logo
We will do everything we can to save Alexander Dennis jobs, vows Swinney

We will do everything we can to save Alexander Dennis jobs, vows Swinney

Independent3 days ago

The Scottish Government will do 'everything we can' to support jobs at bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis, the First Minister has said.
The company announced on Wednesday it is proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire.
The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year.
Speaking at First Minister's Questions on Thursday, John Swinney said he is 'deeply concerned'.
He told the chamber: 'This issue has been occupying a great deal of the focus and the attention of the Deputy First Minister and I and the UK Government ministers since we became aware of the situation over the last few weeks, and then ultimately to the decision that was announced yesterday.'
He said his Government has 'supported' the manufacturer.
But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China, while pointing to the order from Alexander Dennis of around 160 vehicles by the publicly-owned network in Greater Manchester.
In Scotland, public service buses are procured by private operators, who then run them on routes across the country.
Mr Swinney said state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis.
He quoted a joint letter from the UK and Scottish governments, which pledged to 'work closely with Alexander Dennis at this challenging time'.
He added: 'That's us indicating that we're keen to do everything we can to find a way through the Subsidy Control Act provisions, so the Government can continue to operate within the law, which we must do, but also, we can support manufacturing in Scotland, which is my priority.'
Responding, Mr Sarwar said: 'If John Swinney can't figure out a way to order buses in Scotland, I suggest he picks up the phone to (Greater Manchester Mayor) Andy Burnham and see how he managed to do it.
'Almost five times as many bus orders from Manchester.'
Mr Sarwar's claim stems from the second phase of the Scottish Government's green bus initiative ScotZEB, which ordered 44 buses from Alexander Dennis.
However, according to a press release from the time, 137 buses were ordered from the firm in the first phase, amounting to a total of 181.
In a statement, Mr Burnham – who has visited the Falkirk site – said: 'Our iconic Bee Network buses are a bit of Scotland right here in Greater Manchester.
'We have over 160 Alexander Dennis buses criss-crossing our city-region every day – connecting our communities to opportunity.
'If Greater Manchester can invest in world-class Scottish bus manufacturing, then why can't the SNP Scottish Government?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Confident Kemi says: 'We can beat the SNP in constituencies across the country... anything can happen'
EXCLUSIVE Confident Kemi says: 'We can beat the SNP in constituencies across the country... anything can happen'

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Confident Kemi says: 'We can beat the SNP in constituencies across the country... anything can happen'

Kemi Badenoch has insisted the Scottish Conservatives could beat the SNP in constituencies up and down the country at the Holyrood election next year. The UK Tory leader suggested the party would take the fight to the Nationalists at the 2026 parliamentary vote, adding: 'Anything can happen.' In an interview with The Mail, Ms Badenoch said the Scottish Conservatives - led by her colleague Russell Findlay - could make gains beyond their traditional supporter base in the North East and in the Scottish Borders. It comes as in a speech to the party's conference at Murrayfield, Edinburgh, on Saturday Mr Findlay laid bare his ambitious plans to oust First Minister John Swinney from his Perthshire North constituency - as well as SNP MSPs in Ayr and Moray. Last night, Ms Badenoch said the party's position on repealing Labour 's 'family farm tax', the energy profits levy and its strong position on the ' gender debate' offered a clear alternative to voters. The UK leader - who replaced Rishi Sunak in November - said: 'I think there's very, very clear blue water between us and the SNP between us and Conservative Party is very clear on what its offer is.' Such optimism was palpable in her Friday speech to conference delegates on Friday, during which she said the party needed to bring about the SNP's 'electoral defeat'. Asked if she truly believed the Scottish Conservatives were able to beat the SNP in the Holyrood election, she said: 'Yes, anything can happen'. She continued: 'People look at what's happening in a particular moment, and assume it's always going to be like that. 'But we're not going to beat them by joining with them. We're going to beat them by having a better offer.' Such fighting talk comes despite a Survation poll in May suggesting the Tories are likely to return fewer MSPs than Nigel Farage's Reform party at the Holyrood vote next year. According to projections from Professor Sir John Curtice the SNP would return 58 seats and the Conservatives fewer than half their current group, returning 13 MSPs compared to its current crop of 30. Reform, meanwhile, would move into second place as the main opposition party on 21 seats. A recent litmus test of Tory support, the Hamilton by-election, saw the party slip into fourth place behind Reform - and was viewed by some pundits as evidence that Mr Farage's party posed an existential threat to the Tories' electoral fortunes. Mr Findlay yesterday dismissed what he labelled as 'pointy head' pollsters, which he said had been proven wrong in the past. And while Ms Badenoch is keenly aware of the rise in popularity of Reform - even warning in her speech to conference at the end of last week that Mr Farage is a threat to the Union because he does not care about more SNP rule - she insisted that 'everybody is a competitor' ahead of the 2026 Scottish Parliament election. She said: 'We live in a multi party era; we're going to be fighting for every single vote; we're not singling any party out.' However, unable to resist being drawn on how she might describe the First Minister John Swinney in three words, the UK Tory leader was characteristically robust. 'Not. An. Option,' she said. Both Ms Badenoch and Mr Findlay hope a display of humility and contrition to voters over mistakes made in government is key to boosting support for the party. Asked how she can prove to Scottish voters who appear to have switched to Reform that they need the Scottish Tories, Ms Badenoch said: 'By winning back their trust, and we will do that by being very honest about where we made mistakes. She said: 'The windfall tax [on oil and gas company profits] was one example. 'I often use immigration as another. We've come up with a whole new set of policies on immigration - which are much tougher - stopping people who have not contributed in our society from getting benefits, which act as a pull factor; not making British citizenship so easy to get, which is another pull factor. 'So we are changing our policy - but we're being very honest, in a way that the other parties simply are not being.' She added: 'The way we win is by rebuilding trust, winning back that trust, but showing who we are, what we stand for, whose side we're on and having an offer that's actually going to work.' On Saturday, in his first major conference speech since becoming Scottish Tory leader, Mr Findlay said he was an 'optimist' and that he was 'not prepared to accept doom and gloom'. Speaking of his party's hopes to win the First Minister's Perthshire North seat, he teased: 'Wouldn't that be some prize? Swinney paying the price for his abysmal record.'

Now SNP face ANOTHER gender legal fight… this time for failing to give guidance on Supreme Court trans ruling
Now SNP face ANOTHER gender legal fight… this time for failing to give guidance on Supreme Court trans ruling

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Now SNP face ANOTHER gender legal fight… this time for failing to give guidance on Supreme Court trans ruling

The SNP Government faces ANOTHER legal challenge after failing to update public sector transgender guidance in the wake of a watershed court ruling. In April, John Swinney 's government was left humiliated when the UK's highest court ruled against it on the legal definition of a woman. It stipulated it was 'biological sex' which determines a person's rights under the 2010 Equality Act, not gender choice or a gender certificate. The ruling meant women-only spaces such as changing rooms are off-limits to biological males who identify as women. Despite the ruling, SNP ministers have so far failed to update guidance on single-sex spaces for the public sector. They have also repeatedly claimed they are waiting to see the final position of the European and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before going ahead with any changes. Now, the group behind the successful Supreme Court challenge, For Women Scotland, have said they are speaking to lawyers about taking the Scottish Government to court AGAIN to force them into action. The organisation's Susan Smith told a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh yesterday: 'We've spoken to the Scottish Government. 'They are still reluctant to withdraw things like the transgender guidance for schools, which was unlawful even before this Supreme Court ruling.' She added: 'There's resistance within organisations, and so we are possibly going to have to go back to court in order to get some of the government policies, especially policies of prisoners and schools, sorted out.' Speaking to reporters later, she said: 'We really do need some action, and they [the Scottish Government] are telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Ms Smith also said statements by Baroness Faulkner and Akua Reindorf KC of the EHRC had made the situation clear. She added: 'And in fact, obviously Baroness Faulkner and Akua Reindorf KC and others have said: 'No, you need to start to act now.' Asked if Ms Smith had a timeline for possible legal action, she said: 'No, we're still talking through things and talking through things with our lawyers as well. We haven't got anything like that but we are exploring options.' Ms Smith suggested the delay could be because Scottish ministers fear if they change the guidance, they face a legal challenge from transgender activists who were unhappy with the clarification over equalities law given by the Supreme Court. At the centre of the successful For Women Scotland challenge against the Scottish Government was the question of whether a 'woman' could include trans women in law. The legal fight was sparked by the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards Act, which aimed to get more women onto public bodies, but could include those who had been born men. Five justices handed down a unanimous verdict against the Scottish Government's position and said sex was 'binary' and a person was 'either a woman or a man'. It sent shockwaves across Scotland's public sector organisations including the prison service. The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) has 16 transgender inmates, according to latest figures, with current rules allowing trans women to be housed in the female estate. Meanwhile The Mail on Sunday has told how a number of councils in Scotland have failed to adapt schools in line with the ruling. That is despite parents winning a separate legal fight over single-sex facilities at the new £16.6 million Earlston Primary School in Berwickshire. Judge Lady Ross, KC, said she would issue a court order to make legal obligations on all Scottish state schools clear. Ms Smith said: 'The Scottish Government tell us that the Scottish Prison Service set their own policy, that they're an arms length organisation, but any case would be taken against the Scottish ministers. 'So I think we need to start to step up and take a bit of responsibility, because these things are under their remit. 'And we've heard that they can't do anything about the NHS guidance, they can't do anything about the prisons…actually, I'm starting to think, well, what is the point of the Scottish government if they have no responsibility for any of these things that actually they do control?' A Scottish Prison Service spokesperson said: 'We have received the Supreme Court's judgement and are considering any potential impact it may have.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'As the judgment relates specifically to the guidance issued under the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards 2018 Act and stated that it was incorrect in relation to the definition referred to of 'woman' under the Equality Act, the guidance has now been removed and will be updated shortly to reflect the judgment. 'The Scottish Government has already begun work on implementation. We have established a Short Life Working Group to ensure support and consistency across Government.'

