
No age limit on law, says Met Police chief as 83-year-old arrested at protest
The Metropolitan Police posted on X on Saturday afternoon saying officers were responding to the demonstration in Parliament Square, London, and later added that 29 people were arrested.
On Sunday afternoon, the force said that all 29 have been bailed pending further inquiries.
The protest started at about 1.10pm and officers were seen taking people away shortly after 1.30pm.
Reverend Sue Parfitt, 83, who was sat in a camp chair with placards at her feet, appeared to have been taken away by officers.
A woman seen lying on the ground in handcuffs was lifted by officers and put in a police van.
Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley was asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg whether it was a good use of police time after the priest was pictured being taken away from the demonstration.
He said: 'The law doesn't have an age limit, whether you're 18 or 80.
'If you're supporting proscribed organisations, then the law is going to be enforced.
'Officers, you could see, did it with great care and tried to preserve that person's dignity, but they're breaking a serious law.
'Palestine Action have over the last 18 months, I have to be careful what I say, because there's cases coming to trial, but some really serious criminal offences that they're accused of. There are millions of pounds worth of damage on multiple occasions. There are assaults, there are weapons used.
'It is not about protest. This is about an organisation committing serious criminality and obviously the Home Secretary was persuaded by the papers on her desk to proscribe them, that law has come into force, and if people want to defy that law, then we have to enforce it.'
Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight.
The designation as a terror group means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
A group had earlier said it was set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries.
In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction, but we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.'
The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday.
Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident at RAF Brize Norton.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
From 'obsolete' to the 'opposite of that': Trump changes tune on NATO
"It was very unfair because the United States paid for almost a hundred percent of it, but now they're paying their own bills, and I think that's much better," Trump told the BBC. "We changed NATO a lot," he added. Trump gave the interview after an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. The pair announced a plan for Europe to pay the United States for weapons that the alliance ships to Ukraine. Trump issued an ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin during the meeting, saying he has 50 days to make peace with Ukraine or he'll face economic punishment. NATO latest: Trump to send Ukraine weapons through NATO, threatens secondary tariffs on Russia Trump told the BBC later that he was disappointed with Putin but not done negotiating with the Russian leader, whom he suggested he does not trust. He told the British network he thought he had a deal with Putin to end the war four times. "And then you go home, and you see, just attacked a nursing home or something in Kyiv. I said: 'What the hell was that all about?'"


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Ukraine hails 'Agent Melania' after Trump admits First Lady explained Putin's lies
Ukrainians have hailed Melania Trump as an unlikely 'undercover agent' after explaining Vladimir Putin's lies to the US President Ukrainians have lauded Melania Trump as an unexpected "undercover agent" after the US President disclosed that it was his wife who persuaded him to change his stance on Vladimir Putin. Following another collapse in US-Russia peace negotiations, Donald Trump openly acknowledged that it was the First Lady who consistently revealed Putin's deceit, leading to his stark change of attitude towards Moscow. "I go home, I tell the First Lady: I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation," Trump recounted. "She said: Really? Another city was just hit." The US President will meet Keir Starmer in Scotland later this month to discuss, among other things, Ukraine peace talks. He continued: "We thought we had a deal numerous times. I get home, I'd say, 'First Lady, I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir. I think we're finished.' And then I'd turn on the television or she'll say to me one time, 'Well that's strange because they just bombed a nursing home.'" These comments, interpreted by many as evidence of Trump's mounting irritation with Putin, have generated a flurry of commendation for Melania on pro-Ukrainian social media platforms, reports the Mirror US. Subsequent to the president's statement, a user on platform X circulated a doctored image of "Agent Melania Trumpenko" donning a wide-brimmed hat and a military-style jacket adorned with the Ukrainian Armed Forces badge. "Plenty of affection for Melania Trump across Ukrainian social media this evening," shared the publication Business Ukraine, accompanied by a meme depicting three cartoon figures ceremoniously placing a traditional Ukrainian hat upon her head. "Melania single-handedly doing more for Ukraine than the entire GOP," remarked user Ernő Buzás. On Monday, Trump caught a seasoned BBC journalist off guard with an unexpected late-night telephone call that nearly resulted in him missing the interview because he was fast asleep. The US president conducted an unplanned interview from the White House that covered topics ranging from Vladimir Putin to the NATO alliance, plus the assassination attempt that almost claimed his life. Respected Gary O'Donoghue, the BBC's Chief North America political correspondent, had spent several days pursuing a potential interview to commemorate a year since the shooting at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. However, after no call materialised, he had abandoned hope until his telephone rang whilst he slumbered. Discussing Trump's tendency to ring journalists unexpectedly, O'Donoghue revealed: "On Monday evening, it was my turn. And I'll be frank with you - I was asleep when the White House rang. "I'd spent the best part of five days believing there was an outside chance I would get an interview with him, to mark a year since the attempt on his life in Butler, Pennsylvania." O'Donoghue then recounted the call. "Hi, Gary, I'm here with the president. Here you go," said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. During the candid 20-minute chat, Trump displayed a rare introspective mood when questioned about whether the shooting had altered him. "I don't like dwelling on it because if I did, it would be, you know, might be life-changing," he remarked. "I like the power of positive thinking, or the power of positive non-thinking."


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
How the BBC got into a mess over Gaza
On Monday, the BBC released its long-awaited report into its decision to remove the documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone from its platforms. The report determined that not making viewers aware of the fact that the narrator's father was a member of the Hamas-run government of Gaza constituted a breach of its editorial policies, specifically on accuracy. However, the documentary was not found to have breached guidelines on impartiality. As the Guardian's media editor Michael Savage tells Helen Pidd, the release of this report has come after a particularly intense period for the BBC, in which its handling of the war in Gaza has been heavily criticised. In response to the resignation of Gary Lineker, its coverage of Glastonbury performers, and its decision not to broadcast certain documentaries, the BBC has faced heightened criticism from many sides in the conflict. The pair discuss how the Labour government is approaching the BBC, the shrinking number of licence fee subscribers, and whether this string of controversies will change the way the corporation approaches more sensitive issues. Support the Guardian today: