Dealmakers hope on European revival as US stutters.
It hasn't worked out that way. The first quarter is disappointing, with global investment banking fees down by 10pc to $20.6bn for the first three months of this year, according to data provider Dealogic. The US has slipped by 7pc to $10.6bn for the period, while European fees have fallen even further, dropping 22pc to $4.6bn.
But despite the numbers, top dealmakers in the financial district of London say that Europe is starting to benefit from the volatility that has hit the US. High hopes from Trump's election in November, when he promised to tame inflation, increase US exceptionalism and kick-start deregulation of the M&A market, have given way to caution.
Global co-head of the alternative capital group at USB, Simona Maellare, said: 'In January, there was a lot of talk about animal spirit in the US and people were very negative on Europe.
'Three months later and those predictions have not come about because the M&A market does not like volatility. In Europe, sponsors are making progress, so we are seeing improved levels of activity. Overall, Q1 has been soft, but I am encouraged by the amount of activity in Europe, where we see big deals continue to happen.'
Global co-head of the infrastructure and strategic investors group at JPMorgan, Guillermo Baygual, said that there was increasing optimism around European deal activity as appetite to transact has dampened in the US.
'This could end up being good for Europe, because it is forcing European nations to get their act together,' he said. 'The infrastructure fund in Germany, other infrastructure initiatives developing in European countries, the emerging plans for investment in the military across Europe, governments in Europe are supporting investment and therefore growth. Europe has big challenges, but suddenly there's a sense that things are looking up.'
'America First' policies in the US have seen European leaders coin the phrase 'Make Europe Great Again' – a nod to the red baseball cap sported by Trump supporters and Trump himself proclaiming he'll 'make America great again'.
Dealmakers say that pressure for Europe to take care of itself is spurring growth. One example is the German government's plans to increase defence spending by 500bn euros in a bid to counter what its chancellor Friedrich Merz called Russian president Vladimir Putin's war of aggression against Europe'.
Global head of sectors and advisory at BNP Paribas, George Holst, said that a 25pc increase in Emea (Europe, Middle East, Africa) M&A volume was spurred by 'material growth' in deals over 1bn euros, even though the number of transactions is down.
'Higher fiscal stimulus in Europe, paired with the need for greater sovereignty plus a trend of lower rates, has made Europe more attractive on a relative basis,' he said. 'The need and search for a scale is apparent in many sectors and we saw broad activity in a cross section of areas.'
Bankers were also expecting an increase in equity capital markets activity after a slump in listings that has resulted in a brutal three years for the business. However, market conditions have led to clients pulling planned IPOs and struggling to price them effectively, dealmakers said.
'This recent period of volatility has reopened the debate on the sustainability of the recently reopened IPO market,' said Gareth McCartney, global co-head of ECM at UBS. 'The consensus was that 2025 would see a return to normalised IPO issuance volumes, but a slow start has questioned this, albeit we have a long way to go.' (The writer is our foreign correspondent based in the UK)andyjalil@aol.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
European Union's flawed investment strategy
Last year, former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi produced a landmark report on the future of European competitiveness, in which he recommended that the European Union increase annual investment by more than €800 billion ($930 billion) – the equivalent of more than 4% of its GDP. This report has now become the intellectual foundation for an ambitious strategy to revitalize growth in Europe. But Europe should be careful what it wishes for. As Japan has shown, investment is no panacea. The idea that more investment is the key to economic success is a potent one in Europe. The so-called Lisbon Strategy, launched in 2000, sought to increase investment in research and development to 3% of GDP. That target has remained on the official EU agenda for a quarter-century, but has never been reached. In 2015, the European Commission added another investment goal: its Investment Plan for Europe sought to mobilize €315 billion in additional investment within three years, in order to increase competitiveness and long-term growth. But investment has not saved Japan from several decades of stagnation. Since 1970, Japan's gross fixed capital formation has averaged – and, often, significantly exceeded – 30% of GDP. That is much higher than not only the EU average, but also the rate in Germany, the EU's strongest economy, where gross fixed capital formation has hovered around 23% of GDP. The four-percentage-point difference between the most recent values (26% in Japan, and 22% in both Germany and the EU) amounts to about €800 billion annually – exactly the amount Draghi recommends adding to total EU investment. Of course, the type of investment matters. Whereas investment in new machinery leads to diminishing returns once a company has enough capacity to serve the market, investing in new ideas should theoretically be bound by no such constraints. But if one singles out R&D investment, Japan performs even better. In 2000, when the EU set its Lisbon Strategy target, Japan was already investing nearly 3% of its GDP in R&D – a rate it has maintained over the last 25 years, compared to the EU's average of 2%. Flags are seen behind the logo of the European Investment Bank pictured in the city of Luxembourg, Luxembourg. — Reuters And yet, despite impressive rates of investment in fixed capital and R&D, Japan's economy weakened over the last quarter-century. In the 1980s and 1990s, Japan boasted the world's second-largest economy, powered by a manufacturing sector that seemed unbeatable. Now, Japan is the world's fourth-largest economy, having recently fallen behind Germany despite having a much larger population (120 million, compared to 80 million), owing partly to yen depreciation. One might argue that this is an unfair comparison, because evaluating an economy at current exchange rates, without accounting for inflation differentials, does not adequately reflect quality of life. But if one looks at per capita income at purchasing power parity, Japan was at rough parity with Germany 20 years ago, and is now doing worse than Italy. In any case, exchange rates are not irrelevant, at least politically: Japanese are well aware of their declining purchasing power when they travel abroad, and they undoubtedly notice foreign tourists flaunting their purchasing power in Japan. This may have helped to create fertile ground for the far right. So, what explains Japan's economic underperformance? The answer is not unfavorable demographics. In fact, Japan's population is not shrinking nearly as fast as conventional wisdom suggests, having fallen since the turn of the century by only three million, to just under 124 million last year, with employment increasing by ten percentage points. To explain Japan's struggles requires looking behind the headline investment figures. While investment in R&D is strong, it is happening mostly within large firms, which are primarily interested in delivering incremental improvements to existing products or processes, rather than developing radically new ideas or technologies. True innovation is much more likely to happen in startups, but in Japan – as in the EU – the largest spenders on R&D have remained the same for decades. Large companies have recognized the limitations of their in-house R&D efforts. Some have even created specialized Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) departments, tasked with hunting for promising ideas outside their corporate structures. But, in 2022, the leading spenders on R&D in Japan accounted for only 7.3% of global CVC investment. That is about one-third of EU companies' share (22%), but given that the EU economy is about four times the size of Japan's, these levels are similar, in relative terms. The EU did much better than Japan by another measure, however: over 40% of European firms' CVC investment went to local startups. In Japan, that share was miniscule – 0.01% – with the rest going mostly to start-ups in the United States. Furthermore, US and even Japanese companies have delivered substantial CVC funding to EU companies, which attracted a total of about 9% of global CVC funding in 2022. That is much less than the 80% that went to the US, but also significantly more than the tiny share – close to zero – that flowed into Japan. The lesson for the EU is clear: rather than focusing simply on increasing investment, it should seek to nurture and fortify its innovation ecosystem. Only then will it be able to deliver the kinds of game-changing ideas and inventions that underpin global competitiveness in the twenty-first century. Project Syndicate
Observer
3 hours ago
- Observer
Oil market retreats as supply outlook pressures prices
Oil prices extended their recent declines, falling 1.2% on Monday before steadying on Tuesday, as traders await Friday's highly anticipated meeting between US and Russian leaders. The talks could lead to a partial easing of US sanctions on Russia, an OPEC+ member, potentially adding more supply to the market. According to Vijay Valecha, Chief Investment Officer at Century Financial, crude prices have been under pressure this year as the OPEC+ producer group accelerated output increases despite lingering risks of oversupply. The US Department of Energy on Tuesday raised its forecast for this year's global oil surplus to 1.7 million barrels per day, while OPEC maintained a more bullish view, predicting a tighter market ahead. The International Energy Agency's latest projections are due Wednesday. US industry data indicated a slight increase in nationwide stockpiles last week, with official figures expected later in the day. In Asian trading hours, Brent futures volumes remained subdued, and volatility in the benchmark hovered near a two-week low. Technically, Brent is trading at $65.7, with resistance at $67.3 (50 SMA) and support at $63.7. US benchmark WTI is holding below the 9 SMA, reflecting a bearish bias. Key support sits at $62.1, with a breakdown potentially opening the way to the $60–$59 range. Resistance is noted at $63.6, and a move above could see prices test $64.3 and $65.1. The combination of robust supply forecasts, geopolitical developments, and technical resistance levels is likely to keep crude oil trading under pressure in the short term.
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
India PM likely to meet Trump in US next month
NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to meet President Donald Trump during a visit to the United States next month to attend the UN General Assembly meeting, the Indian Express newspaper reported on Wednesday, citing sources. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. An Indian official familiar with the matter said a decision has not yet been taken, and that countries usually reserve slots for the General Debate at the assembly, which is why India's "head of government" features in a provisional list of speakers on September 26. "The list will go through revisions," the official said, adding that it had not yet been decided if Modi would be going to the assembly. The General Assembly kicks off on September 9, but the debate, the annual meeting of heads of state and government, will be held from September 23-29. Although the reason for the potential visit will be to attend the UN meeting in New York, a key objective will be to hold talks with Trump and iron out trade and tariff issues that have led to some souring of ties between the two countries, the newspaper reported. News of a possible Modi trip to the U.S. comes days after Trump announced an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods to penalise New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil. The penalty took the total levy on Indian goods exported to the U.S. to 50%, among the highest levied on any U.S. trading partner. Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. On Tuesday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said several large trade agreements were still waiting to be completed, including with Switzerland and India, but New Delhi had been "a bit recalcitrant" in talks with Washington. Bessent told Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" he hoped the Trump administration could wrap up its trade negotiations by the end of October. "That's aspirational, but I think we are in a good position," he said, adding "I think we can be, we will have agreed on substantial terms with all the substantial countries."
