VAT victory should see Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana adjusting projected growth rate
Frank Blackmore, lead Economist at KPMG, told Business Report that he thinks this was good news for most South Africans as it spares them an additional stress of increasing prices on numerous goods throughout the economy in an environment where they already facing a very high cost of living.
Image: Se-Anne Rall / IOL
On Thursday morning South Africans woke up to the news that Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has withdrawn the proposal to hike vat by 0.5 basis points this year to be followed by a potential 0.5% next year.
Frank Blackmore, lead Economist at KPMG, told Business Report that he thinks this was good news for most South Africans as it spares them an additional stress of increasing prices on numerous goods throughout the economy in an environment where they already facing a very high cost of living.
He added that the VAT U-turn was down to mainly two reasons.
"The first reason was obviously the social backlash that was received on this proposal and the second was that the revenue authorities managed to collect an extra sort of R10 billion from the previous year. Therefore, there was no need to institute a vat hike to get this additional revenues," Blackmore said.
"Even in the planning, the additional revenues that would have come from this half a percentage point of our time could have been around R13.5 billion but if you take the zero rated goods into account that reduces to around this R10 billion making it a moot point for this budget. I think it's important to note that South Africa is also facing a lot more stress given the pressures put on it and by the global trade war that is currently ongoing," Blackmore said.
"I think the next thing from the budget that will be adjusted will be the growth rate in Minister Godongwana's budget that had been tabled. The growth rate for this year for South Africa was at 1.9% but given the events in the US of the imposition of tariffs as well as our local missteps in terms of policy and management, I think we'll be lucky to get close to that 1% growth this year. Therefore, expectations of revenue would be paid back along with that growth rate for this particular year. I think it's also important that with the cancellation of this proposed vat hike that the extra money is found through expenditure, savings, and on unnecessary areas of expenditure and does not come importantly from service delivery which is relied on by most South Africans in terms of health, education, social grants and other public sector delivery that is expected," the economist added.
"I think it is vital for that to happen that costs or cut and expenditures is left alone in order to create some kind of momentum in terms of economic growth in future," Blackmore added.
The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) on Thursday said it applauds the Minister's announcement that government will scrap the proposed VAT hike of 0.5%.
The trade union added that this will provide relief to millions of workers who have been struggling to cope with the rising costs of living.
"Working- and middle-class families spend most of their income on transport and electricity whose increases far exceed CPI. A VAT hike and not adjusting Personal Income Tax (PIT) brackets for inflation would simply make their lives even more unbearable. Whilst this year's Parliamentary budget processes have been anything but elegant, we are pleased that government led by the African National Congress, has shown the humility to listen to COSATU, other organisations and society, and the political maturity to respond decisively. These are signs of a vibrant democracy and a signal that government must listen to the frustrations of working-class communities," Cosatu stated.
Meanwhile, Abigail Moyo, spokesperson of the trade union UASA also welcomed the announcement.
"The decision is a victory for the hardworking people of South Africa, particularly the poorest of the poor, against the backdrop of limited growth prospects in an uncertain geopolitical and global environment. We have seen all investment strategies presented before, as well as the increased taxes over the years. Yet, the government has not succeeded in growing the economy or reducing unemployment and the national debt to a level that harnesses economic growth and development," Moyo said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Political events happening in June expected to affect South African SMEs
'The fuel levy increases will compound existing cost pressures for SMEs, particularly those in logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors that rely heavily on transportation.' June will provide some relief for Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) following the South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) Monetary Policy Committee's (MPC) decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points. Another relief is that inflation is largely stable, and the exchange rate is trending favourably, giving the MPC some room for monetary easing. The economy needs every bit of help it can get, and this cut will no doubt be reflected in business confidence. Miguel da Silva, group executive for business banking at TymeBank noted how upcoming events will impact South Africa's position in a rapidly evolving global landscape and the effect of this reconfiguration on SMEs. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank cuts repo rate thanks to lower inflation, stronger rand Budget treads tricky course without cutting expenditure 'The national budget outlined a programme of continued expenditure propped up by less contentious funding mechanisms than previously tabled,' said Da Silva. After much debate, the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate will remain at 15%, providing certainty for SME pricing and cash flow planning following the proposed increase's withdrawal. To make up the shortfall, the general fuel levy has increased by 16 cents per litre for petrol and by 15 cents per litre for diesel. 