logo
Trump's Memecoin Dinner Questioned by Top Democrat on House Judiciary Committee

Trump's Memecoin Dinner Questioned by Top Democrat on House Judiciary Committee

Yahooa day ago

A senior Democrat in the House of Representatives, Jamie Raskin, joined his name to lawmakers seeking answers about President Donald Trump's recent dinner for top investors in his memecoin, sending questions directly to Trump.
Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has been a vocal critic of the president and becomes the latest of many from his party to probe details about the event, which they've called out as evidence of White House corruption. Because Raskin is in the minority party, his demands are unlikely to lead to further congressional action unless they regain the House or Senate in next year's elections.
"I write today to demand that you release the names of all the attendees at this dinner and provide information about the source of the money they each used to buy $TRUMP coins, so that we can prevent illegal foreign government emoluments from being pocketed without congressional consent," Raskin wrote this week to the president, joining many counterparts in the Senate in seeking the information, including Senators Elizabeth Warren, Chris Murphy and Richard Blumenthal.
"We deserve to know who is paying for access to our president, and what steps you took to ensure that the funds you receive are legitimate and legal, rather than the proceeds from foreign states or monarchs or illegal activities," Rasking said, specifically highlighting Tron founder Justin Sun, a guest who was a major early investor in Trump's family crypto operations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tsogo Sun (JSE:TSG) Is Due To Pay A Dividend Of ZAR0.30
Tsogo Sun (JSE:TSG) Is Due To Pay A Dividend Of ZAR0.30

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tsogo Sun (JSE:TSG) Is Due To Pay A Dividend Of ZAR0.30

The board of Tsogo Sun Limited (JSE:TSG) has announced that it will pay a dividend on the 28th of July, with investors receiving ZAR0.30 per share. This means that the annual payment will be 7.6% of the current stock price, which is in line with the average for the industry. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While it is always good to see a solid dividend yield, we should also consider whether the payment is feasible. However, prior to this announcement, Tsogo Sun's dividend was comfortably covered by both cash flow and earnings. This means that most of its earnings are being retained to grow the business. Over the next year, EPS could expand by 39.8% if recent trends continue. Assuming the dividend continues along recent trends, we think the payout ratio could be 34% by next year, which is in a pretty sustainable range. View our latest analysis for Tsogo Sun The company has a long dividend track record, but it doesn't look great with cuts in the past. The annual payment during the last 10 years was ZAR0.89 in 2015, and the most recent fiscal year payment was ZAR0.60. Doing the maths, this is a decline of about 3.9% per year. A company that decreases its dividend over time generally isn't what we are looking for. Growing earnings per share could be a mitigating factor when considering the past fluctuations in the dividend. It's encouraging to see that Tsogo Sun has been growing its earnings per share at 40% a year over the past five years. Rapid earnings growth and a low payout ratio suggest this company has been effectively reinvesting in its business. Should that continue, this company could have a bright future. Overall, we think that Tsogo Sun could be a great option for a dividend investment, although we would have preferred if the dividend wasn't cut this year. The cut will allow the company to continue paying out the dividend without putting the balance sheet under pressure, which means that it could remain sustainable for longer. Taking this all into consideration, this looks like it could be a good dividend opportunity. It's important to note that companies having a consistent dividend policy will generate greater investor confidence than those having an erratic one. Meanwhile, despite the importance of dividend payments, they are not the only factors our readers should know when assessing a company. For instance, we've picked out 2 warning signs for Tsogo Sun that investors should take into consideration. Is Tsogo Sun not quite the opportunity you were looking for? Why not check out our selection of top dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump officials are visiting Alaska to discuss a gas pipeline and oil drilling

