our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below… Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Reform has to distance itself from extremists
According to the National – a worrying phrase, I admit, given the Scottish newspaper's obsessive adulation of anyone pro-Scottish independence and its obsessive hostility to anyone who opposes it – this weekend saw a Scottish Reform councillor share a platform with a member of a far-right group at a protest outside a Falkirk hotel housing asylum seekers. What is most interesting about this story is not the protest itself, or even the Reform councillor's presence. It is the response of Reform to one of its councillors sharing a platform with this person and saying or doing nothing about it. Despite the widespread labelling of anyone who believes that our borders should be controlled as far right, and despite the usual bias of the National, the facts it has reported seem clear. At the protest, Claire Mackie-Brown shared a platform with one Richard McFarlane, a member of Patriotic Alternative, which describes itself as a 'ethno-nationalist organisation that campaigns for the rights and wellbeing of White Britons.' Last year, the government's anti-extremism advisor described Patriotic Alternative as 'a racist and anti-Semitic far-right group founded in 2019 by former BNP youth leader Mark Collett.' Cllr Mackie-Brown can be forgiven if she had no idea who McFarlane was when he began to speak. But once he did, no one could have been in any doubt about his views. In his seven-minute speech he asserted that, 'we need to give them the fingers, and say we are white, we are British, we are proud'. He concluded: 'Keep Britain white, keep Britain British.' According to the protest organiser, neither the Reform councillor nor the Patriotic Alternative member were invited to speak: 'The microphone was open to anyone who wished to share their personal concerns or experiences. No speakers were formally invited or endorsed by the organisers it was a platform for local people. If individuals with affiliations to political groups or outside organisations chose to speak, that was entirely their choice and not something we had pre-arranged or promoted.' That's fair enough, and in those circumstances it's easy to see how a local residents' protest was overrun by the far-right. But that is far from being a one-off. One of the recurring themes of these protests up and down the country is how they attract the far-right. Which makes it all the more obvious, and all the more important, that mainstream politicians from mainstream parties should have a serious and convincing response when the far-right are present. At the very least, that needs to involve denouncing the racism and the white nationalism of extremists. Otherwise, it becomes easy to label all the protests as being far-right, and to label representatives of parties such as Reform which stand alongside them as being part of the far-right. As far as one can tell from reports, which have not been contradicted, that did not happen this weekend in Falkirk. Cllr Mackie-Brown appears to have said nothing in response. But while Cllr Mackie-Brown may have been out of her depth and blindsided by what she heard, one might expect that Reform itself would have a ready-made response to such issues. And it has: but the response is useless. Reform told the National: 'Councillor Claire Brown was there to represent Reform and her concerned constituents, she is not responsible for the other people attending and will continue to stand up for residents on this extremely important issue.' Of course she isn't responsible for the other speakers. No one has suggested she is. But as a representative of Reform, she – and anyone else in a similar situation – has to react. You can't simply pretend you are in a bubble, removed from scene, when someone you are standing with is ranting 'Keep Britain white.' It's a similar point to what has been happening on the 'Free Palestine' hate marches. The argument is made that the majority present are ordinary, decent people simply concerned about the deaths in Gaza. They may indeed be. But if you turn up at a march to discover that a proportion of your fellow marchers are Jew haters, chanting anti-Semitic slogans and waving anti-Semitic banners, then you have a choice. You can leave, distancing yourself. Or – as has been happening – you can continue on the march and, even worse, come back the following week, again saying and doing nothing to condemn the hate around you. And in doing so you not only remove any claim to decency, you become part of the problem. Reform has the same choice to make. Does it pretend that it is not part of the same protest when the far-right arrives? Or does it denounce and condemn racists for leaching onto a legitimate protest by ordinary and decent local residents? This will be a recurring theme for Reform as its elected officials and members – entirely legitimately – attend protests outside asylum hotels and are joined by far-right agitators. Unless Reform finds a way to properly distance itself from them, it will be tarred with their brush.