'The fuel levy increases will compound existing cost pressures for SMEs, particularly those in logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors that rely heavily on transportation.' With many small businesses already operating on razor-thin margins, this 16-cent increase represents an additional burden that will likely be passed on to consumers, potentially dampening demand in an already constrained market. ALSO READ: GDP grew marginally in first quarter – agriculture helped keep economy afloat First quarter GDP figures 'The Minister also revised his predictions for our economic growth to 1.4% in 2025, down from 1.9%. With the official unemployment rate now at 32.9%, the disconnect between our economic ambitions and the harsh reality that only 16.8 million South Africans are in active employment highlights the urgent need for policy innovation,' he added. Da Silva said what seems clear is that under these constrained market conditions, there is no way for established businesses to incorporate the millions of South Africans seeking employment. There is far greater potential for entrepreneurs to create new jobs, and a focus on small business support and development must be prioritised. 'SME funding will remain an important area of discussion and entrepreneurs; funders and public-sector representatives will meet to discuss the state of small business funding in South Africa at the SME SA Funding Summit 2025 on 12 June – but even more important is the creation of an environment which is conducive to entrepreneurship: less red tape and dependable infrastructure.' ALSO READ: Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks Agoa forum in DRC The relationship between SA and the US remains fraught, but at least there is dialogue. 'Apart from the Presidential meeting in the Oval Office, trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau and agriculture minister John Steenhuisen have submitted a new trade framework to US trade representative Jamieson Greer. 'There are key areas where US investment might help us unlock value at home, and which might appeal to the deal-centric nature of the US administration. Developing a domestic source of natural gas would bolster SA's regional competitiveness and energy security, and we remain a key source of scarce minerals,' he added. The annual conference on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) between trade ministers of Agoa-eligible countries and the US is scheduled to take place in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in June. This will be an important indicator of what the US will do when Agoa expires in September 2025, though it seems unlikely at this stage that SA's Agoa benefits will be extended. While the overall impact of losing Agoa would not be immense for SA, some sectors – particularly the automotive and agricultural sectors – would be significantly affected. Both sectors have extensive value chains, and SME suppliers are rapidly adjusting their operations. 'The potential loss of Agoa benefits creates particular uncertainty for SME suppliers in the automotive value chain, many of whom have built their business models around preferential access to US markets. 'These companies now face the complex challenge of either finding alternative markets or restructuring their operations to remain competitive under standard trade terms.' ALSO READ: Analysts say Trump's bid to weaken Brics will fail as US influence declines Brics summit in Brazil Da Silva added that the Brics Summit, scheduled to take place in Brazil in early July, will again put SA in the US crosshairs, as provocative issues (such as an alternative to the dollar as the world's reserve currency) will be raised and debated by Brics countries. 'The timing could not be more delicate. For SMEs, particularly those in export-oriented sectors, this diplomatic tightrope walk translates into very real business planning challenges. 'Where do allegiances lie in a rapidly shifting global order? This geopolitical balancing act requires SMEs to develop strategies that can withstand diplomatic volatility while capitalising on emerging opportunities within both Western and Brics markets.' NOW READ: Political uncertainties that will impact SMEs in the coming months

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
NPA Hit with Massive Legal Bill After Botched Banxso Case
Taxpayers left to foot nearly R500,000 after prosecutors' failed funds grab backfires in court. Image: IOL / Ron AI The National Prosecuting Authority has been ordered to pay a costs order approaching half a million rand after their attempt to freeze Banxso's funds collapsed on appeal, leaving South African taxpayers to shoulder the financial burden of what legal experts describe as a fundamentally flawed strategy. The costly legal defeat began when the NPA secured what appeared to be a straightforward victory through an ex parte application. This legal procedure allows only one party to present their case to the court without the opposing side being present or having an opportunity to respond. "Ex parte applications are supposed to be reserved for genuine emergencies where there's a real risk of assets disappearing overnight," explained a senior legal practitioner. "The fact that this preservation order was successfully overturned on appeal suggests the original application may not have met the stringent requirements for such urgent relief." Banxso successfully challenged the preservation order through a Reconsideration Application, resulting in the court not only overturning the original ruling but imposing substantial legal costs on the NPA. Liquidation Proceedings Present Far Greater Risk The NPA's financial setback, whilst significant, represents only a fraction of the potential costs exposure facing applicants in the ongoing liquidation proceedings. The main liquidation case, which has been progressing through the courts since October 2024, involves substantially more complex legal issues and protracted hearings. Judge Le Grange heard the liquidation application in early May, but judgment remains pending. Legal sources suggest the extended timeline and complexity of liquidation proceedings could result in costs orders exponentially higher than the NPA's bill. "When you're dealing with liquidation applications of this magnitude, costs can spiral very quickly," said a liquidation expert with extensive experience in commercial insolvencies. "The NPA matter was relatively straightforward compared to what we're seeing in liquidation proceedings. If that resulted in costs approaching R500,000, we could be looking at exposure running into tens of millions for the main case." The expert noted that liquidation proceedings typically involve multiple postponements, extensive documentation, and lengthy court hearings—all factors that contribute to escalating legal costs. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Strategic Legal Positioning Banxso has requested that the court grant a de bonis propriis order against Mostert and Bosman Attorneys. This legal mechanism would make the attorneys personally liable for costs rather than their clients bearing the financial burden. "A de bonis propriis order is a serious remedy that courts don't grant lightly," the legal source explained. "It essentially means the lawyers would pay costs out of their own pockets. Courts typically only make such orders where there's evidence of improper conduct or where attorneys are seen to be the real driving force behind litigation." Banxso has consistently maintained that the applicants are being used by their legal representatives, who allegedly stand to benefit financially from liquidation proceedings regardless of the outcome for creditors. This argument gained judicial attention when Judge Le Grange questioned why the applicants would reject Banxso's offer of security for their claims in favour of pursuing liquidation proceedings that would yield only 15 to 50 cents on the rand in the best-case scenario. Section 381 Implications During proceedings, Advocate Rudi van Rooyen, representing the applicants, referenced the possibility of a section 381 application. This provision would allow provisional liquidators to apply for extended powers equivalent to those of finally appointed liquidators, including authority to institute commissions of enquiry and appoint expensive legal teams. "Section 381 applications can dramatically increase costs because they essentially give liquidators carte blanche to investigate and litigate using the company's own funds," the liquidation expert noted. "It's a powerful tool, but it can also be expensive for all concerned." Judge Le Grange observed that such an application would effectively allow Banxso's money to be used to fund litigation against the company itself, reinforcing Banxso's argument that liquidation primarily benefits attorneys and liquidators rather than creditors. Financial Consequences Mount The NPA's substantial costs order will be paid from government coffers, adding to taxpayers' financial burden. The failed preservation strategy has resulted in the state bearing the cost of unsuccessful litigation whilst achieving none of its intended objectives. Meanwhile, the applicants in the liquidation matter face potential personal liability for costs that could exceed the NPA's financial exposure by significant margins. Industry observers note that liquidation proceedings involving Mostert and Bosman have previously resulted in substantial legal fees being deducted from creditor payouts. "The pattern we've seen in previous matters suggests that legal costs can consume a significant portion of available funds," the liquidation expert observed. "Creditors often end up receiving much less than anticipated because of the fees involved in the liquidation process." Financial disclosures from the Mirror Trading International liquidation revealed that Mostert and Bosman had levied legal costs exceeding R24 million by September 2023, with creditors still awaiting dividend payments and a second Liquidation and Distribution account remaining unpublished. Pending Judgment The contrast between the NPA's failed strategy and Banxso's defensive approach has become increasingly apparent. Whilst the state prosecution authority faces a substantial costs order for unsuccessful litigation, Banxso continues defending its position and seeking to protect client interests through the judicial process. As the legal community awaits Judge Le Grange's judgement, the NPA's costly defeat stands as a stark reminder of the financial consequences when aggressive legal strategies backfire in the commercial courts.

IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Stella Must Go: Youth unemployment soars under her leadership
Minister Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams has presided over a department that has delivered little to nothing for SMMEs or the youth who rely on entrepreneurship for opportunity and survival. There has been a steady decline and collapse of support for Small, Medium, and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) under the leadership of Minister Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams since her appointment 1400 days ago. Her tenure has delivered frustration for millions of young South Africans, be they job seekers or job creators. The recent appointment process for the Small Enterprise Ombud, which will be debated in Parliament today, is one more example of political patronage being placed ahead of championing SMMEs. Instead of appointing a credible, independent voice to advocate for struggling entrepreneurs, the process has been marred by backroom deals and insider politics. The very office that is meant to protect SMMEs from government red tape and corruption is being used as a reward mechanism for loyal cadres. Minister Ndabeni-Abrahams has presided over a department that has delivered little to nothing for SMMEs or the youth who rely on entrepreneurship for opportunity and survival. Despite numerous glossy presentations and photo ops, the facts speak for themselves: South Africa now has the highest youth unemployment rate in the world, with 4.7 million young people aged 15–34 not in employment, education, or training (NEET). In Q1 of 2025, the economy grew by a dismal 0.1%, confirming that the government's economic policy is directionless and anti-growth. Over 320,000 graduates remain unemployed, proving that education alone is not enough in a broken economy with no job pipeline and no enabling environment for new businesses. Young entrepreneurs trying to start or grow businesses face insurmountable obstacles: late payments from the government, lack of access to capital, bureaucratic red tape, and no safety net when disputes arise. Instead of reforming the system to support these youth-led enterprises, the department is busy recycling political appointees and rehashing failed strategies. It is time for Minister Ndabeni-Abrahams to step aside. South Africa needs a youth-focused, jobs-focused leader at the helm. Someone who understands the urgency of the unemployment crisis and who will fight for real reforms to unlock the full potential of the SMME sector. BOSA calls for: The immediate suspension of the current Ombud appointment process, pending a full review to ensure transparency and credibility. The resignation or dismissal of Minister Ndabeni-Abrahams, whose track record has become a barrier to growth, not a driver of it. The establishment of an independent SMME Red Tape Commission, led by private sector and youth representatives, to identify and remove the barriers preventing small business success. South Africa's young people are not lazy. They are not without ideas. They are without opportunity. If the government cannot get out of the way, it must be pushed out of the way. It is time for Stella to go. Roger Solomons - BOSA Spokesperson