time35 minutes ago

Trump officials are visiting Alaska to discuss a gas pipeline and oil drilling

JUNEAU, Alaska -- The Trump administration is sending three Cabinet members to Alaska this week as it pursues oil drilling in the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and reinvigorating a natural gas project that's languished for years. The visit by Department of Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin comes after Trump signed an executive order earlier this year aimed at boosting oil and gas drilling, mining and logging in Alaska. It also comes amid tariff talks with Asian countries that are seen as possible leverage for the administration to secure investments in the proposed Alaska liquefied natural gas project. Their itinerary includes a meeting Sunday with resource development groups and U.S. Sens. Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski in Anchorage before heading to Utqiagvik, an Arctic town on the petroleum-rich North Slope where many Alaska Native leaders see oil development as economically vital to the region. The federal officials also plan to visit the Prudhoe Bay oil field Monday — near the coast of the Arctic Ocean and more than 850 miles (1,368 kilometers) north of Anchorage — and speak at Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy's annual energy conference Tuesday in Anchorage. While it's not unusual for U.S. officials to visit Alaska during warmer weather months, Dunleavy's office said the officials' visit is significant. Dunleavy, a Trump ally, said he is thankful for an administration that 'recognizes Alaska's unique value.' Government and industry representatives from a number of Asian countries, including Japan, are expected to participate in a portion of the trip, reflecting pressure from the U.S. to invest in the pipeline — despite skepticism and opposition from environmental groups. In Alaska, some environmentalists criticized the agenda for Dunleavy's conference. Highlighting fossil fuels alongside renewable or alternative energy make 'energy sources of the past look more legitimate at a conference like this," said Andy Moderow, senior policy director with the Alaska Wilderness League. 'I think we should be looking at climate solutions that work for Alaskans, not trying to open up places that industry is taking a pass on, namely the Arctic refuge,' he said. Trump has long taken credit for provisions of a 2017 tax law championed by Alaska's congressional delegation that called for two oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's coastal plain by late 2024. The first one remains the subject of ongoing litigation, with the main bidder a state corporation that saw its seven leases later canceled by then-President Joe Biden's administration. A judge in March ruled Biden's administration overstepped, and the Interior Department, in line with Trump's executive order, is working to reinstate the leases. There weren't any bids in the second sale, held under Biden and blasted by the state as overly restrictive. Debate over drilling in the refuge — home to polar bears, musk ox, birds and other wildlife — has long been a flashpoint. Indigenous Gwich'in leaders consider the coastal plain sacred land, noting its importance to a caribou herd they rely upon. Many North Slope Iñupiat leaders who support drilling in the refuge felt their voices were not heard during the Biden era. During the Trump officials' visit, they also hope to make a case for additional development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, which Trump has advocated, and for being included in planning decisions. Nagruk Harcharek, president of Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat, an advocacy group whose members include leaders from the region, called the officials' visit 'a step in the right direction.' For years, the state has sought to develop its stores of North Slope natural gas as a way to provide affordable energy to more residents and bolster revenues via exports. But cost concerns, shifts in direction, competition from other projects and questions about economic feasibility have stymied progress. Oil companies have long reinjected gas that occurs with oil deposits on the slope to produce more oil, which remains Alaska's economic lifeblood. The latest gas proposal calls for a roughly 810-mile (1,300-kilometer) pipeline that would carry gas from the North Slope to port and a facility that would process and export liquefied natural gas to Asian countries. In a March speech to Congress, Trump touted his ongoing support of the 'gigantic natural gas pipeline." He said countries like Japan and South Korea 'want to be our partner, with investments of trillions of dollars each.' No firm commitments from countries have been made. The company advancing the project — in partnership with a state corporation — is in a stage of refining cost estimates, previously pegged at around $44 billion for the pipeline and related infrastructure, before final decisions are made on whether to move forward with the project. While Dunleavy has likened Trump's friendly approach to energy development as 'Christmas every day,' Alaska's fortunes remain tightly linked to the volatility of oil prices, which are down sharply from a year ago, squeezing state revenues. State lawmakers across party lines overwhelmingly passed a resolution urging Congress to provide Alaska with 90% of royalty revenues for oil and gas leases in the Arctic refuge, arguing the U.S. government reneged on past promises for such a share. The resolution also asked for that to be extended to the petroleum reserve. Alaska's tax structure allows companies like ConocoPhillips Alaska — which is pursuing a massive oil project known as Willow in the reserve — to write off a portion of their development costs against production taxes they incur elsewhere on the North Slope. While lawmakers widely support Willow, they also have argued a change in federal royalty share would address a hit to state revenues created by production in the reserve.

To end the war in Ukraine, Trump should treat Putin the way he's treating Harvard
To end the war in Ukraine, Trump should treat Putin the way he's treating Harvard

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

To end the war in Ukraine, Trump should treat Putin the way he's treating Harvard

But if Trump used the same punitive tactics on Putin that he continues to inflict on universities and international students in the US, Russia's war against Ukraine might be coming to an end. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Unable to bend Harvard to his will, Trump has launched an onslaught of attacks against the university. They include Advertisement And since the Trump administration's assault on higher education is much bigger than Harvard, Secretary of State But it's a much different story in Trump's dealings with Putin. Even some Republican legislators who usually keep their lips buttoned when it comes to criticizing the president are prodding him to do more than say that he's 'disappointed' in Putin. Advertisement 'I believe president trump was sincere when he thought his friendship [with] Putin [would] end the war,' Republican Grassley went further. 'Pres Trump [should] take the decisive action [against] Putin that he takes [against] Harvard. Sanctions for Putin like no fed grants for Harvard.' Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, as stalwart a Trump sycophant as they come, said in The Wall Street Journal that the Senate is willing to do what Trump so far has not: slap severe sanctions on Russia. 'As [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune said last week, if Mr. Putin continues to play games, the Senate will act,' Graham wrote. 'I'm hoping for the best, but when it comes to the thug in Moscow, we should all prepare for more of the same.' Trump has said that he's considering sanctions against Russia, but so far that's been a hollow threat. On his social media site, Trump said: 'What Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened in Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD. He's playing with fire!' There's about as much heat coming from the White House as from a televised holiday Trump is dithering as Ukrainians die, and Putin does whatever he wants. The president loves to portray himself as strong and decisive, but that's never been the case where Putin is concerned. Advertisement Even after Trump called Putin 'crazy' on social media and claimed that 'something happened to him,' the Kremlin reacted to him as if he were a child having a meltdown. Trump, Russian officials said, was experiencing 'emotional overload.' Whatever Trump is going through, it's not provoking him to hatch a decisive plan to confront Putin and force him to comply with a fairly negotiated plan to exit his war. Asked by a reporter on May 28 whether he believed that Putin 'actually wants to end the war,' the president gave a cryptic answer. 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks, within two weeks,' he said. If Putin is 'tapping us along,' Trump said his administration 'would respond a little bit differently.' It's unlikely anything will change in two weeks. When it comes to Putin, the president has the goalposts on wheels. It's easier for Trump to attack education and international students than to face down the dictator he has called a 'friend,' because when Putin flexes, Trump flinches. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store