EXCLUSIVE Now doctors say: 'We don't trust Neil Gray'...as pressure grows on the Health Secretary to quit after fresh 'Limogate' scandal
EXCLUSIVE Now doctors say: 'We don't trust Neil Gray'...as pressure grows on the Health Secretary to quit after fresh 'Limogate' scandal

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Now doctors say: 'We don't trust Neil Gray'...as pressure grows on the Health Secretary to quit after fresh 'Limogate' scandal

Health Secretary Neil Gray faced mounting pressure to quit last night after Scots doctors launched an unprecedented attack saying they don't trust him. In an extraordinary row with under-fire Mr Gray over pay talks, the British Medical Association Scotland accused the minister of 'an egregious breach of trust.' The organisation - which represents 16,000 NHS staff - said: 'When you look someone in the eye, shake hands and then do something completely different, it inevitably raises real questions of trust.' The BMA's outburst comes just days after it was revealed the beleagured minister had been chauffeur-driven to a pub, despite official records stating he had been taken to a 'personal address'. The Scottish Government was forced to admit Mr Gray's trip to the Brig O'Don pub, in Aberdeen, was for a 'personal engagement,' rather than any duties related to his government role. It is the latest twist and turn in a scandal that has dogged Mr Gray in recent months and one that saw him apologise twice over his use of ministerial cars. Critics, who have called for him to resign in the wake of the pub trip revelations, said the scathing comments from BMA Scotland is further proof of why he is not up to the job. Scottish Conservative health spokesman Dr Sandesh Gulhane MSP said: 'This just shows that Neil Gray has lost all credibility. 'If he can't be trusted to honour his word to the BMA, why should we believe him when he says he has a plan to fix our NHS?' The party has already said his position is 'untenable' due to the scandal and have urged him to resign. The furious medics said Mr Gray assured them during a face-to-face meeting that their concerns about a below-inflation salary increase would be addressed. However, despite shaking hands and looking the medics 'in the eye', Mr Gray went on to issue a statement just hours later indicating the matter was settled. In a scathing joint statement, BMA Scotland representatives Dr Alan Robertson and Dr Sine Steele, said Mr Gray's actions had left them 'with considerable anger and frustration'. The medics, who say the health service in Scotland is 'collapsing', have also accused Mr Gray and the SNP administration of 'an egregious breach of trust'. Scottish Labour health spokesperson Jackie Baillie said: 'Neil Gray has found himself embroiled in one scandal after another - but the worst scandal of all is his mismanagement of our NHS. 'It is clear from his shambolic and dishonest approach to negotiations that Neil Gray cannot be trusted to do right by doctors or deliver for our NHS. 'Hardworking NHS staff and long-suffering patients cannot keep paying the price for SNP failure.' The BMA Scotland statement said the actions of Mr Gray and the Scottish Government had 'undermined the discussions' and 'resulted in considerable damage to our relationship' As such, they said they had written to the health secretary 'to leave him in no doubt of our anger and dissatisfaction'. The discussion with medics concerned pay negotiations for 1,300 speciality and associate specialist doctors (SAS) in Scotland, who work in areas including A&E, cancer care, GP clinics, and also as dentists. Last month the Doctors' and Dentists' Remuneration (DDRB) pay review body, DDRB recommended that pay for SAS medics be increased by 4 per cent. However, the BMA argues that years of pay erosion and a failure 'to keep up with inflation compared to other public sector workers and similar professions' means the offer should be higher. Pointing out that vacancies for SAS doctors stand at 1 in 4 and that more than 14 per cent of consultant posts are empty, the BMA representatives warned: 'The NHS is collapsing around us.' They added: 'These actions will no doubt further erode what little confidence many SAS and consultants have in the Government's approach to us as senior members of vital NHS services up and down the country.' They added: 'To do so without even informing us in advance and in direct contradiction to what has just been said in a meeting is, in our view, an egregious breach of trust.' Two days after the contentious meeting with BMA Scotland, Mr Gray made headlines yet again over his chauffeur-driven trips. Last year, it emerged Dons fan Mr Gray had been chauffeured to and from nine football matches involving Aberdeen FC or Scotland in the period between 2022 and 2024. He went on to apologise to parliament in November for giving 'the impression of acting more as a fan and less as a minister' but reassured MSPs the matches were not junkets and that officials had made a record of business meetings at the games. However, in January, he was forced to apologise again and admit he had misled parliament after it was revealed there was no such written record of discussions he was involved in when he attended the 2023 Scottish League Cup Final between his favourite team, Aberdeen, and Rangers. One of the trips, ahead of Aberdeen FC's pivotal match against Livingston last year, stated he had been driven to and from a 'personal address, Aberdeen'. It was this account that had to be corrected this week after it emerged he had in fact been driven to the city's Brig O'Don watering hole and then to Pittodrie.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store